• Rapper Azealia Banks reveals she has been sacrificing chickens in her closet for 3 years
    79 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Viper123_SWE;51604910]Even with a vegetarian/vegan diet you still need to take extra vitamins to compensate. I'm not gonna say that eating meat is the only solution but the thing is that when an animal is slaughtered they're not just used for their meat but parts of them provide ingredients for medicine etc. This is something which is wasted when some crazy bitch does a vodoo ritual and TBH it doesn't matter if it's just two, three or four chickens because they're still animals which were killed pointlessly. Human industry is real, vodoo isn't.[/QUOTE] I'm just saying that if she believes in voodoo her actions are morally sound from her perspective, but they're based on erroneous beliefs. She needs to get educated on how things work but she's not necessarily a bad person. I'm kinda playing the devil's avocado here, maybe the reality is that she gets a kick from killing animals idk. I think the topic of what constitutes a pointless killing is fairly open to discussion is all.
Wow, she is a seriously awful person.
Sacrificing a fucktom of chickens isn't doing a thing for your career [i]take the hint[/i]
[QUOTE=Dantz Bolrew;51604992]From the article [editline]31st December 2016[/editline] :ohno:[/QUOTE] shes made it well known she only dates older guys, prolly cuz she was molested when she was younger or something
damn what the fuck this is nasty
[QUOTE=Viper123_SWE;51604910]Even with a vegetarian/vegan diet you still need to take extra vitamins to compensate. I'm not gonna say that eating meat is the only solution but the thing is that when an animal is slaughtered they're not just used for their meat but parts of them provide ingredients for medicine etc. This is something which is wasted when some crazy bitch does a vodoo ritual and TBH it doesn't matter if it's just two, three or four chickens because they're still animals which were killed pointlessly. Human industry is real, vodoo isn't.[/QUOTE] Those chickens probably made a great meal for the neighborhood raccoons. They may have been killed pointlessly, but you know they don't just vanish, nature still finds a use for them. ya chickens can be used for a lot of stuff, but they are also grossly expendable, we even genetically modify them to be featherless to make it more efficient to kill & prepare. Unless they are on an endangered species list, their lives don't really matter, "[I]they will grow back[/I]". McDonalds isn't gonna lose a millisecond of sleep over a nutcase sacrificing them to Unkulunkulu. What she did is gross, but I don't believe chicken lives are 'sacred', who really cares about what shes doing. Unless shes killing people, she can continue to waste her money and look like a utter shit sack to the rest of the internet. [QUOTE]Human industry is real, vodoo isn't.[/QUOTE] the ecosystem is also real, nothing gets truly wasted(except energy...)
The resale value of that place is going to be nil.
This is going to make for one crazy episode of MTV Cribs
[QUOTE=yff;51604965]Why is this Not getting some more attention? I swear that the double standards that are happening are unreal. We all know what the reactions would be if someone white said black bitch. This isn't first time some black celebrity was using skin color in derogatory term on Twitter either.[/QUOTE] I think we're all a little bit more concerned about the ritualistic sacrifice.
[QUOTE=noh_mercy;51606773]Unless they are on an endangered species list, their lives don't really matter[/QUOTE] To be fair, there aren't really any lives that actually objectively "matter", if you think about it. It's just a matter of opinion, at least from the looks of it.
Today I learned that Azealia and Iggy azalea are two different people :v:
So a known celebrity who's completely ignorant, repeatedly makes racist comments towards anyone who doesn't find the same value in her beliefs or anyone who straight up dislike her and vice versa, and more importantly inhumanely kills animals under the guise of the occult and basically hoards whatever is left of the remains in a closet? Have to agree: this person seriously needs help, even though it's probably really, really too late for that.
