Some Experts Say: Obama Re-election Is Americans' Top Fear
123 replies, posted
Call it, Obama gets re-elected.
No hassle.
[QUOTE=GlebGuy;34157089]Call it, Obama gets re-elected.
No hassle.[/QUOTE]
From Lithuania.
[QUOTE=Sanius;34155960]no president has ever been the best president[/QUOTE]
Those that you tend to kill after two years of office tend to be those you guys worship the most.
Also. You'd have to be a goddamn full-on retard to not want Obama back in. Just look at all of the restrictions those biblical morons offer. The other candidates all seem to be a danger even to themselves at times.
[editline]11th January 2012[/editline]
[QUOTE=Megafanx13;34157199]From Lithuania.[/QUOTE]
I voted last time.
Imo we should have a say in who the world leader is and since many in your country are incapable of NOT voting for insane religious zealots, we will have to do that for them until they get mental help or better, an education.
[QUOTE=Bomimo;34157207]Those that you tend to kill after two years of office tend to be those you guys worship the most.
Also. You'd have to be a goddamn full-on retard to not want Obama back in. Just look at all of the restrictions those biblical morons offer. The other candidates all seem to be a danger even to themselves at times.[/QUOTE]
In terms of the choice, it's basically like this:
1. Vote for Obama to go against the GOP candidate (who will probably be Mitt Romney)
2. Vote for the GOP to go against Obama (Unless you REALLY like Social Conservatism, bad option)
3. Vote for 3rd party you agree with the most in protest of the two-party system
[QUOTE=TheCloak;34153566][b]Obama is one of the best presidents we have ever had[/b]
I don't know why everybody hates him[/QUOTE]
Off the top of my head
Eisenhower
Roosevelt
Kennedy
Clinton
maybe even Lincoln
[QUOTE=Chicken_Chaser;34157246]Off the top of my head
Eisenhower
Roosevelt
Kennedy
Clinton
maybe even Lincoln[/QUOTE]
Let's see the accomplishments they presided over:
Eisenhower - Highway system with the Federal-Aid Highway Act in 1956
Roosevelt - Progressive candidate with good success, strong on foreign policy, etc.
Kennedy - Strong orator, signed several civil rights bills
Clinton - Balanced the budget, presided over a surplus
Lincoln - Preserved the Union, freed the slaves (in a general sense)
Yeah I'd say Obama's up there, but then again so would Carter be for his diplomatic skills.
[QUOTE=Megafanx13;34157220]In terms of the choice, it's basically like this:
1. Vote for Obama to go against the GOP candidate (who will probably be Mitt Romney)
2. Vote for the GOP to go against Obama (Unless you REALLY like Social Conservatism, bad option)
3. Vote for 3rd party you agree with the most in protest of the two-party system[/QUOTE]
I'm Scandinavian. IMO Obama is the best shit to happen to you since... well ever.
Obama is the best of a bad situation
[QUOTE=Bomimo;34157517]I'm Scandinavian. IMO Obama is the best shit to happen to you since... well ever.[/QUOTE]
He's good with diplomacy and relatively cautious as far as intervention goes. He's stood poorly on the PATRIOT Act extension and the Bush Tax Cuts extension but overall he's better than any of the GOP hopefuls.
[QUOTE=Chicken_Chaser;34157246]Off the top of my head
Eisenhower
Roosevelt
Kennedy
Clinton
maybe even Lincoln[/QUOTE]
They ain't got shit on Hoover.
Not going to lie but even if obama or anyone else gets the position.
America is fucked 100%
there is just no winning for you guys.
[QUOTE=Sir Whoopsalot;34157708]They ain't got shit on Hoover.[/QUOTE]
but he was shit
[QUOTE=RaptorBlackz;34157794]Not going to lie but even if obama or anyone else gets the position.
America is fucked 100%
there is just no winning for you guys.[/QUOTE]
same shit will happen no matter who becomes president. the system is broken beyond repair
[QUOTE=Megafanx13;34158279]but he was shit[/QUOTE]
I don't know what you're talking about, the man had entire towns named after him!
[QUOTE=rinoaff33;34152972]You underestimate the power of Southerners in large numbers.[/QUOTE]
Where I live none of the Republican candidates (except some Romney support) are taken seriously.
It's basically Romney, Obama, and small amounts of Ron Paul support.
[QUOTE=Sanius;34158287]same shit will happen no matter who becomes president. the system is broken beyond repair[/QUOTE]
But at least Obama wouldn't send you hurling into the cesspit of theocracy. Everyone else will pretty much make you the Christian equivalent of the Middle-East. Lord knows you're already closer than most of you think to that title.
[editline]11th January 2012[/editline]
[QUOTE=Raidyr;34158326]Where I live none of the Republican candidates (except some Romney support) are taken seriously.
It's basically Romney, Obama, and small amounts of Ron Paul support.[/QUOTE]
problem is that Romney still has support. This proves that they're still retards.
Change title to:
A little less then a third of Fox News reader's top fear is Obama's re-election.
[QUOTE=Bomimo;34158345]But at least Obama wouldn't send you hurling into the cesspit of theocracy. Everyone else will pretty much make you the Christian equivalent of the Middle-East. Lord knows you're already closer than most of you think to that title.[/QUOTE]
Well ignoring the fact that you've just generalized the entire Middle East as a fundamentalist mass of land, I'd hardly say that we're anywhere near as bad as the more fundamentalist nations in the Middle East, like Saudi Arabia for example. Women have basically the same rights as men, even though pay gaps still exist, you can't teach religious ideology as fact in schools, nor can it be taught as a competitor to evolution in public schools. There may be minor exceptions to this, but it's true for the most part.
