• Lamborghini bursts into flames on M25
    82 replies, posted
*Picture and description of a car model and type that I think is far superior compared to everything else and state it as a fact*
[QUOTE=rampageturke 2;41906456]pure jealousy[/QUOTE] To be fairly honest I wouldn't want a car that randomly bursts into flames either. It's not like lamborghinis are the only cars in that price bracket.
[QUOTE=FingerSpazem;41911662]I had no idea there were cars with such low mpg. Just shows what I know[/QUOTE] It was voted the gas guzzler of the year when it came out :v: [editline]21st August 2013[/editline] [QUOTE='[IT] Zodiac;41913780']Guys, Lambo are NOT luxury cars. If you actually had one, you'd know that inside they are as bare as a desert: no radio, no air conditioning, nothing. They aren't as comfortable or as easy to drive as a Rolls Royce, or even a normal, inexpensive car. They are super-cars, made for wanna-be racers. You're not supposed to drive them in the streets for your daily needs. You take them to a race track and have fun.[/QUOTE] Only the lp 670-4 sv doesnt has a radio because its a lightweight roadgoing competition version of the regular lp 640-4. Every other lambo has those comforts actually. Not like a rolls but still. [editline]21st August 2013[/editline] [QUOTE=Ganerumo;41915094]To be fairly honest I wouldn't want a car that randomly bursts into flames either. It's not like lamborghinis are the only cars in that price bracket.[/QUOTE] Ob that price braket, I'm thinking maybe mclaren mp4-12c.
[QUOTE=Ishwoo;41905861]I'd be pretty pissed if i was the guy who owned this, you would've thought a car that expensive wouldn't just randomly burst into flames[/QUOTE] This [B]keeps[/B] happening to very expensive cars, its like they are all doing something wrong.
[QUOTE=matt.ant;41905769][B]A Lamborghini burst into flames today, causing traffic chaos on the M25, Britain's busiest motorway. [IMG]http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2013/08/20/article-2398259-1B618523000005DC-350_634x343.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE] ©Ferrari ? :v:
[QUOTE=Jsm;41915556]This [B]keeps[/B] happening to very expensive cars, its like they are all doing something wrong.[/QUOTE] Don't think this doesn't happen with cheap cars. They just don't make the news.
[QUOTE=kebab52;41908385]In a thread about cars catching fire you're saying you'd want a TVR?[/QUOTE] Well... yes. It's all part of the excitement! [editline]21st August 2013[/editline] [QUOTE=_Maverick_;41908992][img]http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4151/5059428869_19d6a9a7b9.jpg[/img] Why would you pick a car with an ugly as sin body kit when you can have a work of art such as this beauty[/QUOTE] lolcan'tturn
[QUOTE=FinalHunter;41920623]Seriously? Why would you EVER pick a Countach over a Ferrari F40? Or better yet, a different Lambo. [thumb]http://www.hdcarwallpapers.com/walls/lamborghini_aventador_lp700_4_usa-wide.jpg[/thumb][/QUOTE] Well first I said it's the best lambo and not best car ever. Second I mean it purely look wise as I am not big into the technical aspect of cars. I just prefer the straight lines of the countach to the new designs. And I do like the F40 it has a cute worried expression [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/V5eYBOM.jpg[/IMG]
[QUOTE=butre;41911305]I owned an italian car once and I can tell you it's just how italians do things[/QUOTE] My father bought a Moto Guzzi and it partially caught on fire too.
[QUOTE=FinalHunter;41921033]I could never own a countach because it looks too much to me like something you'd make out of legos.[/QUOTE] You are saying it like it's a bad thing.
