[QUOTE=Glorious leader;25637552]Even if he will be homeless, the fact that he was emotionally traumatized will also negatively impact people around him, and start a chain reaction.
You're really dull.[/QUOTE]
Like I said, the people close to that person.
You're blowing this completely out of proportion and you're making it sound like a kid getting raped is a world catastrophe. By your dumbass logic, we would be reduced to a wasteland with all the kids that get raped every year.
Also, by saying sex with animals shouldn't be illegal, you're basically saying that you are okay with it which is pretty fucked up.
[QUOTE=Meller Yeller;25638950]Like I said, the people close to that person.
You're blowing this completely out of proportion and you're making it sound like a kid getting raped is a world catastrophe. By your dumbass logic, we would be reduced to a wasteland with all the kids that get raped every year.
Also, by saying sex with animals shouldn't be illegal, you're basically saying that you are okay with it which is pretty fucked up.[/QUOTE]
You still are unable to understand what I said. I'll explain it to you more clearly now.
First, I'm saying that when a child is raped, it would give him an emotional trauma.
Emotional traumas have been proven to negatively impact the person's performance and decisions.
If that person is emotionally traumatized, he won't be able to contribute to the society as much as he could without the emotional trauma inflicted.
This doesn't apply to animals. When animals are emotionally traumatized their performance would be reduced, but the impact of this reduction on the human society would be smaller than that of a person being unable to rape an animal.
[QUOTE=Glorious leader;25639192]You still are unable to understand what I said. I'll explain it to you more clearly now.
First, I'm saying that when a child is raped, it would give him an emotional trauma.
Emotional traumas have been proven to negatively impact the person's performance and decisions.
If that person is emotionally traumatized, he won't be able to contribute to the society as much as he could without the emotional trauma inflicted.
This doesn't apply to animals. When animals are emotionally traumatized their performance would be reduced, but the impact of this reduction on the human society would be smaller than that of a person being unable to rape an animal.[/QUOTE]
Well then I don't know why you're arguing with me and calling me dumb since that's the same thing I've said several times over. Before you were saying it would affect "all of mankind" which is just idiotic.
Glorious leader, you DO know that the "list" option near the ratings you get tells who rated what, right? We can see that you only agree with yourself.
[QUOTE=Funky Pickle;25639265]Glorious leader, you DO know that the "list" option near the ratings you get tells who rated what, right? We can see that you only agree with yourself.[/QUOTE]
That's the only way he'll get any.
What a hairy and sticky situasion he is in.
[QUOTE=Meller Yeller;25639302]That's the only way he'll get any.[/QUOTE]
Honestly, who cares?
Ehhh... thats quite sick.
[QUOTE=MisterMooth;25636082]fucking furries[/QUOTE]
Yes because dressing up in fursuits and sexing humans dressed like animals and actually having sex with animals are the same thing. :downs:
[QUOTE=Glorious leader;25639192]You still are unable to understand what I said. I'll explain it to you more clearly now.
First, I'm saying that when a child is raped, it would give him an emotional trauma.
Emotional traumas have been proven to negatively impact the person's performance and decisions.
If that person is emotionally traumatized, he won't be able to contribute to the society as much as he could without the emotional trauma inflicted.
This doesn't apply to animals. When animals are emotionally traumatized their performance would be reduced, but the impact of this reduction on the human society would be smaller than that of a person being unable to rape an animal.[/QUOTE]
You put too much emphasis on every individual having to contribute to society. If you were to follow that, people who had severe handicaps should either be locked up or killed.
[QUOTE=kirderf;25641127]You put too much emphasis on every individual having to contribute to society. If you were to follow that, people who had severe handicaps should either be locked up or killed.[/QUOTE]
Nope, they're still able to contribute. Take Stephen Hawking as an example.
Emotional trauma to the population inflicted from executing them would also slow down the progress.
[img]http://liherald.static.adqic.com/uploads/original/1287787758_42b1.jpg[/img]
wow that's an ugly dog.
[QUOTE=G-Strogg;25641499][img_thumb]http://liherald.static.adqic.com/uploads/original/1287787758_42b1.jpg[/img_thumb]
wow that's an ugly dog.[/QUOTE]
Calling people ugly is counter-productive - our current environment and society doesn't require selection of the 'prettiest' (those who show specific traits) anymore.
Calling people dumb and uncreative if they deserve it is productive however.
