• N. Korean general says Pyongyang has nuke-tipped ICBMs on standby
    194 replies, posted
Do they realise that really no one cares? Also, why are they so hell-bent to bring down their country with them?
[QUOTE=Gekkosan;39842718]I find it funny that no one seems to take this very seriously. [/QUOTE] That's because if they try anything they'll be fucked over quicker than you can say ''Communist theology''.
[QUOTE=WeekendWarrior;39842736]That's because if they try anything they'll be fucked over quicker than you can say ''Communist theology''.[/QUOTE] ofcourse they would lose, I am not implying anything else, just saying that if even 1 nuke blows up it's bad.
At this point it's like if they want to be invaded.
[QUOTE=WeekendWarrior;39842736]That's because if they try anything they'll be fucked over quicker than you can say ''Communist theology''.[/QUOTE] Everyone always says this as if such a thing would be an easy fight. Newsflash, it would be likely be super-mega bloody and hard fought. I don't doubt that SK and their western allies would win eventually, but to just brush it off like it would be a quick "in and out regime change" job is incredibly naive.
I'm just picturing the Fatman bomb, as big as a car, on top of a missile I'm not seeing it
[QUOTE=TestECull;39842720]More ramblings from the crybaby toddler of the world stage. Yawn.[/QUOTE] [QUOTE=WeekendWarrior;39842736]That's because if they try anything they'll be fucked over quicker than you can say ''Communist theology''.[/QUOTE] [QUOTE=F T;39842751]At this point it's like if they want to be invaded.[/QUOTE] What you people fail to understand is that even though Best Korea will lose, thousands, if not millions of people will die. Their nukes may be short range, but say they bomb Seoul with no warning and for some reason the missile doesn't get shot down by Murica's missile defenses there in South Korea. That's around 10 million dead. What if we invade and they detonate nuclear devices in populated areas where US forces are? Now we're at almost 12 million military and civilian casualties. That's 12 million men, women and children. Snuffed out. Gone. Ash. Don't act like it's no big deal when North Korea threatens things like this, because it is a big deal and you should be worried about it.
[QUOTE=Solomon;39842817]What you people fail to understand is that even though Best Korea will lose, thousands, if not millions of people will die. Their nukes may be short range, but say they bomb Seoul with no warning and for some reason the missile doesn't get shot down by Murica's missile defenses there in South Korea. That's around 10 million dead. What if we invade and they detonate nuclear devices in populated areas where US forces are? Now we're at almost 12 million military and civilian casualties. That's 12 million men, women and children. Snuffed out. Gone. Ash.[/QUOTE] 12 Million now may be better than 20 Million in 15 years, and on the flipside, it may even turn out that they don't have the capability to do it at all. But for once the White House knows far more about it than we do, and they shrugged it off
[QUOTE=Solomon;39842817]What you people fail to understand is that even though Best Korea will lose, thousands, if not millions of people will die. Their nukes may be short range, but say they bomb Seoul with no warning and for some reason the missile doesn't get shot down by Murica's missile defenses there in South Korea. That's around 10 million dead. What if we invade and they detonate nuclear devices in populated areas where US forces are? Now we're at almost 12 million military and civilian casualties. That's 12 million men, women and children. Snuffed out. Gone. Ash.[/QUOTE] Lmfao, no way in hell are they gonna kill the entire population of Seoul, let alone a quarter of it. Sure, there would be some considerable damage, but 10 million dead? Man you're overestimating.
[QUOTE=Itsjustguy;39842314]I bet US and Korean special forces are already inside N.K.[/QUOTE] I wouldn't be surprised if this was the case tbh
[QUOTE=TheTalon;39842833]12 Million now may be better than 20 Million in 15 years, and on the flipside, it may even turn out that they don't have the capability to do it at all[/QUOTE] The point I'm trying to get at is the whole 'hurr best korea cant and wont do anything becuz well fuckem up!!!!' is stupid.
[QUOTE=Solomon;39842844]The point I'm trying to get at is the whole 'hurr best korea cant and wont do anything becuz well fuckem up!!!!' is stupid.[/QUOTE] ... But we will still fuck'em up.... right?
North Korea: Just the tip!
[QUOTE=Solomon;39842844]The point I'm trying to get at is the whole 'hurr best korea cant and wont do anything becuz well fuckem up!!!!' is stupid.[/QUOTE] Yeah, but overestimating them by saying "omfggg all of seoul will die" is also stupid.
