• The Full 12 Minutes Of Battlefield 3 Footage
    292 replies, posted
SNIPPED
[QUOTE=Overv;29264900]Actually, I paid enough attention to the thread to see the following completely unnecessary posts: It's obvious that he was going to continue forcing his opinion down our throats, if I hadn't stopped him from doing that. If you're not interested in a game, you shouldn't post in a thread discussing the trailer of that game. On top of that, The Great Ghast is notorious for shitposting and I realise he got off easy with this 1 day ban.[/QUOTE] y'know this is pointless considering he's unbanned by now but considering my huge wannabe og ego i guess i'll have to fire back Before even commenting on the posts; you can quite clearly be interested in a game while still disliking it. I'm interested in BF3 because it's a sequel to likely my favorite game ever, and as things are shaping up now, well, it doesn't look like a sequel [I]at all[/I]. Now, for the posts! I'd understand your reasoning if the first two posts were completely out of the blue aimed at people who were saying "this game is going to be great!" and he just flies in and calls them fanboys for this. That's shiposting. But, dearie, if you'll notice, each of those posts is a response to a post that was aimed at him that had little to no effort put into it; aka zeldars "wow" and moarfunz "wow what a shitposter". His reponses were legitimate responses to those posts. The third post was not even directed at anyone, it was a simple opinion and observation. He was stating he didn't like it. You banning for [I]that,[/I] now? 4th post ain't the best by any means, but it's hardly uncommon by practically everyone in this fucking section so to take exception to that is just, well, silly as shit. And the last post you made, well, that was his first, and again, it's not only legitimate to say, it's an opinion. This is interesting that you, as a part of the majority, are saying he's forcing your opinion down other's throats; which is the exact opposite of what usually occurs. Generally when someone on fp (news node and GGD specifically) makes any sort of comment that's against the norm they get flooded with inflammatory comments (such as the ones you've seen in this very thread!) and in this case the user was [I]banned [/I]for it. If you're going to argue he's shitposting you may as well ban half the users in this thread and in the whole forum, because he's posting like any normal fp user. [editline]18th April 2011[/editline] i don't even agree with this chucklefuck bf2 was my favourite game ever but the ban was sILLY overv!
-nevermind BrickInHead is a cool guy- [editline]18th April 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=Odellus;29277255]"this is a thread to discuss the game, and it looks like shit to me" good logic[/QUOTE] p sure that's discussing a game. when you discuss a game, it don't have to be praise for it good logic
[QUOTE=BrickInHead;29279304]y'know this is pointless considering he's unbanned by now but considering my huge wannabe og ego i guess i'll have to fire back Before even commenting on the posts; you can quite clearly be interested in a game while still disliking it. I'm interested in BF3 because it's a sequel to likely my favorite game ever, and as things are shaping up now, well, it doesn't look like a sequel [I]at all[/I]. Now, for the posts! I'd understand your reasoning if the first two posts were completely out of the blue aimed at people who were saying "this game is going to be great!" and he just flies in and calls them fanboys for this. That's shiposting. But, dearie, if you'll notice, each of those posts is a response to a post that was aimed at him that had little to no effort put into it; aka zeldars "wow" and moarfunz "wow what a shitposter". His reponses were legitimate responses to those posts. The third post was not even directed at anyone, it was a simple opinion and observation. He was stating he didn't like it. You banning for [I]that,[/I] now? 4th post ain't the best by any means, but it's hardly uncommon by practically everyone in this fucking section so to take exception to that is just, well, silly as shit. And the last post you made, well, that was his first, and again, it's not only legitimate to say, it's an opinion. This is interesting that you, as a part of the majority, are saying he's forcing your opinion down other's throats; which is the exact opposite of what usually occurs. Generally when someone on fp (news node and GGD specifically) makes any sort of comment that's against the norm they get flooded with inflammatory comments (such as the ones you've seen in this very thread!) and in this case the user was [I]banned [/I]for it. If you're going to argue he's shitposting you may as well ban half the users in this thread and in the whole forum, because he's posting like any normal fp user. [editline]18th April 2011[/editline] i don't even agree with this chucklefuck bf2 was my favourite game ever but the ban was sILLY overv![/QUOTE] I understand your reasoning as well, but he should have just reported the posts instead of making it worse. I believe my ban is fully justified and I don't understand why you're defending someone who has multiple permabanned alts for spamming. If you don't like the ban, you are free to go to Dragon and complain about it, but please don't waste my time with this nonsense.
