• Fox News on Boston Bombers and Family: "He has no rights!"
    125 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Big Dumb American;40489164][media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4X_9au28_9M[/media][/QUOTE] When Bill O'Reilly is the voice of reason in your discussion you know you're a fucking nutcase
[QUOTE=Pierrewithahat;40491708]Wow. She's a well liked personality?[/QUOTE] no
I've never met anyone whose liked Ann Coulter besides a friend I had in high school who was a Neo-Con
Jesus christ that woman (in the OP) is a dumbass. She seriously seems like a [I]stereotype[/I] of a conservative rather than a real one. Then again, conservatives in the US tend to be like that. Same with the guys in the Jon Stewart video. "We gave these immigrants rights and freedoms, and they blow us up! Why should we let them be here?" is the exact same reasoning as this video, except not a joke: [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9S75Rfva9O8[/media] "I don't give a damn if the rest of the world likes us or not, they attack us and hate us, so why should we care?" She [I]does[/I] know that people attack us and hate us [I]because[/I] they don't like us, right? I mean, that's just basic fucking logic. She's just exacerbating the problem.
[QUOTE=Big Dumb American;40489164][media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4X_9au28_9M[/media][/QUOTE] I lost it at radiation being good for you
[QUOTE=deltasquid;40488610]"Innocent until proven guilty? naaaah" ~Fox News[/QUOTE] Not to defend Fox, but pretty much all media throws the whole "innocent until proven guilty" thing out the window.
This reminds me so much of bioshock infinite
Natives, Africans, Mexicans, Chinese, Irish, Japaneses, Homosexuals, Muslims. What will the Magical Wheel of Bigotry land on next?
Stuff like this being on television is legitimately scary to me. like, i know you guys have the freedom to say what you want when you want etc etc, but the fact the level of hateful, fear-mongering, ignorant and morally abhorrent shit that ive seen in clips posted through-out this thread is considered acceptable enough that its decided worthy of being televised in america is reeeeally unsettling.
[QUOTE]Privacy? PRIVACY?! WHAT PRIVACY?!? [/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Splarg!;40488634]Love the Crazy Jihad Lady photo they used for her quotes. [img]http://oi40.tinypic.com/rscsxt.jpg[/img][/QUOTE] why isn't that libel
[QUOTE=Zeke129;40496205]why isn't that libel[/QUOTE] The flames and "momsama bin laden" were added in later. It was just the quote and her picture, though the picture is def cherry picked.
[QUOTE=Pierrewithahat;40491564]Between Fox News and other shitty media outlets as well as shit like the drone strikes then the US could easily become one of the most hated countries in the world. Which just drives the wheel of war really, the next generation of terrorists are currently growing up watching their neighbours get eviscerated thanks to some cunt sitting having his morning coffee as he pilots a drone.[/QUOTE] What makes that "cunt" any different than a "cunt" who can shit out bombs from his plane from miles away in the air? Or a "cunt" who shoves a shell into a cannon miles away that can blow you to smithereens? Or a "cunt" a mile away looking through a telescope as he blows your head off? Why is the drone "cunt" any worse?
[QUOTE=i-am-teh-sex;40492233]I lost it at radiation being good for you[/QUOTE] I feel like that is the one part she wasnt absolutely retarded on, but she still was being stubborn
Bring back public executions string them up in the streets and send osama bin obama a message god bless fox news
There was a really fascinating, albeit low budget, documentary about the methods Fox News uses to imprint ideas onto their audience, like starting a sentence with "Some say..." I wish I could remember the name of it.
Stay classy, Fox.
[QUOTE=Metashotzo;40496998]There was a really fascinating, albeit low budget, documentary about the methods Fox News uses to imprint ideas onto their audience, like starting a sentence with "Some say..." I wish I could remember the name of it.[/QUOTE] outfoxed?
Am I watching reality television? This is some pretty good acting.
He was denied a lawyer if I recall correctly.
