• Dmitry's testicles have been stolen
    63 replies, posted
Where's Gwoodman?
[QUOTE=LuaChobo;47230977]lmao dude il give you the nuts stolen thing but people die all the time in hospitals and even in GPs if zones a doctor, hes also in india with a huge population doctors see people die, people that have no chance of living if you really think he gives a shit that i said people have died under his care then you are essentially saying he thinks he can save everyone which is a childish thing to think when you are a doctor il admit the actual thing relating to the balls being stolen was a little dumb, but its not really uncommon for people to have that shit amputate in actual settings so i guess i was just a little surprised a doctor had never heard of it before.[/QUOTE] I don't understand how someone can act this passive-aggressively assholish over this article. Did the other children not play with you when you were young?
Well, it's time to say "good bye!" to Moscow's sauna's for good. Never liked them anyway.
[QUOTE=LuaChobo;47231003]arent you doing the same thing over a post on the internet i just made the comment (albeit with poor wording) that a doctor would have seen worse shit than this[/QUOTE] I've seen worse shit sure, just not people deliberately stealing balls for God knows what nefarious purposes. Worse shit is kind of objective, it's different when it's because of accidents or the like, because people haven't gotten deliberately cut up here for their organs to get put on the black market.
Sounds like something out of a fucked up James Bond movie
I'm still confused: if someone gets a testicle transplant, will the semen contain the host or the donor's DNA?
[QUOTE=LuaChobo;47234780]if you get a heart transplant will it pump someone elses blood?[/QUOTE] Well, the question's a lot more complicated than that. The heart doesn't create blood. It's a muscle that moves that blood and nothing more. The testes actually create sperm cells, and presumably develop in such a manner that they are 'pre-programmed' with a copy of the original person's genetic information from which to create the gamete. It's a valid question if a new host's DNA could somehow rewrite the genetic information on which those testes had previously operated, and even Zonesylvania, who is a doctor, said there's no conclusive findings yet. It's entirely possible that after a transplant it would function, but would still create gametes from their original owner's genetic material.
[QUOTE=LuaChobo;47235541]ok heres a better way to think about it if you get a marrow transplant would it be considered similar to getting a blood transfusion as part of your blood is now being produced by someone elses tissue blood comes from marrow[/QUOTE] I suppose that argument could be made, sure. I mean, I don't know a lot about marrow transplants, but don't both people need to have, among other things, the same blood type?
[QUOTE=LuaChobo;47235572]id assume so but id also assume that there isnt really anything known as a cum type so i dont think thats entirely relevant maybe science will find out that i have scientifically proven grade A cum if that ever becomes a thing though[/QUOTE] It's not really called "grade A cum", but it is possible to have "lazy sperm", sperm that doesn't swim fast enough, or in the right direction
[QUOTE=LuaChobo;47235739]which is more based on the organ itself and not necessarily the genetic code correct?[/QUOTE] I'm not sure if you're aware of this, but... your sperm, produced in your testes, carry your genes. When they fertilize an egg, they combine traits that you possess with traits your partner possesses to create a child. Sperm cells from two different men are NEVER the same. Hell, your own sperm cells are each different, but all carry some part of your genes as an individual. This is something taught in basic elementary school biology. Ergo, it is a valid question whether another man's testicles attached to your body will produce sperm carrying your genetic material, or his. What about that is so hard to understand? To entirely re-write itself, all of the original cells would have to be replaced, since those cells carry the original owner's DNA. And since they carry the original owner's DNA, they will generate more cells to replace any dying ones from that same DNA. [editline]1st March 2015[/editline] I guess that answers the question.
[QUOTE=LuaChobo;47236065]you seem to be missing the point that over time it wouldnt be the exact same pair of nuts pretty much every part of your body has cells, those cells die and reproduce based on whatever model they have so assuming the transplant is a success and can produce sperm, not only would it be taking on "ingredients" from the rest of the body (which has probably already gone through changes due to the original organs) but the testicles themselves have probably taken on some form of traits due to cell reproduction (assuming transplanted organs can actually heal at all, if they cant welp that sucks, im not a fuckin surgeon or in the medical field at all im just going off of shit i was taught in highschool like 5 years ago) if it can heal, chances are its going to heal with the larger organism which will literally change it over time as more of the old tissue dies, thus changing the organ. im actually interested in reading research on this, because you'd think that if the organ itself is healing with the makeup of the new host then the structure of what its creating would change too, at least somewhat. this is all outside of rejection mind you edit: after re-reading your post i have noticed you have been arguing me with my own point what is even happening [editline]1st March 2015[/editline] WHAT IM TRYING TO SAY IS the genetic code is what choses how the organs form and grow iirc the organs themselves produce based off of that, in most cases that means its pretty fucking close in terms of genetic structure if you implant someone elses nuts, itl be a fuckin sloth of the sperm makeup or completely sterile anyway[/QUOTE] Actually sterility is more likely, considering. We won't know the answer for sure until someone actually experiments and documents it. There's got to be at least ONE person out there who'd want to have it done.
