• Former Cheerleader put on Probation for Fellating 12 year old boy.
    247 replies, posted
[QUOTE=AJisAwesome15;42873173]what the fuck is wrong with you people[/QUOTE] anime
[QUOTE=RobbL;42871846]It's rape, why isn't she being charged with it?[/QUOTE] Because she's a women.
[QUOTE=Snowmew;42871081]Because randomly feeling up grown men is perfectly acceptable, normal behavior. So does that mean I can go into the womens' restroom and get a handful of tits?[/QUOTE] if you know who they are, yes.
[QUOTE=J!NX;42873032]but if you can't tell reality from fiction then how would you know if you can tell what is real and not real? in fact what if you're just imagining this? what if nothing is real? OH GOD[/QUOTE] [sp] Im Your Mother from the Future. [/sp] Now you have my Permission to Cry in Fear. [sp] Yes, i have very pretty boobies [/sp]
rather, on top of them being ok with that kinda stuff.
Well that sucks. Ha.
Pretty much what I take away from this thread is that I'm going to laugh my ass off when the feds find all that child pornography on Aidan_088's hard drive. Edit: Rate it dumb all you want, guys. . .dude defended NAMBLA a page ago. I feel no shame in saying he's more than likely a pedophile.
[QUOTE=NuclearJesus;42873499]Pretty much what I take away from this thread is that I'm going to laugh my ass off when the feds find all that child pornography on Aidan_088's hard drive.[/QUOTE] Watch Out, NSA.
The judge that ordered probation should be ashamed of himself/herself. This woman sexual assaulted a boy. She should be tried like any other case. It does not matter if you're a man or woman, sexual assault/rape/molestation is just that a crime, a serious one at that. The fact that some of you are actually congratulating the boy is fucking sickening too. There is a difference between fantasizing about rape and even roleplaying with a partner and a actual real rape. Learn to separate between the two. Lets also learn what consent is, i doubt the kid consented or even knew what was going on. Some of you arguing consent is stupid too, i bet if a 30 year old neck beard had sex with a 12 year old girl who consented you would be demanding death penalty. What is wrong with people..
[QUOTE=MR-X;42873539]The fact that some of you are actually congratulating the boy is fucking sickening too.[/QUOTE] You wouldn't be congratulating if it was the other way round, would you?
[QUOTE=MR-X;42873539]The judge that ordered probation should be ashamed of himself/herself. This woman sexual assaulted a boy. She should be tried like any other case. It does not matter if you're a man or woman, sexual assault/rape/molestation is just that a crime, a serious one at that. The fact that some of you are actually congratulating the boy is fucking sickening too. There is a difference between fantasizing about rape and even roleplaying with a partner and a actual real rape. Learn to separate between the two. Lets also learn what consent is, i doubt the kid consented or even knew what was going on. Some of you arguing consent is stupid too, i bet if a 30 year old neck beard had sex with a 12 year old girl who consented you would be demanding death penalty. What is wrong with people..[/QUOTE] Speaking as a 32 year old neckbeard. . .hell yes, I would. Speaking as a father. . .fuck yes I would. Speaking as a human being. . .the pedo apologists in this thread are subhuman.
pedo's deserve nothing less then being lined up against a wall to face a firing squad.
[QUOTE=Kai-ryuu;42873833]pedo's deserve nothing less then being lined up against a wall to face a firing squad.[/QUOTE] You tell 'em, Huell.
[QUOTE=NuclearJesus;42873499]Pretty much what I take away from this thread is that I'm going to laugh my ass off when the feds find all that child pornography on Aidan_088's hard drive. Edit: Rate it dumb all you want, guys. . .dude defended NAMBLA a page ago. I feel no shame in saying he's more than likely a pedophile.[/QUOTE] Dunno man, I defend the legalization of marijuana, but I've never done it.
[QUOTE=Kai-ryuu;42873833]pedo's deserve nothing less then being lined up against a wall to face a firing squad.[/QUOTE] Yeah! Set a Example! Kill a few Pedophiles! Burn down their Houses! Why don't we start executing Rapists too! Oh and Murderers! We should execute ALL of them! Do you see where your logic fails? It achieves nothing, Education and Rehabilitation is where change will come from.
[QUOTE=Cone;42872593]well they might like, get raped. and then have people accuse them of making it up. and then get arrested for making it up. or, failing that, they might be verbally abused by people saying it's their fault. so, you know, quite a lot.[/QUOTE] Usually society is inclined to believe the woman.
[QUOTE=AJisAwesome15;42873861]Dunno man, I defend the legalization of marijuana, but I've never done it.[/QUOTE] There is a huge divide between defending the rights of adults to imbibe a mildly mood/mind altering substance with no history of death or injury, and defending the rights of adults to fuck children.
