Screenshots Released for Modern Warfare on the Wii
49 replies, posted
gameplay > graphics
[highlight]EXCLUSIVE FIRST SHOT OF CRYENGINE 3 ON THE WII[/highlight]
[img]http://www.l00k.org/spot_proj/images/spot_pixelated_NEW.gif[/img]
[QUOTE=jcallan;16800326][highlight]EXCLUSIVE FIRST SHOT OF CRYENGINE 3 ON THE WII[/highlight]
[img]http://www.l00k.org/spot_proj/images/spot_pixelated_NEW.gif[/img][/QUOTE]
Rated you optimistic. Probably won't look that good.
[QUOTE=Daimao;16800548]Rated you optimistic. Probably won't look that good.[/QUOTE]
This is what it will look like:
[img]http://tbn2.google.com/images?q=tbn:AWsGMOvZhPtpeM:http://www.in.gov/arts/images/BlackBox.jpg[/img]
The wii crashed
And you play at that resolution.
I tried playing a wii for the first time today... there is absolutely no reason I would give up my mouse and keyboard to play with a wii. To me the wii offers nothing but awful motion sensors to equally shitty graphics, [b][r]IMO[/r][/b].
Wait, just modern warfare? What's the point in that? The game is from 2007... They should have done modern warfare 2 instead.
[QUOTE=Xyrec;16799000]Probably using 64x64 textures. :aaaaa:[/QUOTE]
God forbid they don't do an ID and scream about how companies are nazis because they want to use stupidly sized textures.
It looks a heck of a lot better than World at War.
Third-party developers are still total shit at making graphics on the Wii. There's one game every so often that really tries (Conduit), but the rest of them are just completely unoptimized and effortless shit. I've read a lot of blogs from devs who complain loudly about other devs being completely fucking lazy with Wii graphics; most of them simply don't care to learn how to use the proprietary technology and choose instead to develop on an older platform and just port the work over, cutting corners as they go to reduce framerate loss (And guess what that means? Yup, it means that the graphics get even SHITTIER). Thanks for continuing the trend, Activision.
too blocky i mean look at the snipers gun!!
Haha, it looks horrible.
WAAAHMBULANCE IS HERE
:bandwagon:
NO WAIT WHERE'S THE WAAHMBULANCE
Oh god a game looks terrible on the Wii let's point and laugh at it!!!11!!!111!
You people act like graphics mean everything, shit.
[QUOTE=killz2much;16815904]Oh god a game looks terrible on the Wii let's point and laugh at it!!!11!!!111!
You people act like graphics mean everything, shit.[/QUOTE]
Story is needed and so is good gameplay.
But you at least should be able to look at the game without having to get eyestrain.
Would you defend the virtual boy saying that graphics aren't everything?
[QUOTE=killz2much;16815904]Oh god a game looks terrible on the Wii let's point and laugh at it!!!11!!!111!
You people act like graphics mean everything, shit.[/QUOTE]
I don't want a Wii game to look like Crysis, I know that the Wii isn't capable of something like that.
However, I DO want a Wii game to look at least decent, and MW for the Wii doesn't. Old SNES side-scrollers were more pleasant to the eye than this.
[QUOTE=ioc;16800191]gameplay > graphics[/QUOTE]
That's a released game-only argument.
well there is not much you can do with a 729mhz CPU and a 243mhz GPU that can make the graphics look like they are much better than The elder scrolls III: Morrowind.
[QUOTE=killz2much;16815904]Oh god a game looks terrible on the Wii let's point and laugh at it!!!11!!!111!
You people act like graphics mean everything, shit.[/QUOTE]
You act like this is a new game. If a new game is released, looks decent but the gameplay is absolutely amazing, people won't really care about graphics.
But we all know what CoD4 plays like and how it looked on 3 different consoles and they release it a year later and it looks bad. So we can complain about graphics.
It could have been worse, [b]much worse.[/b] If it wasn't for the horrendously low-res textures it would have been alright.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.