• Casey Anthony found not guilty of murder
    437 replies, posted
who ever did is a suck mother fucker
I will admit, I exclaimed with anger when I read the thread title. Now, however, after thinking about it, I agree that she should not be put in for the murder. Negligence, yes. Murder, no.
[QUOTE=ButtsexV3;30922222]innocent until proven guilty[/QUOTE] It doesn't matter if they some how found evidence tomorrow that proves she's guilty. You can't retrial a case once it's already been done.
[quote]but what evidence do you have that she never played any part?[/quote] this is not how our justice system works
[QUOTE=mpntball2012;30922164]Indeed, but justice can't be administered when you let your only suspect essentially walk free. Practically everybody who followed this case knows she did it, her parents know she did it, and obviously she knows she did it. Yes, there may not have been any evidence that was good enough to prove her guilty, but what evidence do you have that she never played any part? Just as most of you do, I believe wholeheartedly that Casey Anthony committed the murder. Whether that was her true intent or not, Caylee was left to die and she should be held responsible.[/QUOTE] If it was so certain then how was she found not guilty? You don't know any more than the rest of us do, so stop acting like you do.
[QUOTE=Atlascore;30922436]Amazing US justice system at work.[/QUOTE] Yeah, there's a reason why you can't just keep trying someone for the same thing. It's actually pretty cool.
[QUOTE=Atlascore;30922436]Amazing US justice system at work.[/QUOTE] oh ok let's just let people be charged for the same crime an unlimited amount of times there's no way that can be abused!!!
I don't know about you, but I don't want to go to court for a murder trial for the rest of my life and be found not guilty every time. It gets old after a while. [editline]5th July 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=Lazor;30922488]oh ok let's just let people be charged for the same crime an unlimited amount of times there's no way that can be abused!!![/QUOTE] Whoever has the most money wins!
[QUOTE=Atlascore;30922543]How about only letting it happen if you find something that absolutely proves that person did x crime?[/QUOTE] Then why wasn't it brought up the first time?
old cases are brought back up all the time, anytime new evidence is found it can happen
[img]http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-KAleweBQNL8/TgNW7bxdUZI/AAAAAAAAFxc/7lj-JXBk6Ms/s400/OJ+Simpson.jpg[/img]
Isn't this the same reason why OJ got off - the prosecutors weren't good enough?
[QUOTE=Randdalf;30922959]Isn't this the same reason why OJ got off - the prosecutors weren't good enough?[/QUOTE] Yeah, they failed to present evidence correctly, etc.
Not only did she (most likely) kill her own child because she was a nuisance, she also accused her brother and father of molesting her. She also implicated her father as an accessory to the murder by suggesting he helped dispose of the body. Now she will most likely not spend a day in jail since her current 3 years in police custody will count as time served. Can't wait for her tell all book, made for TV movie, and countless EXCLUSIVE interviews. GOD BLESS AMERICA :911:
[QUOTE=Rigged237;30923090]Not only did she (most likely) kill her own child because she was a nuisance, she also accused her brother and father of molesting her. She also implicated her father as an accessory to the murder by suggesting he helped dispose of the body. Now she will most likely not spend a day in jail since her current 3 years in police custody will count as time served. Can't wait for her tell all book, made for TV movie, and countless EXCLUSIVE interviews. GOD BLESS AMERICA :911:[/QUOTE] You can't send someone to prison for life on what you think "likely" happened based on what you hear from sensationalist media like Nancy Grace and other idiots like her The evidence wasn't there, so she was found NOT GUILTY that's how a free society works
[QUOTE=Zeke129;30923187]You can't send someone to prison for life on what you think "likely" happened The evidence wasn't there, so she was found NOT GUILTY that's how a free society works[/QUOTE] I'm not saying the verdict was wrong. The jury made the right decision. The case was purely circumstantial, the prosecution had no cause of death, murder weapon, or any evidence connecting Casey to the body. but you know she's good for it
[QUOTE=Atlascore;30922436]Amazing US justice system at work.[/QUOTE] Double jeopardy provisions are found in the US bill of rights, the canadian charter of rights and freedoms, the european convention on human rights, the constitution of japan, the constitution of pakistan, the constitution of the republic of serbia, and the south african bill of rights
So many Facebook statuses. "The bitch was found not guilty... wtf is wrong with those people..." Sorry, that's what happens when you build a justice system on the notion that people are innocent until it can be shown beyond reasonable doubt that they are not. You get people who you think did it who you can't convict because you can't show beyond doubt that they're guilty. A fair price to pay, I think.
