• Obama is the ‘worst president in history,’ claims worst Vice President in history
    267 replies, posted
Obama isn't the problem, it's all the dumbfuck republicans in congress voting all his bills down so he looks bad.
Wow, he hasn't even been in office for a year yet and people are already judging him? [B]Edit:[/B] give me boxes
[QUOTE=ButtsexV2;24025811][url]http://www.google.com/search?q=%22the+buck+stops+here%22[/url][/QUOTE] Let me put it to you this way, he isn't fucking God and he sure as hell is the most important part of the democratic system. President's are essentially commercials, the Hitch Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy put it best with Zaphod Bebblebrox. [QUOTE=Emperor Scorpious II;24025807]The president is more or less the face of the government. What ever the government does, for better or for worse, gets credited to him.[/QUOTE] Exactly, that's what I'm trying to say.
Oh my god Dan Quayle had a son? And he's in politics? AND HE' S CRITICIZING SOMEONE?!
[QUOTE=Killer900;24025854]Wow, he hasn't even been in office for a year yet and people are already judging him?[/QUOTE] He's been in office for almost 2 I believe.
[QUOTE=ButtsexV2;24025710]we already won. we just don't have an exit strategy. we won years ago.[/QUOTE]And when we pull out everything goes to hell again, just like Nam.
[QUOTE=Combine_dumb;24025846]Obama isn't the problem, it's all the dumbfuck republicans in congress voting all his bills down so he looks bad.[/QUOTE] And there's 'merican politics for ya folks.
[QUOTE=Killer900;24025854]Wow, he hasn't even been in office for a year yet and people are already judging him?[/QUOTE] :geno:
[QUOTE=Killer900;24025854]Wow, he hasn't even been in office for a year yet and people are already judging him?[/QUOTE] [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama[/url] [quote][b]Assumed office [/b] January 20, 2009[/quote] that's more than a year bro
Yes... Obama really is the worst president ever. :hurr: [IMG]http://ts3.mm.bing.net/images/thumbnail.aspx?q=196045906790&id=febae1999e79231ad74c6ffd2033b2cd&index=ch1[/IMG]
[QUOTE=ButtsexV2;24025811][url]http://www.google.com/search?q=%22the+buck+stops+here%22[/url][/QUOTE] Wow great argument no wait not really
No, Buchanan was.
has everyone forgot about good ole' George Bush Senior? I'd be willing to throw his name into the hat for "worst president" title.
[QUOTE=DOG-GY;24025904]Wow great argument no wait not really[/QUOTE] wow great rebuttal no wait not really You can't give a contentless rebuttal, it just doesn't work like that
[QUOTE=ButtsexV2;24025893][url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama[/url] that's more than a year bro[/QUOTE]Oh wow...:doh:
[QUOTE=Fkpuz Version 1;24025944]has everyone forgot about good ole' George Bush Senior? I'd be willing to throw his name into the hat for "worst president" title.[/QUOTE] Bush Senior wasn't a bad president by any means.
[QUOTE=MrAfroShark70;24025765]He's a good president but the congress is restraining him too hard. Plus, the president isn't the most important person, why not talk about the congress, or legislative, or judicial branches of the government? Why does it always have to be fucking Obama! [img]http://img62.imageshack.us/img62/6289/getthefuckout.gif[/img][/QUOTE] This is kinda' funny, it's like a double standard for Bush. why does it always have to be fucking Bush? You do realize that the house speaker Nacy Pelosi had to sign the bill allowing funding for the Iraq war? They could've cut funding anytime they wished, they openly "protest" the war but they don't do shit. IE: all presidents suck except George Washington
[QUOTE=ButtsexV2;24025946]wow great rebuttal no wait not really You can't give a contentless rebuttal, it just doesn't work like that[/QUOTE] Well, I don't get it, could you please explain?
[QUOTE=Mr.Dounut;24025951] IE: all presidents suck except George Washington[/QUOTE] Hey. HEY. TR was pretty badass.
[QUOTE=Mr.Dounut;24025951] IE: all presidents suck except George Washington[/QUOTE] [img]http://www.ralphmag.org/BE/fdr-rain373x439.gif[/img]
[QUOTE=Emperor Scorpious II;24025983]Hey. HEY. TR was pretty badass.[/QUOTE] Teddy was too much of an imperialistic dick, FDR was way cooler.
So Nixon never existed and the Watergate never happened?
[QUOTE=Emperor Scorpious II;24025983]Hey. HEY. TR was pretty badass.[/QUOTE] What about Lincoln, he survived for 9 hours after he was shot.
[QUOTE=ButtsexV2;24025946]wow great rebuttal no wait not really You can't give a contentless rebuttal, it just doesn't work like that[/QUOTE] Saying that a president took responsibilities for the nations problems is great and all but you can't seriously believe that's true. That would mean he has absolute control. I thought this was so obvious it didn't even need to be stated. God damn
[QUOTE=Xen Tricks;24026002]Teddy was too much of an imperialistic dick, FDR was way cooler.[/QUOTE] All my history teachers have always told me "You either like one or the other". So far, I have yet to see this disproved.
[QUOTE=Wayword;24025713]Trying to implement national health care. Trying to pull out of the war on terror. Repeal bush tax cuts[/QUOTE] We don't need national healthcare. It's going to increase our taxation on the people. The middle class is shrinking very rapidly. The rich are getting richer and the poor are getting poorer. Out of all the people who do not have healthcare, most admitted they could afford it, but didn't want to recieve it. The old system of private insurances providing healthcare to it's clients worked just fine. On the war on terror, why should we pull out? We're the only things keeping the taliban, al-quada, the average jihadist from taking back Iraq, and Afghanhistan. The Iraqi, and Afghani goverments aren't ready yet to handle things, and the US forces in the middle east are protecting the population. Yea, innocent people have died, but unfortunatley innocents die in war. Looked what happened in Vietnam. Right after the we pulled out of Vietnam. Within months the NVA over ran the South Vietnamese Army. They weren't ready yet, and if pull out now the same thing will happen and the terrorists will again gain power. How are high taxes good? If anything taxes should be kept low. If taxes are low the citizens have more to spend. If they have more to spend companies start to get money and with that money the start to gain stability. They use that money to hire new workers, and inturn the population gets that money back in the form of a paycheck. It would boost the economy, and local economies. If we tax the population and businesses both have less to spend, and give back to the workforce. The population's flow of money dwidles down to the point where the companies tart to lose money. If the companies start to lose money they lay off workers and if it continues the economy grinds to a halt with no flow of money from the consumer to the provider, back to the consumer. This is my opinion if you don't agree with it too bad.
[QUOTE=Emperor Scorpious II;24026026]All my history teachers have always told me "You either like one or the other". So far, I have yet to see this disproved.[/QUOTE] Wait, what? I can understand liking Teddy, but not liking FDR? :confused:
[QUOTE=MrAfroShark70;24026018]What about Lincoln, he survived for 9 hours after he was shot.[/QUOTE] Yeah, but TR single handedly conquered Cuba, personally gave Columbia the middle finger AND wrestled grizzly bears one on one. [editline]09:29PM[/editline] [QUOTE=Xen Tricks;24026056]Wait, what? I can understand liking Teddy, but not liking FDR? :confused:[/QUOTE] From what they say, it's a combination of not just their policies, but who personality and character as well.
Mis-leading thread title, read the real article. It's about his failing support.
I'm confused how you can not like fdr
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.