• Marine who urinated on dead Taliban sentenced to 30 days in jail
    352 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Governor Goblin;38916980]You've changed my mind. Going to dig up your dead relatives and eat them[/QUOTE] isnt that illegal as well? you dont see how odd and double standard this entire shit is?
[QUOTE=lolwutdude;38916962]why is desecration criminal? just because it 'hurts' your feelings and its 'obscene' to you, doesnt mean it should be illegal![/QUOTE] are people really so desperate to justify every action US soldiers commit that we're now questioning why desecration is illegal?
[QUOTE=lolwutdude;38916986]uh, its a corpse, it cant feel pain and go 'ouch stop thats assault', but i guess we should treat corpses with utmost respect while we allow westboro to heinously grief already fragile minded parents cause its freedom of speech???[/QUOTE] I don't see how these two things are the inverse, so how can you be comparing them? They are both bad.
[QUOTE=Lachz0r;38916999]are people really so desperate to justify every action US soldiers commit that we're now questioning why desecration is illegal?[/QUOTE] im not justifying shit, im against desecration of corpses, im pointing out how fucking hilariously stupid it is we're saying its not okay and should be criminal to piss on corpses while its okay to grief grieving parents in order incite reaction to get lawsuits while indoctrinating their children, cause i'd say the latter is [B]worse[/B]
[QUOTE=lolwutdude;38916995]isnt that illegal as well? you dont see how odd and double standard this entire shit is?[/QUOTE] You just tried to justify that!
lolwutdude pls stop
[QUOTE=lolwutdude;38916986]uh, its a corpse, it cant feel pain and go 'ouch stop thats assault', but i guess we should treat corpses with utmost respect while we allow westboro to heinously grief already fragile minded parents cause its freedom of speech???[/QUOTE] You were asking why pissing on corpses isn't protected as free speech (stupid question) and why what the WBC does is. One is desecration, and one is free speech. The WBC already has some restrictions on how close they can protest, they have to be pretty far out in the distance.
[QUOTE=lolwutdude;38917024]im not justifying shit, im against desecration of corpses, im pointing out how fucking hilariously stupid it is we're saying its not okay and should be criminal to piss on corpses while its okay to grief grieving parents in order incite reaction to get lawsuits while indoctrinating their children, cause i'd say the latter is [B]worse[/B][/QUOTE] well, the WBC doesn't have to abide by the geneva convention or the set of standards that you agree to follow when you become a soldier [editline]21st December 2012[/editline] and yeah, we have laws against desecration, not against free speech
[QUOTE=Starpluck;38917043]You were asking why pissing on corpses isn't protected as free speech (stupid question) and why what the WBC does is. One is desecration, and one is free speech. The WBC already has some restrictions on how close they can protest, they have to be pretty far out in the distance.[/QUOTE] its not a stupid question, you guys get your panties in a twist when we try to legally obstruct westboro from mentally torturing grieving parents by protesting a funeral ( which is honestly desecration, they're intentionally saying shit to incite reaction, preferably violence, to create lawsuits ) saying its THEIR RIGHT, but suddenly a dumbass marine pees on corpses, we're having pitchforks to get him charged for such 'OBSCENE GESTURE'!!! both acts are fucking horrendous if you really think pissing on a corpse is actually worse than what westboro does to other [B]living [/B]people, all i can say is lmao
[QUOTE=lolwutdude;38917086]its not a stupid question, you guys get your panties in a twist when we try to legally obstruct westboro from mentally torturing grieving parents by protesting a funeral ( which is honestly desecration, they're intentionally saying shit to incite reaction, preferably violence, to create lawsuits ) saying its THEIR RIGHT, but suddenly a dumbass marine pees on corpses, we're having pitchforks to get him charged for such 'OBSCENE GESTURE'!!! both acts are fucking horrendous if you really think pissing on a corpse is actually worse than what westboro does to other [B]living [/B]people, all i can say is lmao[/QUOTE] Yeah, it's not like that corpse had a family or anything.
[QUOTE=Melkor;38917105]Yeah, it's not like that corpse had a family or anything.[/QUOTE] just like the family of 27 dead people in connecticut, see how both acts are horrendous???
