If it has vehicles, large maps, spawn points and different kits. Its a battlefield game.
Also, Android, you should really take of those rose-tinted goggles you're wearing. The battlefield you're remembering isn't what you keep thinking it is.
Back when I was a BF2 fan, sure my fondest memories of amazing rounds are there but they're not how every round turned out. Between the teamkilling for jets, the camping snipers, the constant dolphin diving, the C4ing terrorists bad pilots, the constant lone wolfs and commanders that did about as much for the team as I did while I was afking in a bunker somewhere.
Bad Company 2 is a Battlefield game, it has battlefield aspects you can't deny that, stop saying it isn't. They're not drastically different at all. Also, just because I'm here and have a little bit of time.
[quote]
-Battlefield:
Slow pace - [b] Not really, I've had a lot of quick and slow matches in both.[/b]
Entire team working together [b] Uh, once again, pretty rare. Sure it happened, but not all the time [/b]
Commander is essential [b] Nope, I've won time and time again where the commander was just dicking about. [/b]
Each class has a priority above pew pew [b] So does BC?[/b]
Multiple square mile maps with up to 4-stage campaigns [b] No maps were square [i]miles[/i].[/b]
Up to 128 players [b] With mods? [/b]
Realistic ammunition systems [b] As opposed to what? [/b]
Years to rank up and many weapons you'll never unlock [b] There was 1 unlock per class. I got 4 of them within 2 months. Plus, who cares about ranks when you play for fun. [/b]
Hour-long rounds [b] Only if the tickets were set high enough, which was rare. [/b]
-Bad Company
Fast pace [b] I've had really slow games. [/b]
Squads occasionally working together [b] Same as above. [/b]
No commander or voice chat with entire team. [b] You know the only people who could hear the commander in BF2 was the squad leaders right? Maybe that was just 2142.[/b]
Each class priority is pew pew [b] Wrong. [/b]
Small, dense maps with many chokepoints and few vehicles [b] This is probably the ONLY difference between the games.[/b]
Up to 32 players [b] Maybe this aswell, but its not that big of a difference.[/b]
Ammo pool system for foot soldiers, infinite ammo of every kind for all vehicles [b] I guess...[/b]
All items unlocked by level ~20, rank up incredibly fast [b] Rank 24, Plus, who cares about ranks when you play for fun.[/b]
20-minute rounds[b] You've actually played both these games right? [/b]
[/quote]
Also, the fuck is up with the "price makes it a battlefield game." Thats not even an argument.
Ok, I lied, I only had 3 unlocks.
[url]http://www.bf2stats.net/player/78171499/[/url]
[url]http://bfbc2.statsverse.com/stats/pc/Dekoy/[/url]
[QUOTE=Android phone;29230056]yeah, they're totally going to make the campaign and multiplayer feel and play dramatically different :downs:[/QUOTE]
DOWII
[QUOTE=Fire Kracker;29260138]and the whole thing about the SP being more linear, if it was battlefield style in single player then it'd be hard to tell a story, you'd just grab the vehicles and kill the dumb AI until you've won
it'd be like online only without people that sounds boring to me[/QUOTE]
it's not the gameplay as much as the mechanics, infantry on infantry will still be like bad company and that's bullshit
judging the entire game based on 12 minutes of single player footage lolololo
fyi guys: HL2's mp was nothing like its sp, BC2's mp was nothing like its sp, Crysis' mp was nothing like its sp
[QUOTE=thedekoykid;29260157]
Also, the fuck is up with the "price makes it a battlefield game." Thats not even an argument.
[/QUOTE]
no, it isn't an argument, and I never said that, good job putting words in my mouth
maybe if you read my post you'd be able to understand it
I'll reply to the rest of this tomorrow, I'm going to bed
[editline]asdf[/editline]
oh wow, skimming your little rebuttle and I'm not convinced I need to reply to it, you're ass-backwards
[editline]17th April 2011[/editline]
[QUOTE=Odellus;29260262]judging the entire game based on 12 minutes of single player footage lolololo
fyi guys: HL2's mp was nothing like its sp, BC2's mp was nothing like its sp, Crysis' mp was nothing like its sp[/QUOTE]
you seriously think they're going to change almost everything between singleplayer and multiplayer? lolololo
hl2's mp played exactly like its campaign, with more physics objects to hurl around
bc2's mp was literally exactly the same as the sp, with the exception of carrying weapons
crysis only changed suit power usage and health in the mp
you have your head up your ass
Can somebody post a link of the video not on youtube?
I'm in china ._.
