• Michelle Obama endorses healthier school lunches
    403 replies, posted
I'm tired and just kind of rifling through posts at the moment, whoops.
[QUOTE=HumanAbyss;26706384]FOR THE LAST FUCKING TIME GLABER, THIS TIME PAY ATTENTION. She has said nothing at all about doing this in homes or replacing it for anyone, it's SOLELY for kids who can't afford normal healthy food, and kids who just don't get to eat right. It's not a meal replacement, it's not mandatory, it's optional, and it's solely to help unfortunate kids. It will not foster dependency anymore so that anything at home would, there is no difference in the long run. No one here respects you for the simple fact that you ignore any argument, you ignore everything you simply don't agree with. When someone presents you something new, you just regurgitate old information, or overly biased shit, don't say you don't, your favorite sources are Rush, Fox[B], Levin, and Hannity.[/B][/QUOTE] Fixed. You want to know why I regurgitate? Because the new info sounds just like the old in new wrapping. Yes it's optional, so? Isn't Free health care in Europe optional? And don't more people over there use the free health care opposed to private insurance? Just because something is optional, doesn't mean people can't get addicted to it. (Smoking is a good example of that.) [QUOTE=HumanAbyss;26706384] Glabber, the government as most people know it is not a totally incapable slow mess of bureaucratic bullshit, it's unfortunate you live in the states and think that corporations are somehow faster than them in anyway, but you're so naive... These arguments are worthless, you don't even try and learn from anything, just the same thing over and over again.[/QUOTE] HumanAbyss, the US government is not as fast as any of the European ones, Or shouldn't be. If they moved too fast they wind up missing the pork barrel spending that gets added on. Just like what happened with health care reform! [QUOTE=Zeke129;26706496]Yes, private enterprise does it so much better. Look at UPS, they will deliver your fine china powder in a spherical box three weeks late but it's the free market so horray![/QUOTE] They do that, then they loose my business and I use FedEx instead. [QUOTE=Lambeth;26706444](what's a strait face by the way?)[/QUOTE] Bad spelling.
[QUOTE=Glaber;26706625]HumanAbyss, the US government is not as fast as any of the European ones, Or shouldn't be. If they moved too fast they wind up missing the pork barrel spending that gets added on. Just like what happened with health care reform![/QUOTE] Didn't it take like a year for the HCR law to make it through the system? [editline]14th December 2010[/editline] [QUOTE=Glaber;26706625]Fixed.[/QUOTE] That's not a wild improvement.
did you just imply serving salad at school and receiving health care when you have no means of paying for more expensive privatized insurance that covers more than the basics is as addictive as absorbing nicotine through your lungs?
[QUOTE=Glaber;26706625]Just because something is optional, doesn't mean people can't get addicted to it. [/QUOTE] Yeah I keep wondering why you go back to FOX
[QUOTE=daijitsu;26706684]did you just imply serving salad at school and receiving health care when you have no means of paying for more expensive privatized insurance that covers more than the basics is as addictive as absorbing nicotine through your lungs?[/QUOTE] I think he did. The difference: I feel like shit and crave a cigarette if I haven't smoked because my body has developed a craving for nicotine. I'm pretty sure no one is going to start feeling like shit and start craving school lunches if they stop letting their kid get free lunches.
[QUOTE=Glaber;26706625]Fixed. You want to know why I regurgitate? Because the new info sounds just like the old in new wrapping. Yes it's optional, so? Isn't Free health care in Europe optional? And don't more people over there use the free health care opposed to private insurance? Just because something is optional, doesn't mean people can't get addicted to it. (Smoking is a good example of that.) HumanAbyss, the US government is not as fast as any of the European ones, Or shouldn't be. If they moved too fast they wind up missing the pork barrel spending that gets added on. Just like what happened with health care reform! They do that, then they loose my business and I use FedEx instead. Bad spelling.[/QUOTE] ...You're inhumanely ridiculous. You regurgitate for no fucking reason at all, and you fixed your list to be as bad as the original, none of those people are any different from each other. They are all sensationalists, and they know that. And yeah, more people do use public [b]because it works just as well, way to kick your argument that socialized medicine sucks[/b]. People who need extravagant or extreme forms of coverage probably will pay more, and that's fine, no one is against that to my knowledge. Oh, and you're the fucking WORST person for analogies, I seriously can't believe you use as shitty ones as you do. Did you just say the US government SHOULD be slow and inefficient? You know that whole checks and balances thing, that can be fast you know, efficient. Either there's a layer of sarcasm I simply don't see here, or you're just an idiot, I can't tell yet. I've used Fedex before, it's nice but they've fucked up my shit before a few times, and are prohibitively expensive for anyone not capable of disposable income, I've also used canada post, and it always seems to work well enough for almost nothing. Overall, you still haven't said anything, and you still have a mountain of far more important posts to reply to.