I think the countach is a pretty radical design considering it's 40 years old
[QUOTE=Midas22;41914966]Lamborghini is owned by Audi and Audi's supercars and their subsidiaries have a reputation of setting on fire. It's an Audi thing.[/QUOTE] No, lambo is owned by fiat, which is ironic because chrysler once owned lambo, guess who owns chrysler now [editline]21st August 2013[/editline] [QUOTE=*Freezorg*;41920590]Well... yes. It's all part of the excitement! [editline]21st August 2013[/editline] lolcan'tturn[/QUOTE] Want a boat, try a 442 made into a station wagon [img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/02/'69_Oldsmobile_Vista_Cruiser_(Rigaud).jpg/280px-'69_Oldsmobile_Vista_Cruiser_(Rigaud).jpg[/img] or better yet, my dad's friend's car [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bsrLaZwSEYM[/media] The one with the Ontario plates
[img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/31/SoundTransit_DE60LF_6.png[/img] representin'
[QUOTE=viperfan7;41923269]No, lambo is owned by fiat, which is ironic because chrysler once owned lambo, guess who owns chrysler now[/QUOTE] What? "Automobili Lamborghini S.p.A. is an Italian manufacturer of luxury sportscars which is owned by Volkswagen Group through its subsidiary Audi." [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Audi[/url] under subsidaries "Automobili Lamborghini S.p.A." Maserati on the other hand is owned by Fiat.
[QUOTE=Spectre1406;41914648][Img]http://www.extravaganzi.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/1972-Lamborghini-Miura-SV.jpg[/img][/QUOTE] I like the old, strange Lamborghinis more than the modern ones, (favorite being that beauty, the Miura). like this 4 seater hatchback, the Espada. [img]http://www.instablogsimages.com/1/2012/09/18/1347974054.jpg[/img]
I'd really hate to be the owner in this situation. Nothing like having your awesome car get incinerated with nothing to do about it. That's potentially hundreds of thousands of dollars down the drain right there, even if it is covered under warranty or not entirely paid for.
[img]http://photos.ecarlist.com/M7/9m/fY/Xb/cH/gP/zR/Vy/tr/p0/RQ_640.jpg[/img] I'd get one of those
[QUOTE=Flarey;41927199][img]http://photos.ecarlist.com/M7/9m/fY/Xb/cH/gP/zR/Vy/tr/p0/RQ_640.jpg[/img] I'd get one of those[/QUOTE] trust me they're better to look at than they are to own.
[QUOTE=Flarey;41927199][img]http://photos.ecarlist.com/M7/9m/fY/Xb/cH/gP/zR/Vy/tr/p0/RQ_640.jpg[/img] I'd get one of those[/QUOTE] As much as I long for this car, I can't exactly say I would like to have one as a daily driver. The insurance drinks more money than a Steam summer sale and the Track Edition( shown in the picture ) lacks the rear seats, not to mention that the people don't have much head room. You're basically paying more to have no rear seats, a carbon fiber spoiler, and those rims could be easily replaced by VOLK TE37 Tokyo Time Attack's. And as far as I know the engine is the same as the Premium version.
[QUOTE=Flarey;41927199][img]http://photos.ecarlist.com/M7/9m/fY/Xb/cH/gP/zR/Vy/tr/p0/RQ_640.jpg[/img] I'd get one of those[/QUOTE] They are smooth as fuck @ high speeds.
[QUOTE=Panda X;41925095]What? "Automobili Lamborghini S.p.A. is an Italian manufacturer of luxury sportscars which is owned by Volkswagen Group through its subsidiary Audi." [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Audi[/url] under subsidaries "Automobili Lamborghini S.p.A." Maserati on the other hand is owned by Fiat.[/QUOTE] Wait what, this is news to me, I could have sworn I read that they were owned by fiat [editline]22nd August 2013[/editline] I'm an idiot, posted that while exhausted from not sleeping for 36 hours, I was thinking of ferarri
[QUOTE=FinalHunter;41935437]My neighbor has one of those. Full black just like that one, rims and all. I have no idea how he afforded it, but I cream myself every time I hear it go by.[/QUOTE] That thing costs around $80k or $90k, which is pretty cheap.
why is this thread still relevant its irritating me fuck man
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.