[QUOTE=hypno-toad;29261783]Porbably supposed to be XM982 Like this [/QUOTE] Seems about spot on. I wonder what other types of ordinance they'll include?
[QUOTE=Overv;29280998]I understand your reasoning as well, but he should have just reported the posts instead of making it worse. I believe my ban is fully justified and I don't understand why you're defending someone who has multiple permabanned alts for spamming. If you don't like the ban, you are free to go to Dragon and complain about it, but please don't waste my time with this nonsense.[/QUOTE] i'm not defending anyone, i'm pointing out a bad ban. i don't care about ghast (sorry ghast). and the best way to not have your time wasted by it is to not get into the debate in the first place, dear! Considering you took the time to actually come up with replies, someone might accidentally mistake the thought that you have a stake in it.
That has to be the worst sniper I've ever seen Their fucking heads is sticking up
[QUOTE=Tobba;29282956]That has to be the worst sniper I've ever seen Their fucking heads is sticking up[/QUOTE] He was probably Libyan.
[QUOTE=Overv;29280998]I understand your reasoning as well, but he should have just reported the posts instead of making it worse. I believe my ban is fully justified and I don't understand why you're defending someone who has multiple permabanned alts for spamming. If you don't like the ban, you are free to go to Dragon and complain about it, but please don't waste my time with this nonsense.[/QUOTE] multiple alts? My sister just spammed on ONE (1) alt that got permad
[QUOTE=Pilotguy97;29283390]He was probably Libyan.[/QUOTE] Yeah those snipers can only hit people in slow moving crowds. Or with anti-aircraft shells.
[QUOTE=Tobba;29282956]That has to be the worst sniper I've ever seen Their fucking heads is sticking up[/QUOTE] He could be an untrained/badly trained insurgent. Still, he should know that he's just giving away his position.
[QUOTE=The Great Ghast;29279353]-nevermind BrickInHead is a cool guy- [editline]18th April 2011[/editline] p sure that's discussing a game. when you discuss a game, it don't have to be praise for it good logic[/QUOTE] [QUOTE=The Great Ghast;29275563]I'm not allowed to voice my opinion? [B]This isn't a thread to talk about how good the game is. That's the Battlefield 3 thread.[/B] This is a thread to discuss the trailer, and it looks like shit to me.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Odellus;29285590][/QUOTE] ya know what i meant
[QUOTE=The Great Ghast;29279353]-nevermind BrickInHead is a cool guy- [editline]18th April 2011[/editline] p sure that's discussing a game. when you discuss a game, it don't have to be praise for it good logic[/QUOTE] I don't even understand what you just said.
how hard is it to understand that not everyone likes what you like what a revelation :monocle: I'm going to get to countering your post in a second odellus, I had a five hour nap today and that didn't leave much activity time :v: [editline]18th April 2011[/editline] [quote= thedekoykid]-Battlefield: Not really, I've had a lot of quick and slow matches in both. [b]Conquest takes much longer in BF2 than BC2.[/b] Uh, once again, pretty rare. Sure it happened, but not all the time [b]I played one game where my team wasn't communicating, that was a fun server.[/b] Nope, I've won time and time again where the commander was just dicking about. [b]Commanders do much more than you think, you just aren't aware of them unless they call in an airstrike.[/b] So does BC? [b]No, class individuality was defined by what weapons they had. Assault got assault rifles, medics got machine guns, recons got snipers, and engineers got submachine guns. Their kit is always second in priority.[/b] No maps were square miles. [b][url=http://battlefield.wikia.com/wiki/Strike_at_Karkand]Strike at Karkand 64 player[/url] and [url=http://battlefield.wikia.com/wiki/Sharqi_Peninsula]Sharqi Peninsula 64 player[/url] With mods? [b]After some patch, let me find it[/b] As opposed to what? [b]Ammo pool. BF2 used magazines, BC2 has individual bullets.[/b] There was 1 unlock per class. I got 4 of them within 2 months. Plus, who cares about ranks when you play for fun. [b]BF2 didn't encourage playing for rank, hardly anyone cared since the new unlocks were cosmetic most of the time. You can't unlock certain special weapons until halfway through the ranks in BC2.[/b] Only if the tickets were set high enough, which was rare. [b]Maybe MAYBE not in infantry-only 16 player servers, I haven't ever played a match that lasted less than an hour.[/b] -Bad Company I've had really slow games. [b]Fast pace, ie twitch reflex gameplay, infinite sprint, teleporto-knife, squad spawning, etc.[/b] Same as above. [b]My point was satirical, the only reason most players join squads is to get point bonuses. I've never heard anyone use voice chat in a public server, nobody ever heals or gives out ammo or repairs or spots, etc.