[QUOTE=lolwutdude;38917086]its not a stupid question, you guys get your panties in a twist when we try to legally obstruct westboro from mentally torturing grieving parents by protesting a funeral ( which is honestly desecration, they're intentionally saying shit to incite reaction, preferably violence, to create lawsuits ) saying its THEIR RIGHT, but suddenly a dumbass marine pees on corpses, we're having pitchforks to get him charged for such 'OBSCENE GESTURE'!!! both acts are fucking horrendous if you really think pissing on a corpse is actually worse than what westboro does to other [B]living [/B]people, all i can say is lmao[/QUOTE] well, first it's freedom of speech. it's kind of an important thing. second, you're trying to compare the actions of private citizens to the actions of a soldier
[QUOTE=lolwutdude;38917086]its not a stupid question, you guys get your panties in a twist when we try to legally obstruct westboro from mentally torturing grieving parents by protesting a funeral ( which is honestly desecration, they're intentionally saying shit to incite reaction, preferably violence, to create lawsuits ) saying its THEIR RIGHT, but suddenly a dumbass marine pees on corpses, we're having pitchforks to get him charged for such 'OBSCENE GESTURE'!!! both acts are fucking horrendous if you really think pissing on a corpse is actually worse than what westboro does to other [B]living [/B]people, all i can say is lmao[/QUOTE] it's not like it's WBC or soldiers urinating on corpses are the ONLY two options we must pick from to prosecute or morally allow. [editline]20th December 2012[/editline] [QUOTE=lolwutdude;38917115]just like the family of 27 dead people in connecticut, see how both acts are horrendous???[/QUOTE] Yes, so what's your fucking point?
[QUOTE=Lachz0r;38917117]well, first it's freedom of speech. it's kind of an important thing. second, you're trying to compare the actions of private citizens to the actions of a soldier[/QUOTE] yeah it is important, but if doing what westboro does to try gank money from grieving parents with their kind of method is freedom of speech, you might as well call pissing on a corpse freedom of speech, both acts are shit, just because you're a soldier doesnt mean you should be immune or vulnerable than others
it's really quite disgusting how many people try to justify American soldiers doing terrible things.
[QUOTE=lolwutdude;38917115]just like the family of 27 dead people in connecticut, see how both acts are horrendous???[/QUOTE] Except that the Westboro baptist church didn't pee on the 27 dead bodies.
[QUOTE=lolwutdude;38917115]just like the family of 27 dead people in connecticut, see how both acts are horrendous???[/QUOTE] Opinions aren't banned. Pissing on corpses are. Learn to distinguish the two because you're having difficulty. And yes while WBC's opinions are extremely insensitive, they must be 200 yards away from the cemetery itself and cordoned off. You're making it sound like their at the funeral procession in front of the families face when in fact they're pretty far away and would only get in contact with them as they're leaving the cemetry.
[QUOTE=Governor Goblin;38917126]it's not like it's WBC or soldiers urinating on corpses are the ONLY two options we must pick from to prosecute or morally allow. [editline]20th December 2012[/editline] Yes, so what's your fucking point?[/QUOTE] point is if you're going to criminalizes the act of pissing on a corpse, then you should be supporting legal obstruction of westboro's attempt to grief people at the funerals of the 27 dead people of connecticut and of future dumb shit they do
I can't believe I am seeing someone trying to justify pissing on a corpse. Dude, that is the ultimate disrespect. I may not agree with what WBC has to say, but they have a right to say it, even if it is hurtful. Pissing on a dead corpse is a completely different issue, I cannot convey just how wrong it is to do that.
[QUOTE=lolwutdude;38917154]yeah it is important, but if doing what westboro does to try gank money from grieving parents with their kind of method is freedom of speech, you might as well call pissing on a corpse freedom of speech, both acts are shit, just because you're a soldier doesnt mean you should be immune or vulnerable than others[/QUOTE] well actually when you decide to become a soldier you take on more responsibilities than you're a private citizen. responsibilities to uphold your military tradition, the military treaties of your nation and all that bullshit. that's why soldiers fucking around is worse than normal people, and if soldiers got a problem with that then they shouldn't sign up for it. but yeah, well, maybe the WBC should get done for being scam artists? surely it can be proven that what they do is for money, and don't like, those crazy stage christian dudes that scam people out of money get done for being scammers?