[QUOTE=ma21212;40497373]He was denied a lawyer if I recall correctly.[/QUOTE] What's your source on this? I have two that both say Judy Clarke was assigned as a lawyer to the defense team of the Boston Bombing. [url]http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/29/boston-bombing-judy-clark_n_3181083.html[/url] [url]http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/unabomber_lawyer_judy_clarke_is_appointed_to_represent_boston_marathon_bomb/[/url] Regardless, Fox is going to slip and end up with a slander/libel court case on their hands. Ironically after doing some research the judge is right in that the federal judge didn't have the right to end the interrogation unless Tsarnaev explicitly stated he wished to remain silent. If I recall though, if the interrogation is regarding immediate public safety then he has to be informed of his Miranda rights prior to the interrogation. A person doesn't, legally speaking, [b]have[/b] to be informed of their Miranda rights but any information gained just can't be used in court.
[QUOTE=Truckasaurus1;40496736]What makes that "cunt" any different than a "cunt" who can shit out bombs from his plane from miles away in the air? Or a "cunt" who shoves a shell into a cannon miles away that can blow you to smithereens? Or a "cunt" a mile away looking through a telescope as he blows your head off? Why is the drone "cunt" any worse?[/QUOTE]I see your point, but I think what he's getting at is that it's mostly a psychological thing. The cannon, pilot, and sniper cunts - while still pretty safe - have invested a bit of time and effort to be in the optimal position to ruin your day. The drone-piloting cunt, for all you know, may not have even bothered to put on pants yet.
As a former drone operator, I can attest to hardly ever wearing pants.
[QUOTE=Pennywise;40498510]I see your point, but I think what he's getting at is that it's mostly a psychological thing. The cannon, pilot, and sniper cunts - while still pretty safe - have invested a bit of time and effort to be in the optimal position to ruin your day. The drone-piloting cunt, for all you know, may not have even bothered to put on pants yet.[/QUOTE] Yeah but the pilot doesn't have to trek countless miles across land, putting himself in harms way, sleep in muddy foxholes and suffer withering elements. He doesn't have to look you in the eye as he eviscerates you. That seems to be the only way combat is justified in the eyes of UAV haters. It's as if they wish for warfare to be as brutal as possible otherwise it's... different somehow. People have been blowing each other up fom very far away for a very, very long time now. "Hey Vercintegorix, how about those goddamn Roman catapults, huh? That's bullshit. Those cunts just sit back way far away from the actual battle and kill you without batting an eye!"
[QUOTE=Truckasaurus1;40500828] "Hey Vercintegorix, how about those goddamn Roman catapults, huh? That's bullshit. Those cunts just sit back way far away from the actual battle and kill you without batting an eye!"[/QUOTE] IIRC archers were the lowest of the low in ye olde armies exactly because of that, so that's actually fairly accurate.
...Wow. This has simply further strengthened my belief that America is actually mentally retarded. I don't mean everyone in it, but if people like this, and that crazy Ann woman are actually allowed on public television to speak about things, then its quite clear the people in power do not have any brain matter inside their skulls.
[QUOTE=WitheredGryphon;40497980]What's your source on this? I have two that both say Judy Clarke was assigned as a lawyer to the defense team of the Boston Bombing. [url]http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/29/boston-bombing-judy-clark_n_3181083.html[/url] [url]http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/unabomber_lawyer_judy_clarke_is_appointed_to_represent_boston_marathon_bomb/[/url] Regardless, Fox is going to slip and end up with a slander/libel court case on their hands. Ironically after doing some research the judge is right in that the federal judge didn't have the right to end the interrogation unless Tsarnaev explicitly stated he wished to remain silent. If I recall though, if the interrogation is regarding immediate public safety then he has to be informed of his Miranda rights prior to the interrogation. A person doesn't, legally speaking, [b]have[/b] to be informed of their Miranda rights but any information gained just can't be used in court.[/QUOTE] Well I mean that he wasn't assigned a lawyer when he asked for one. [url]http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/apr/29/tsarnaev-right-to-counsel-denied[/url]
WHAT THE FUCK WHY ARE PEOPLE LIKE THESE EVEN ALIVE?? UGHH
this isn't a judge who gives actual convictions in a real court, is she? if so, holy fuck. A judge saying "I don't give a damn about the constitution" should instantly strip her of any legal power she has. She is actually trying to make out Obama as the "bad guy" because he follows the constitution and the bill of rights??? How did this bitch make it so far in our legal system?? A judge saying "fuck the constitution" should be treason.
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/E7ai9nt.png[/IMG] [I]PROIVACY?[/I]
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.