[QUOTE=Android phone;29260317]you seriously think they're going to change almost everything between singleplayer and multiplayer? lolololo[/QUOTE]
yea there's going to be NPCs that talk to you and you have to follow and the map progression is going to be linear, and there's going to be tons of scripted events everywhere with lots of narrative
[QUOTE=Android phone;29260317]hl2's mp played exactly like its campaign, with more physics objects to hurl around
bc2's mp was literally exactly the same as the sp, with the exception of carrying weapons
crysis only changed suit power usage and health in the mp
you have your head up your ass [/quote]
because there's no such thing as objectives, multiplayer oriented maps or such a concept as do what you want in these games right
What i hope is they leave the ability to kick doors open to the players in MP and people camp out in buildings, then we have these awesome SWAT-4 building raids.
Or you can just drop a bomb on it.
Yeah, not going to happen, but funny as hell to think about.
[QUOTE=JoeSkylynx;29255444]Cluster Bomb Missiles.[/QUOTE]
What the hell is a bomb missile? Cluster bombs also do not explode like that in the air, they are in a canister that pops open 100m or so in the air.
[QUOTE=GunFox;29258027]It looks like a walking heavy artillery barrage.[/QUOTE]
Would seem more likely, looking at it frame by frame, one of them shows 2 projectiles flying in while none of the others do. So there's probably 2 that come in each time, I understand an artillery team but for them to all hit at the exact same moment is weird. (Top Middle)
[img]http://i.imgur.com/6mu8o.jpg[/img]
The MP and SP of BF2:MC were pretty different.
[QUOTE=rnate;29261068]What the hell is a bomb missile? Cluster bombs also do not explode like that in the air, they are in a canister that pops open 100m or so in the air.
Would seem more likely, looking at it frame by frame, one of them shows 2 projectiles flying in while none of the others do. So there's probably 2 that come in each time, I understand an artillery team but for them to all hit at the exact same moment is weird. (Top Middle)
[img_thumb]http://i.imgur.com/6mu8o.jpg[/img_thumb][/QUOTE]
That doesn't look like artillery. For one... I'm not aware of something which fires a telephone pole of an artillery shell, and if not cluster bomb/cluster missile it's most likely an dumb fire airblast bomb.
I'm sure they didn't expect people to look at it frame by frame to see how long the munition may be...Like I said, cluster bombs DO NOT blow up in the air, they split apart, but no explosions until the actual bombs on the inside of the cluster bomb hit the ground. Anyways, no point arguing over this as even when the game does come out we still might not know. I was just interested in the dual-explosion part.
[QUOTE=rnate;29253046][img_thumb]http://i.imgur.com/kRvC6.jpg[/img_thumb]
What are these even supposed to be? I was just thinking a mortar round with airburst shells or something, but each one has a double explosion.[/QUOTE]
Porbably supposed to be XM982
Like this
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QaJBmyDxtYE[/media]
[QUOTE=hypno-toad;29261783]Porbably supposed to be XM982
Like this
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QaJBmyDxtYE[/media][/QUOTE]
That is sick.
[QUOTE=JoeSkylynx;29247333]Here you go..
From BFBC2 Forums not to long ago... The following groups HAVE been confirmed for BF multiplayer...
[B]Middle Eastern Coalition[/B][/QUOTE]
Oh my fucking God yes
I love those guys
[QUOTE=Android phone;29260247]it's not the gameplay as much as the mechanics, infantry on infantry will still be like bad company and that's bullshit[/QUOTE]
Infantry combat in BF2 is shit. Half the time it's just dolphin diving.
If I see a single goddamn potato while BF3 is releasing, someone's head's gonna roll...
[QUOTE=Android phone;29260247]it's not the gameplay as much as the mechanics, infantry on infantry will still be like bad company and that's bullshit[/QUOTE]
EVEN HIDEO KOJMA LIKES IT
[url]http://twitter.com/#!/HIDEO_KOJIMA_EN/status/59849988787802112[/url]
Why can't you?
[QUOTE=BrickInHead;29253750]tldr bad ban sorry overv
[editline]17th April 2011[/editline]
really did you even pay attention to the thread[/QUOTE]
Actually, I paid enough attention to the thread to see the following completely unnecessary posts:
[QUOTE=The Great Ghast;29241273]Battlefield fanboy detected.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=The Great Ghast;29245940]Hey look another fanboy of BF who doesn't like it when nay sayers talk bad about his favorite game that hasn't even been released yet.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=The Great Ghast;29241159]Betting :10bux: that the multiplayer will suck. The destructible environment will be cool and all, but it'll be the only selling point. The only people who will really enjoy it are Battlefield fans who thought even Bad Company 2 was good. If there are no dedicated servers and mod tools it's pretty worthless to me.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=The Great Ghast;29219777]Graphics =/= good game.
What are you 11?[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=The Great Ghast;29218698]Hey look, another generic FPS[/QUOTE]
It's obvious that he was going to continue forcing his opinion down our throats, if I hadn't stopped him from doing that. If you're not interested in a game, you shouldn't post in a thread discussing the trailer of that game. On top of that, The Great Ghast is notorious for shitposting and I realise he got off easy with this 1 day ban.