[QUOTE=Solomon;39842817]What you people fail to understand is that even though Best Korea will lose, thousands, if not millions of people will die. Their nukes may be short range, but say they bomb Seoul with no warning and for some reason the missile doesn't get shot down by Murica's missile defenses there in South Korea. That's around 10 million dead. What if we invade and they detonate nuclear devices in populated areas where US forces are? Now we're at almost 12 million military and civilian casualties. That's 12 million men, women and children. Snuffed out. Gone. Ash. Don't act like it's no big deal when North Korea threatens things like this, because it is a big deal and you should be worried about it.[/QUOTE] They want to take S. Korea right, nuking Seoul wouldn't be smart at all, if they win, what do they have to do then? Rebuild a whole fucking city and also that would piss of China to the point of invasion, radiation doesn't sit in one place.
[QUOTE=Solomon;39842844]The point I'm trying to get at is the whole 'hurr best korea cant and wont do anything becuz well fuckem up!!!!' is stupid.[/QUOTE] No they would get fucked up. They only MIGHT have the capability to do a lot of damage one time to South Korea. We can do considerable damage to them non stop from areas not even near the Korean Peninsula without ever putting a soldier into North Korea. I don't think anyone will do anything though. It's all just more dick waving
[QUOTE=Marbalo;39842872]no it isn't. it's more dangerous to underestimate your enemy than it is to overestimate it. everyone should be prepared for the worst.[/QUOTE] It's hard when we're talking about North Korea here.
Would be funny if they launched a nuke and it exploded on launch and blew them up.
[QUOTE=H4wkeye;39842884]Would be funny if they launched a nuke and it exploded on launch and blew them up.[/QUOTE] Is it bad that its what will probably happen? Their success rates are low.
[QUOTE=H4wkeye;39842884]Would be funny if they launched a nuke and it exploded on launch and blew them up.[/QUOTE] That would be more likely than it making it all the way to the pacific, let alone Washington D.C. I wonder if they know that D.C is on the eastern coast, not on the western coast?
they won't do it.
Don't underestimate the enemy. Always be prepared for the worst.
[QUOTE=TheTalon;39842833]12 Million now may be better than 20 Million in 15 years, and on the flipside, it may even turn out that they don't have the capability to do it at all. But for once the White House knows far more about it than we do, and they shrugged it off[/QUOTE] Best case scenario, Seoul gets bombed to shit by North Korea's artillery pieces. Worst case scenario... Yeah, what Solomon said.
[QUOTE=F T;39842892]Is it bad that its what will probably happen? Their success rates are low.[/QUOTE] Only bad thing about it would be potential effect on civilians, I couldn't care less if it blew up Kim Jong Un and his shitty military officials. [QUOTE=Garik;39842898]That would be more likely than it making it all the way to the pacific, let alone Washington D.C. I wonder if they know that D.C is on the eastern coast, not on the western coast?[/QUOTE] They also don't realize that even if they DID manage to launch it, it would be SHOT DOWN above the Pacific before it even reaches the US west coast. And the retaliation by the US would be precision bombing of all their launch sites, thus destroying all their further launch capabilities. Also, very possible that SOCOM would have Spec Ops teams infiltrate and sabotage their vital structures.
If North Korea launches their nukes, everyone else will launch theirs too and the world will end. I'm not really concerned.
Also, the US and NATO already have a planned out strategy for the worst case scenario about NK. That is common sense. But it's all kept strictly classified. There is no way NK would catch US or the rest unprepared. They would be full stopped before even attempting to launch a nuke at any country. [editline]8th March 2013[/editline] [QUOTE=MightyLOLZOR;39842944]If North Korea launches their nukes, everyone else will launch theirs too and the world will end. I'm not really concerned.[/QUOTE] Doubtful. They would just shoot down the NK nuke and retaliate with conventional bombs. US above all, knows very well the potential threat of launching a single nuke on NK. It is best to just use regular bombers to take out their infrastructures. Cause NK doesn't even have anything to combat the bombers.
you what I would more worried about? When wars build up there is indeed money to be made and you would be surprised of what guns are in circulation in the world that could be sold to them or even just given to North Korea just because they know it could come into conflict within the United states or her allies to be specific (totally not like what America did with in afghanistan right? Or Russia did in vietnam? or even more lesser cases for that matter.). Hell China is not the most credible and would probably have no qualms in giving North Korea the said weapons for the war just so they can sell their old equipment to make a buck out of it, or even Burma, Vietnam, or Russia. Lets hope it does not really happen but dont forget this can indeed balloon up very quickly.
[QUOTE=Marbalo;39842872]no it isn't. it's more dangerous to underestimate your enemy than it is to overestimate it. everyone should be prepared for the worst.[/QUOTE] Preemptive strike, then.
[QUOTE=Apache249;39843027]Preemptive strike, then.[/QUOTE] Sure, let's launch nukes at a population of 24.5 million people everything will be hunky dorey yep. OR We attack a military that's around 9 million strong. [del]That'd be cool.[/del] No it wouldn't.
Guys, I've played BMS Falcon. North Korea loses bad every time unless China helps them. I know what I'm talking about!
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.