[QUOTE=lolwutdude;38917170]point is if you're going to criminalizes the act of pissing on a corpse, then you should be supporting legal obstruction of westboro's attempt to grief people at the funerals of the 27 dead people of connecticut and of future dumb shit they do[/QUOTE] no one is going to step on freedom of assembly nor should they
[QUOTE=SKEEA;38917180]I can't believe I am seeing someone trying to justify pissing on a corpse. Dude, that is the ultimate disrespect. I may not agree with what WBC has to say, but they have a right to say it, even if it is hurtful. Pissing on a dead corpse is a completely different issue, I cannot convey just how wrong it is to do that.[/QUOTE] where am i saying its okay to piss on corpses lol, im saying both shit are stupid and both are the 'ultimate disrespect', its not a completely different issue, one just involves piss other involves mental torture, this is so hilarious
[QUOTE=lolwutdude;38917170]point is if you're going to criminalizes the act of pissing on a corpse, then you should be supporting legal obstruction of westboro's attempt to grief people at the funerals of the 27 dead people of connecticut and of future dumb shit they do[/QUOTE] are you seriously trying to be an apologist for a representative of the strongest military on earth, part of a supposed bastion of freedom and democracy trying to liberate the afghani people, for doing something a 12 year old would think to do? like really what the fuck is your deal? [editline]20th December 2012[/editline] [QUOTE=lolwutdude;38917205]where am i saying its okay to piss on corpses lol, im saying both shit are stupid and both are the 'ultimate disrespect', its not a completely different issue, one just involves piss other involves mental torture, this is so hilarious[/QUOTE] you're trying pretty damn hard to make it seem like no big deal.
[QUOTE=SgtCr4zyGunz;38917206]are you seriously trying to be an apologist for a representative of the strongest military on earth, part of a supposed bastion of freedom and democracy trying to liberate the afghani people, for doing something a 12 year old would think to do? like really what the fuck is your deal? [editline]20th December 2012[/editline] you're trying pretty damn hard to make it seem like no big deal.[/QUOTE] uhm apologist implies i think the marine should not be charged???? i think he should be??? and its the same shit they do lol, what westboro does is 'not a big deal', but pissing on a corpse is
[QUOTE=lolwutdude;38917205]where am i saying its okay to piss on corpses lol, im saying both shit are stupid and both are the 'ultimate disrespect', its not a completely different issue, one just involves piss other involves mental torture, this is so hilarious[/QUOTE] No, I guarantee you people would be way more outraged if the WBC stormed the funeral and started urinating on the dead bodies.
[QUOTE=lolwutdude;38917226]uhm apologist implies i think the marine should not be charged???? i think he should be??? and its the same shit they do lol, what westboro does is 'not a big deal', but pissing on a corpse is[/QUOTE] then stop bitching about WBC because it has literally nothing to do with this issue, it's an invalid comparison.
[QUOTE=SgtCr4zyGunz;38917249]then stop bitching about WBC because it has literally nothing to do with this issue, it's an invalid comparison.[/QUOTE] no its a valid comparison, people are just double standard and wanting that agree rating cause their moral standards are so fucking weird, im outie
[QUOTE=lolwutdude;38917205]where am i saying its okay to piss on corpses lol, im saying both shit are stupid and both are the 'ultimate disrespect', its not a completely different issue, one just involves piss other involves mental torture, this is so hilarious[/QUOTE] That. Is. Not. How. You. Compare. Things.
[QUOTE=lolwutdude;38917255]no its a valid comparison, people are just double standard and wanting that agree rating cause their moral standards are so fucking weird, im outie[/QUOTE] your moral standards are fucking weird if you think pissing on a corpse and freedom of assembly are in any way comparable. please don't come back thanks.
So they did it for laughs or pure hatred and venting off some steam?
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.