• FL. Horse Murderer
    107 replies, posted
[QUOTE=rilez;16608133]Typical response, can't say I didn't expect it. Whenever these threads crop up there's always some idiot that says "BURN HIM AT THE STAKE, SO & SO ANIMAL IS THE BEST AND HE SHOULD BE BRUTALLY MURDERED FOR IT" or something to that effect. Grow up.[/QUOTE] You know he's saying that because now there's one less horse for him to fuck, or be fucked by.
[QUOTE=rilez;16608133]I don't see what's wrong with it if he's using the meat.[/QUOTE] The horses don't belong to him dear [editline]04:32AM[/editline] [QUOTE=rilez;16614154]Well, it's his fault for leaving them right out in the open where someone could get to them.[/QUOTE] Good point, maybe he should have kept his horse in his house [editline]04:33AM[/editline] Oh wait that would be STUPID
[QUOTE=TH89;16616245]The horses don't belong to him dear [editline]04:32AM[/editline] Good point, maybe he should have kept his horse in his house [editline]04:33AM[/editline] Oh wait that would be STUPID[/QUOTE] he should have kept them locked up in the barn, if the guy did it during the night the farmer was stupid to let his horse graze that late. also it's so easy to get a rise out of you guys it's almost incredible [QUOTE=Xenomoose;16615450]you are the stupidest person I have ever read the words of. I mean, it's not like these are fucking wild horses roaming the prairies and grazing on some grass. this is another person's fucking property! I'm guessing that by your logic, any person who breaks into houses and steals all of their valuables should be treated lightly because "they need the money". for a crack den, maybe. :rolleyes: also, you used the "if you were in his shoes" arguement, so I shall fire back. what if you were the one who owned that horse. spent 30K raising it, feeding it, and keeping it healthy, grew a fucking bond between you and it, and someone goes and butchers it. would you let it slip because "he needed the meat". and lastly, if you read the article fully you'd see that the police suspect there may be a "black market demand". this isn't some homeless guy killing horses because he's starving. this is some guy taking the fucking meat and selling it to rich foreign so they can have a fancy dinner. that's not necessity, it's fucking greed. in short, kindly shut the fuck up and get out.[/QUOTE] no, i'm just saying that if the guy truly needed to eat, it's not as morally wrong as just out right killing a horse. it's still wrong, just not as wrong. if he was doing it for the black market then I apologize, the guy is a dick. [quote]also, you used the "if you were in his shoes" arguement, so I shall fire back. what if you were the one who owned that horse. spent 30K raising it, feeding it, and keeping it healthy, grew a fucking bond between you and it, and someone goes and butchers it. would you let it slip because "he needed the meat".[/quote] if he really needed it and wasn't just going to sell it, then i'd probably force him to work on my farm or some shit to pay it off. if the horse is dead, the horse is dead. no need to make a starving mans life any worse
[QUOTE=rilez;16617551]he should have kept them locked up in the barn, if the guy did it during the night the farmer was stupid to let his horse graze that late. also it's so easy to get a rise out of you guys it's almost incredible no, i'm just saying that if the guy truly needed to eat, it's not as morally wrong as just out right killing a horse. it's still wrong, just not as wrong. if he was doing it for the black market then I apologize, the guy is a dick. if he really needed it and wasn't just going to sell it, then i'd probably force him to work on my farm or some shit to pay it off. if the horse is dead, the horse is dead. no need to make a starving mans life any worse[/QUOTE] Explain how it's logical to sneak on to private property, find a horse, kill it (which by the way I assume it's harder than you think), butcher it, and eat it. Mind you if he [b]really[/b] wanted to eat, it would be entirely impractical to kill a horse, seeing as you would have [b]no way[/b] to haul and properly preserve the meat, you'd be making a massive amount of food go to waste, unless you had access to certain commodities which cost [b]money[/b], which in itself contradicts the whole idea as if you had money you could buy real food. That's why it is impractical to kill even 1 (let alone 19) horse if you're truley a starving madman who needs food, and why eating at a soup kitchen makes more sense than any of the insanely dumb points you're trying to make. Once again you have to be trolling.