Feels meh.
[editline]18th April 2011[/editline]
Might change my mind.
[QUOTE=Joazzz;29262289]Oh my fucking God yes
I love those guys[/QUOTE]
Asteval mustaiyev!
(at least that's what I imagined they were saying)
Frostbite 2.
Jets.
Prone.
It's gonna be one hell of a game!
[QUOTE=Janus Vesta;29263008]Infantry combat in BF2 is shit. Half the time it's just dolphin diving.[/QUOTE]
True, they can at least take the infantry combat from BC2.
Sure, on release it was bad, but at the moment the combats pretty decent. (not the weapon handling, just the mechanics)
Whats with all the bad-mouthing BC2? Sure, it's not a proper BF game, but it sure is fun.
[QUOTE=Overv;29264900]Actually, I paid enough attention to the thread to see the following completely unnecessary posts:
It's obvious that he was going to continue forcing his opinion down our throats, if I hadn't stopped him from doing that. If you're not interested in a game, you shouldn't post in a thread discussing the trailer of that game. On top of that, The Great Ghast is notorious for shitposting and I realise he got off easy with this 1 day ban.[/QUOTE]
I'm not allowed to voice my opinion? This isn't a thread to talk about how good the game is. That's the Battlefield 3 thread. This is a thread to discuss the trailer, and it looks like shit to me.
[QUOTE=The Great Ghast;29275563]I'm not allowed to voice my opinion? This isn't a thread to talk about how good the game is. That's the Battlefield 3 thread. This is a thread to discuss the trailer, and it looks like shit to me.[/QUOTE]
ae
[QUOTE=The Great Ghast;29275563]I'm not allowed to voice my opinion? This isn't a thread to talk about how good the game is. That's the Battlefield 3 thread. This is a thread to discuss the trailer, and it looks like shit to me.[/QUOTE]
How about I lay you straight...
This forum is regarding [b] BF3 [/b]
We were all having a very educated discussion regarding how somethings in the trailer looked bad, while somethings looked good. You came in here, and declared the game sucked because of 'X'
We didn't mind that... What we did mind though was when you began starting flame wars with people who tried to bring logical debate towards you, and your counter arguement is calling everyone who likes BF3, and I quote, "Battlefield Fanboys" "Shitty Gamers" "11 Year Olds" not to even mention I've seen similar posts done by you in other Battlefield trailer releases relating in the same fashion. I don't know exactly what too tell you, but if their is any logical thought going through your mind right now... You wouldn't try too start shit with the moderator after he already had to go out of his way to ban you once.
[QUOTE=The Great Ghast;29275563]I'm not allowed to voice my opinion? This isn't a thread to talk about how good the game is. That's the Battlefield 3 thread. This is a thread to discuss the trailer, and it looks like shit to me.[/QUOTE]
"This game is shit" isn't discussion. "I think this game is shit because..." is discussion. All you've done is the former.
[QUOTE=JoeSkylynx;29277503]How about I lay you straight...
This forum is regarding [b] BF3 [/b]
We were all having a very educated discussion regarding how somethings in the trailer looked bad, while somethings looked good. You came in here, and declared the game sucked because of 'X'
We didn't mind that... What we did mind though was when you began starting flame wars with people who tried to bring logical debate towards you, and your counter arguement is calling everyone who likes BF3, and I quote, "Battlefield Fanboys" "Shitty Gamers" "11 Year Olds" not to even mention I've seen similar posts done by you in other Battlefield trailer releases relating in the same fashion. I don't know exactly what too tell you, but if their is any logical thought going through your mind right now... You wouldn't try too start shit with the moderator after he already had to go out of his way to ban you once.[/QUOTE]
When was Facepunch all about BF3 ???
Who'd I call a shitty gamer?
[QUOTE=Janus Vesta;29263008]Infantry combat in BF2 is shit. Half the time it's just dolphin diving.[/QUOTE]
Dolphin diving is retarded but I've gotten into some spectacular firefights in the last few times I've played. Setting up on a hillsides and raining my PKM-Beast fire on poor peons.
But the Combat in Bad Comapy is just dreary, All guns have insane rates of fire, no recoil and a nearly perfect cone of fire. It's point and click at it's most extreme.. just point and hold down the trigger. I'll agree that I like the head-bob and crap like that in Bad Company but the weapon handling is a joke.
[QUOTE=JoeSkylynx;29257802]BF3 isn't a console port... They even announced. PC First, Console second. If they don't stay to their word someone would most likely start a boycott.
Also... They better make that expansion BF 2143. We've gotten vietnam, 1942, where the fuck is 2142?[/QUOTE]
Developers have broken promises before
a lot
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.