• US Government Declares 22 Clinton Emails as "Top Secret"
    148 replies, posted
[QUOTE=DohEntertainmen;49636036]If you seriously think Britain is in any shape to make such diplomatic suicide with a nuke-armed powerhouse, you're seriously mistaken.[/QUOTE] Is that to imply that the Trump Administration would threaten to nuke Britain if they cut ties? [QUOTE=DohEntertainmen;49636036]Also, the Bush era featured a swell relationship with Russia, which is something Obama lost out on, due to his overtly bureaucratic policies meshing with their more straightforward ones.[/QUOTE] Our relationship with Russia continued to improve under Obama until [u]Russia invaded Ukraine[/u]. That was entirely Russia's doing. Although you're right, under Trump our relationship would have probably stayed strong, because Trump wouldn't care if Russia invaded some country he couldn't point out on a map. [QUOTE=DohEntertainmen;49636089]What kind of anecdote is that supposed to be? He's never said anything like that.[/QUOTE] No but he did say he could go shoot someone and he wouldn't lose supporters.
[QUOTE=Mr. Someguy;49638805]Is that to imply that the Trump Administration would threaten to nuke Britain if they cut ties?[/QUOTE] Yes. The same as ours between Russia, as well, under the Obama administration. M.A.D. works wonders for politics. [QUOTE=Mr. Someguy;49638805]Our relationship with Russia continued to improve under Obama until [u]Russia invaded Ukraine[/u]. That was entirely Russia's doing. Although you're right, under Trump our relationship would have probably stayed strong, because Trump wouldn't care if Russia invaded some country he couldn't point out on a map.[/QUOTE] Maybe we should stop caring for countries not on our map? I'm all for cutting off foreign aid, and focusing on one's own country, as much as that offends your liberal mindsets about "Globalisation", and the "New-World-Order". If the U.N. can't stop Israel from plowing Palestine into the dirt, why bother with them all, in the first place? [QUOTE=Mr. Someguy;49638805]No but he did say he could go shoot someone and he wouldn't lose supporters.[/QUOTE] Because he's pointing out the madness behind modern politics, as politicians today tend to be more revered than gods. It would be most unwise to insult Obama, now. Wouldn't it?
[QUOTE=RenegadeCop;49638899]The irony, my heart can't take it[/QUOTE] Yes. He's not beyond insulting himself. It's all really silly, and I'm aware of it, but he's still showing to be a better candidate than the rest, for supporting his own campaign, and being a bit self-aware.
[QUOTE=DohEntertainmen;49636036]If you seriously think Britain is in any shape to make such diplomatic suicide with a nuke-armed powerhouse, you're seriously mistaken.[/QUOTE] so when did we start taking political tips from north korea?
[QUOTE=Ninja Gnome;49638990]so when did we start taking political tips from north korea?[/QUOTE] North Korea wasn't the first. Just look at our attitude prior to the Vietnam war. Once you put up the guns, you cannot lay them down. That would show weakness before the foreigners.
[QUOTE=DohEntertainmen;49638999]North Korea wasn't the first. Just look at our attitude prior to the Vietnam war. Once you put up the guns, you cannot lay them down. That would show weakness before the foreigners.[/QUOTE] so in order to get what we want, we threaten to nuke anyone who doesn't give us our way. you want america to turn into the evil country in some action movie?
[QUOTE=DohEntertainmen;49638841]Yes. The same as ours between Russia, as well, under the Obama administration. M.A.D. works wonders for politics.[/QUOTE]Are you completely fucking stupid or are you just too young to vote? There is no goddamn way that we would ever, [B]ever[/B] threaten an ally we've had since before the 20th century and a fellow founding member of NATO with our nuclear arsenal. If you think otherwise you don't know what the fuck you're talking about and frankly you should probably go learn a thing or two before you want to spout dumb bullshit. This is assuming that Trump would be even that fucking stupid, and if he truly was then we would need an armed revolution ASAP because a serious threat of [B]nuclear warfare[/B] on our closest, strongest ally is one of the few times where it might be a good idea to clean house in the government. That's assuming Congress wouldn't have his fat ass impeached in a fucking second. [editline]30th January 2016[/editline] [QUOTE=DohEntertainmen;49638999]North Korea wasn't the first. Just look at our attitude prior to the Vietnam war. Once you put up the guns, you cannot lay them down. That would show weakness before the foreigners.[/QUOTE]"show weakness before the foreigners" holy shit you are an actual Trump supporter aren't you? Wow. Fucking wow. I didn't know we had one on here.
