• [TITS] Germany confirmed to be gay. Artist sends a naked model into mass transit, most people barely
    112 replies, posted
[QUOTE=IPK;40513003]Germany has a law against [I]everything[/I][/QUOTE] Yeah, like laws protecting the privacy of its population. Or the rights of customers.
[QUOTE=MaxOfS2D;40513454]i'm more annoyed by the title that implies you're gay if you aren't obsessed with breasts 24/7[/QUOTE] Is that a bird, is it a plane? No, it's the joke
[QUOTE=Eukos;40512496]Most people here (Was raised in Berlin) don't really give a shit what happens outside. There is barely any communication really, I experienced myself that in a couple emergency situations barely anyone gives a shit. There was some old guy who passed out on the street and me and my dad had to help him all by ourselves in a massive public area with hundreds of people around so that's pretty sad really. There was only some woman around who shouted that someone should help that poor guy but she didn't do anything herself That is not the first time something like that happened, my brother got once in a fight with a couple armed guys and no one did even think about calling the police. I really hope that it's changed for the better now, though! I have hope for my hometown. And yeah we got quite a bit nudity here[/QUOTE] Is it the opposite in Munich? I went to visit there and an old man fell down and hit his face, and there were people helping him before he hit the ground, and enough people called 911 for them to be there in minutes.
[QUOTE=i-am-teh-sex;40514494]Is that a bird, is it a plane? No, it's the joke[/QUOTE] jokes are always indicative
[QUOTE=wallyroberto_2;40514508]Is it the opposite in Munich? I went to visit there and an old man fell down and hit his face, and there were people helping him before he hit the ground, and enough people called 911 for them to be there in minutes.[/QUOTE] Munich isn't in Germany, it's in Bavaria. [sp](Don't dumb me, it is an inside joke. Bavarians always complain about belonging to Germany and even calling their state a freestate)[/sp]
[QUOTE=NoDachi;40513451]what are you fucking 12[/QUOTE] There's definitely art which has the naked human figure in it which are great and interesting but this is literally just having a naked woman walk around having trying to pass it off as 'art'. Too many people just blindly defend art that has naked women in it; this is comparable to going into an art museum to see hardcore porn that's passed off as 'art' just because there's naked people in it. The people who make those are sick bastards. the only fucking reason you're hearing about this 'art' is because the guy who set this up knows there's some shock value to this and it'll get him attention, not because it's 'deep' or 'meaningful'. You're just as bad as the people trying to pass this shit on as art.
[QUOTE=E1025;40514558]There's definitely art which has the naked human figure in it which are great and interesting but this is literally just having a naked woman walk around having trying to pass it off as 'art'. Too many people just blindly defend art that has naked women in it; this is comparable to going into an art museum to see hardcore porn that's passed off as 'art' just because there's naked people in it. Those artists are sick bastards. the only fucking reason you're hearing about this 'art' is because the guy who set this up knows there's some shock value to this and it'll get him attention, not because it's 'deep' or 'meaningful'. You're just as bad as the people trying to pass this shit on as art.[/QUOTE] Could you give me an example of said art museum with hardcore porn?
[QUOTE=E1025;40514558]There's definitely art which has the naked human figure in it which are great and interesting but this is literally just having a naked woman walk around having trying to pass it off as 'art'. Too many people just blindly defend art that has naked women in it; this is comparable to going into an art museum to see hardcore porn that's passed off as 'art' just because there's naked people in it. The people who make those are sick bastards. the only fucking reason you're hearing about this 'art' is because the guy who set this up knows there's some shock value to this and it'll get him attention, not because it's 'deep' or 'meaningful'. You're just as bad as the people trying to pass this shit on as art.[/QUOTE] Don't tell me you're one of those annoying trollops who only classify fucking 'fine art' as art.
[QUOTE=E1025;40514558]There's definitely art which has the naked human figure in it which are great and interesting but this is literally just having a naked woman walk around having trying to pass it off as 'art'. Too many people just blindly defend art that has naked women in it; this is comparable to going into an art museum to see hardcore porn that's passed off as 'art' just because there's naked people in it. The people who make those are sick bastards. the only fucking reason you're hearing about this 'art' is because the guy who set this up knows there's some shock value to this and it'll get him attention, not because it's 'deep' or 'meaningful'. You're just as bad as the people trying to pass this shit on as art.[/QUOTE] Just because your impression on this doesn't fit what the artist was going for, doesn't mean it's not art.
When there were reactions, god damn they were good [img]http://i.imgur.com/s1bRJHn.jpg[/img] [img]http://i.imgur.com/lDFlON2.jpg[/img] [img]http://i.imgur.com/OOPfaH6.jpg[/img]
[QUOTE=SuddenImpact;40514576]Could you give me an example of said art museum with hardcore porn?[/QUOTE] Pretty sure it was the Saatchi Gallery in London I went to. The top floor is absolutely disgusting. [QUOTE=NoDachi;40514623]Don't tell me you're one of those annoying trollops who only classify fucking 'fine art' as art.[/QUOTE] Where did I impy that? Art comes in a lot of forms but this just appears to be flashing tits in people's faces. [QUOTE=i-am-teh-sex;40514643]Just because your impression on this doesn't fit what the artist was going for, doesn't mean it's not art.[/QUOTE] True although I have trouble believing this was a 100% genuine art performance and nothing else.