[QUOTE=Kljunas;51605071]I'm just saying that if she believes in voodoo her actions are morally sound from her perspective, but they're based on erroneous beliefs. She needs to get educated on how things work but she's not necessarily a bad person. I'm kinda playing the devil's avocado here, maybe the reality is that she gets a kick from killing animals idk. I think the topic of what constitutes a pointless killing is fairly open to discussion is all.[/QUOTE] True, I would personally say that this would probably fall under unethical animal cruelty, but at the same time there is something to be said about the humaneness of killing and the purpose a killing serves. From an ethics standpoint I say that this is unethical and unjustified animal cruelty because if one is to say that animals have some rights, and one of those rights being a right to life or some autonomy unless raised for food, killing of chickens in the name of religion is unjustified. This argument has weaknesses though where one can argue the rights of animals and further then the justification for animals harvested for food. Why I disagree with religious sacrifice (any religion, not just her particular spin) mainly comes from the issue of cultural relativism. While her viewpoint may be that this is justified, and from the viewpoint of Judaism or Islam, animal sacrifice is justified in certain scenarios, certain rights of animals and people are absolute, and I would say shouldn't be revoked by any culture, religion, or otherwise without due cause.
[QUOTE=Doctor Zedacon;51604646]You have to be joking. Right? This is so asinine I can't believe it to be anything other than a joke.[/QUOTE] Please explain why. imo killing an animal by slitting its throat (how I assume this was done) is many times more humane than pumping an animal full of steroids, keeping it in a small confined area, and then killing it through preferred method. Who gives a fuck about dead chickens? Unless she is torturing it in some manner straight out of an Eli Roth film, who gives a fuck. Chickens aren't sentient beings and I don't see how this is even newsworthy. [editline]31st December 2016[/editline] For fuck's safe, most deer probably suffer more from being shot by a hunter than this chicken did. Sacrificial animals are often treated pretty well before being killed.
[QUOTE=pentium;51603982]I seem to recall it wasn't allowed in the past unless it was something exceptionally big or expected that another source would pick it up within a few minutes. Unless [url=http://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/azealia-banks-shocks-internet-posting-9536766]The Mirror[/url] counts as an alt source.[/QUOTE] Its allowed when combined with an alternate source. And I would say the original twitter post is 100% acceptable as a source
[QUOTE=Man in the Moon;51607142]Today I learned that Azealia and Iggy azalea are two different people :v:[/QUOTE] When I first read it, I saw the pale white face part and wondered what the fuck
[QUOTE=matt000024;51607715]Please explain why. imo killing an animal by slitting its throat (how I assume this was done) is many times more humane than pumping an animal full of steroids, keeping it in a small confined area, and then killing it through preferred method. Who gives a fuck about dead chickens? Unless she is torturing it in some manner straight out of an Eli Roth film, who gives a fuck. Chickens aren't sentient beings and I don't see how this is even newsworthy. [editline]31st December 2016[/editline] For fuck's safe, most deer probably suffer more from being shot by a hunter than this chicken did. Sacrificial animals are often treated pretty well before being killed.[/QUOTE] I get what you're trying to say, but I don't think your point stands because the chickens she got were probably raised in a farm under the same terrible conditions that food chickens experience. And I think what most people take issue with is the necessity of sacrificing an animal to satiate an arguably baseless religious desire, versus killing an animal to fulfil the basic human need for food, which is why this is being discussed in the first place.
[QUOTE=Headhumpy;51607753]I get what you're trying to say, but I don't think your point stands because the chickens she got were probably raised in a farm under the same terrible conditions that food chickens experience. And I think what most people take issue with is the necessity of sacrificing an animal to satiate an arguably baseless religious desire, versus killing an animal to fulfil the basic human need for food, which is why this is being discussed in the first place.[/QUOTE] A lot of animals killed for food end up being mostly wasted anyway due to a lot of any food rotting and going to waste. What difference does it really make? People hunt animals purely for fun yet that isn't illegal (and it shouldn't be despite what your morals are). Personal morals should never dictate laws as long as no human being is being harmed.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.