• Scott Brown Tries Balancing Act as Tea Party Favorite in a Blue State
    295 replies, posted
[QUOTE=PrismatexV8;21336404]bahahahahahhahahahahahahha that's not marxism at all hahahahah look up social democracy kay[/QUOTE] Dear god, your posts WREAK of an assumed superiority complex. Stop acting like he's a laughable idiot because he disagrees with you.
This is fluff, not news. It's also Faux News. You're an idiot and further reinforce our negative opinion of you by announcing you listen to Hannity. Stop posting your shit.
[QUOTE=Gummylamb;21340506]Dear god, your posts WREAK of an assumed superiority complex. Stop acting like he's a laughable idiot because he disagrees with you.[/QUOTE] oh come on you can't be serious
[QUOTE=Lambeth;21340557]oh come on you can't be serious[/QUOTE] Oh I mean sure he's not very smart, but he (prisma) is acting like he's superior to him, even though a lot of this is JUST opinion.
[QUOTE=Gummylamb;21340567]Oh I mean sure he's not very smart, but he (prisma) is acting like he's superior to him, even though a lot of this is JUST opinion.[/QUOTE] Having certain opinions can make you an idiot. This is an example of that.
[QUOTE=MisterMooth;21340699]Having certain opinions can make you an idiot. This is an example of that.[/QUOTE] Only for things that have a lot of proof for it (like evolution or something), I haven't really followed Glaber's activities, but I assume all he's been doing really is being a republican supporter
[img]http://i165.photobucket.com/albums/u70/AccessDenied_36/ats53606_ThreadDirection-1.jpg[/img]
[QUOTE=Gummylamb;21340733]Only for things that have a lot of proof for it (like evolution or something), I haven't really followed Glaber's activities, but I assume all he's been doing really is being a republican supporter[/QUOTE] He called Obama a Marxist. [editline]09:07PM[/editline] try to rationalize that
[QUOTE=Lambeth;21340766]He called Obama a Marxist. [editline]09:07PM[/editline] try to rationalize that[/QUOTE] He believes the health care reform to be the devil? I dunno, some things he says are dumb
[QUOTE=Gummylamb;21340733]Only for things that have a lot of proof for it (like evolution or something), I haven't really followed Glaber's activities, but I assume all he's been doing really is being a republican supporter[/QUOTE] Now that's a massive understatement.
[QUOTE=Not Tishler;21340486]marxism is not a system of socialism[/QUOTE] The burden of proof is now on you. 2 out of the 3 sources I've cited say it is and I got an additional four more to back me up. [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marxism[/url] (jump down to the Marxism as a political practice section) [url]http://www.nyu.edu/projects/ollman/docs/what_is_marxism.php[/url] [url]http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/03/what_is_marxism.html[/url] [url]http://www.socialistparty.org.uk/WhatIsMarxFrame.htm[/url] (Right from the socialist party themselves)
[quote=that wikipedia page for marxism]Part of the Politics series on [b]Communism[/b][/quote]
[QUOTE=Lambeth;21340903][quote=that wikipedia page for marxism]Part of the Politics series on Communism[/QUOTE][/QUOTE] It's not just that. [quote=that wikipedia page for marxism]Part of the Politics series on Socialism[/QUOTE] [quote=that wikipedia page for marxism]Part of the Politics series on Maoism[/QUOTE] [quote=that wikipedia page for marxism]Part of the Politics series on Left communism[/QUOTE] Do I need to get a screen capture?
Maoism and Left Communism are also Communism. 3 outta 4 ain't bad
[QUOTE=Lambeth;21341203]Maoism and Left Communism are also Communism. 3 outta 4 ain't bad[/QUOTE] Ah, but it still covers Socialism. Also: [quote= that same Wiki article] Historical periodisation Marx considered that these socio-economic conflicts have historically manifested themselves as distinct stages (one transitional) of development in Western Europe.[10] Primitive Communism: as in co-operative tribal societies. Slave Society: a development of tribal progression to city-state; Aristocracy is born. Feudalism: aristocrats are the ruling class; merchants evolve into capitalists. Capitalism: capitalists are the ruling class, who create and employ the proletariat. Socialism: workers gain class consciousness, and via proletarian revolution depose the capitalist dictatorship of the bourgeoisie, replacing it in turn with dictatorship of the proletariat through which the socialization of the means of production can be realized. Communism: a classless and stateless society.[/quote] Either way it leads to a dictatorship.
[QUOTE=Glaber;21341246]Ah, but it still covers Socialism. Also: Either way it leads to a dictatorship.[/QUOTE] None of this relates to Obama.
indeed! none of it relates to scott brown either
[QUOTE=Not Tishler;21336571][media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jscSfkYTY2I[/media][/QUOTE] Glaber?
[QUOTE=MisterMooth;21341468]Glaber?[/QUOTE] Not even close.
Yeah, that guy is much more intelligent.
I'm sure he can spell Glenn right.
[QUOTE=Glaber;21339454]Sorry, went into School paper mode for a moment there. If I went into full School paper mode this would had taken longer and have APA citations. [/QUOTE] learn the difference between socialism and communism
[QUOTE=MisterMooth;21340699]Having certain opinions can make you an idiot. This is an example of that.[/QUOTE] No it can't. Having an opinion doesn't make you an idiot.
[QUOTE=yawmwen;21342152]No it can't. Having an opinion doesn't make you an idiot.[/QUOTE] So let's just say this: In my opinion, rape is fine, all children should be murdered, Hitler was a great man, and evolution is nothing but anti-religious propaganda. That wouldn't make me an idiot?
[QUOTE=MisterMooth;21342215]So let's just say this: In my opinion, rape is fine, all children should be murdered, Hitler was a great man, and evolution is nothing but anti-religious propaganda. That wouldn't make me an idiot?[/QUOTE] No, it would make you someone with an opinion most people would object and take offense to. You wouldn't be an idiot, but you would be hated. An idiot lacks knowledge, or the will to learn.
In my opinion, the world is flat.
[QUOTE=MisterMooth;21342256]In my opinion, the world is flat.[/QUOTE] You can't have an opinion on fact or science. You can only interpret data. Saying the world is flat is ignorant, because you are either not looking at all the data, or you refuse to accept data given to you. So no, it is not flat in your opinion. Your interpretation is that it is flat.
[QUOTE=yawmwen;21342239]No, it would make you someone with an opinion most people would object and take offense to. You wouldn't be an idiot, but you would be hated. An idiot lacks knowledge, or the will to learn.[/QUOTE] You're right actually, sure some people will think "oh my GOD YAWMWEN YOU'RE SUCH AN IDIOT PEOPLE WHO THINK THAT STUFF ARE IDIOTS AHHH" but in reality, them thinking those people are idiots is their opinion, which is not a fact.
[QUOTE=Gummylamb;21342403]You're right actually, sure some people will think "oh my GOD YAWMWEN YOU'RE SUCH AN IDIOT PEOPLE WHO THINK THAT STUFF ARE IDIOTS AHHH" but in reality, them thinking those people are idiots is their opinion, which is not a fact.[/QUOTE] Not all opinions are of equal value. Why you want to assume so is beyond me. Some opinions are idiotic.
[QUOTE=HumanAbyss;21342665]Not all opinions are of equal value. Why you want to assume so is beyond me. Some opinions are idiotic.[/QUOTE] Everything ^ is an opinion ;]
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.