[QUOTE=Rofl my Waff;16617774]Explain how it's logical to sneak on to private property, find a horse, kill it (which by the way I assume it's harder than you think), butcher it, and eat it. Mind you if he [b]really[/b] wanted to eat, it would be entirely impractical to kill a horse, seeing as you would have [b]no way[/b] to haul and properly preserve the meat, you'd be making a massive amount of food go to waste, unless you had access to certain commodities which cost [b]money[/b], which in itself contradicts the whole idea as if you had money you could buy real food. That's why it is impractical to kill even 1 (let alone 19) horse if you're truley a starving madman who needs food, and why eating at a soup kitchen makes more sense than any of the insanely dumb points you're trying to make. Once again you have to be trolling.[/QUOTE] Do they have soup kitchens out in country? This guy could live in the woods for all you know. Do you think he's going to walk that entire distance (if he was starving he'd probably die of exhaustion) just for a bowl of soup, when there's a horse right in front of him that no one is guarding? I think you'd be surprised the lengths that a starving man would go to in order to get food. Hell, I'm sure he'd even walk the distance to the soup kitchen if that was the only way, but then he'd probably die. As for one guy killing 19 horses to sell? Yeah, that's a dick move.
[QUOTE=rilez;16617892]Do they have soup kitchens out in country? This guy could live in the woods for all you know. Do you think he's going to walk that entire distance (if he was starving he'd probably die of exhaustion) just for a bowl of soup, when there's a horse right in front of him that no one is guarding? I think you'd be surprised the lengths that a starving man would go to in order to get food. Hell, I'm sure he'd even walk the distance to the soup kitchen if that was the only way, but then he'd probably die. As for one guy killing 19 horses to sell? Yeah, that's a dick move.[/QUOTE] I find it very difficult to believe a starving man would have the strength to kill a horse.
[QUOTE=rilez;16617892]Do they have soup kitchens out in country? This guy could live in the woods for all you know. Do you think he's going to walk that entire distance (if he was starving he'd probably die of exhaustion) just for a bowl of soup, when there's a horse right in front of him that no one is guarding? I think you'd be surprised the lengths that a starving man would go to in order to get food. Hell, I'm sure he'd even walk the distance to the soup kitchen if that was the only way, but then he'd probably die. As for one guy killing 19 horses to sell? Yeah, that's a dick move.[/QUOTE] Uhhhhhh.... So let's get this straight, to make your insane story sound logical we must first assume A man wanders on to a farm, 1. He is a man about to collapse from starvation (despite having eaten 18 horses mind you) 2. He is a pro horse wrestler and can kill them, butcher them, and eat them 3. He lives in the woods 4. He has no access at all to any food and can't simply ask for it 5. He's insane because once again, he lives in the woods with no access to food Also I'm gonna point out the stupidity in this statement "you'd be surprised the lengths that a starving man would go to in order to get food." 1. If that's true why did you say earlier it's illogical to eat a cat 2. bahhahahah and you think locking them up in a barn is going to save them if there's a wild-rabid-horse-wrestling-stark-raving-mad-wood-dweller starving man? Once again this is all a moot point as none of that is what actually happened and you just sound stupid.
