Full 9/11 Disclosure Imminent — Russia To Release Satellite Evidence Of 9/11 ‘Inside Job’
78 replies, posted
anyone wanna ask why russian military spy satelites (a precious commodity in 2001 for russia) were pointed at the world trade centers in new york at precisely the moment of impact (another amazing feet for spy satelites which are only ever over a target for but a moment), when new york has neither a navy, airforce, or army base, and no real strategic targets?
[editline]11th February 2015[/editline]
[QUOTE=ColgateMaster;47120948]You must be in denial to say that the government had no involvement with 9/11. I mean what happened to building 7 was just ridiculous. And something even more shady is that Bin Laden and cia agent and a close really close friend to Bush became master villian. I mean Bin Laden even helped Bush financially.[/QUOTE]
building 7 got hit by debris from the towers that collapsed right next to them, and its foundation was partially destroyed in the collapse, and it burned uncontrolled for days
[QUOTE=ColgateMaster;47120948]You must be in denial to say that the government had no involvement with 9/11. I mean what happened to building 7 was just ridiculous. And something even more shady is that Bin Laden and cia agent and a close really close friend to Bush became master villian. I mean Bin Laden even helped Bush financially.[/QUOTE]
Someone's off their meds.
I think that even if it discovered that It was an inside job the damage will still be done. The people will continue distrusting Muslims and faulting them from the wars.
[QUOTE=Axsisel;47120979]I think that even if it discovered that It was an inside job the damage will still be done. The people will continue distrusting Muslims and faulting them from the wars.[/QUOTE]
it [I]was not[/I] an inside job. if it was, why wouldn't we just outright blame iraq for financing 911 instead of spending 2 years constructing a story of weapons of mass destruction, it would have saved GW many headaches and possible purgery charges
The dead horse is nothing more than a pile of bonemeal and splintered clubs at this point.
Remember, jet fuel can't melt steel beams.
(But it can weaken them significantly over time to the point that they'll be unstable enough to support a large structure)
I was always scared if FP going to finally stumble upon pravda.ru
Those folks are lunatics.
[QUOTE=karimatrix;47121054]I was always scared if FP going to finally stumble upon pravda.ru
Those folks are lunatics.[/QUOTE]Are they roughly the same sort of people as ran it in the Soviet days, or is the only likeness nowadays the name and general level of nuttiness?
[QUOTE=Sgt Doom;47121235]Are they roughly the same sort of people as ran it in the Soviet days, or is the only likeness nowadays the name and general level of nuttiness?[/QUOTE]
It's owned by the communist party of the russian federation.
[QUOTE=isreal?;47121253]It's owned by wanna be relevant remnants of the communist party of the russian federation.[/QUOTE]
Fixed.
Pravda is a kind of information agency that trying to cash on russian celebs and blatant outrageous sensationalism. Yellow pages pretty much.
So basically the Daily Mail but run by the Russian government?
I can't wait for this to whip back around into the US conspiracy-idiot culture.
"[I]The Russians have proof it was an inside job and the government is trying to cover it up![/I]"
[QUOTE=alexguydude;47120903]I don't know why it's so insane to think the U.S government would do something like this. I've heard a lot of really big named engineers come out and say 9/11 should not have happened just from a plane. To say our government is not capable of something like this I would disagree.
I'm sure our government has done some really bad shit.[/QUOTE]
You're right, the government has done some really bad shit - and everyone knows about it, from supporting dodgy regimes to spying on its allies. So don't you see how insane it is to believe what you put, especially considering that there is not a single shred of evidence that the Government was involved in what is probably one of the most scrutinised events in US history?
[QUOTE=elixwhitetail;47121311]So basically the Daily Mail but run by the Russian government?
I can't wait for this to whip back around into the US conspiracy-idiot culture.
"[I]The Russians have proof it was an inside job and the government is trying to cover it up![/I]"[/QUOTE]
Russian communist party =/= russian goverment. Just informing.
Ohhh boy, seeing their North Korea-tier photoshop wizardry again is going to be fucking hilarious.
You know, this reminds me of that time when everyone laughed at people when they were claiming that US government is spying on everything and everyone and then the NSA happened.
I may be laughed at now for believing that Saudis were definitely involved in 9/11 and that Bin Laden family had really close relations with some of the higher US officials, but time will tell if I'm right or wrong.
[QUOTE=butt2089;47121361]You're right, the government has done some really bad shit - and everyone knows about it, from supporting dodgy regimes to spying on its allies. So don't you see how insane it is to believe what you put, especially considering that there is not a single shred of evidence that the Government was involved in what is probably one of the most scrutinised events in US history?[/QUOTE]
I mean there is a decent amount of information out there claiming to be evidence, but nobody will look at it because of what it is suggesting.
People discard an idea without even actually looking at the information. So who is to say there isn't real evidence? I can't be one to say whether it's credible or not, you would need some engineers or something else. I'm just simply stating that to say you know every detail about what happened is pretty ignorant.