[QUOTE=Cone;42871648]yeah, but i just said that you CAN'T do it on a case by case basis because that would be hideously impractical, wasteful, and largely unnecessary. consider the kind of budget required to screen every single person under the age of sixteen in the UK alone for sexual readiness, which isn't even quantifiable to begin with. you'd need psychologists, neuroscientists, medical doctors, huge amounts of regulation and police presence to make sure the system isn't exploited, all kinds of checks and balances, and all that would NOT be cheap. and you'd probably have to do that shit [I]yearly[/I], AND children would still slip through the cracks and wind up being raped because somebody said they were okay for sex when they weren't. the whole thing is just a heinously poor, expensive, wasteful, and above all immoral idea, all for the incredibly small amount of children who are sexually ready before the age of sixteen. it's far easier to just put down the age of consent and enforce it rather than coming up with these overly grandiose systems that mostly wouldn't even work properly and rely on the unquantifiable measurement of sexual readiness.[/QUOTE] What a disastrous mentality. [I]It's too much work so don't even bother[/I]. That cancerous mindset is the reason justice systems are full of holes, needless bloat while still being ridiculously vague, improper use and political-correctness bullshit. In fact that mentality is the reason a lot of the bullshit in the modern era continues to exist. You should be ashamed for contributing to the snails pace that is humanities advancement.
[QUOTE=NuclearJesus;42873944]There is a huge divide between defending the rights of adults to imbibe a mildly mood/mind altering substance with no history of death or injury, and defending the rights of adults to fuck children.[/QUOTE] I understand that, I was just saying just because they are defending it doesn't mean they are a pedophile. That's the kind of shit that gets people killed for no reason.
[QUOTE=AJisAwesome15;42874004]I understand that, I was just saying just because they are defending it doesn't mean they are a pedophile. That's the kind of shit that gets people killed for no reason.[/QUOTE] Yeah, there used to be quite a culture of witch hunting and name calling with the BBC in Britain one time when it came to this. Alot of speculation with no substance behind it. Mainly coming from people on twitter arguing back and forth. Innocent until Proven Guilty?
She can rape me anytime she wants. It's a double standard I am completely ok with. But darn it. Why does a 12 year old boy get more action than a lonely 20 year old like me gets.
[QUOTE=cqbcat;42874184]She can rape me anytime she wants. It's a double standard I am completely ok with. But darn it. Why does a 12 year old boy get more action than a lonely 20 year old like me gets.[/QUOTE] you sound like a fedora neckbeard. are you a fedora neckbeard?
[QUOTE=AJisAwesome15;42874004]I understand that, I was just saying just because they are defending it doesn't mean they are a pedophile. That's the kind of shit that gets people killed for no reason.[/QUOTE] Defending the rights of pot smokers = People who smoke pot feel more at ease about smoking pot. Defending the rights of people who fuck children = . . .
[QUOTE=AJisAwesome15;42873861]Dunno man, I defend the legalization of marijuana, but I've never done it.[/QUOTE] Can't believe you just made this comparison.
[QUOTE=cqbcat;42874184]She can rape me anytime she wants. It's a double standard I am completely ok with. But darn it. Why does a 12 year old boy get more action than a lonely 20 year old like me gets.[/QUOTE] I wonder why.
[QUOTE=sloppy_joes;42874314]Can't believe you just made this comparison.[/QUOTE] I know. It's like the homophobes who say that gay marriage is the same as people marrying their dogs.
[QUOTE=NuclearJesus;42874417]I know. It's like the homophobes who say that gay marriage is the same as people marrying their dogs.[/QUOTE] That Mental Image, don't give me it again.
[QUOTE=sloppy_joes;42874314]Can't believe you just made this comparison.[/QUOTE] He isn't comparing marijuana with child porn. He's just saying that just because you support a person's right to x doesn't mean you yourself do x, that's some retarded ass logic.
nice
[QUOTE=be;42874492]He isn't comparing marijuana with child porn. He's just saying that just because you support a person's right to x doesn't mean you yourself do x, that's some retarded ass logic.[/QUOTE] Thinking that fucking kids is something that can be reasonably defended is some retarded ass logic. If you can't see my point, go back through this thread and read his posts. You can only claim "spirited debate for the sake of debate" so much. The man spent the entire thread giving reasons why it's perfectly acceptable, and desirable, to allow children to "experiment" and pursue sexual relationships with adults, and to allow adults to do the same. AT LENGTH. EDIT: And with that, I remove myself from the discussion. If I post any longer, I'll just be parroting what I've already said. Suffice to say, when it comes to sex with children, even the "willing" participants are victims. It will stay with them for the rest of their lives. And no man, or woman, has the right to scar a child in such a manner.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.