• Lulsec Hacker Faces Life in Prison for Revealing Truth
    91 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Mike42012;38585226]So you're saying I can hack companies and legally be punished at the same level as a murderer?[/QUOTE] Hacking multiple companies, releasing personal information, and hurting companies to no end isn't something to go light on. [editline]25th November 2012[/editline] [QUOTE=Ybbats;38585251]Yeah, fuck bradley manning, he should get the chair except it's too good for him. Isn't life so much easier when we have our government to tell us who the bad guys are?[/QUOTE] Life sentence is excessive, but still he needed to be punished. He caused too much damage and hurt many for his actions. Without reason either, just for jokes. He needs a 6 year or something. Life is long for something like this.
[QUOTE=Rocko's;38585255]Life sentence is excessive, but still he needed to be punished. He caused too much damage and hurt many for his actions. [B]Without reason either, just for jokes.[/B] He needs a 6 year or something. Life is long for something like this.[/QUOTE] Wow, who better to judge Bradley Manning than someone who has NO FUCKING CLUE as to why he did what he did. You are the literal definition of ignorance. He uncovered a WAR CRIME that the military covered up, in which innocent civilians, including [I]children[/I], were murdered by the US Military. You think he did this just for a 'joke'? Seriously, look it up, you've clearly been fed a bunch of misinformation from the US Military's damage control team.
[QUOTE=Ybbats;38585306]Wow, who better to judge Bradley Manning than someone who has NO FUCKING CLUE as to why he did what he did. You are the literal definition of ignorance. He uncovered a WAR CRIME that the military covered up, in which innocent civilians, including [I]children[/I], were murdered by the US Military. You think he did this just for a 'joke'? Seriously, look it up, you've clearly been fed a bunch of misinformation from the US Military's damage control team.[/QUOTE] No one brought up Bradley Manning, this is about the leader of Lulzsec getting arrested and put in prison for causing damage to many. And I do know about his situation, but this isn't the time and place to talk about something completely unrelated
[QUOTE=Rocko's;38585328]No one brought up Bradley Manning, this is about the leader of Lulzsec getting arrested and put in prison for causing damage to many. And I do know about his situation, but this isn't the time and place to talk about something completely unrelated[/QUOTE]I did, and you quoted me right before you said that. But if you seriously can't determine his probable cause for revealing and exposing a corporation that secretly spies on thousands of citizens daily and makes money off of it, then I guess you can't be expected to be very smart, can you?
[QUOTE=Ybbats;38585353]I did, and you quoted me right before you said that. But if you seriously can't determine his probable cause for revealing and exposing a corporation that secretly spies on thousands of citizens daily and makes money off of it, then I guess you can't be expected to be very smart, can you?[/QUOTE] Well gee I didn't know Sony and it's customers spied on me! This changes everything now. Do you even know what Lulzsec did and the companies/people they hacked?
[QUOTE] hacktivist [B]collective[/B] Anonymous[/QUOTE] Hey look, the media got it right.
[QUOTE=Rocko's;38585255]Hacking multiple companies, releasing personal information, and hurting companies to no end isn't something to go light on. [/QUOTE] A life is worth more than that. And yet here we are, giving them the same punishment.
all of those companies can probably suck my cock but lulzsec were p much spergs even disregarding that :v:
Who else remembers this thread? [url]http://www.facepunch.com/showthread.php?t=1101270[/url]
I'm not sure if this was mentioned, but this might explain the ridiculous sentence: [quote]In a press release issued under the branding of the Anonymous collective, supporters for Hammond call for Judge Preska’s immediate resignation from the case. “Judge Preska by proxy is a victim of the very crime she intends to judge Jeremy Hammond for.[b] Judge Preska has failed to disclose the fact that her husband is a client of Stratfor[/b] and recuse herself from Jeremy's case, therefore violating multiple Sections of Title 28 of the United States Code,” the statement reads. “Judge Loretta Preska's impartiality is compromised by her Husband's involvement with Stratfor and a clear prejudice against Hammond exists, as evident by her statements,” it continues. “Without justice being freely, fully, and impartially administered, neither our persons, nor our rights, nor our property, can be protected.”[/quote]
Life imprisonment for messing with some big cannons dumb shit. Fuck that. I think we should redesign the justice system so its the individual person that has most favor and large asshole corperations with the least. Im so fucking tired of how money can solve everything, wheres the heart in things? The guy was just a kid that wanted to play around, he found a few holes in their shit, they shouldve paid him for finding those holes instead of going "WAAAAAA LULZEC B GRIFFIN ME BAN HE" Fucking crybabies.