It is absolutely unfathomable to me that somebody could not care at all about a candidate's policies and base their support of a candidate solely based on the strength of that candidate's convictions, regardless of what those convictions actually are. It doesn't matter that trump wants to bankrupt the country building a wall across the entire mexican border or ban an entire religion from entering the country, so long as he [I]really wants to[/I].
[QUOTE=Ninja Gnome;49639113]so in order to get what we want, we threaten to nuke anyone who doesn't give us our way. you want america to turn into the evil country in some action movie?[/QUOTE] They've been "evil" for some time, and you can't have a big stick sawed off, unless you want a lot of people prepping their own, in order to give you the what-for. Such is realpolitik. [QUOTE=JumpinJackFlash;49639124]Are you completely fucking stupid or are you just too young to vote? There is no goddamn way that we would ever, [B]ever[/B] threaten an ally we've had since before the 20th century and a fellow founding member of NATO with our nuclear arsenal. If you think otherwise you don't know what the fuck you're talking about and frankly you should probably go learn a thing or two before you want to spout dumb bullshit. This is assuming that Trump would be even that fucking stupid, and if he truly was then we would need an armed revolution ASAP because a serious threat of [B]nuclear warfare[/B] on our closest, strongest ally is one of the few times where it might be a good idea to clean house in the government. That's assuming Congress wouldn't have his fat ass impeached in a fucking second. [editline]30th January 2016[/editline] "show weakness before the foreigners" holy shit you are an actual Trump supporter aren't you? Wow. Fucking wow. I didn't know we had one on here.[/QUOTE] You seem upset at current events. I wonder how you felt when we stormed Egypt. Was the same sort of anger enraging through you, or was it all fair, because our Casus Belli had them using a different form of government from our own, and something about massacres, when it was really over their push for a gold-based economy, rather than a petrol-based one? Also, I'm not implying there would be a war. I'm saying there wouldn't be, as both sides would see it as very silly, and dangerous to do. You're the one getting mad, because you don't like the idea of the world not being all hunky dory. [editline]30th January 2016[/editline] [QUOTE=Mort Stroodle;49639153]It is absolutely unfathomable to me that somebody could not care at all about a candidate's policies and base their support of a candidate solely based on the strength of that candidate's convictions, regardless of what those convictions actually are. It doesn't matter that trump wants to bankrupt the country building a wall across the entire mexican border or ban an entire religion from entering the country, so long as he [I]really wants to[/I].[/QUOTE] He doesn't want to bankrupt America, but bully Mexico, and other corrupt states like Honduras into chipping in for a pretense against illegal migration, which are an issue both racially, and socially .
[QUOTE=DohEntertainmen;49639170]You seem upset at current events.[/QUOTE]No, I'm just wondering what in the fuck is going through your head. [QUOTE=DohEntertainmen;49639170]I wonder how you felt when we stormed Egypt.[/QUOTE]... [I]What?[/I] What the fuck? lmao What are you talking about? [QUOTE=DohEntertainmen;49639170]Was the same sort of anger enraging through you, or was it all fair, because our Casus Belli had them using a different form of government from our own, and something about massacres, when it was really over their push for a gold-based economy, rather than a petrol-based one?[/QUOTE]No, there wasn't any anger, uh, enraging through me because I honestly am trying to think of a time when we "stormed Egypt." Also what in the [I]fuck[/I] are you talking about when you say "push for a gold-based economy" anyway? Egypt's never had significant petroleum reserves. Honestly I have no idea what the fuck you're talking about. At all. You went from crazy bullshit to hilariously misinformed or perhaps just common ignorance, I'm completely unable to follow you. [QUOTE=DohEntertainmen;49639170]Also, I'm not implying there would be a war. I'm saying there wouldn't be, as both sides would see it as very silly, and dangerous to do. You're the one getting mad, because you don't like the idea of the world not being all hunky dory.[/QUOTE][B]You cannot just make idle threats to use nuclear weapons against allies, that shit is not okay.[/B] Fucking Donald Trump supporters holy shit.