I myself love me a horse so it's a sad day for me. Poor person :(
[QUOTE=Rofl my Waff;16617981]Uhhhhhh.... So let's get this straight, to make your insane story sound logical we must first assume A man wanders on to a farm, 1. He is a man about to collapse from starvation (despite having eaten 18 horses mind you) 2. He is a pro horse wrestler and can kill them, butcher them, and eat them 3. He lives in the woods 4. He has no access at all to any food and can't simply ask for it 5. He's insane because once again, he lives in the woods with no access to food Also I'm gonna point out the stupidity in this statement "you'd be surprised the lengths that a starving man would go to in order to get food." 1. If that's true why did you say earlier it's illogical to eat a cat 2. bahhahahah and you think locking them up in a barn is going to save them if there's a wild-rabid-horse-wrestling-stark-raving-mad-wood-dweller starving man? Once again this is all a moot point as none of that is what actually happened and you just sound stupid.[/QUOTE] I think it's incredible that you're missing the point entirely. Here's my point; if there was a starving man with no other means to eat, other than killing the horse, and he somehow managed to do so, it's understandable. Not acceptable, but you shouldn't just condemn the guy. I'm not talking about the guy in the news, so why do you keep bringing up 19 horses? If you're going to ignore my point, I'll just play the story game with you: 1) A man who may or may not have eaten in a day or two stumbles upon a farm. This is so far out in the country that there are no other buildings for miles. It does not matter how he got there. 2) He saw a horse, unguarded, grazing in the pasture. This guy is starving. He needs something to eat. Adrenaline kicks in. 3) He used the last of his energy combined with the adrenaline and smashes the horse's skull with the largest rock he could find (perhaps the horse was asleep so it had no chance to react. this took place during the night after all) 4) Using a farming tool he found laid against the fence, he cut some of the meat off of the body, ran back into the woods, and ate the meat raw. Is that not believable? Seems so to me. [editline]02:05AM[/editline] it's pathetic you made me get so offtopic
[QUOTE=rilez;16618178]I think it's incredible that you're missing the point entirely. Here's my point; if there was a starving man with no other means to eat, other than killing the horse, and he somehow managed to do so, it's understandable. Not acceptable, but you shouldn't just condemn the guy. I'm not talking about the guy in the news, so why do you keep bringing up 19 horses? If you're going to ignore my point, I'll just play the story game with you: 1) A man who may or may not have eaten in a day or two stumbles upon a farm. This is so far out in the country that there are no other buildings for miles. It does not matter how he got there. 2) He saw a horse, unguarded, grazing in the pasture. This guy is starving. He needs something to eat. Adrenaline kicks in. 3) He used the last of his energy combined with the adrenaline and smashes the horse's skull with the largest rock he could find (perhaps the horse was asleep so it had no chance to react. this took place during the night after all) 4) Using a farming tool he found laid against the fence, he cut some of the meat off of the body, ran back into the woods, and ate the meat raw. Is that not believable? Seems so to me. [editline]02:05AM[/editline] it's pathetic you made me get so offtopic[/QUOTE] No, that's not believable. Sorry to break it to you but just because something so incredibly far-fetched as that is [i]technically[/i] possible, it is retarded and very unlikely. Even so, I could settle with an insanely fatigued starving man killing one horse, despite the fact that any logical person would just ask the farmer for food. That's not the point of this thread, the point of this thread is that someone killed 19 horses who didn't need to, and how you somehow went from attempting to justify it to a completely different scenario in an attempt to make your babbling seem intelligent.
Godfather joke anyone?
[QUOTE=Rofl my Waff;16618481]No, that's not believable. Sorry to break it to you but just because something so incredibly far-fetched as that is [i]technically[/i] possible, it is retarded and very unlikely, even so. I could settle with an insanely fatigued starving man killing one horse, despite the fact that any logical person would just ask the farmer. That's not the point of this thread, the point of this thread is that someone killed 19 horses who didn't need to, and how you somehow went from attempting to justify it to a completely different scenario in an attempt to make your babbling seem intelligent.[/QUOTE] i wasn't attempting to justify this news story at all, before I knew it was black market I said it was good that he was using the meat and HQRSE went off his rocker and then you started telling me how hard it is to kill a horse if you're starving You win; you have shown me how hard it is for a starving man to kill 19 horses; something which I never even believed happened. I fold. My point was that if a starving man killed a horse, and used the meat to keep himself alive, I would understand his situation, rather than just go off and say "I would kill this person if I met him irl" like HQRSE did, and like most of FP does in threads like these I'm done posting in animal abuse type threads, you can send these people all the death threats you want, I give up.
