• Obama releasing information "imperative to national security" - Turn on the news
    276 replies, posted
they finally got osama?
-snip!-
[QUOTE=Detective P;29562292]CNN: All government agencies and alert levels raised for the moment, worries over "immediate retaliation", still waiting for Obama to speak.[/QUOTE] Watching CNN and NBC, both say 8-12 minutes.
Wow, they raised Obama's security level, I guess, really high, for this speech.
I'm digging a fallout shelter under my desk as we speak
I like how the White House live stream doesn't have the "speech beginning at 10:30" anymore
I'm not sure who I trust more, the uninformed important looking man in front of the blue wall on NBC, or the uninformed angry looking woman.
The CNN website should be streaming Obama's speech when he starts.
Im still on the fence about this: Photos or it didnt happen.
Well I know who I'm voting for in 2012. [editline]1st May 2011[/editline] Guys, it's [B][I]over[/I][/B]. We can actually leave Afghanistan knowing we're technically done.
Just as Reagan takes credit for ending the Cold War, so too does Obama now take credit for ending terrorism.
[QUOTE=JasperWB;29562381]I'm not sure who I trust more, the uninformed important looking man in front of the blue wall on NBC, or the uninformed angry looking woman.[/QUOTE] i trust box news
[QUOTE=Canuhearme?;29562442]Well I know who I'm voting for in 2012. [editline]1st May 2011[/editline] Guys, it's [B][I]over[/I][/B]. We can actually leave Afghanistan knowing we're technically done.[/QUOTE] HAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHA. No. Now we have to spend 7 years rebuilding.
[QUOTE=Canuhearme?;29562442]Guys, it's [B][I]over[/I][/B]. We can actually leave Afghanistan knowing we're technically done.[/QUOTE] Not really. Afghanistan was about fighting the Taliban, not Al-Queda. They're two different organizations.
Took 9 and a half years too long, but I'm glad that goat fucker's gone.
[QUOTE=Detective P;29562471]HAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHA. No. Now we have to spend 7 years rebuilding.[/QUOTE] We've already been rebuilding for more than that. Just destroy the main command structure of these organisations so another gang, the Afghan government, can take hold.
This is outragous, he shouldn't have been killed, They should have captured him and put him on trial in New York city.
[QUOTE=Novistador;29562546]This is outragous, he shouldn't have been killed, They should have captured him and put him on trial in New York city.[/QUOTE] If it's between killing him there or letting him potentially escaping again, I'll take having him dead.
[img]http://img15.imageshack.us/img15/6379/unleduz.png[/img]
[QUOTE=Fhenexx;29562483]Not really. Afghanistan was about fighting the Taliban, not Al-Queda. They're two different organizations.[/QUOTE] They were only concerned with the Taliban was because they were harboring high ranking Al-Queda members.
[QUOTE=Novistador;29562546]This is outragous, he shouldn't have been killed, They should have captured him and put him on trial in New York city.[/QUOTE] Where a mob of heavily armed people will garuntee he never makes it to the courthouse.
[QUOTE=Detective P;29562564]If it's between killing him there or letting him potentially escaping again, I'll take having him dead.[/QUOTE] Your avatar is a picture of colonel sanders, your argument is invalid.
[QUOTE=Devodiere;29562496]We've already been rebuilding for more than that. Just destroy the main command structure of these organisations so another gang, the Afghan government, can take hold.[/QUOTE] The Afghanistan government was the Taliban pretty much.
[QUOTE=Novistador;29562546]This is outragous, he shouldn't have been killed, They should have captured him and put him on trial in New York city.[/QUOTE] Also I was being sarcastic.
Damn, they finally got him.. :c00lbert:
[QUOTE=Zeddy;29562607]The Afghanistan government was the Taliban pretty much.[/QUOTE] The new one then, Karzai's not so Fundamentalist but still corrupt and shit government.
CNN is reporting there's a large crowd gathering outside of the White House chanting the Star Spangled Banner.
[QUOTE=Novistador;29562596]Your avatar is a picture of colonel sanders, your argument is invalid.[/QUOTE] It's Trotsky.
What was that shit a week back, about if he was killed or caught nuclear storms would ensue?
So, how exactly? Air strike? Drone strike? A Delta Force guy personally shooting him in the face?
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.