• Michelle Obama endorses healthier school lunches
    403 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Glaber;26682841]good point. But still I hold the views of the Country I was born and raised in, and That country is the USA.[/QUOTE] But your views AREN'T at all the only ones held in america, nor are they even a majority. I don't know how you manage the bullshit logic you manage.
[img_thumb]http://www.facepunch.com/fp/emoot/911.gif[/img_thumb] Anyways I was born and live in America but I hold more European views. Why do you insist on keeping your viewpoint artificially narrow?
[QUOTE=Prismatex;26682888]Are you saying that the USA is a monolithic bloc that all holds the same views?[/QUOTE] No, I just lack the words to better explain myself.
[QUOTE=Glaber;26682841]good point. But still I hold the views of the Country I was born and raised in, and That country is the USA.[/QUOTE] Let's take a look at American views that have since changed: - Owning black people is okay - Women can't vote - Britain is the enemy - Equal rights for everyone (to be fair you guys haven't nailed this one yet even though it's written everywhere)
[QUOTE=Glaber;26683147]No, I just lack the words to better explain myself.[/QUOTE] That's been obvious for quite a while.
It's bout' time too. You can't exactly live too long of the gruel they serve in most public schools. Anyway the point of this quality control is that it pays back in the long run. Organic food price will go down as it is produced more frequently and locally.
School food is all fat. Everything is dripping in grease, and there's no color to it. All beige. It's about time they did something about this. Doesn't help that most people get the most unhealthy things on the menu, and a double order of fries.
[QUOTE=chewgo;26676103]Uum, what. They're enforcing healthy foods for local schools, stop getting on her case. This is good, if you didn't notice. Also, what is Obum?[/QUOTE] How is it good that the government is telling *us* what we should do with our bodies? Interesting. Are you pro-abortion, by chance? [QUOTE]Oh Palin, you so smart.[/QUOTE] Actually, it is a nanny state action. You're probably too brainwashed and slack-jawed from your porn, marijuana, and soap operas to really think for yourself apart from whatever opinion you've absorbed, though.
my school lunches are actually half-decent, sometimes there's some good shit now and again. [editline]14th December 2010[/editline] [QUOTE=Jenkem;26684093]How is it good that the government is telling *us* what we should do with our bodies? Interesting. Are you pro-abortion, by chance? Actually, it is a nanny state action. You're probably too brainwashed and slack-jawed from your porn, marijuana, and soap operas to really think for yourself apart from whatever opinion you've absorbed, though.[/QUOTE] lol look who it is.
[QUOTE=Jenkem;26684093]How is it good that the government is telling *us* what we should do with our bodies?[/quote] Yes, I think the government has the right to decide what they put in public school lunches. [quote]You're probably too brainwashed and slack-jawed from your porn, marijuana, and soap operas to really think for yourself apart from whatever opinion you've absorbed, though.[/QUOTE] Typical Jenkem ad hominem shit. Lots of very intelligent people have been fans of porn and marijuana.
[QUOTE=Jenkem;26684093]Are you pro-abortion, by chance?[/QUOTE] No such thing. I believe you're talking about pro-choice. It's pretty great because it gives woman control over their own uterus. [editline]13th December 2010[/editline] [QUOTE=Jenkem;26684093]How is it good that the government is telling *us* what we should do with our bodies?[/QUOTE] look a hypocrite [editline]13th December 2010[/editline] [QUOTE=Jenkem;26684093]Actually, it is a nanny state action. You're probably too brainwashed and slack-jawed from your porn, marijuana, and soap operas to really think for yourself apart from whatever opinion you've absorbed, though.[/QUOTE] Get off your high horse.
I have no problems with the school lunches but the price is an outrage. I miss my school delicious chicken tortilla.
[QUOTE=Jenkem;26684093]How is it good that the government is telling *us* what we should do with our bodies? Interesting. Are you pro-abortion, by chance?[/QUOTE] The hypocrisy in these two sentences made me go blind.
[QUOTE=Glaber;26676060]They’re trying to teach their kids the kind of healthy habits that will stay with them for a lifetime.[/QUOTE] My God, Get me the president.
You can always take your own food to school. I used to do that all the time when I was a kid.
[QUOTE=Habsburg;26684446]No such thing. I believe you're talking about pro-choice. It's pretty great because it gives woman control over their own uterus.[/QUOTE] People who hack off their own body parts end up in a mental asylum. But said person destroying a massive chunk of "herself" (if we want to say it's part of the woman) in a potentially harmful process is okay. [QUOTE=The Vman;26684591]The hypocrisy in these two sentences made me go blind.[/QUOTE] Sorry, what was that? I was too busy staring at your mesmerizing avatar to even notice your completely unnecessary, misguised, and altogether useless post. Here, have a cookie. That way, you'll be too busy eating it to say anything else pointless.
[QUOTE=Jenkem;26685053]People who hack off their own body parts end up in a mental asylum. But said person destroying a massive chunk of "herself" (if we want to say it's part of the woman) in a potentially harmful process is okay. [/quote] Uhhh.... Maybe you'd have a point if it was the woman herself doing the abortion, but it's done by a doctor. Does having your arm amputated by a doctor make you mentally insane?
