• Flaws found in Ukraine's probe of Maidan massacre (Reuters special report)
    42 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Spirit_Breaker;46206246]So what, only pro-western bias is allowed here?[/QUOTE] I'd rather have a pro-western bias than RIA novosti or RussiaToday for everything Russia says.
[QUOTE=laserguided;46202932]Yeah. Russia is corrupt but not as corrupt as Ukraine.[/QUOTE] Absolutely true.
[QUOTE=Ghost656;46206283]I'd rather have a pro-western bias than RIA novosti or RussiaToday for everything Russia says.[/QUOTE] An interesting point of view. I mean, i always thought it's better to think with your own head, especially if you know that both sides are more or less biased.
[QUOTE=Ghost656;46206283]I'd rather have a pro-western bias than RIA novosti or RussiaToday for everything Russia says.[/QUOTE] Then you're not better than laserguided. And so, have no right to judge him.
[QUOTE=antianan;46206790]An interesting point of view. I mean, i always thought it's better to think with your own head, especially if you know that both sides are more or less biased.[/QUOTE] If you actually read properly maybe you'd have figured I meant if I had to choose between two I'd prefer a pro-western bias.
[QUOTE=Ghost656;46208541]If you actually read properly maybe you'd have figured I meant if I had to choose between two I'd prefer a pro-western bias.[/QUOTE] It's not about if western media is biased or not (it is, imo, but it's just my personal opinion and it's not related to my post). I meant it's strange that you'd prefer to choose any bias at all instead of trying to figure out what's actually happening.
[QUOTE=antianan;46208799]It's not about if western media is biased or not (it is, imo, but it's just my personal opinion and it's not related to my post). I meant it's strange that you'd prefer to choose any bias at all instead of trying to figure out what's actually happening.[/QUOTE] I don't believe he said he wasn't reading both sides, but that he prefers Western news overall. Honestly, I do too but to the extent allowed, because sometimes things are obvious bullshit. Personally I haven't "read" much on the conflict, I've just looked at pictures and tried to trace them to events in the news, like lets say I saw a picture of burnt out tanks, I'd try to find out of there was battle a while ago and see what happen from that standpoint. So I have photographic evidence at first, then statements and etc information from news to go on.
This thread's shite
[QUOTE=Matthew0505;46210289]It's like reading an Infowars comment section[/QUOTE] the shills come out of the woodwork when you post about ukraine or russia maxspeed and twistai are good examples
[QUOTE=Ghost656;46206212]It's funny how you're still trying hard to hide the fact you're a shill. Like can you get any more obvious, we get it, you hate Ukraine and you're obsessed with Russia now please leave the thread.[/QUOTE] Do you even know what shill means?
[QUOTE=laserguided;46213624]Do you even know what shill means?[/QUOTE] He probably doesn't, but that doesn't change the fact you're actually that idiotic and predictable that people think you're funny. I don't even know if you believe half the shit you say
[QUOTE=laserguided;46213624]Do you even know what shill means?[/QUOTE] Do you even look at yourself or consider whether or not the shit you peddle like a gong farmer is true or not? Are you capable of self-reflection, or would the realization you've been a pointless proponent of objectively national policy be too hard for you to bear?
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.