I haven't ever seen a clear video of the pentagon airplane crash, even though there are tons of cameras in that area.
The pentagon has tons of cameras on it. There's buildings across the street that have cameras. Some videos were claimed to even be confiscated.
Doesn't that at LEAST make you raise an eyebrow? There are other things that really don't add up on 9/11, but I'm not going to continue posting about them because most people already have their minds made on the matter. I would just keep an open mind on what our government is capable of. After all, everyone who said the government was collecting all of our data were "tinfoil hat people", yet some of them turned out to be right with their proof.
An Iquisitr story written with Pravda as a source; all we need is infowars and this would be the most credible story.
[QUOTE=DudesonFan;47121488]Ohhh boy, seeing their North Korea-tier photoshop wizardry again is going to be fucking hilarious.[/QUOTE]
It's probably going to look a lot like this:
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/MRI8pKg.png[/IMG]
In other words, about as disconcerting as that one German morale officer from Saving Private Ryan yelling "DAS STATUE OF LIBERTY IST KAPUTT"
[QUOTE=ExplodingGuy;47121581]An Iquisitr story written with Pravda as a source; all we need is infowars and this would be the most credible story.[/QUOTE]
It quoted Veterans Today also. It's like the Avengers of hilarious reporting.
[QUOTE=Explosions;47121594]It quoted Veterans Today also. It's like the Avengers of hilarious reporting.[/QUOTE]
Soo what does it make FP?
[sp]Heil Garry[/sp]
Building 7's collapse didn't make any sense at all. It is the only case of fire destroying a steel frame building in our history, and it collapsed at free fall rates suggesting there was no internal structure. The investigation into it even mentioned that it would not fall at free fall rates, contradicting their own reports. I'm not saying there was an inside job but the investigations were done so criminally it shouldn't even count as investigation.
For instance, when a plane crashes for even remotely weird reasons we photograph everything, move it to another location, piece it together and do more forensic work. Quickly after 9/11 we sold off the scrap debris to China and had it melted down. At the very least the people in charge of the investigation should all be fired. What are your thoughts for dealing with these discrepancies?
Pull it.
[QUOTE=karimatrix;47121261]Fixed.
Pravda is a kind of information agency that trying to cash on russian celebs and blatant outrageous sensationalism. Yellow pages pretty much.[/QUOTE]
You mean yellow [I]journalism[/I]. Yellow Pages is a phone book.
[QUOTE=DoctorSalt;47121971]Building 7's collapse didn't make any sense at all. It is the only case of fire destroying a steel frame building in our history, and it collapsed at free fall rates suggesting there was no internal structure. The investigation into it even mentioned that it would not fall at free fall rates, contradicting their own reports. I'm not saying there was an inside job but the investigations were done so criminally it shouldn't even count as investigation.
For instance, when a plane crashes for even remotely weird reasons we photograph everything, move it to another location, piece it together and do more forensic work. Quickly after 9/11 we sold off the scrap debris to China and had it melted down. At the very least the people in charge of the investigation should all be fired. What are your thoughts for dealing with these discrepancies?[/QUOTE]
Why would they blow up that building lol? What, the two giant citadels weren't enough the small, unheard of building next to them also had to go?
[QUOTE=Explosions;47122110]Why would they blow up that building lol? What, the two giant citadels weren't enough the small, unheard of building next to them also had to go?[/QUOTE]
Just the question they want you to ask!!
Lol, Pravda again. Foxnews is more trustworthy than this crap.
[QUOTE=Aredbomb;47122109]You mean yellow [I]journalism[/I]. Yellow Pages is a phone book.[/QUOTE]
It's "yellow press" in here, sounds kinda similar for us.
[QUOTE=DoctorSalt;47121971]Building 7's collapse didn't make any sense at all. It is the only case of fire destroying a steel frame building in our history, and it collapsed at free fall rates suggesting there was no internal structure. The investigation into it even mentioned that it would not fall at free fall rates, contradicting their own reports. I'm not saying there was an inside job but the investigations were done so criminally it shouldn't even count as investigation.
For instance, when a plane crashes for even remotely weird reasons we photograph everything, move it to another location, piece it together and do more forensic work. Quickly after 9/11 we sold off the scrap debris to China and had it melted down. At the very least the people in charge of the investigation should all be fired. What are your thoughts for dealing with these discrepancies?[/QUOTE]
Building 7 had massive structural damage and totally unchecked fires burning all day. The fire eventually caused critical parts of the steel to expand which resulted in the collapse which started at lower levels.
I'm also confused on what you are talking about regarding the scrap metal. Do you want them to rebuild the fucking trade centers? The two planes where obliterated by the impact. The scrap metal was the metal of the trade center remains. You don't know what you are talking about
wow putin is really upset we called him an asspie
The owner had insured the buildings against terrorism 6 months before it happened.
[QUOTE=Carlton Dance;47122381]The owner had insured the buildings against terrorism 6 months before it happened.[/QUOTE]
WTC was hit with a truck bomb in 1993, I'd get it insured against terrorism too.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.