Well, at least the horse is in a better place. But honestly, who murders a HORSE? They're perfectly decent creatures, don't even LIKE human flesh. Hope that madman gets his comeuppance, namely death by horse.
[QUOTE=rilez;16618554]i wasn't attempting to justify this news story at all, before I knew it was black market I said it was good that he was using the meat and HQRSE went off his rocker and then you started telling me how hard it is to kill a horse if you're starving You win; you have shown me how hard it is for a starving man to kill 19 horses; something which I never even believed happened. I fold. My point was that if a starving man killed a horse, and used the meat to keep himself alive, I would understand his situation, rather than just go off and say "I would kill this person if I met him irl" like HQRSE did, and like most of FP does in threads like these I'm done posting in animal abuse type threads, you can send these people all the death threats you want, I give up.[/QUOTE] No where in any of your original posts did you indicate that you were talking about a theoretical situation, now you're sounding like someone who's covering his tracks. Once again if you think it's alright just because you're using the meat then you're pretty dumb. But we've already been over that. This totally sounds like you're talking about someone else and not the person who killed 19 horses, and it's totally believable that you never said anything about the original killer [quote]I don't see what's wrong with it if he's using the meat.[/quote]
[QUOTE=Rofl my Waff;16618572]Once again if you think it's alright just because you're using the meat then you're pretty dumb. But we've already been over that.[/QUOTE] once again that was never my point; i said it was understandable, not acceptable my point was that you shouldn't threaten to kill a man because he killed a horse because you never know what kind of situation they're in [editline]02:36AM[/editline] [QUOTE=Rofl my Waff;16618572]No where in any of your original posts did you indicate that you were talking about a theoretical situation, now you're sounding like someone who's covering his tracks.[/QUOTE] "If you were a starving man and you found an unguarded horse, would you take the opportunity?"
I don't like horses, they have creepy smiles :tinfoil: [img]http://img.thesun.co.uk/multimedia/archive/00698/horse_280x390_698041a.jpg[/img]
[quote] "He was ridden by everybody," she says. "He was irreplaceable." [/quote] :q: :smug:
[QUOTE=HQRSE;16606483]No, but horses are just so innocent.[/QUOTE] Until you take their innocence.
[QUOTE=rilez;16618612]once again that was never my point; i said it was understandable, not acceptable my point was that you shouldn't threaten to kill a man because he killed a horse because you never know what kind of situation they're in [editline]02:36AM[/editline] "If you were a starving man and you found an unguarded horse, would you take the opportunity?"[/QUOTE] Not only was that not your original post, that was you trying to manipulate what actually happened to make your retarded philosophy somewhat justifiable. Also you forgot this [quote]This totally sounds like you're talking about someone else and not the person who killed 19 horses, and it's totally believable that you never said anything about the original killer [/quote]
[QUOTE=The Slayer;16605551][img]http://www.jonco48.com/blog/happy_20horse.jpg[/img][/QUOTE] The best thing about eating grass isn't having bad teeth, but showing everyone online I do.
[QUOTE=Rofl my Waff;16618655]Not only was that not your original post, that was you trying to manipulate what actually happened to make your retarded philosophy somewhat justifiable.[/QUOTE] i must be marty mcfly where the fuck did I park the delorean
Sorry I forgot, the original post on page one happened after the posts on page two. You're right, I guess you can travel through time.