[QUOTE=JumpinJackFlash;49639226]No, I'm just wondering what in the fuck is going through your head. ... [I]What?[/I] What the fuck? lmao What are you talking about? No, there wasn't any anger, uh, enraging through me because I honestly am trying to think of a time when we "stormed Egypt." Also what in the [I]fuck[/I] are you talking about when you say "push for a gold-based economy" anyway? Egypt's never had significant petroleum reserves. lmao what in the fuck is even going on in that head of yours? I'm sorry, I know I'm being condescending but you're making it so goddamn easy because you went from crazy bullshit to hilariously misinformed or just plain ignorant of basic historic events. [B]You cannot just make idle threats to use nuclear weapons against allies, that shit is not okay.[/B] Fucking Donald Trump supporters holy shit.[/QUOTE] I am talking about the Egyptian colonisation by Britain, which is part of this mention. Control of the Suez Canal was seen as the utmost importance, during the time of Colonialism, and it was effectively taken by the former empire as a means to enforce itself. If you think things are any different, and any of the "change" has stopped things like Libya, or Syria from being destroyed for the sake of the aforementioned "change", you've got a lot to learn about the days of Imperialism ever really ending. There is a lot of war to be done, and if one does not swing about their big stick, the other will rabble theirs, instead. Countries like Russia cannot be handled, otherwise.
[QUOTE=DohEntertainmen;49638780]All you can do is pull Godwin, and act like that means anything, other than a rather generic liberal fallacy.[/QUOTE] Not a godwin in the slightest. The people that allow someone to get away with being a bigot and all-around terrible person just because they're against the things they hate is the exact sort people that allow fascists into power. [QUOTE=DohEntertainmen;49638780] Your blatant hatred for him only popularizes him in the eyes of people who oppose your political kind, you know.[/QUOTE] Yes, thank you, I'm already well aware his popularity is based on blind impulsiveness.
[QUOTE=Mingebox;49639250]Not a godwin in the slightest. The people that allow someone to get away with being a bigot and all-around terrible person just because they're against the things they hate is the exact sort people that allow fascists into power. Yes, thank you, I'm already well aware his popularity is based on blind impulsiveness.[/QUOTE] Do you really think the word "bigot" is going to carry any conversational weight, in this coming day and age? In reality, people are becoming very repulsed by liberal "feel>fact" politics, and things like Absolutism are unfortunately for you, making a comeback, with Donald's "blind impulsiveness" playing well into the manipulation of modern politics, which I only support him not for that, but the fact he's remained mostly independent, for a republican.
[QUOTE=DohEntertainmen;49639247]I am talking about the Egyptian colonisation by Britain, which is part of this mention. Control of the Suez Canal was seen as the utmost importance, during the time of Colonialism, and it was effectively taken by the former empire as a means to enforce itself.[/QUOTE]Do you understand what the fuck "we" means? "We" "storming Egypt" does not include the United States which is who we were talking about [B]when you said we (THE FUCKING USA) should threaten the UK with our nuclear arsenal.[/B] Oh and to correct your shit on the Suez: that was the result of a rebellion against British and Turkish control of the region and the British put it down and held the Suez up until 1953. [QUOTE=DohEntertainmen;49639247]If you think things are any different, and any of the "change" has stopped things like Libya, or Syria from being destroyed for the sake of the aforementioned "change", you've got a lot to learn about the days of Imperialism ever really ending.[/QUOTE]what are you even fucking talking about [QUOTE=DohEntertainmen;49639247]There is a lot of war to be done, and if one does not swing about their big stick, the other will rabble theirs, instead.[/QUOTE]Yeah, no, brinkmanship died when the global economy became a thing. Sure you can criticize that (there's a lot to criticize) but one thing that did was put an end to the "saber rattling" that caused more wars than they prevented. (the analogy doesn't include sticks by the way) [QUOTE=DohEntertainmen;49639247]Countries like Russia cannot be handled, otherwise.[/QUOTE]Or we can just sanction them and attack them economically which has done far more to Russia than any threat of a war that would [I]never[/I] happen anyway, which isn't very fucking threatening.