[QUOTE=Canesfan;30919523]A legal system based on convicting people using limited, questionable evidence is not a good legal system. Would you really cast your vote to give her the death penalty when there's really a good bit of doubt as to what really happened?[/QUOTE] The poor kid was missing for a month before anybody got wind of it. A month. Any mother that did not do it would have been frantically scouring the earth for her child. She went out partying. Let's get real.
[QUOTE=JohnnyMo1;30923346]So many Facebook statuses. "The bitch was found not guilty... wtf is wrong with those people..." Sorry, that's what happens when you build a justice system on the notion that people are innocent until it can be shown beyond reasonable doubt that they are not. You get people who you think did it who you can't convict because you can't show beyond doubt that they're guilty. A fair price to pay, I think.[/QUOTE] but the media made her look like a bad lady I want her dead :((((
[quote]Something to think about Missing Swamp Evidence Hard core tangible evidence that would link the killer to Cayle. 1. During the swamp investigation there would have been footprints left behind by the person who had carried Cayle's body into the swamp to dispose of it. Even though the body had been there for six months the impressions left behind would still be present as a result of the combined weight of the person carrying Cayle and Cayle herself forcing the foot into moist ground that would leave behind a footprint. A footprint that could be matched to the killer without question. 2.The shoes of the killer would also tell the tale of who committed the crime as the swamp material from where the killer walked into the swamp and deposited the body would be present on the shoes. Given the weight of Cayle and the killer the amount of swamp material on the shoes would be considerable. The swamp material would tell exactly who carried Cayle and who the killer is given the water line on the shoes theirself. If the shoes were covered in swamp material close to the top of the shoe then the person who killed and deposited Cayle's body would be a lightweight person who would have trouble in picking their feet out of the swamp material because of their strength in countering the suction of the swamp on their feet and the combined weight of carrying Cayle pressing their foot into the swamp. This level of swamp material on the shoe would point to a female killer. If the swamp material was closer to the bottom of the shoe then the evidence would point to a male killer who would have the strength to both carry Cayle and avoid the suction swamp while they were walking thus resulting in a shallower foot print. 3. If someone in the family had purchased a new pair of shoes prior to the disappearence of Cayle and those shoes are now gone then those shoes that are missing would also be a credible link to the killer. The Duct Tape 1. The duct tape was not used to suffocate Cayle but used to administer a lethal dose of either gasoline or other toxic substance that would have caused Cayle to become unconscious and remain unconscious until she died of affixaition due to gas inhalation. 2.If the duct tape was used to suffocated Cayle then it would have been crimped around the nose in order to seal the nostril pathway's to not allow any oxygen into Cayle's lungs. Depending upon the condition of the tape will determine how it was used. If it was crimped then it was used to affixiate Cayle. If not and the duct tape was a straight piece that went from the mouth to the mandible then the duct tape was used to administor a chemical substance to keep Cayle sedated as well as eventually causing her to suffocate. 3.The duct tape would also tell the tale of who placed the duct tape over Cayle's mouth due to the following fact. Duct Tape is maleable meaning that it can be formed to different ridges of preferation depending upon the temperature that the duct tape is present in. Stay with me. Take a piece of duct tape and place it on your hand over the knuckles. In order to form a tight seal you will need to press rather hard on the tape with the other hand thus leaving impression's of the killers fingertip's on the left side of the tape where it was drawn across Cayle's face and at the right end of the peice of tape where the killer would have attached the duct tape to the mandible of Cayle. When the duct tape is placed in such a manner on Cayle's face the killer would had to have pressed rather hard to make the tape stick. This evidence could then be placed against anyone in the family where the finger impression in the tape would match the person in the family who killed Cayle. DNA 3.DNA at the crime scene. If there was DNA taken at the crime scene such as a hair folicle that would tell the tale of the killer being a women because of the length of the hair. Then such hair folicle would once be admissable as a anothr link to who placed Cayle's body in the smamp. 