[QUOTE=Jenkem;26685053]People who hack off their own body parts end up in a mental asylum. But said person destroying a massive chunk of "herself" (if we want to say it's part of the woman) in a potentially harmful process is okay. [/QUOTE] There's a difference between hacking off your arm, which is essential to much of normal daily life, and sucking a fetus out of your uterus. For one, the fetus isn't a "massive chunk" of flesh, it's often just a few ounces. Yes, people have the right to have an abortion but not to remove their arms. Why? Because there are legitimate medical/societal reasons for an abortion. There are no legitimate reasons for removing a fully functional body part. Oh, and can you provide a source for the "potentially harmful process" part? The most dangerous abortions are the ones done clandestinely, which occur when you ban abortion.
[QUOTE=Jenkem;26685053]People who hack off their own body parts end up in a mental asylum. But said person destroying a massive chunk of "herself" (if we want to say it's part of the woman) in a potentially harmful process is okay. [/QUOTE] A woman isn't destroying her uterus. [editline]13th December 2010[/editline] fuck having a conversation with you is difficult [editline]13th December 2010[/editline] It's like talking to that guy in my law class who's convinced the communists are still out to get us all.
I propose to the mods that Glaber should lose his ability to post threads
[QUOTE=Jenkem;26685053]Sorry, what was that? I was too busy staring at your mesmerizing avatar to even notice your completely unnecessary, misguised, and altogether useless post. Here, have a cookie. That way, you'll be too busy eating it to say anything else pointless.[/QUOTE] If abortion was banned (the ultimate goal of prolifers I'm sure) wouldn't that mean the government would be telling you what to do with your body?
[QUOTE=PvtCupcakes;26685092]Uhhh.... Maybe you'd have a point if it was the woman herself doing the abortion, but it's done by a doctor. Does having your arm amputated by a doctor make you mentally insane?[/QUOTE] I would call you mentally insane for having a doctor cut your arm of for something that's, well and truly, frivilous. Don't want the kid? Don't have sex unless you're prepared for a kid - most abortions aren't done for rape victims, you know, so don't even start on that one. [QUOTE=Prismatex;26685116]Because there are legitimate medical/societal reasons for an abortion. There are no legitimate reasons for removing a fully functional body part.[/QUOTE] See above. Define "legitimate." I don't think cutting off another human being's entry over selfish motives is really all that legitimate. [QUOTE]Oh, and can you provide a source for the "potentially harmful process" part? The most dangerous abortions are the ones done clandestinely, which occur when you ban abortion.[/QUOTE] Going to bed. I'll do this tomorrow if I have time/remember. Abortions have harmed people before. I don't know why you think they haven't.
[QUOTE=Jenkem;26685213]Don't want the kid? Don't have sex unless you're prepared for a kid[/QUOTE] oohhhh god
[QUOTE=Jenkem;26685213]Going to bed. I'll do this tomorrow if I have time/remember. Abortions have harmed people before. I don't know why you think they haven't.[/QUOTE] Well yeah but only if it's made illegal. [editline]13th December 2010[/editline] [QUOTE=Jenkem;26685213]Don't have sex unless you're prepared for a kid[/QUOTE] Don't post unless you're prepared to be mocked for your stupid fucking opinions.
[QUOTE=Jenkem;26685213]I would call you mentally insane for having a doctor cut your arm of for something that's, well and truly, frivilous. Don't want the kid? Don't have sex unless you're prepared for a kid - most abortions aren't done for rape victims, you know, so don't even start on that one. [/QUOTE] "Don't drive a car unless you're prepared to die in a crash" People screw up. Should we force them to carry children to term because of that? [editline]14th December 2010[/editline] [QUOTE=Jenkem;26685213]Abortions have harmed people before. I don't know why you think they haven't.[/QUOTE] Find me a case of a medical abortion in a first-world country (not a back-alley abortion) causing serious harm.
[QUOTE=Jenkem;26685213]Define "legitimate." I don't think cutting off another human being's entry over selfish motives is really all that legitimate.[/QUOTE] Hey maybe a 17 year old gets impregnated but can't afford to pay for a baby and go to college. [editline]13th December 2010[/editline] sounds like a legitimate reason for me
[QUOTE=Jenkem;26685213]Define "legitimate." I don't think cutting off another human being's entry over selfish motives is really all that legitimate.[/QUOTE] "Selfish motives"? Please define "selfish". If a 16-year-old fucked up and got pregnant, should she force the unborn child to be born and possibly to grow up in an environment where it wouldn't have great chances of success, or would she have an abortion and just wait a few years before actually having a kid?
[QUOTE=Jenkem;26685213]most abortions aren't done for rape victims, you know, so don't even start on that one.[/QUOTE] That's true and you know what, [i]there's not a single fucking thing wrong with that.[/i]
[QUOTE=Habsburg;26685314]Hey maybe a 17 year old gets impregnated but can't afford to pay for a baby and go to college. [editline]13th December 2010[/editline] sounds like a legitimate reason for me[/QUOTE] durr hurr it's selfish for her to put her desire for education ahead of that fetus's need to live
[QUOTE=Prismatex;26685348]durr hurr it's selfish for her to put her desire for education ahead of that fetus's need to live[/QUOTE] Actually, it is.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.