[QUOTE=JumpinJackFlash;49639292]Do you understand what the fuck "we" means? "We" "storming Egypt" does not include the United States which is who we were talking about [B]when you said we (THE FUCKING USA) should threaten the UK with our nuclear arsenal.[/B] Oh and to correct your shit on the Suez: that was the result of a rebellion against British and Turkish control of the region and the British put it down and held the Suez up until 1953.[/QUOTE] I'm saying that Britain in history, especially regarding their taking of a certain Southern American Isle formation, are not far off from the same game Americans play. There wouldn't be war between the two powers over an election they have no doing with, and there never will be. [QUOTE=JumpinJackFlash;49639292]Yeah, no, brinkmanship died when the global economy became a thing. Sure you can criticize that (there's a lot to criticize) but one thing that did was put an end to the "saber rattling" that caused more wars than they prevented. (the analogy doesn't include sticks by the way)[/QUOTE] The global economy is trash, and is collapsing, as much as the billing globalists attempt to print victory out for it all, as nations will never give up their cultures, their people, and their differences for the sake of the progressive poison that is multiculturalism, miscegenation, and globalism itself. Nobody wants that, nor needs it, and you know it. [QUOTE=JumpinJackFlash;49639292]Or we can just sanction them and attack them economically which has done far more to Russia than any threat of a war that would [I]never[/I] happen anyway, which isn't very fucking threatening.[/QUOTE] Good luck, when their democratic economy is doing far better than ours, thanks to their inherited land, which is also larger than ours, as well. If you seriously think they wouldn't react brashly with both pen and sword, you're seriously underestimating a nation we should be chums with, not caring for their wars, as they should be none of our business. To hell with Belgium. What should we care what the Kaiserreich does to them? That was their war, and the world's been suffering thanks to such brash interventionism, for the sake of "peacemaking".
So is more going to come of this, or is this announcement the end of it?
[QUOTE=DohEntertainmen;49639384]I'm saying that Britain in history, especially regarding their taking of a certain Southern American Isle formation, are not far off from the same game Americans play. There wouldn't be war between the two powers over an election they have no doing with, and there never will be. [/QUOTE] How in the name of god are you possibly comparing the Falklands to the genocide of north america? How little do you actually know about history? [QUOTE] The global economy is trash, and is collapsing, as much as the billing globalists attempt to print victory out for it all, as nations will never give up their cultures, their people, and their differences for the sake of the progressive poison that is multiculturalism, miscegenation, and globalism itself. Nobody wants that, nor needs it, and you know it.[/QUOTE] Oh holy shit you're serious aren't you? You're too much bud. You better throw your computer in the garabage right now, unless you don't really believe that "multiculturalism, miscegenation, and globalism" are the poisons you claim they are? You're only on the internet because of that, so you're a living breathing hypocrite who can't even see that.
[QUOTE=HumanAbyss;49639437]How in the name of god are you possibly comparing the Falklands to the genocide of north america? How little do you actually know about history?[/QUOTE] You seem to not know much, considering how you're probably relying on government education to dictate your thought. Books funded by globalists, mind you. Just wait until Common Core rears it's ugly head, and you'll have a generation saying the same thing about the books they read from, as well. Classic Indoctrination. [QUOTE=HumanAbyss;49639437]You're too much bud. You better throw your computer in the garabage right now, unless you don't really believe that "multiculturalism, miscegenation, and globalism" are the poisons you claim they are? You're only on the internet because of that, so you're a living breathing hypocrite who can't even see that.[/QUOTE] The internet would just as likely exist under any other world, and you cannot claim the invention of such a thing is unique to only this reality. I'm sure it'd be popular in any world, be it invented earlier, or sooner. Your revisionist historical views are just claiming that there are no ties between Marxism, Socialism, Progressiveness, and finally Communism under any possibility, which is downright ignorant, ironically in itself.