[QUOTE=E1025;40514786]Pretty sure it was the Saatchi Gallery in London I went to. The top floor is absolutely disgusting. Where did I impy that? Art comes in a lot of forms but this just appears to be flashing tits in people's faces. True although I have trouble believing this was a 100% genuine art performance and nothing else.[/QUOTE] so basically, you're a prude who recoils at the sight of a human body okay you're not one really to judge art tbh because its been full of naked shit for thousands of years
[QUOTE=E1025;40514786]Pretty sure it was the Saatchi Gallery in London I went to. The top floor is absolutely disgusting. [/QUOTE] Why was it disgusting? What did they show?
I could never do this. Random boners. oh god why.
those are some slick looking glasses she's got
[QUOTE=NoDachi;40514822]so basically, you're a prude who recoils at the sight of a human body okay you're not one really to judge art tbh because its been full of naked shit for thousands of years[/QUOTE] It's pretty funny because I don't think this is genuine so you're assuming I'm a 12 year old boy who giggles / gets grossed out every-time I see a pair of boobs. I already said there's a lot of good pieces that feature the naked human body and are non-provocative, that includes a lot of recent stuff excluding this. [QUOTE=SuddenImpact;40514856]Why was it disgusting? What did they show?[/QUOTE] For one there was literally a wall of hardcore straight and gay stuff that looked like it had been screen-capped from a scummy porn website. I think there was even rape stuff. It was a shame because there was quite a lot of interesting stuff in the gallery as well.
Gorgeous model. I'm not an artsy person so I didn't get why every shot was repeated twice or three times.
[QUOTE=E1025;40514786]Where did I impy that? Art comes in a lot of forms but this just appears to be flashing tits in people's faces.[/QUOTE] I too only believe in displaying fine [url=http://u.cubeupload.com/Paramud/xJULCV.jpg]~art~[/url]
she wants the d. Why are all the virgins rating me dumb you've probably got a huge hard on right now wishing she did want the d. [highlight](User was banned for this post ("Shitpost" - Megafan))[/highlight]
[QUOTE=E1025;40515201]I already said there's a lot of good pieces that feature the naked human body and are non-provocative, that includes a lot of recent stuff excluding this. [/QUOTE] Good art is supposed to be provocative.
[QUOTE=NoDachi;40515497]Good art is supposed to be provocative.[/QUOTE] Art isn't meant to be anything as anything can be art.
[QUOTE=Flem;40515504]Art isn't meant to be anything as anything can be art.[/QUOTE] what a wonderful non-statement.
[QUOTE=NoDachi;40515513]what a wonderful non-statement.[/QUOTE] It was provocative because you reacted so therefore it was art because you said art was provocative, I am an artist.
Did nobody notice, or did everybody try to look like they didn't notice, which is the standard reaction to whenever someone does something weird on public transit?
[QUOTE=E1025;40515201]It's pretty funny because I don't think this is genuine so you're assuming I'm a 12 year old boy who giggles / gets grossed out every-time I see a pair of boobs. I already said there's a lot of good pieces that feature the naked human body and are non-provocative, that includes a lot of recent stuff excluding this.[/QUOTE] surely the point of art is to illicit some kind of emotional reaction? i mean if they weren't pushing the limits it would just be boring samey shit
fake; she's wearing heels
[QUOTE=NoDachi;40515497]Good art is supposed to be provocative.[/QUOTE] Umm, no?
[QUOTE=Cone;40515558]surely the point of art is to illicit some kind of emotional reaction? i mean if they weren't pushing the limits it would just be boring samey shit[/QUOTE] Honest curious question (I agree with your point), but the "illicit some kind of emotional reaction makes me think; Does that mean that trolling is a art?
[QUOTE=The golden;40515621]If art doesn't catch your eye and attention then it's not doing a very good job.[/QUOTE] A piece of art can be eye catching without being provocative about it [url=http://www.google.ie/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&docid=M9sX6PdeM3vhFM&tbnid=iKBrgPQaj3yZRM:&ved=&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.claude-monet.com%2Fimpression-sunrise.jsp&ei=HvODUdjcKcaN7QbvoYHYDw&bvm=bv.45960087,d.ZGU&psig=AFQjCNF8_u3gYDl-wWPSPNlKBWAPbxzI4Q&ust=1367688349230799]Impression Sunrise[/url] is eye catching; [url=http://www.pablopicasso.org/images/paintings/guernica.jpg]Guernica[/url] is eye catching Neither are provocative in anyway
Since when did fucking provocative suddenly meant eye catching and jazzy. gawd.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.