[/b] You know the only people who could hear the commander in BF2 was the squad leaders right? Maybe that was just 2142. [b]That's got nothing to do with my point.[/b] Wrong. [b]Classes are better defined by their weapons and perks than their kits and you know it.[/b] Maybe this aswell, but its not that big of a difference. [b]Double the amount of players isn't a big difference? lol okay[/b] Rank 24, Plus, who cares about ranks when you play for fun. [b]If you just play for fun it'll take a damn long time to get all weapons. Faster ranks with tangible rewards drives people to rank up as fast as they can.[/b] You've actually played both these games right? [b]hurr :downs:[/b][/quote] [QUOTE=Odellus;29260738]yea there's going to be NPCs that talk to you and you have to follow and the map progression is going to be linear, and there's going to be tons of scripted events everywhere with lots of narrative [b]you're just being a smartass. they didn't make the singleplayer play the way it did then introduce a magazine system, prone, actual recoil, and teamwork in the multiplayer, the gameplay mechanics are exactly the same.[/b] because there's no such thing as objectives, multiplayer oriented maps or such a concept as do what you want in these games right [b]I can't even understand you here. I'm still talking about gameplay, not game mechanics. Obviously there's a difference between singleplayer and multiplayer in all of those games, but you move and shoot the same way.[/b][/QUOTE] [editline]18th April 2011[/editline] now I'm off to get some real sleep
Keep 'em replies coming.
Notice how bullets dident move at all when he was firing the HMG?
i'm gonna be stuck in my room all winter this + skyrim oooooooooooooh jesus
[QUOTE=doonbugie2;29294753]Notice how bullets dident move at all when he was firing the HMG?[/QUOTE] You are probably around the fourth or so person to have mentioned that. Please read the thread next time. [QUOTE=Android phone;29286378]how hard is it to understand that not everyone likes what you like what a revelation :monocle:[/QUOTE] I do agree that the game trailers are sort of over rated. But I think what most people are interested in are earthquakes (which have a chance of being in MP, which is goddamn crazy awesome) and the graphics. The game is very beautiful judging by the videos, and this is just an alpha build. There could be so many tweaks added to the game before the release that could increase performance (which is what people seem to be a little worried about) while making it look just as good. The gameplay probably won't be as awesome as the physics and the graphics.
[QUOTE=Android phone;29286378]how hard is it to understand that not everyone likes what you like what a revelation :monocle: I'm going to get to countering your post in a second odellus, I had a five hour nap today and that didn't leave much activity time :v: [editline]18th April 2011[/editline] [editline]18th April 2011[/editline] now I'm off to get some real sleep[/QUOTE] [QUOTE=Android phone]you're just being a smartass. they didn't make the singleplayer play the way it did then introduce a magazine system, prone, actual recoil, and teamwork in the multiplayer, the gameplay mechanics are exactly the same.[/QUOTE] do you even understand the concept of "singleplayer"? prone is already confirmed, I didn't see anything wrong with the recoil but there certainly are games where recoil is completely different in sp and mp, and of COURSE there's going to be no teamwork in SP but there is in MP, what the fuck that's the whole point [QUOTE=Android phone]I can't even understand you here. I'm still talking about gameplay, not game mechanics.[/QUOTE] ... you just said you were talking about game mechanics [QUOTE=Android phone]Obviously there's a difference between singleplayer and multiplayer in all of those games, but you move and shoot the same way.[/QUOTE] duh
[QUOTE=SoaringScout;29302280]You are probably around the fourth or so person to have mentioned that. Please read the thread next time. I do agree that the game trailers are sort of over rated. But I think what most people are interested in are earthquakes (which have a chance of being in MP, which is goddamn crazy awesome) and the graphics. The game is very beautiful judging by the videos, and this is just an alpha build. There could be so many tweaks added to the game before the release that could increase performance (which is what people seem to be a little worried about) while making it look just as good. The gameplay probably won't be as awesome as the physics and the graphics.[/QUOTE] I dont read threads, my mind reading ability seems to have been clouded by your faggotry.
[QUOTE=doonbugie2;29305518]I dont read threads, my mind reading ability seems to have been clouded by your [B]faggotry[/B].[/QUOTE] Grow up. Also, don't you think that 8 PAGES IN someone would have already pointed that out.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.