[QUOTE=DohEntertainmen;49638841]liberal mindsets about "Globalisation", and the "New-World-Order"[/QUOTE]is this a troll or parody post, because it just sounds way too similar Alex Jones' ramblings
[QUOTE=DohEntertainmen;49639467]You seem to not know much, considering how you're probably relying on government education to dictate your thought. Books funded by globalists, mind you. Just wait until Common Core rears it's ugly head, and you'll have a generation saying the same thing about the books they read from, as well. Classic Indoctrination. The internet would just as likely exist under any other world, and you cannot claim the invention of such a thing is unique to only this reality. I'm sure it'd be popular in any world, be it invented earlier, or sooner. Your revisionist historical views are just claiming that there are no ties between Marxism, Socialism, Progressiveness, and finally Communism under any possibility, which is downright ignorant, ironically in itself.[/QUOTE] Stop sucking on the teat of conpsiratards. I get my education from older thinkers. People who encouraged rational discourse, critical thought, and skepticism. If there's one between the two of us, who has an issue with bias, I believe it would be you as you have effectively argued with nothing BUT bias and perspective.
[QUOTE=DohEntertainmen;49639384]I'm saying that Britain in history, especially regarding their taking of a certain Southern American Isle formation, are not far off from the same game Americans play. There wouldn't be war between the two powers over an election they have no doing with, and there never will be.[/QUOTE]Bunch of irrelevant bullshit, literally had nothing to do with anything we were discussing which was [B]threatening allies with nuclear weapons.[/B] You said something stupid, I pointed it out, now you're trying desperately to explain why it's actually relevant and not dumb with more irrelevant dumb explanations. [QUOTE=DohEntertainmen;49639384]progressive poison that is multiculturalism, miscegenation, and globalism itself. Nobody wants that, nor needs it, and you know it.[/QUOTE][QUOTE=DohEntertainmen;49639384]multiculturalism, miscegenation, and globalism itself.[/QUOTE]I fuck Asian chicks as much as possible because I enjoy exotic pussy. Learn to fucking deal with it, if you want to do something about it come to my house and find out real fucking quick that I have no duty to retreat in Minnesota. [QUOTE=DohEntertainmen;49639384]Good luck, when their democratic economy is doing far better than ours, thanks to their inherited land, which is also larger than ours, as well.[/QUOTE]"I think Russia works better because they keep the sandniggers out and they are bigger. My view and understanding of the world is pretty simple, when I don't understand something I ignore reality and make up shit until it makes sense." That's what I'm reading here. [QUOTE=DohEntertainmen;49639384]If you seriously think they wouldn't react brashly with both pen and sword, you're seriously underestimating a nation we should be chums with, not caring for their wars, as they should be none of our business.[/QUOTE]You don't actually sound smart if try to make your words sound more poetic, it actually makes it worse when you're blatantly wrong about shit. So drop the "sword and pen" flowery bullshit. [QUOTE=DohEntertainmen;49639384]To hell with Belgium.[/QUOTE]Oh what now. Actually I'm done. I'm not arguing with somebody who has an equal understanding of global politics as a ten-year-old.
if you hate multiculturalism, you might as well just leave america
[QUOTE=Blackavar;49639560]if you hate multiculturalism, you might as well just leave america[/QUOTE] You might as well just leave earth because earth is stuck as a multicultural place and it will never regress.