Obviously there are Evangelists and others who claim that the teaching of LGBT history or evolution in schools will lead to a lack of morals, but they do little more than complain and I've yet to see much influence from them in my textbooks, except for the usual bias in American textbooks (referring to anything allied with the Soviet Union as communist, a slight bias towards capitalism in general, etc.). However, anyone with half a brain stem can read past it, so it's not a big issue for me, but it may be in other areas.
[QUOTE=Bomimo;34158345]But at least Obama wouldn't send you hurling into the cesspit of theocracy. Everyone else will pretty much make you the Christian equivalent of the Middle-East. Lord knows you're already closer than most of you think to that title.
[editline]11th January 2012[/editline]
problem is that Romney still has support. This proves that they're still retards.[/QUOTE]
It was a response to the Republican field in general. If 6 of the 8 Republican candidates don't have hardly any support in the Southern community where I live then it still sends the message that Southern voters aren't this stereotype people like throwing around.
[editline]11th January 2012[/editline]
[QUOTE=mac338;34158481]Change title to:
A little less then a third of Fox News reader's top fear is Obama's re-election.[/QUOTE]
I think the title was done like that satirically on purpose.
oh god you can't use Fox as a news source, it's on pair with the Onion
[QUOTE=Megafanx13;34158547]Well ignoring the fact that you've just generalized the entire Middle East as a fundamentalist mass of land.[/QUOTE]
It's a lump of theocratic nations. They're fundamentalist as fuck. But that isn't MY stereotype. I'm using what YOUR nation has been pushing the past 20 years. If anyone but Obama gets elected, you're headed that way... I conclude that by the other candidates PROMISING you that you will go that way. Controlling and regulating the liberties of non-christians is the same scenario as controlling and regulating the liberties of Non-muslims son.
One of them is pushing his ideal of a perfect family as the only family that should be allowed to exist untouched. That is breach of civil rights. He's dictating How he wants people to live in his country to receive all of the benefits that the government will offer. On some points, that is MORE extreme than the middle east. Next thing for him would be to restrict voting rights to Christians only and then after that, you forfeit your voting rights indefinitely if you vote against him by the next election. That's some of the shit i fear that could evolve from you guys just letting him dictate that his ideals are the only right ones.
He shouldn't even be voted on that. This is how every oppressive regime started. A president is supposed to represent his people as a whole. Obama does fine at that, what with not shoving his religion on everyone all of the time.
[editline]11th January 2012[/editline]
[QUOTE=Raidyr;34158575]It was a response to the Republican field in general. If 6 of the 8 Republican candidates don't have hardly any support in the Southern community where I live then it still sends the message that Southern voters aren't this stereotype people like throwing around.
[/QUOTE]
The other two have support. Do they not push extreme policies? If not, Then awesome.
[QUOTE=Chicken_Chaser;34157246]Off the top of my head
Eisenhower
Roosevelt
Kennedy
Clinton
maybe even Lincoln[/QUOTE]
I said one of the
implying there are other great presidents
It's funny how Americans still fear the black man.
Clinton was [B]not[/B] a good president
[QUOTE=Contag;34159092]Clinton was [B]not[/B] a good president[/QUOTE]
But he did get the bitches. Or rather a particular one.
[QUOTE=Sir Whoopsalot;34159128]But he did get the bitches. Or rather a particular one.[/QUOTE]
[img]http://www.esquire.com/cm/esquire/images/1998-monica-lewinsky-lg-86834256.jpg[/img]
[QUOTE=Bomimo;34158690]It's a lump of theocratic nations. They're fundamentalist as fuck. But that isn't MY stereotype. I'm using what YOUR nation has been pushing the past 20 years. If anyone but Obama gets elected, you're headed that way... I conclude that by the other candidates PROMISING you that you will go that way. Controlling and regulating the liberties of non-christians is the same scenario as controlling and regulating the liberties of Non-muslims son.
One of them is pushing his ideal of a perfect family as the only family that should be allowed to exist untouched. That is breach of civil rights. He's dictating How he wants people to live in his country to receive all of the benefits that the government will offer. On some points, that is MORE extreme than the middle east. Next thing for him would be to restrict voting rights to Christians only and then after that, you forfeit your voting rights indefinitely if you vote against him by the next election. That's some of the shit i fear that could evolve from you guys just letting him dictate that his ideals are the only right ones.
He shouldn't even be voted on that. This is how every oppressive regime started. A president is supposed to represent his people as a whole. Obama does fine at that, what with not shoving his religion on everyone all of the time.
[editline]11th January 2012[/editline]
The other two have support. Do they not push extreme policies? If not, Then awesome.[/QUOTE]
Yes, because as an American I 100% support the military-industrial complex and the paranoia of the Middle East? Are you daft?
[QUOTE=Sanius;34158287]same shit will happen no matter who becomes president. the system is broken beyond repair[/QUOTE]
It can still be repaired. We just need to push for election reform to go from [URL="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s7tWHJfhiyo"]FPTP[/URL] to [URL="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Y3jE3B8HsE"]any better option.[/URL]
Who are these "EXPERTS" and why are they called experts for predicting stuff that is bound to be incorrect?
[QUOTE=Megafanx13;34159409]Yes, because as an American I 100% support the military-industrial complex and the paranoia of the Middle East? Are you daft?[/QUOTE]
Are you THAT bad at reading?
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.