• Police suspect tech used X-rays, mammograms for sexual gratification
    37 replies, posted
[img]http://media.cleveland.com/metro/photo/jaime-aguirrejpg-316b1ebfa956ed27_small.jpg[/img] [quote]BRIMFIELD, Ohio — A technician at a Tiffin imaging center caught driving with a stash of X-rays, mammograms, videos and pictures of women and children used the images for sexual gratification, police believe. Jaime Aguirre, 42, of Willard, had hundreds of the images in his car when he was stopped Sunday in the township on a traffic violation, officers said. He was held in Portage County Jail in lieu of posting $250,000 bond. He is charged with four counts of possession of child pornography. His first hearing is Friday in Kent Municipal Court. "He had images of neck-to-knees X-rays and mammograms of women and girls under the age of 18 which we believe he was using for sexual gratification, those are in addition to the pictures of women and children undressing," said Brimfield Police Chief David Blough. "This is one of the strangest things I've ever seen." An officer stopped Aguirre for a traffic violation and thought the driver acted peculiarly, Blough said. Aguirre was returning home after attending a Pittsburgh Steelers football game. Police don't not know why he carried the images with him. "The officer saw file storage devices, like zip discs and memory sticks in the car, and asked if he could look inside the car," Blough said. "He also found marijuana in the car." Blough said when police started looking through the storage devices they found the images. There are names and identification numbers on the files. Blough said police officers will spend hundreds of hours examining the images. "It's a lot of work, but we owe it to the victims to be thorough," he said. Karen Vela, administrator of Advanced Medical Imaging in Tiffin, where Aguirre has worked since December of 2007, said it is still unclear whether the images were taken at the facility. "We have not yet compared the names and numbers," she said. Police also confiscated the computer and hundreds of CDs, DVDs and other storage devices from Aguirre's home in Huron County. Aguirre also had numerous pictures and videos of women taken in public, Blough said. Related topics: brimfield police, child pornography, mammograms, x-ray technician [/quote] [url]http://blog.cleveland.com/metro/2009/10/x-ray_technician_arrested_for.html[/url]
Wow, he is a genius
Meanwhile in LMAO threads...... [img]http://chzgifs.files.wordpress.com/2011/03/breathep1.gif[/img] [img]http://alexsuze.com/images/strap-on-x-ray.jpg[/img]
They should x-ray a guy getting hit in the face.
How is this child pornography?
I don't get why he was arrested, really, lol
[QUOTE=s0beit;28865347]I don't get why he was arrested, really, lol[/QUOTE] I don't see the difference between this and jacking off to some pics of kids from google images.
[QUOTE=DoctorSalt;28865272]Meanwhile in LMAO threads...... [img_thumb]http://chzgifs.files.wordpress.com/2011/03/breathep1.gif[/img_thumb][/QUOTE] ..What is going on in this??
[quote]Blough said police officers will spend hundreds of hours examining the images.[/quote] yeah it's only illegal when he does it :rolleyes:
[QUOTE=Quark:;28866669]..What is going on in this??[/QUOTE] Mouse in mouth?
[QUOTE=Richard Simmons;28865305]How is this child pornography?[/QUOTE] [QUOTE=Article]...in addition to the pictures of women and children undressing...[/QUOTE]
[quote]The officer saw file storage devices, like zip discs and memory sticks in the car, and asked if he could look inside the car[/quote] The funny thing is that it would've been 100% within his rights to say no and he wouldn't be in this predicament. Even if you don't have anything illegal in your possession you should still tell an officer they need a warrant to search the vehicle, they don't have the right to rummage through your stuff.
[QUOTE=Richard Simmons;28865305]How is this child pornography?[/QUOTE] how is it not jesus christ did you read the thread?
-snip-
[QUOTE=DoctorSalt;28865272]Meanwhile in LMAO threads...... [img_thumb]http://chzgifs.files.wordpress.com/2011/03/breathep1.gif[/img_thumb][/QUOTE] That's... Strangely erotic? Also you can't arrest someone because you believe their gonna jack off over something. That's like arresting anyone who wants to jack off over people wearing uniforms.
[QUOTE=Quark:;28866669]..What is going on in this??[/QUOTE] She is saying "blade"
[img]http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTm8ebb0IlyCDIhNxYh42XVuNDYfw3uF9QzMc4C_fLvyLLE35Ah&t=1[/img] Awesome
[b]zip discs[/b] holy fuck do those still exist
[QUOTE=M2k3;28866747]The funny thing is that it would've been 100% within his rights to say no and he wouldn't be in this predicament. Even if you don't have anything illegal in your possession you should still tell an officer they need a warrant to search the vehicle, they don't have the right to rummage through your stuff.[/QUOTE] You tell them they need a warrent, they will instantly go on the radio and say "I got a refusal." Then they'll call the K9 unit to get into your car.
[QUOTE=VistaPOWA;28869615][b]zip discs[/b] holy fuck do those still exist[/QUOTE] um legacy hardware still exists everywhere
[QUOTE=Quark:;28866669]..What is going on in this??[/QUOTE] It's a woman talking. The thing moving back and forth is her tongue.
[QUOTE=brianosaur;28870302]You tell them they need a warrent, they will instantly go on the radio and say "I got a refusal." Then they'll call the K9 unit to get into your car.[/QUOTE] if you dont have anything illegal in your car you could sue the state for violating your fourth amendment right to unwarranted searches [editline]31st March 2011[/editline] hell even if you do have something illegal in your car you could still sue them probably
[QUOTE=yawmwen;28918169]if you dont have anything illegal in your car you could sue the state for violating your fourth amendment right to unwarranted searches [editline]31st March 2011[/editline] hell even if you do have something illegal in your car you could still sue them probably[/QUOTE] Most likely not in this case. It is mentioned that he had marijuana in the car, the officer probably smelled it, and proceeded under the circumstances of probable cause.
[QUOTE=ExplodingGuy;28918710]Most likely not in this case. It is mentioned that he had marijuana in the car, the officer probably smelled it, and proceeded under the circumstances of probable cause.[/QUOTE] Um no the article would have said that. It said he asked to search after seeing the storage devices. It's really not hard to conceal the smell. [editline]31st March 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=brianosaur;28870302]You tell them they need a warrent, they will instantly go on the radio and say "I got a refusal." Then they'll call the K9 unit to get into your car.[/QUOTE] Doesn't work that way.
[quote]"The officer saw file storage devices, like zip discs and memory sticks in the car, and asked if he could look inside the car," Blough said. "He also found marijuana in the car."[/quote] So what, if i leave a couple of my 2GB USB sticks in the car, the cops are going to go "SEARCH!"? And then they find my grass and do some big bustage over NOTHING? Geez, what has the law lowered itself to...
There's no way this guy is gonna go to jail. The pot might get him in trouble, but even then he can just say he didn't willingly let them search his car, and he gets off.
oh yeah look at those skeletons so hot
Why would someone want to do that? Maybe he really cares about his work and brings it home with him?
[QUOTE=Miskatonic;28869435][img_thumb]http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTm8ebb0IlyCDIhNxYh42XVuNDYfw3uF9QzMc4C_fLvyLLE35Ah&t=1[/img_thumb] Awesome[/QUOTE] holy shit, shes got no hair!
[QUOTE=RBM11;28921313]Um no the article would have said that. It said he asked to search after seeing the storage devices. It's really not hard to conceal the smell. [editline]31st March 2011[/editline] Doesn't work that way.[/QUOTE] then what way does it work?
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.