• South Korea enacts chemical castration law against child sexual abuse
    414 replies, posted
[QUOTE=FlapadarV2;31327844]So it's ignorant to stand up against a poor defenceless child being abused by a person like you, that believes that it's ok? Just because you Spanish can fuck 13 year olds doesn't mean it's ok to go lower than that. You make me sick.[/QUOTE] I'm not even Spanish, and that's not even relevant to the discussion. You don't even read what I say and insult me. You have no right to post here if you do that.
Woah, all the fallacies that should have been spread out across the thread came raining down on this page...
[QUOTE=FlapadarV2;31327884][media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o4m4wbYc08k[/media] How is standing up against sick bastards ignorant?[/QUOTE] How am I a sick bastard?
[QUOTE=FlapadarV2;31327844]So it's ignorant to stand up against a poor defenceless child being abused by a person like you, that believes that it's ok? Just because you Spanish can fuck 13 year olds doesn't mean it's ok to go lower than that. You make me sick.[/QUOTE] What on earth are talking about?
[QUOTE=FlapadarV2;31327884][media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o4m4wbYc08k[/media] How is standing up against sick bastards ignorant?[/QUOTE] He is not a peadophile, he is not defending peadophiles. He is arguing against the legalisation of child porn and for a way to decrease child abuse. [editline]25th July 2011[/editline] Read before you post god damnit.
[QUOTE=carcarcargo;31327896]What on earth are talking about?[/QUOTE] From what I saw, Kendra thinks child porn is morally right. Which is sickening; making him as bad as the people who made it. [QUOTE=MrJazzy;31327904]He is not a peadophile, he is not defending peadophiles. He is arguing against the legalisation of child porn and for a way to decrease child abuse. [editline]25th July 2011[/editline] Read before you post god damnit.[/QUOTE] [QUOTE=Kendra;31324398]You don't really deserve to lose a primal function because of something you can't help, not to mention paedophilia is usually caused by society and the influence it has on children at an early stage.[/QUOTE] He's defending them.
[QUOTE=MrJazzy;31327904]He is not a peadophile, he is not defending peadophiles. He is arguing against the legalisation of child porn and for a way to decrease child abuse.[/QUOTE] Actually he was arguing against the castration of paedophiles.
[QUOTE=AngryChairR;31327835]HAHA ignorant for disagreeing with child porn! You're ignorant for wanting to rape a child and ruining their life.[/QUOTE]How about making an actual point against someone's arguments instead of throwing insults.
[QUOTE=FlapadarV2;31327915]From what I saw, Kendra thinks child porn is morally right. Which is sickening; making him as bad as the people who made it.[/QUOTE] Where did you read that? quote that post.
[QUOTE=FlapadarV2;31327844]So it's ignorant to stand up against a poor defenceless child being abused by a person like you, that believes that it's ok? Just because you Spanish can fuck 13 year olds doesn't mean it's ok to go lower than that. You make me sick.[/QUOTE] come on man, no one is saying abusing children is good, people are mostly saying that watching cp is not doing harm and therefore it's pointless to arrest people and throw them in jail because they own cp. no one is (hopefully) saying that producing or distributing cp should be ok unless I misread something
[QUOTE=Kendra;31327895]How am I a sick bastard?[/QUOTE] Watching child porn, getting a boner of a child, raping a child, touching a child or any mix or mild relation to any of those is considered by the majority of people to be [b]SICK[/b]. How is that hard to understand?
[QUOTE=carcarcargo;31327917]Actually he was arguing against the castration of paedophiles.[/QUOTE] That aswell yeah.
Ok so get this. By the logic of these 2 annelids (that's what they must be by their reading comprehension and argumentign), if I try to explain why a psychopath would murder a person, I myself am a psychopath who condones murder. A+ logic right there lads.
[QUOTE=FlapadarV2;31327915]From what I saw, Kendra thinks child porn is morally right. Which is sickening; making him as bad as the people who made it.[/QUOTE] I think you got a whole lot of things mixed up here, no one has said that child porn should be legal to make.
[quote=FlapadarV2]From what I saw, Kendra thinks child porn is morally right. Which is sickening; making him as bad as the people who made it.[/quote] Who has argued that child porn is morally right at all? I'm pretty sure all of us on this side of the argument are just pointing out that legalizing the viewing of it should decrease the total amount of child rape.
[QUOTE=FlapadarV2;31327915]From what I saw, Kendra thinks child porn is morally right. Which is sickening; making him as bad as the people who made it. He's defending them.[/QUOTE] You haven't actually read the thread have you? And on a related note it sure was nice when we were managing to civilized debate about this before you and AngryChaiR appeared.
It seems that the debate has gone out of the window, I'll come back when the tard storm ends.
[QUOTE=Kendra;31327928]Ok so get this. By the logic of these 2 annelids (that's what they must be by their reading comprehension and argumentign), if I try to explain why a psychopath would murder a person, I myself am a psychopath who condones murder. A+ logic right there lads.[/QUOTE] If you said a psychopath who had murdered 40 people doesn't deserve life in prison / death, then you must have an inner reasoning for doing that. Likely that you plan it yourself. [QUOTE=ThisGuy0;31327941]You haven't actually read the thread have you? And on a related note it sure was nice when we were managing to civilized debate about this before you and AngryChaiR appeared.[/QUOTE] I don't have the time to look through 6 other pages than the two I've read. I've seen enough from the two pages (1 and 8) that I've read to judge what's going on here.
