US Government Declares 22 Clinton Emails as "Top Secret"
148 replies, posted
That was one helluva loud "WHITE POWER" that guy was suppressing there.
Trumpers, ladies and germs.
I literally just can't even... Like, wow! Never legitimately seen somebody argue that interracial relationships were "hedonistic" and "degenerate to the human race." Fuck me. Haha.
Trump's target demographic, everybody.
What the fuck has this thread devolved into.
From Hillary Clinton and her emails to...hedonism and asian girls?
[QUOTE=Big Dumb American;49640486]I literally just can't even... Like, wow! Never legitimately seen so!ebody argue that interracial relationships were "hedonistic" and "degenerate to the hu!an race." Fuck me. Haha.[/QUOTE]
there's plenty of other similar guys around, but naturally they're much more quiet or eloquent than this fellow
[QUOTE=Big Dumb American;49640486]I literally just can't even... Like, wow! Never legitimately seen so!ebody argue that interracial relationships were "hedonistic" and "degenerate to the hu!an race." Fuck me. Haha.[/QUOTE]
I predict a complaint in the Camp about this site being "leftist", "marxist", or whatever other buzzwords right-wing nuts tend to sling.
[QUOTE=Sobotnik;49640458]since when does having sex with an asian girl lead to the destruction of society[/QUOTE]Every time I go to Koreatown I risk destroying America in a drug-fueled hedonistic orgy.
[I]I am not sorry.[/I]
[QUOTE=JumpinJackFlash;49640497]Every time I go to Koreatown I risk destroying America in a drug-fueled hedonistic orgy.
[I]I am not sorry.[/I][/QUOTE]
Every time I take a bite of shawarma, I contribute to the gradual erosion of American culture.
The future has never been so tasty.
[QUOTE=Disgruntled;49640495]I predict a complaint in the Camp about this site being "leftist", "marxist", or whatever other buzzwords right-wing nuts tend to sling.[/QUOTE]
It's even better. "This is what I honestly believe, why am I being banned for my opinion?" :v:
RIP, he will be forgotten by morning.
I bet that guy fucking loves pizza. You know, from filthy foreign Italy.
Is there any chance of this thread recovering, and getting back to Clinton fucking up a bunch of security protocols and whatnot? That would be preferable to locking it due to the increasingly distracting rants of some nutter.
Oh yeah, I hope someone throws the book at Hillary. She dun goofed.
[QUOTE=Big Dumb American;49640633]Is there any chance of this thread recovering, and getting back to Clinton fucking up a bunch of security protocols and whatnot? That would be preferable to locking it due to the increasingly distracting rants of some nutter.[/QUOTE]
My hope is
[QUOTE=Wii60;49633099]rip Hillary 2016[/QUOTE]
Hillary should absolutely go to prison, anyone else who did even a fraction of what she did would be in Leavenworth (as Maverick1B said) and it's frankly a little fucking insulting that we have a class of untouchables in the United States. Our system was built to prevent that very thing from happening, so it's not only wrong but it's also anti-American if she gets goes unpunished.
[QUOTE=JumpinJackFlash;49640702]Hillary should absolutely go to prison, anyone else who did even a fraction of what she did would be in Leavenworth (as Maverick1B said) and it's frankly a little fucking insulting that we have a class of untouchables in the United States. Our system was built to prevent that very thing from happening, so it's not only wrong but it's also anti-American if she gets goes unpunished.[/QUOTE]
Like I said earlier though, different spanks for different ranks.
Look at Gen. Petraeus.
[QUOTE=Psychokitten;49640803]Like I said earlier though, different spanks for different ranks.
Look at Gen. Petraeus.[/QUOTE]Yes, and we're a nation of laws. They're written down for a reason.
He escaped punishment just barely and still got paroled, and now he's going to get retroactively demoted for that shit too. Had things been just a cunthair off he'd likely be sitting his ass in prison, and really I don't think he should have merely gotten off with probation and a likely demotion.
Even so his situation is mitigated by the fact that he has admitted it was a damaging mistake and he really didn't try to dodge punishment. (though the Republicans went to bad for him fucking immediately) Hillary has tried so goddamn hard to avoid this every which way she can and it's gross. She's trash, and we put trash in places specifically designed to hold trash for however long a court of law deems necessary.