I'm glad that this will probably put an end to the "lulzsec" bullshit once and for all.
The life sentence was probably because he did it multiple times, like if a guy robbed multiple shops or banks.
Prepare for pizzas, Judge Preska.
[QUOTE=Pvt. Martin;38581810]Why do Dreadlocks always look like a bunch of cat hairballs to me?[/QUOTE] Because that's what hair looks like when you never wash it.
[QUOTE=Face Melter;38583706]1 day of prison would be enough to set this kid straight[/QUOTE] I don't know why people like you try and put this guy down by calling him a kid. He's 27 years old for fuck sake. [editline]25th November 2012[/editline] [QUOTE=V12US;38585881]Because that's what hair looks like when you never wash it.[/QUOTE] You are aware you can wash dreadlocks, right?
[QUOTE=laylay;38586356] You are aware you can wash dreadlocks, right?[/QUOTE] genuine dreadlocks are a rastafarian hairstyle, caused by them never, ever washing their hair.
any amount of time in jail is too much i reckon. why don't they just do that shit where they ban them from using the internet forever or something? although i guess for some of those lulzsec dudes that would be worse than life in prison. but yeah i dunno, prison for internet crimes that DIDN'T involve stealing money or whatever seems unreasonable to me
I don't get why this is deserving of life in prison, are they classed as [i]cyber terrorists[/i] or something?
[QUOTE=Lachz0r;38586849]any amount of time in jail is too much i reckon. why don't they just do that shit where they ban them from using the internet forever or something? although i guess for some of those lulzsec dudes that would be worse than life in prison. but yeah i dunno, prison for internet crimes that DIDN'T involve stealing money or whatever seems unreasonable to me[/QUOTE] They leaked peoples accounts, which had paid for stuff on them, so I do believe they should go to jail.
Weren't these the guys who hacked the CIA website?
He is still young. Lifetime? 20 years max in my opinion.
[QUOTE=Aphtonites;38585833]I'm glad that this will probably put an end to the "lulzsec" bullshit once and for all.[/QUOTE] How many fucking times do I have to say it?????? The Sony hacking was their last "lul" they disbanded right after that. That was over a year ago yea, luzsec has not done anything for that long and you are acting like they just hacked into the super secret space government's database just yesterday. God dammit people
[QUOTE=Drag0nSnak3;38585716]I'm not sure if this was mentioned, but this might explain the ridiculous sentence:[/QUOTE] Is that not the very meaning of a conflict of interest?
[QUOTE=rrunyan;38581681]The gent in question: [img]http://i.imgur.com/6HvtK.jpg[/img][/QUOTE] He looks like a member of some shitty nu-metal band.
[QUOTE=Ybbats;38585251]Yeah, fuck bradley manning, he should get the chair except it's too good for him. Isn't life so much easier when we have our government to tell us who the bad guys are?[/QUOTE] Oh get your fucking bullshit out of here. This topic has nothing to do with Bradley Manning, but people like you constantly need to bring his name up whenever someone goes on trial for hacking. And you know what, both people knew the risks before they did their acts. I'm not saying either deserves it, but if you don't want to face the risks, don't do the fucking acts.
Kinda reminds me of the celebrity photo hacker, 60 fucking years because people aren't smart.
nobody needs to have their life thrown away because of something like this
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.