[QUOTE=FlapadarV2;31327915]From what I saw, Kendra thinks child porn is morally right. Which is sickening; making him as bad as the people who made it. He's defending them.[/QUOTE] That is in no way implying he is for child abuse or anything like that. [editline]25th July 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=carcarcargo;31327946]It seems that the debate has gone out of the window, I'll come back when the tard storm ends.[/QUOTE] I'll do the same.
[QUOTE=FlapadarV2;31327915]From what I saw, Kendra thinks child porn is morally right. Which is sickening; making him as bad as the people who made it. He's defending them.[/QUOTE] Murder is not morally right, yet you can't blame a psychopath who's actions are not normal because they don't know what's normal, [I]even if they are told it's wrong[/I].
[QUOTE=Thy Reaper;31327939]Who has argued that child porn is morally right at all? I'm pretty sure all of us on this side of the argument are just pointing out that legalizing the viewing of it should decrease the total amount of child rape.[/QUOTE] Nobody in correct mental form would want child porn legalised unless they wanted to watch it. [quote]Murder is not morally right, yet you can't blame a psychopath who's actions are not normal because they don't know what's normal, even if they are told it's wrong.[/quote] Oh, dear god...
[QUOTE=carcarcargo;31327946]It seems that the debate has gone out of the window, I'll come back when the tard storm ends.[/QUOTE] I'm going to do the same. Shame, it was a good thread for first few pages.
[QUOTE=FlapadarV2;31327948]If you said a psychopath who had murdered 40 people doesn't deserve life in prison / death, then you must have an inner reasoning for doing that. Likely that you plan it yourself. I don't have the time to look through 6 other pages than the two I've read. I've seen enough from the two pages (1 and 8) that I've read to judge what's going on here.[/QUOTE] Point 1: They don't deserve 40 years of prison. They deserve medical help. Point 2: If you don't read the thread, don't fucking argue what is said in the thread. Is that so hard to understand?
[QUOTE=FlapadarV2;31327948]I don't have the time to look through 6 other pages than the two I've read. I've seen enough from the two pages (1 and 8) that I've read to judge what's going on here.[/QUOTE]Read the thread, no one is arguing for child abuse.
[quote=AngryChaiR]Nobody in correct mental form would want child porn legalised unless they wanted to watch it.[/quote] For other types of pornography and related sexual abuse, legalizing the porn decreases the abuse. Therefore, legalizing the viewing (and only viewing) of child porn should decrease the total amount of child sexual abuse. Overall, less children hurt. I must be a sick monster for wanting less children harmed. [editline]25th July 2011[/editline] Yeah, I'm out for now too. At least points were being made before, instead of 'lol you monsters'.
[QUOTE=AngryChairR;31327963]Nobody in correct mental form would want child porn legalised unless they wanted to watch it. [/QUOTE] uh yeah if scat porn was illegalised I would argue that it should be legalised but I'll never watch it ever
[QUOTE=Sanius;31328012]uh yeah if scat porn was illegalised I would argue that it should be legalised but I'll never watch it ever[/QUOTE] You're trying to compare raping faeces with raping children? I'm leaving, I will never understand you people. [MEDIA]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qVmVTRdtaHw[/MEDIA]
[QUOTE=FlapadarV2;31327948]If you said a psychopath who had murdered 40 people doesn't deserve life in prison / death, then you must have an inner reasoning for doing that. Likely that you plan it yourself. [/QUOTE] No they don't deserve death, and if you think that anyone against death penalty is intending to do a crime that could give them death penalty, you are retarded.
[QUOTE=AngryChairR;31328054]You're trying to compare raping faeces with raping children?[/QUOTE] ex·am·ple &#8194; &#8194;[ig-zam-puhl, -zahm-] Show IPA noun, verb, -pled, -pling. &#8211;noun 1. one of a number of things, or a part of something, taken to show the character of the whole: This painting is an example of his early work. 2. a pattern or model, as of something to be imitated or avoided: to set a good example. 3. an instance serving for illustration; specimen: The case histories gave carefully detailed examples of this disease. EXPAND &#8211;verb (used with object) 7. Rare . to give or be an example of; exemplify (used in the passive). Origin: 1350&#8211;1400; Middle English exa ( u ) mple < Middle French example < Latin exemplum, akin to eximere to take out ( ex- ex-1 + emere to buy, orig. take); replacing Middle English exemple < Latin, as above &#8212;Synonyms 1. Example, sample, specimen refer to an individual phenomenon taken as representative of a type, or to a part representative of the whole. Example is used of an object, condition, etc., that is assumed to illustrate a certain principle or standard: a good example of baroque architecture. Sample refers to a small portion of a substance or to a single representative of a group or type that is intended to show what the rest of the substance or the group is like: a sample of yarn. Specimen usually suggests that the &#8220;sample&#8221; chosen is intended to serve a scientific or technical purpose: a blood specimen; zoological specimens. 2. See ideal. 3. See case1 . [url=http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/example]Source[/url]
Last point before bailing out, AngryChaiR is clearly a troll, so let's stop responding to him and maybe this thread will get back on track sooner.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.