[QUOTE=ilikecorn;49640907]But you assume our system is [I]functional[/I]. Which we've all seen that anyone who knows the right people, or has enough money, or a combination of the two, is virtually free to do as they see fit. With Hillary running for president, there's no fucking way she'll get charged with anything, at all, it'll get buried in the deepest recesses of the FBI archives until the day she dies, AND THEN they'll continue the investigation. Is she innocent, is she guilty, were those files really there? We'll never know, because she's the poster child for the dems right now, and there's a lot of weight behind making her stay nice and "clean".[/QUOTE]Hey I'm not saying it's all going to work out like it should but I am saying it ought to.
Situation is fucked up, if somebody wants a good example of something that's wrong with our country I'll point to this and go "all of this stupid, silly shit." None of this should have even happened in the first place.
[QUOTE=elixwhitetail;49632867]This is why Bill Clinton only ever sent two emails while in office. One was a test email, the other was an email to the ISS.
Email is not secure, period. It was never designed to be used to transmit sensitive information or protect itself from compromise.[/QUOTE]
While emails alone are about as secure as a letter, it's possible to secure the contents of the email to make it one of the most secure ways of communication possible.
[QUOTE=Psychokitten;49640803]Like I said earlier though, different spanks for different ranks.
Look at Gen. Petraeus.[/QUOTE]
Like I said earlier, Petraeus didn't really get off. He resigned, got 2 years of probation, and had to pay a $100,000 fine which was MORE than the prosecution was even asking for. This is what the law demanded for what he did, showing his lover a few documents (We really don't know how much. It could have just been one or two) to impress her in private. And he only got what he did because he took a plea deal.
It's not even comparable to Clinton.
[QUOTE=sgman91;49641455]Like I said earlier, Petraeus didn't really get off. He resigned, got 2 years of probation, and had to pay a $100,000 fine which was MORE than the prosecution was even asking for. This is what the law demanded for what he did, showing his lover a few documents (We really don't know how much. It could have just been one or two) to impress her in private. And he only got what he did because he took a plea deal.
It's not even comparable to Clinton.[/QUOTE]
That plea deal is exactly the issue.
Imagine some dumb-fuck PFC in exactly the same circumstances. Think he would have gotten one? Fuck no. They'd have shoved the book so far up his ass, he'd be blowing his nose with the pages.
Funny how she did this shit and is petitioning to ban encryption
She hasn't got a fucking clue how security works
[QUOTE=DrDevil;49641047]While emails alone are about as secure as a letter, it's possible to secure the contents of the email to make it one of the most secure ways of communication possible.[/QUOTE]That doesn't matter at all. You could make it all but completely airtight and it would still boil down to something already said:
[QUOTE=MaverickIB;49635175]Encrypted =/= secure as far as top secret information goes.
Top secret information is not allowed to be online. Ever. It only exists on closed off networks and is only sent from one designated computer with connection to that network to another computer on that network. When it needs to be transported physically, it's done in locked the fuck up briefcases with an individual practically handcuffed to it, containing a clearly marked CD or document. It can also be transmitted via phone, but on specific phones designated for top secret information through a satellite that handles nothing but top secret shit. It's an absurdly complicated process to transfer TS information.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Psychokitten;49641498]That plea deal is exactly the issue.
Imagine some dumb-fuck PFC in exactly the same circumstances. Think he would have gotten one? Fuck no. They'd have shoved the book so far up his ass, he'd be blowing his nose with the pages.[/QUOTE]
Do you have an equivalent example? If not, then it's nothing but conjecture. Anything where a lower ranked person showed confidential info in a private scenario, that never got published, with no ill-intent, and stopped with an admittance of guilt before trial (cases that go to trial generally have higher penalties).
Why the fuck do we have plea deals? Is it just to boost conviction rate? Like, seriously?
So, are Hillary and the government covering up top secret emails outlying mass surveillance...again?
I'd be more concerned about what they're trying to hide than what effect this has on her bullshit campaign.
[QUOTE=Sobotnik;49640458]since when does having sex with an asian girl lead to the destruction of society[/QUOTE]
dont you get it? its text book example of slippery slope
first you bang asian chicks, and next you know you are banging dead cats and dogs! OR WORSE
men
[QUOTE=Sobotnik;49640458]since when does having sex with an asian girl lead to the destruction of society[/QUOTE]
Well, if those girls like guys who spend their time writing essays about their sexual libido and genetic supremacy in a thread about Hilary Clinton on a video game forum... then the future of society may truly be in danger.
Anybody further derailing the thread is gonna get banned. This is about a Clinton acandal, not race traitors or whatever.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.