[quote]This totally sounds like you're talking about someone else and not the person who killed 19 horses, and it's totally believable that you never said anything about the original killer[/quote] you're right, that was before i knew he was selling the meat to the black market
[QUOTE=rilez;16618679]you're right, that was before i knew he was selling the meat to the black market[/QUOTE] So before that you found it completely logical to assume something that is incredibly illogical? Not only that, but you're making less and less sense. [quote]I think it's incredible that you're missing the point entirely. Here's my point; if there was a starving man with no other means to eat, other than killing the horse, and he somehow managed to do so, it's understandable. Not acceptable, but you shouldn't just condemn the guy. [b]I'm not talking about the guy in the news, so why do you keep bringing up 19 horses? If you're going to ignore my point, I'll just play the story game with you:[/b] 1) A man who may or may not have eaten in a day or two stumbles upon a farm. This is so far out in the country that there are no other buildings for miles. It does not matter how he got there. 2) He saw a horse, unguarded, grazing in the pasture. This guy is starving. He needs something to eat. Adrenaline kicks in. 3) He used the last of his energy combined with the adrenaline and smashes the horse's skull with the largest rock he could find (perhaps the horse was asleep so it had no chance to react. this took place during the night after all) 4) Using a farming tool he found laid against the fence, he cut some of the meat off of the body, ran back into the woods, and ate the meat raw. Is that not believable? Seems so to me. Edited: it's pathetic you made me get so offtopic [/quote] Right here you state that you were not talking about a person killing 19 horses, only one.
[QUOTE=Rofl my Waff;16618707]So before that you found it completely logical to assume something that is incredibly illogical and not likely? Not only that, but you're making less and less sense. Right here you state that you were not talking about a person killing 19 horses, only one.[/QUOTE] what the fuck are you doing i said that it was good that he was atleast using the meat. this was before i knew it was black market. my next post was the one where I said imagine a starving guy killing one horse i don't know how you get confused over something simple like that [editline]02:47AM[/editline] not counting the beetlejuice joke
[QUOTE=rilez;16618727]what the fuck are you doing i said that it was good that he was atleast using the meat. this was before i knew it was black market. my next post was the one where I said imagine a starving guy killing one horse i don't know how you get confused over something simple like that [editline]02:47AM[/editline] not counting the beetlejuice joke[/QUOTE] I'm not getting confused I'll put this in sequencial order 1. You state it's alright to kill 19 horses if you use the meat 2. You state that (in a completely different scenario) killing 1 horse if you're starving is alright 3. I say that's logical but still stupid and not likely 4 You state that you were exclusively talking about a situation where the guy might have been starving, despite earlier saying that a starving man would only kill 1 horse to justify the strength issue. 5. You then state that before you knew the black market bit, you assumed it was alright because he could have been starving.
[QUOTE=Rofl my Waff;16618764]I'm not getting confused I'll put this in sequencial order 1. You state it's alright to kill 19 horses if you use the meat 2. You state that (in a completely different scenario) killing 1 horse if you're starving is alright 3. I say that's logical but still stupid and not likely 4 You state that you were exclusively talking about a situation where the guy might have been starving, despite earlier saying that a starving man would only kill 1 horse. 5. You then state that before you knew the black market bit, you assumed it was alright because he could have been starving.[/QUOTE] if you say so
I'm glad we finally agree.
[QUOTE=Rofl my Waff;16610946] "some dude just cut the head off my cat, it's okay though cause he explained the situation and told me he was gonna use the meat"[/QUOTE] Actually it's a tactical idea for soldiers behind enemy lines (usually only good in rural areas) to kill small and roaming animals, like cats, for food instead of things you'd expect to be killed, but would end up buttfucking the person killing it because it's so obvious, like a penned cow or a horse (although it was on a ten-acre ranch). Back to horses.
[QUOTE=cccritical;16618817]Actually it's a tactical idea for soldiers behind enemy lines (usually only good in rural areas) to kill small and roaming animals, like cats, for food instead of things you'd expect to be killed, but would end up buttfucking the person killing it because it's so obvious, like a penned cow or a horse (although it was on a ten-acre ranch). Back to horses.[/QUOTE] but that could be someones pet how could you do that, that's so mean! :( [editline]02:58AM[/editline] rofl I just want you to know I never meant to get into that stupid argument, I've just seen two or three animal abuse threads that generally consist of angry nerds throwing death threats over the internet
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.