[QUOTE=HumanAbyss;49639570]You might as well just leave earth because earth is stuck as a multicultural place and it will never regress.[/QUOTE] I just don't get how some people think it's a bad thing. Some libertarian argued with me once saying that Sanders wouldn't be able to do anything, or that his policies wouldn't be able to work, in part because we aren't homogeneous and are too multicultural unlike the Scandinavian countries how does that make sense at all
[QUOTE=Joazzz;49639487]is this a troll or parody post, because it just sounds way too similar Alex Jones' ramblings[/QUOTE] Please, if anyone could consider that planted oaf's ramblings of a Thule conspiracy, it's only him. Such association is merely an argument his supporters would want of you. [QUOTE=HumanAbyss;49639501]I get my education from older thinkers. People who encouraged rational discourse, critical thought, and skepticism. If there's one between the two of us, who has an issue with bias, I believe it would be you as you have effectively argued with nothing BUT bias and perspective.[/QUOTE] Except you have done the same, quite ironically, as you insinuate I'm wrong because I'm "outnumbered", or that I'm being too callous and offensive. [QUOTE=JumpinJackFlash;49639518]I fuck Asian chicks as much as possible because I enjoy exotic pussy. Learn to fucking deal with it, if you want to do something about it come to my house and find out real fucking quick that I have no duty to retreat in Minnesota.[/QUOTE] That sounds very hedonist, and therefore particularly degenerate to the human race. I suggest you stop thinking with your lower head, and instead appeal to something other than smashing my cranium open with your club, as that makes you only seem to be a brute, rather than a reasonable human being; which you are clearly not. [editline]30th January 2016[/editline] [QUOTE=Blackavar;49639560]if you hate multiculturalism, you might as well just leave america[/QUOTE] Revisionist Progressive history. America was never a "melting pot". Those sort of politics were only used at the despise of rich foreigners wishing to keep their own kind out, for the sake of no competition, and the support of urbanisation, which brings me back to the "prison/palace" argument, in which cities are made to keep people under control like a prison, as the officers of the police are the guards. [highlight](User was banned for this post ("Trolling - race mixing "degenerate to the human race" hahaha wow honestly mate wow jeez gosh golly" - Big Dumb American))[/highlight]
So prove multiculturalism is purely bad then? If you're so secure in that knowledge demonstrate it
[QUOTE=MaverickIB;49635146]Hillary emailed that shit knowing damn well she should have been doing that. But she didn't give a fuck. Because she knew she was untouchable, and whereas a submariner who does that gets prosecuted as an agent of espionage or terrorist, the mighty Hillary Clinton will get a slap on the wrist as most. If I emailed top secret bullshit to someone over an unsecured connection, I'd be at Leavenworth in no time flat making big rocks into little rocks. Meanwhile, this chick gets to run for president. Fucking ridiculous.[/QUOTE] You know how what they say. Different spanks for different ranks.
[QUOTE=DohEntertainmen;49639620]Please, if anyone could consider that planted oaf's ramblings of a Thule conspiracy, it's only him. Such association is merely an argument his supporters would want of you. Except you have done the same, quite ironically, as you insinuate I'm wrong because I'm "outnumbered", or that I'm being too callous and offensive. That sounds very hedonist, and therefore particularly degenerate to the human race. I suggest you stop thinking with your lower head, and instead appeal to something other than smashing my cranium open with your club, as that makes you only seem to be a brute, rather than a reasonable human being; which you are clearly not. [editline]30th January 2016[/editline] Revisionist Progressive history. America was never a "melting pot". Those sort of politics were only used at the despise of rich foreigners wishing to keep their own kind out, for the sake of no competition, and the support of urbanisation, which brings me back to the "prison/palace" argument, in which cities are made to keep people under control like a prison, as the officers of the police are the guards.[/QUOTE] Holy shit, I think you might actually be retarded.
[QUOTE=HumanAbyss;49639632]So prove multiculturalism is purely bad then? If you're so secure in that knowledge demonstrate it[/QUOTE] A simple argument against multiculturalism is the symbolism of a color palette. Take the colors, put them together, and you get no diversity, but the ruining of the separate colors. Ruining the home of many for the needs of nobody only leads to people having no home, but instead wandering about as cosmopolitans. As much as I admire Diogenes, there was no doubt that his hatred for the Athenians was the real reason he created such a term. Not for the destruction of separate cultures, for the sake of a one-world culture. [editline]30th January 2016[/editline] [QUOTE=LTJGPliskin;49639641]Holy shit, I think you might actually be retarded.[/QUOTE] More baseless insults with no grounding in a proper argument? Unsurprising.
[QUOTE=DohEntertainmen;49639649]A simple argument against multiculturalism is the symbolism of a color palette. Take the colors, put them together, and you get no diversity, but the ruining of the separate colors. Ruining the home of many for the needs of nobody only leads to people having no home, but instead wandering about as cosmopolitans. As much as I admire Diogenes, there was no doubt that his hatred for the Athenians was the real reason he created such a term. Not for the destruction of separate cultures, for the sake of a one-world culture.[/QUOTE] so everyone will forever stay segregated in their own communities? you are so historically ignorant of how things have come to pass that it's actually shocking. technology is the result of different peoples from different places in the world coming together. please destroy your computer as it the parts of it were no doubt made in china or taiwan, and as a opponent to globalism, you're supporting the regime by holding on to your computer, you should destroy it if you feel even the slightest honesty to your own beliefs.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.