[QUOTE=Glorious leader;25638416]I'm not asking people to have sex with animals nor am I supporting it in any way, other than thinking that it should be legalized, but this one doesn't count as advocating.[/QUOTE]
You're supporting sex with animals becoming legal.
See the word 'support' in that definition?
[QUOTE=Glorious leader;25641559]Calling people ugly is counter-productive - our current environment and society doesn't require selection of the 'prettiest' (those who show specific traits) anymore.
Calling people dumb and uncreative if they deserve it is productive however.[/QUOTE]
I gather from this post that you are an ugly person on top of being a pseudo-intellectual.
[QUOTE=RayDark;25636268]Who the fuck says 'sexing' anyway? I call it fucking, or rape, or having sex with. Not 'sexing'.[/QUOTE]
Why is this even a subject of debate for you. I mean seriously?
why cant he do like other furrys and just keep it on the internet
[QUOTE=Glorious leader;25641559]Calling people ugly is counter-productive - our current environment and society doesn't require selection of the 'prettiest' (those who show specific traits) anymore.
Calling people dumb and uncreative if they deserve it is productive however.[/QUOTE]
Here let me summarize your entire argument through this thread.
"LOGICAL FALLACY LOGICAL FALLACY ASSUMPTION ASSUMPTION.
YOU AREN'T VERY SMART."
Looks like he really screwed the pooch with that decision.
Am I right? Right...?
:sigh:
[QUOTE=Meller Yeller;25637134]That is absolutely ridiculous.
Is this guy actually serious? Really?[/QUOTE]
This is the same guy who thinks leaders being assassinated deters them from being bad leaders. Fortunately, his ability to reason is so low that he will turn into a being of pure energy and descend to a lower plain of existence.
[img]http://liherald.static.adqic.com/uploads/original/1287787758_42b1.jpg[/img]
[B]"Why can't I hold all these things?"[/B]
[QUOTE=MisterMooth;25636082]fucking furries[/QUOTE]
Nice trolling right there.
[QUOTE=not_Morph53;25636680]"Yelp" means no.[/QUOTE]
Oh crap! Thought it meant yes.
[QUOTE=Glorious leader;25636100]It shouldn't be illegal to rape animals as long as you don't harm them.[/QUOTE]
Mind if I rape you up the ass?
[QUOTE=poopsicle;25652852]Mind if I rape you up the ass?[/QUOTE]
No, because I'm a human animal.
[editline]26th October 2010[/editline]
[QUOTE=The Jman Wik;25642085]I gather from this post that you are an ugly person on top of being a pseudo-intellectual.[/QUOTE]
I'm a male to begin with, and I'm just an average guy.
If I'm arguing against calling people ugly reasonably it does not mean I'm ugly.
If I'm arguing for legalizing animal rape it doesn't mean I'm an animal rapist.
Please explain the reason behind you calling me a 'pseudo-intellectual'.
thats fucked up burn all furries
Wait, so killing and eating animals is alright, but raping them isn't?
Someone explain why one is worse than the other?
[QUOTE=Fort83;25653790]yet you argue that calling people dumb is alright?
You want to legalize animal rape? ARE YOU MAD! how would you like it if a moose could come into your house anytime and rape you up anus?![/QUOTE]
I think calling people dumb is alright because our current society requires more intelligent people. Calling dumb people dumb would provide a mild process of natural selection.
I want to legalize humans raping animals.
[editline]26th October 2010[/editline]
[QUOTE=Mr. Scorpio;25653840]Wait, so killing and eating animals is alright, but raping them isn't?
Someone explain why one is worse than the other?[/QUOTE]
This
[QUOTE=Mr. Scorpio;25653840]Wait, so killing and eating animals is alright, but raping them isn't?
Someone explain why one is worse than the other?[/QUOTE]
This is how our society works: If it's a cute animal, you can't hurt it. Is it logical? No. But that's how it goes.
But yeah, this is sick. Don't put your dick in a non-human animal.
[editline]26th October 2010[/editline]
[QUOTE=Glorious leader;25653539]things[/QUOTE]
You rated yourself agree.
[QUOTE=fenwick;25654175]This is how our society works: If it's a cute animal, you can't hurt it. Is it logical? No. But that's how it goes.
But yeah, this is sick. Don't put your dick in a non-human animal.
[editline]26th October 2010[/editline]
You rated yourself agree.[/QUOTE]
Our society can be changed, you know? Changed to ensure the fastest progress possible.
[QUOTE=Glorious leader;25654213]Our society can be changed, you know? [/QUOTE]
Yes, I know that. Do you think I'm stupid or something?
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.