• March 5th&6th Primaries & Caucuses (Louisiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, and Nebraska)
    341 replies, posted
[QUOTE=JohnFisher89;49895927]Trump won Mississippi and looks like Michigan is going trump as well.[/QUOTE] Yeah, I had a feeling Trump would have MS. Surprised Cruz didn't win there
[QUOTE=JohnFisher89;49895927]Trump won Mississippi and looks like Michigan is going trump as well.[/QUOTE] Where are you looking? Politico is only showing like 0.1% reporting in Mississippi so far?
[QUOTE=sgman91;49895956]Where are you looking? Politico is only showing like 0.1% reporting in Mississippi so far?[/QUOTE] CNN is calling it
Bernie has more votes than Hillary but 0 delegates but Hillary has 10 delegates and less votes than him in Michigan? I'm confused
Hillary just took over Bernie in Wayne county.. I thought "maybe if he gets Detroit, then there's hope." but that just got blown away.
[img]http://i.imgur.com/NoaEokh.png[/img] Bernie is continuing to drop in MI
[QUOTE=Sobotnik;49896038]Bernie has more votes than Hillary but 0 delegates but Hillary has 10 delegates and less votes than him in Michigan? I'm confused[/QUOTE] Superdegates from Michigan, I believe.
[QUOTE=Cyan_Husky;49896047]Superdegates from Michigan, I believe.[/QUOTE] So the democratic party doesn't elect its leaders, while the Republican party tries to create a political dynasty?
[QUOTE=JohnFisher89;49896046][IMG]http://i.imgur.com/NoaEokh.png[/IMG] Bernie is continuing to drop in MI[/QUOTE] He just went back up to 49.9 on 14.2% 50.1 @ 15.2%
Really worried Sanders won't get MI now. I don't want to see the race end up being Clinton V. Trump, but it's looking that way...
[QUOTE=Bradyns;49896067]He just went back up to 49.9 on 14.2% 50.1 @ 15.2%[/QUOTE] Wayne county is probably going to be a big boost for hillary [editline]9th March 2016[/editline] [img]http://i.imgur.com/aKP79Ze.png[/img] Changed before the refresh but [url]http://www.huffingtonpost.com/[/url]
[QUOTE=Rocko's;49896075]Really worried Sanders won't get MI now. I don't want to see the race end up being Clinton V. Trump, but it's looking that way...[/QUOTE] It's been looking that way for a long time lol
Hillary called for both MI and MS [url]http://www.decisiondeskhq.com/march-8th-dem/[/url]
[QUOTE=postal;49896101]It's been looking that way for a long time lol[/QUOTE] Yeaaah that's true, still wanted to have some hope though.
[QUOTE=JohnFisher89;49896110]Hillary called for both MI and MS [url]http://www.decisiondeskhq.com/march-8th-dem/[/url][/QUOTE] I don't think that's right. 49% Bernie 47% Hillary. She currently down 4% according to google Nearly 5% now
[QUOTE=JohnFisher89;49896110]Hillary called for both MI and MS [url]http://www.decisiondeskhq.com/march-8th-dem/[/url][/QUOTE][url]https://www.periscope.tv/w/1vOxwWPqwaExB[/url] very scientific
Bernie currently leading in Michigan by 13k votes with 24% reporting.
Bernie's got MI, calling it
[QUOTE=TheDestroyerOfall;49896132]I don't think that's right. 49% Bernie 47% Hillary. She currently down 4% according to google Nearly 5% now[/QUOTE] Because that website is kinda bad [URL="http://www.nytimes.com/elections/results/michigan"]The NY Times[/URL] has a more updated and detailed map available, with some extra details on the side. Apparently Bernie has Wayne county and is currently at 51.3% while Clinton's at 46.8% I'm surprised Kasich was 50,000 votes off from Trump. You'd think it would be Cruz or Rubot.
It should also be noted that behind groups like Decision Desk, or FiveThirtyEight, there's massive amounts of number crunching and statistics going on in their decision making process. They know what they're doing when they're making a call, because it means the alternate hypothesis is incredibly unlikely. Edit: JK Decision Desk made their decision pretty arbitrarily.
[QUOTE=SonicHitman;49896157]Because that website is kinda bad [URL="http://www.nytimes.com/elections/results/michigan"]The NY Times[/URL] has a more updated and detailed map available, with some extra details on the side. Apparently Bernie has Wayne county and is currently at 51.3% while Clinton's at 46.8% I'm surprised Kasich was 50,000 votes off from Trump. You'd think it would be Cruz or Rubot.[/QUOTE] Oh that's better than the site I was using
trumps prop usage in his speeches is somethin else
[QUOTE=fruxodaily;49896155]Bernie's got MI, calling it[/QUOTE] Looks like it's gonna be closer than the polls showed, even if he loses. Gonna be interesting
[QUOTE=cody8295;49896204]Looks like it's gonna be closer than the polls showed, even if he loses. Gonna be interesting[/QUOTE] I have a feeling at the bare minimum it'll be a case of Iowa. I think he's got it though. A lot of blacks voted for him this time around. 33% and he's still got a 4% lead. Blacks I'm Michigan are more liberal than in the South so it's not much a surprise that he has more votes
[QUOTE=cody8295;49896204]Looks like it's gonna be closer than the polls showed, even if he loses. Gonna be interesting[/QUOTE] during Iowa, Clinton was taking the lead, then Sanders kinda pushed through but Clinton was the one to finish first, in this it seems like Clinton is pretty far behind Sanders
[QUOTE=TheDestroyerOfall;49896209]I have a feeling at the bare minimum it'll be a case of Iowa. I think he's got it though. A lot of blacks voted for him this time around. 33% and he's still got a 4% lead. Blacks I'm Michigan are more liberal than in the South so it's not much a surprise that he has more votes[/QUOTE] He got destroyed in Mississippi but saw that coming.
Let's just hope he stays viable.
[QUOTE=cody8295;49896243]He got destroyed in Mississippi but saw that coming.[/QUOTE] Hillary has the south. It's a question of if Sanders can seize enough of the rest of the country to make it up, barring any significant events (Hillary's arrest).
[QUOTE=DaMastez;49896275]Hillary has the south. It's a question of if Sanders can seize enough of the rest of the country to make it up, barring any significant events (Hillary's arrest).[/QUOTE] Well, in my opinion the South doesn't matter much anyways, considering pretty much no Democrat has won it since Kennedy in a general election. You're looking at the most Republican part of the country, so a faux Democrat would do well there on name alone
[QUOTE=TheDestroyerOfall;49896293]Well, in my opinion the South doesn't matter much anyways, considering pretty much no Democrat has won it since Kennedy in a general election. You're looking at the most Republican part of the country, so a faux Democrat would do well there on name alone[/QUOTE] That's not the point. It still gives delegates for the nomination.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.