4.Whoever placed Cayle's body in the swamp knew that because of the swampy environment that the heat and microbials associated with a decaying body would cause the body to decompose faster than if the body of Cayle had merely been thrown into a dumpster or cooler area. Computer Evidence 5.Computer evidence that relates to the search for Chloroform was present during the initial police forensics but when the information was later checked with new tools the information only related to facebook page searches. This would suggest that the new computer software was specifically designed to cover up the search criteria and to return a false report. If there is anyone that the family may know a software programmer then that person may have been contracted by the family to create such a program to cover up the old searches by saying that the old searches based upon the new searches all linked to facebook pages and not the information associated with searching for Chloroform which would once again provide a link to the actual killer. It is also obvious that most of the family seemed to be against Casey and the burden of having to deal with Casey's way of life at having to watch Cayle instead of being able to enjoy their life. So the family conspires against Casey by murdering Cayle where they create a sense of confusion based upon the actions such as the duct tape being placed over Cayle's mouth. The result is an emotionally charged courtroom where the jury is fed circumstantial evidence that is twisted into an emotional value to manipulate the jury into finding Casey guilty. Casey then receives the death penantly and is then sentenced to death. Once Calye is dead the family is free of the burden of having to take care of Cayle based upon the irresponsible nature of Casey that has been used as the main method of trying to convince the jury of Casey being the murderer. The prosecution has not presented any tangible evidence that would specifically link Casey to the murder of Cayle. Basically the prosecution and judge are basing their findings on general catch all punishment's that if they don't get Casey with one law they will get her with another. Such a verdict cannot be reached because there have not been any specifics presented that would link Casey to the crime of killing Cayle unequivocably and without a shadow beyond a doubt. The methods that the prosecution is using are the same types of methods used to convict men, women and child during the Salem Witch Trial's where hersey was against the 'witch' to convict them just because the community thought that they were odd and made them feel badly or the locals became sick. Later on it was discovered that the locals had become deranged because of bad wheat that lead them to the murderous acts....a finding that science discovered as true and factual and not the conspired delusional and mantic attempts to convict someone with tangible proof. Which is the same thing that is occuring in the Casey Anthony Case.[/quote] Shamelessley ripped from a msn comment. I don't know, I just thought you guys would find it interesting.
[QUOTE=massn7;30923362]The poor kid was missing for a month before anybody got wind of it. A month. Any mother that did not do it would have been frantically scouring the earth for her child. She went out partying. Let's get real.[/QUOTE] is that evidence of murder yes or no
[QUOTE=Zeke129;30923412]is that evidence of murder yes or no[/QUOTE] No it's not. I'm not arguing the point of whether or not she was guilty. Personally I think she is, but it doesn't matter. She got off because of lack of evidence and some damn good maneuvering by her defense counsel - that's how our justice system works, and they made it work for them. All I'm saying is, come on.
[QUOTE=massn7;30923459]No it's not. I'm not arguing the point of whether or not she was guilty. Personally I think she is, but it doesn't matter. She got off because of lack of evidence and some damn good maneuvering by her defense counsel - that's how our justice system works, and they made it work for them. All I'm saying is, come on.[/QUOTE] I think "lack of evidence" is an absolutely excellent reason to acquit someone. Why are you mad?
[QUOTE=Randdalf;30922959]Isn't this the same reason why OJ got off - the prosecutors weren't good enough?[/QUOTE] That, and the defense portrayed OJ as a civil rights hero, to the all-black jury. That, and the defense didn't know SHIT about what DNA evidence was. One juror was quoted as saying, on the subject of multiple positive DNA blood tests that had OJ's blood at the scene, "Well, lots of people have the same blood type."
[QUOTE=massn7;30923459]All I'm saying is, come on.[/QUOTE] you would be the worlds worst prosecutor
[QUOTE=Zeke129;30923496]I think "lack of evidence" is an absolutely excellent reason to acquit someone. Why are you mad?[/QUOTE] It is. Again, that's how our system works, and they made it work in their favor. And again, let's get real. Casey dodged one hell of a bullet. [quote=Sanius]you would be the worlds worst prosecutor [/quote] And you would be better? Law degree? Experience?
[QUOTE=Sanius;30923556]you would be the worlds worst prosecutor[/QUOTE] come onnnnn choose guilty come onnnnnn you know you wannnaa
hahaha wow america: where the murder of an infant is acceptable but streaming videogames is not
[QUOTE=Zeke129;30923412]is that evidence of murder yes or no[/QUOTE] yes
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.