• Fox News...defending Wikileaks?
    77 replies, posted
Again this is Fox Business..
I like this guy, but i disagree. Their leakers are stealing documents without the consent of the owner. They are receiving them without the consent of the owner. [editline]18th February 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=PvtCupcakes;28136656]Judge Napolitano isn't like most people on Fox News. I know he's not perfect, but he's more level headed than Glenn Beck and Bill O.[/QUOTE] You can't compare Beck and O'reily. O' has real respectable opinion, while Beck is more of a conspiratorial radical.
Well, duh, it was obviously a democrat plot to take over the country.
[QUOTE='[sluggo];28139471']I like this guy, but i disagree. Their leakers are stealing documents without the consent of the owner. They are receiving them without the consent of the owner.[/quote] The leakers are simply reporting what has been leaked by someone else. After Wikileaks released all of those documents, half the news channels were broadcasting the story and saying things from those leaked documents. Are they just as guilty as Wikileaks?
[QUOTE='[sluggo];28139471']I like this guy, but i disagree. Their leakers are stealing documents without the consent of the owner. They are receiving them without the consent of the owner. [editline]18th February 2011[/editline] You can't compare Beck and O'reily. O' has real respectable opinion, while Beck is more of a conspiratorial radical.[/QUOTE] It's a whistleblower organization how is that a bad thing
[QUOTE=abananapeel;28139568]The leakers are simply reporting what has been leaked by someone else. After Wikileaks released all of those documents, half the news channels were broadcasting the story and saying things from those leaked documents. Are they just as guilty as Wikileaks?[/QUOTE] Once something is out there you can't stop it. But you can stop the people who put it out there, and make sure no one else does.
[QUOTE='[sluggo];28139471'] You can't compare Beck and O'reily. O' has real respectable opinion, while Beck is more of a conspiratorial radical.[/QUOTE] You just can't explain it [editline]18th February 2011[/editline] [QUOTE='[sluggo];28139650']Once something is out there you can't stop it. But you can stop the people who put it out there, and make sure no one else does.[/QUOTE] Wikileaks is just publishing them. Yes, fine, the what the leaker did is illegal, but Assange wasn't the one that leaked the files, he is just publishing, and publishing should never be censored or stopped.
Holy fuck is this really Fox?
your face when you finished the video and realized there was a fox news logo at the bottom left the entire time
This is really surprising coming from Fox News, but he's right.
[QUOTE='[sluggo];28139471'] You can't compare Beck and O'reily. [b]O' has real respectable opinion[/b], while Beck is more of a conspiratorial radical.[/QUOTE] :frog:
This may be the first Fox News report that I've agreed with.
[QUOTE='[sluggo];28139471']O' has real respectable opinion[/QUOTE] [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XrNl6-j9x5w&feature=relmfu[/media]
Interesting... but it's still Fox.
To be honest Fox disagrees with absolutely anything a non-US-and-right-wing government could possibly say. If governments had loved Wikileaks Fox would have done a segment on how evil it was. If Obama smiled at a kitten they would do a segment on how kittens are the devil.
But didn't Palin's daughter and a few other key Republicans call Julian Assange a traitor and a terrorist and a bunch of other names.
[QUOTE=UnidentifiedFlyingTard;28122930]:byodood:[/QUOTE] no content post hahaha this is the best thing
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.