• State Department calls for criminal investigation of Hillary Clinton
    49 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Smooth Jazz;48287320]Biden 2016, anyone?[/QUOTE] He's not running and I'm sure the Democratic Party doesn't need anymore divisions in its ranks for the race for the White House.
[QUOTE=Emperor Scorpious II;48287379]He's not running and I'm sure the Democratic Party doesn't need anymore divisions in its ranks for the race for the White House.[/QUOTE] If Clinton collapses, he would most definitely jump in as the best positioned establishment candidate. DLCers sure as heck aren't going to back Sanders or O'Malley.
Jesus they'll get you for anything now a days.
[QUOTE=Smooth Jazz;48287320]Biden 2016, anyone?[/QUOTE] I've never understood how anyone could support Biden for president. He says stupid things every other time he opens his mouth. He's like the gaff king.
[QUOTE=Smooth Jazz;48287320]Biden 2016, anyone?[/QUOTE] Holy fuck, no.
Why even bother. We should just vote Vermin Supreme for president. He would make a better candidate than half these assclown, fuckwit, inbred yokels. [video=youtube;4d_FvgQ1csE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4d_FvgQ1csE[/video]
Might as well get it out of the way, make it official whether or not shit's fucked.
[QUOTE=Smooth Jazz;48287395]If Clinton collapses, he would most definitely jump in as the best positioned establishment candidate. DLCers sure as heck aren't going to back Sanders or O'Malley.[/QUOTE] I'm sure there's more intelligent Democrats that can run that isn't Biden but an be supported over Sanders or O'Malley.
[QUOTE=Emperor Scorpious II;48290779]I'm sure there's more intelligent Democrats that can run that isn't Biden but an be supported over Sanders or O'Malley.[/QUOTE] Like who else? The Democratic bench has been devastated by two wave midterms. Who's left that could realistically be a good Presidential candidate for the establishment?
[QUOTE=Emperor Scorpious II;48290779]I'm sure there's more intelligent Democrats that can run that isn't Biden but an be supported over Sanders or O'Malley.[/QUOTE] A dem is not going to win. It always flip flops. No one party ever wins a presidential election two times in a row aside from multiple terms. And I for one and ready for an independent or republican to take office. Maybe some actual useful work on mental health issues will happen aside from useless attempts at banning shit like dems are known for (and has proven to do nothing, look at the Baltimore homicide rate. 176 so far this year).
[QUOTE=agentfazexx;48294019]A dem is not going to win. It always flip flops. No one party ever wins a presidential election two times in a row aside from multiple terms. And I for one and ready for an independent or republican to take office. Maybe some actual useful work on mental health issues will happen aside from useless attempts at banning shit like dems are known for (and has proven to do nothing, look at the Baltimore homicide rate. 176 so far this year).[/QUOTE] Except for Roosevelt then Truman, Kennedy then Johnson, Reagan then Bush. But those don't count, right?
[QUOTE=Levelog;48294071]Except for Roosevelt then Truman, Kennedy then Johnson, Reagan then Bush. But those don't count, right?[/QUOTE] I was talking recent history.
[QUOTE=agentfazexx;48294090]I was talking recent history.[/QUOTE] "I was talking after the last time that happened" We've had a grand total of 3 different presidents since the last time that happened.
[QUOTE=agentfazexx;48294090]I was talking recent history.[/QUOTE] That's pretty recent as far as presidential terms go.
[QUOTE=Helix Snake;48294131]"I was talking after the last time that happened" We've had a grand total of 3 different presidents since the last time that happened.[/QUOTE] Not to mention that there have been several elections where one party almost won three terms like 1960, 1968, 1976, and 2000.
[QUOTE=agentfazexx;48294090]I was talking recent history.[/QUOTE] [url]https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_US_Presidents[/url] They're more often clustered than not. With an odd breaker here and there.
[QUOTE=agentfazexx;48294019]A dem is not going to win. It always flip flops. No one party ever wins a presidential election two times in a row aside from multiple terms. And I for one and ready for an independent or republican to take office. Maybe some actual useful work on mental health issues will happen aside from useless attempts at banning shit like dems are known for (and has proven to do nothing, look at the Baltimore homicide rate. 176 so far this year).[/QUOTE] I don't know. Have you see any of the Republican candidates? None of them would have the support base that Hillary or even Joe fucking Biden have.
[QUOTE=Emperor Scorpious II;48284003]Kind of a shitty way to get kicked out of the race. [editline]24th July 2015[/editline] Like, her being taken out this way doesn't make her followers automatically switch to Sander's ideals and political thoughts. She should be taken out that way.[/QUOTE] I think Hilary's popularity isn't down to her politics. Her politics is rubbish. She's a big flip flopper, she's inexperienced, her politics isn't clear and concise, and she has a whole bunch of scandals under her belt. It's a personality cult. Her being knocked out of the race would force her followers to actually look at the other candidates politically, and possibly go to Bernie.
[QUOTE=agentfazexx;48294090]I was talking recent history.[/QUOTE] [QUOTE=agentfazexx;48285409]If you think about it though, [B]at least since WW2[/B], the party affiliation of the president has always flip flopped. Republican...democrat...republican...democrat. Etc. So, if statistics play true, most likely our next person will be "not a democrat" but be some other party. Independent, republican..or something like that.[/QUOTE] Also how is "It usually switches" any reason to believe it will again? It's all about the direction that America is going in and what the people want. We're in a notably progressive era, and this election in particular is going to be the first for a lot of young adults who grew up under Bush and definitely do not want to go back to wherever he was taking us.
[QUOTE=Awesomecaek;48283547]I would also consult an exorcist and at least three specialists on lizardman infiltration because that thing isn't fucking human, I swear [img]http://i.imgur.com/gp4p9I8.jpg[/img][/QUOTE] If I recorded you at 60fps at 1080p then took stills from that video I could get a few bad faces too [editline]26th July 2015[/editline] It's good that they acknowledge finally that outside email servers are a massive fucking hole, its about damn time that the AG goes after these individuals making giant holes in the cybersecurity of this country, too bad it's way too fucking late [editline]26th July 2015[/editline] [QUOTE=CrumbleShake;48298485]I think Hilary's popularity isn't down to her politics. Her politics is rubbish. She's a big flip flopper, she's inexperienced, her politics isn't clear and concise, and she has a whole bunch of scandals under her belt. It's a personality cult. Her being knocked out of the race would force her followers to actually look at the other candidates politically, and possibly go to Bernie.[/QUOTE] Hillary...inexperienced... She's been on the hill for 20 years, she's experienced its her not so secret secret backers that is a massive problem. Most Hillary voters though don't care about that, the democrats are a much more unified front in this election, they already have the republicans split 20 ways
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.