• The Full 12 Minutes Of Battlefield 3 Footage
    292 replies, posted
[QUOTE=rnate;29253046][img_thumb]http://i.imgur.com/kRvC6.jpg[/img_thumb] What are these even supposed to be? I was just thinking a mortar round with airburst shells or something, but each one has a double explosion.[/QUOTE] It looks like a walking heavy artillery barrage.
[QUOTE=cyanidem;29252078]This better be what the online is like.[/QUOTE] Possibly, but I highly doubt it will be. That kind of explosion just screams scripted.
i loved the JJ - My life song.
[QUOTE=SoaringScout;29256937]And we know YOU'RE a fanboy of BF2. So what if it's a mixture of BF2 and BC? That would probably be a good thing. It will probably have an in-the-middle pace, which is what I prefer.[/QUOTE] I've played less bf2 and 2142 combined than bad company 2. I'm so sorry I don't want a good series, known for a certain style of play, to do a 180 and turn into every other game on the market. Do I need to repost my list on every page or are dipshits like you just going to keep ignoring it? [editline]17th April 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=sa2fan;29257400]Really, what's so bad about mixing BC and BF2? Android Phone, your argument is leading to nowhere. What are you trying to prove? Are you trying to convince people?[/QUOTE] >implying I shouldn't voice my opinion on a forum
Well, I think you've proven your point enough.
Obviously not, since you and a few others keep insisting Battlefield 3 will play like Battlefield 2. Judging by 12 minutes of gameplay, it's still a Bad Company game. Why are you so sure it isn't?
[QUOTE=Android phone;29259273]I've played less bf2 and 2142 combined than bad company 2. I'm so sorry I don't want a good series, known for a certain style of play, to do a 180 and turn into every other game on the market. Do I need to repost my list on every page or are dipshits like you just going to keep ignoring it? [editline]17th April 2011[/editline] >implying I shouldn't voice my opinion on a forum[/QUOTE] They aren't doing a 180 turn just by adding barely any elements from BC. It's not going to be that different, so stop complaining. [QUOTE=Android phone;29259384]Obviously not, since you and a few others keep insisting Battlefield 3 will play like Battlefield 2. Judging by 12 minutes of gameplay, it's still a Bad Company game. Why are you so sure it isn't?[/QUOTE] THIS. IS. CAMPAIGN. GAMEPLAY. It will probably be different in MP.
I've never said It would play like BF2. :raise: Yeah, and I guess if BF3 resembles to BC2 this means it's a BC game right? :downs:
"it's not going to be that different" isn't good enough if literally the only thing it has in common with the Battlefield games is the name it isn't a Battlefield game if it plays exactly like a Bad Company game it's a Bad Company game it's disappointing that the devs can't tell the difference, worse if they know damn well and are just making it console-friendly [editline]17th April 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=sa2fan;29259422]I've never said It would play like BF2. :raise: Yeah, and I guess if BF3 resembles to BC2 this means it's a BC game right? :downs:[/QUOTE] I was speaking to everyone that says it's a battlefield game, not just you :downs:
[QUOTE=SoaringScout;29259413]They aren't doing a 180 turn just by adding barely any elements from BC. It's not going to be that different, so stop complaining. THIS. IS. CAMPAIGN. GAMEPLAY. It will probably be different in MP.[/QUOTE] please name a game of similar genre that has drastically different SP and MP playstyles and mechanics
[QUOTE=BrickInHead;29259461]please name a game of similar genre that has drastically different SP and MP playstyles and mechanics[/QUOTE] seriously, what the fuck guys you can't honestly believe the singleplayer will play like bad company BUT WAIT NO THE MULTIPLAYER IS WAY DIFFERENT
I'm sold, next game to get on my list, Battlefield 3
[QUOTE=BrickInHead;29259461]please name a game of similar genre that has drastically different SP and MP playstyles and mechanics[/QUOTE] I never said that it would be drastically different, I'm just saying it will probably play a little differently than SP.
