Fox EXCLUSIVE: U.N. Elects Iran to Commission on Women's Rights
141 replies, posted
[QUOTE=CriticalThought;21637121]Really I didn't see that anywhere in the article
Infact if you had read it you would have seen:
[B]When its term begins in 2011, Iran will be joined by 10 other countries: Belgium, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Estonia, Georgia, Jamaica, Iran, Liberia, the Netherlands, Spain, Thailand and Zimbabwe.[/B]
[/quote]
Nobody reads the article, they skim through it and look at the fancy titles Fox made. They emphasized on the following "Iran, leadership role, elected, womens rights U.N" making people automatically assume what I said previously.
Just go to the Fox News home page
[quote]
You mean Muhummad?[/QUOTE]
No; he doesn't.
[QUOTE=starpluck;21637254] page
No; he doesn't.[/QUOTE]
ah fuck no don't do this again
[QUOTE=starpluck;21637254]Nobody reads the article, they skim through it and look at the fancy titles Fox made. They emphasized on the following "Iran, leadership role, elected, womens rights U.N" making people automatically assume what I said previously.
Just go to the Fox News home page
No; he doesn't.[/QUOTE]
No they didn't emphasis "leadership role", that is something that only appears in your post, and the entire article is written in the same Font, size, and nothing bolded.
Also hey look at this: [B]During this round of "elections," which were not competitive and in which no real votes were cast[/B]
Also yeah he did, as evidenced by my last thread you know nothing of Islam or the Quran, so don't try to start another argument here by just denying everything and skewing things and ignoring evidence to support your points.
[QUOTE=CriticalThought;21637330]No they didn't emphasis "leadership role", that is something that only appears in your post, and the entire article is written in the same Font, size, and nothing bolded.
Also hey look at this: [B]During this round of "elections," which were not competitive and in which no real votes were cast[/B][/quote]
"How could a country that stones women to death for adultery possibly be chosen to serve in a leadership role on the U.N.'s Commission on the Status of Women?"
[url]http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2010/04/29/anne-bayefsky-iran-united-nations-commission-status-women-congress/[/url]
[quote]
Also yeah he did, as evidenced by my last thread you know nothing of Islam or the Quran, so don't try to start another argument here by just denying everything and skewing things and ignoring evidence to support your points.[/QUOTE]
The one that said Islam is going to take over Britain?
[QUOTE=CriticalThought;21636297]Shut the fuck up this is something that is happening regardless of whether it's being reported by Fox News or not[/QUOTE]
Even a complete fucking tool like Glaber will eventually dredge up something even Fox has a hard time spinning pro-Republican.
[QUOTE=starpluck;21637404]"How could a country that stones women to death for adultery possibly be chosen to serve in a leadership role on the U.N.'s Commission on the Status of Women?"
[url]http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2010/04/29/anne-bayefsky-iran-united-nations-commission-status-women-congress/[/url][/QUOTE]
That's a different article, good try though.
[QUOTE=starpluck;21637404]The one that said Islam is going to take over Britain?[/QUOTE]
Based on factual statistics of birth-rates the Muslim population will overtake the Non-Muslim population in Britain. This is fact, and that isn't even what I'm talking about, all the actual points ON ISLAM that were made by you were wrong and quickly refuted yet you chose to ignore them and continue a stance of denial of said points and evidence, and used skewed evidence to fallaciously state things that your own evidence contradicted.
[QUOTE=CriticalThought;21636297]Shut the fuck up this is something that is happening regardless of whether it's being reported by Fox News or not[/QUOTE]
No need to flame, broskie.
[QUOTE=PrismatexV8;21637652]No need to flame, broskie.[/QUOTE]
There wasn't a need for that level of retardedness either.
[QUOTE=CriticalThought;21637694]There wasn't a need for that level of retardedness either.[/QUOTE]
Flaming never gets your message across; it just pisses others off.
[QUOTE=Panda X;21636332]I misread. I apologize.[/QUOTE]
Next time, just suggest that Glaber stop posting like the rest of us do.
At the very least, the Fox EXCLUSIVE thing was not necessary in the least bit.
[QUOTE=Biotoxsin;21638397]Next time, just suggest that Glaber stop posting like the rest of us do.
At the very least, the Fox EXCLUSIVE thing was not necessary in the least bit.[/QUOTE]
But he needs to show everyone how great Fox's Fair and Balanced (TM) reporting is!
[QUOTE=CriticalThought;21637121]Really I didn't see that anywhere in the article
Infact if you had read it you would have seen:
[B]When its term begins in 2011, Iran will be joined by 10 other countries: Belgium, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Estonia, Georgia, Jamaica, Iran, Liberia, the Netherlands, Spain, Thailand and Zimbabwe.[/B]
Notice how they listed Iran as a country joining Iran. I do agree that Fox News can be pretty retarded, that doesn't mean everything they report is invalid.
[editline]07:03PM[/editline]
You mean Muhummad?[/QUOTE]
zimbabwe
what is zimbabwe doing on there
thailand?
why the backwards as fuck countries
[QUOTE=BrickInHead;21638764]zimbabwe
what is zimbabwe doing on there
thailand?
why the backwards as fuck countries[/QUOTE]
Just to remind us how useless the UN is.