[QUOTE=LuaChobo;47230977]lmao dude il give you the nuts stolen thing but people die all the time in hospitals and even in GPs if zones a doctor, hes also in india with a huge population doctors see people die, people that have no chance of living if you really think he gives a shit that i said people have died under his care then you are essentially saying he thinks he can save everyone which is a childish thing to think when you are a doctor il admit the actual thing relating to the balls being stolen was a little dumb, but its not really uncommon for people to have that shit amputate in actual settings so i guess i was just a little surprised a doctor had never heard of it before.[/QUOTE] Are people still trying to prove Zonesylvania isn't a doctor? Get over yourself, dude.
[QUOTE=LuaChobo;47236099]thats gotta be some really small test group though, its not often that people get actual transplants like this (if ever) as i've only heard of plastic implants imagine the people that want to conduct the study constantly searching for people who lost testicles and offering them "a nice new pair" like try explaining to someone without balls that they want to test if these balls they surgically removed from a braindead human can be surgically attached and just go "we dont know if this will work, the science kinda checks out but we need actual tests" like how the fuck would you even test this without human subjects? [editline]1st March 2015[/editline] people still arent reading a thread before attempting to cause more drama nice post dude[/QUOTE] There's supposedly just one documented incident. ONLY one. And from like 1978, was published in a journal. A Japanese man who was one of a pair of identical twins had a testicle from his twin brother implanted into him, and with it was able to impregnate his wife. Now... identical twins are genetically identical, so that still proves nothing. [editline]1st March 2015[/editline] And since they knew each other there was a tiny possibility his brother was banging his wife. But until we have more studies we'll never know.
[QUOTE=LuaChobo;47236099]people still arent reading a thread before attempting to cause more drama nice post dude edit: actually good job reading the post i never even said he wasnt a doctor i just said that its weird he reacted the way he did lmao[/QUOTE] I dunno. Seems a little like backpedaling. But I'll take your word for it, bro.
[QUOTE=LuaChobo;47236123]man this is all so fuckin dumb to think about but its funny as fuck to me and i seriously want to read studies about this if they come out [editline]1st March 2015[/editline] read my first post i said he was a doctor in it anyway #doctorgate[/QUOTE] i've never seen such a clumsy and incoherent collection of rude, backpedalling posts
I've seen some messed up stuff and still, the thought of someone going off with my nuts sounds pretty stomach-wrenching. It doesn't matter if you're at the top of the world or just a nobody living off the streets, your nuts are probably one of the most important possessions you have. Even when the world's turned its back on you and you have no one or nothing to go to, you at least have your nuts. They need to track down this woman and sell her soul on the black market to compensate for her brutal form of torturous terrorism. You never take a man's nuts.
[QUOTE=LuaChobo;47236326]and i havent seen messed up shit apart from random shit online and im not grabbing my crotch feeling his pain[/quote] You can't use your emotions to invalidate other people's emotions [QUOTE=LuaChobo;47236326]also what the heck is torturous terrorism, its literally genital mutilation its fucked up but you are somehow blowing it way out of proportion[/QUOTE] I was being hyperbolic [quote]Even when the world's turned its back on you and you have no one or nothing to go to, you at least have your nuts.[/quote] Should have been an indicator
[QUOTE=LuaChobo;47242936]but i can use words to criticize them though[/QUOTE] Comparing your experiences and emotions with another's is an inherently flawed thing to do. People cringing about a man's tests being cut off is a perfectly valid response for most people. I guess we aren't as "hardcore" as you.
[QUOTE=Kyle902;47249521]Comparing your experiences and emotions with another's is an inherently flawed thing to do. People cringing about a man's tests being cut off is a perfectly valid response for most people. I guess we aren't as "hardcore" as you.[/QUOTE] I know a lot of people who cringe when they see people break their legs or injure themselves skateboarding or playing sports, and I also have friends who don't cringe at all. There's no reason to judge either of them based on their reactions, because it's an impulse reaction that's probably tied to biology and perception. People get grossed out when they see dead bodies, and that's probably a good thing in terms of evolution because it's not good to hang around dead bodies. They carry diseases and indicate danger's around. Some people cringe and stress out at bad presentations because it's uncomfortable to see people someone fail. People react in different ways, and impulsive emotions aren't always bad things or indicate weakness.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.