[QUOTE=SoaringScout;29259516]I never said that it would be drastically different, I'm just saying it will probably play a little differently than SP.[/QUOTE] sp plays like bad company by the looks of it, and bad company playstyle is a complete departure from battlefield ere bf3 isn't going to play like a battlefield game is this not a reasonable observation to make I don't get why people fight this
[QUOTE=SoaringScout;29259516]I never said that it would be drastically different, I'm just saying it will probably play a little differently than SP.[/QUOTE] bad company and battlefield are drastically different, you keep implying the singleplayer is bad company but the multiplayer just [i]has[/i] to be battlefield [editline]17th April 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=BrickInHead;29259536] is this not a reasonable observation to make I don't get why people fight this[/QUOTE]
I'm done. Wouldn't want to derail the thread. Anyways I think this game is good.
If they wanted to make another bad company style game, then they would make bad company 3. There is no reason for them to attach the Battlefield 3 title, unless they plan on making a full blown sequel to Battlefield 2.
Which is a full blow sequel to BF2. Right?
just saw a commercial for battlefield 3 on tv my dad was like "psh, that looks more like that medal of honor than the battlefields I played" :v: [editline]17th April 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=sa2fan;29259551]I'm done. Wouldn't want to derail the thread. Anyways I think this game is good.[/QUOTE] we're not derailing the thread, even gunfox is joining the debate that's what forums are for if you've just realized how illogical you're being and want to slowly creep away just admit it [editline]17th April 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=GunFox;29259571]If they wanted to make another bad company style game, then they would make bad company 3. There is no reason for them to attach the Battlefield 3 title, unless they plan on making a full blown sequel to Battlefield 2.[/QUOTE] remember when Activision was like, "hey guys we're totally going to make Black Ops a PC game, with mod tools and free map packs and dedicated servers and lean" and then didn't even playtest it before release :allears:
Yes I am.
did you guys notice the ammo not moving at all while he was firing the machine gun at the end
[QUOTE=sa2fan;29259694]Yes I am.[/QUOTE] good job being a man about it also, I'd like to point out that if this game is less than $60 ($60 makes it a console game, don't even fucking pretend it doesn't) I'm getting it immediately, it looks fun and all but it's not going to be a battlefield experience
Thanks for :h: Also, being manly on the internet.
[QUOTE=JDER14;29219000]Sgt. Black? Jackson? Why can't we get creative with names? Tired of seeing the same surnames and all that.[/QUOTE] They should throw in some Finnish soldiers, just so they could have ridiculous names like Sgt. Yrjänäinen
being manly on the internet is [img]http://sae.tweek.us/static/images/emoticons/emot-krad2.gif[/img]
It is 60 dollars, but I think it's worth for the amount of content.
if it's $60 on the PC it's a console-inspired moneygrab the only reason console games are typically $60 is because of the cost of packaging and distribution and cover art there is no good reason a PC game, ESPECIALLY a direct download one, should be $60
[QUOTE=BrickInHead;29223774]this video killed the hype for me, there's so much in it that just screams console and departure from Battlefield regenerating health no mag system cannon fodder enemies small silly cone of fire (he fires 4-5 rounds each time goes into ironsights and practically every shot hits) bigass obvious grenades (this isn't just stupid whining, a big part of the advantage of grenades in bf2 was that they weren't obvious and huge when flying in the air, the best giveaway was the nice "clunk" you heard as they hit the ground) this looks generic as shit, and the gameplay looks completely consolized. disappointed. if the MP plays exactly like this, it's just BC2 with bigger environments.[/QUOTE] the ironsight didn't change the cone of fire too much if you watch the part with the MG the cone of fire basically stayed the same untill he up the bipod down iron sight or not
I'll still probably get this. But I got no hopes of Dice or any company returning to the days of 1942. Even 1943 was terrible, but I played the 360 version.
and the whole thing about the SP being more linear, if it was battlefield style in single player then it'd be hard to tell a story, you'd just grab the vehicles and kill the dumb AI until you've won it'd be like online only without people that sounds boring to me
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.