"This just in, the U.N. has announced a possible vote on considering talks of unlikely sanctions against facepunch forumer Dryer-Lint"
Perhaps they're putting Iran on the committee to give them incentive to improve their women's rights record, ever think of that Glaber/Fox?
:bravo: UN, great choice
:wtc:
[editline]01:48AM[/editline]
[QUOTE=Broryt;21639027]:bravo: UN, great choice[/QUOTE]
I believe the correct emote you are looking for is :downsbravo:
[QUOTE=Biotoxsin;21638397]Next time, just suggest that Glaber stop posting like the rest of us do.
At the very least, the Fox EXCLUSIVE thing was not necessary in the least bit.[/QUOTE]
hey, for all we know, it could be his job, he could work for them you know
Glaber do you care about anything other than politics? I haven't seen you post anywhere else on this forum.
[QUOTE=Lambeth;21642983]Glaber do you care about anything other than politics? I haven't seen you post anywhere else on this forum.[/QUOTE]
Sonic.
You got me there.
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M7fWOHsO4GE&feature=related[/media]
Key:
Stuff: Facepunch
Ash : OP
((Not making fun of Ash))
[QUOTE=Boba_Fett;21636204]sharia law and woman's rights conflict in so many ways.[/QUOTE]
Fix'd. Islam is the most tolerant out of the 3 biggest monotheistic religions.
In ancient times, after the 3rd or 4th crusade, the Muslims allowed Christians and Jews to freely enter Jerusalem whenever they wished to worship.
In midevil ages, women had more rights in the middle east than in great Britain or any of the European countries.
So please think before saying things.
[QUOTE=ProboardslolV2;21643072]Fix'd. Islam is the most tolerant out of the 3 biggest monotheistic religions.
In ancient times, after the 3rd or 4th crusade, the Muslims allowed Christians and Jews to freely enter Jerusalem whenever they wished to worship.
In midevil ages, women had more rights in the middle east than in great Britain or any of the European countries.
So please think before saying things.[/QUOTE]
Well none of that really applies since modern Islam has gone to shit.
[QUOTE=Zeke129;21643112]Well none of that really applies since modern Islam has gone to shit.[/QUOTE]
yeah around the 50s
Ahaha what's wrong with Earth these days.
This decision is completely stupid.
At least it's not japan
all iranians treat woman like animals
true story guys
[editline]07:35AM[/editline]
[QUOTE=CriticalThought;21637330]
Also yeah he did, as evidenced by my last thread you know nothing of Islam or the Quran, so don't try to start another argument here by just denying everything and skewing things and ignoring evidence to support your points.[/QUOTE]
lol, you think all muslims are terrorists and are trying to kill you and you subscribe to a neo-nazi party
you think you're credible? AT ALL?
[editline]07:36AM[/editline]
[QUOTE=CriticalThought;21637626]That's a different article, good try though.
Based on factual statistics of birth-rates the Muslim population will overtake the Non-Muslim population in Britain. This is fact, and that isn't even what I'm talking about, all the actual points ON ISLAM that were made by you were wrong and quickly refuted yet you chose to ignore them and continue a stance of denial of said points and evidence, and used skewed evidence to fallaciously state things that your own evidence contradicted.[/QUOTE]
you are fucking paranoid and it astounds me people like you exist.
[editline]07:37AM[/editline]
[QUOTE=dryer-lint;21638894]Just to remind us how useless the UN is.
"This just in, the U.N. has announced a possible vote on considering talks of unlikely sanctions against facepunch forumer Dryer-Lint"[/QUOTE]
can the UN put sanctions on clinicalthought, please?
[editline]07:38AM[/editline]
[QUOTE=Anthracite;21643152]Ahaha what's wrong with Earth these days.
This decision is completely stupid.[/QUOTE]
why?
the muslims will fuck the british out of existince true story here's a blog and an angry old dude
[QUOTE=CriticalThought;21637626]That's a different article, good try though.
Based on factual statistics of birth-rates the Muslim population will overtake the Non-Muslim population in Britain. This is fact, and that isn't even what I'm talking about, all the actual points ON ISLAM that were made by you were wrong and quickly refuted yet you chose to ignore them and continue a stance of denial of said points and evidence, and used skewed evidence to fallaciously state things that your own evidence contradicted.[/QUOTE]
Good job reading what I said. I was talking about Fox News in general hence "just go see their website"
Also what the fuck are you saying? Stop trying to make my refutations inavlid by using words you don't even know, what you mentioned just sounded as if you were trying to find the worst type of argument. Stop bullshitting, what you said was false without a hint of truth.
Also, when arE you going to give up? The Muslims are not going to take over the world and control everything nor are you marked for death.
The Problem with Fox News is that they are largely discredited, opinionated, and very editorial. They are not a reliable news source. It's like how you wouldn't reference information from a Nazi website on a civil rights essay.
If you see something posted by them, look for it elsewhere.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.