I'm starting to think that Glaber really is a troll. In any way, there's no reason at all to argue with him because he keeps using his shitty arguments and even shittier analogies, and even though they're disproved as completely bullshit in seconds he ignores that completely. There is no hope for him.
It should go without saying Glaber is a worthless poster just simply due to how much rhetoric he can spit out without changing his tune once.
At least you can say I'm consistent. [editline]15th December 2010[/editline] [QUOTE=HumanAbyss;26707354] And yeah, more people do use public [b]because it works just as well, way to kick your argument that socialized medicine sucks[/b]. People who need extravagant or extreme forms of coverage probably will pay more, and that's fine, no one is against that to my knowledge. Oh, and you're the fucking WORST person for analogies, I seriously can't believe you use as shitty ones as you do. [/QUOTE] I work with what I have and what I know. If National Health Care was run like the USPS, then we'd be even lower on that health care list you like to trot out. Every time I hear or see hoe much the USPS is in the red, I wonder how they're still around. [QUOTE=HumanAbyss;26707354]Did you just say the US government SHOULD be slow and inefficient? You know that whole checks and balances thing, that can be fast you know, efficient. Either there's a layer of sarcasm I simply don't see here, or you're just an idiot, I can't tell yet. [/QUOTE] I'm saying that it should be slow and efficient, not fast and inefficient. When you go too fast, like this past congress was, you get higher and higher debt, people voting on stuff they have no idea about and people out side of congress in outrage because the people in congress didn't read all of what they voted on. Health care reform, when it finally came time to vote on it, was passed in an inefficient way and is now having parts of it declared unconstitutional, and other parts not starting until after Obama is out of office leaving other congresses to stop them before they start. [QUOTE=HumanAbyss;26707354]I've used Fedex before, it's nice but they've fucked up my shit before a few times, and are prohibitively expensive for anyone not capable of disposable income, I've also used canada post, and it always seems to work well enough for almost nothing. Overall, you still haven't said anything, and you still have a mountain of far more important posts to reply to.[/QUOTE] You want me to reply to that mountain, post them all again. Trying to hunt them down when I don't know where to look is almost like trying to find Easter eggs. Mindtwistah, just because someone has conservative beliefs doesn't mean they're a troll. [QUOTE=daijitsu;26706684]did you just imply serving salad at school and receiving health care when you have no means of paying for more expensive privatized insurance that covers more than the basics is as addictive as absorbing nicotine through your lungs?[/QUOTE] No, I compared receiving a free Breakfast and Dinner everyday to European heath care (Where people should be able to afford private insurance but choose to go with the free one anyway). Cigarettes were just a literal bad example that fit the criteria of being addictive and optional. A better one could of been MMOrpgs.
[QUOTE=Glaber;26712833]I work with what I have and what I know. If National Health Care was run like the USPS, then we'd be even lower on that health care list you like to trot out. Every time I hear or see hoe much the USPS is in the red, I wonder how they're still around. [/QUOTE] How the fuck would health care be run like the USPS? The USPS is a private company authorized by the Constitution to have a monopoly over first-class mail. They receive zero government funding.
Rated bad reading. I said LIKE, not by.
Sorry, I typed by instead of like. My point still stands.
if something is run [i]like[/i] USPS, you are saying that it would be [i]like[/i] it being run [i]by[/i] USPS.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.