Manga images 'not child porn', says Sweden's Supreme Court
497 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Kopimi;36373318]did you honestly type this out and think: "yeah.. this discussion is OVER..."
because furries jerk it to HUMANS with an animal color scheme or a tail or some other minor feature. by and large they're jerking it to pictures of HUMANS. if someone took a picture of a DOG and found it attractive i'd say there's a chance they'd be attracted to REAL DOGS.
the same way that furry illustrations represent humans, so do loli images. your brain sees an image of a HUMAN (child) and is attracted to it. the fact that the character doesn't exist in real life doesn't matter, the anatomy of the child is still attractive to you
[editline]17th June 2012[/editline]
um there are stylistic differences but you're pathetically desperate if you honestly don't think anime figures represent humans
[editline]17th June 2012[/editline]
like are you seriously saying "BUT THEY HAVE BIG EYES, REAL PEOPLE DONT HAVE BIG EYES!!" and expecting that is supposed to be solid evidence that anime attraction != human attraction?[/QUOTE]
my sides hurt from this
Wait...I lost track.
What's this debate about now?
also having a small figure != child
[QUOTE=Sanius;36372973]a great way to invalidate an argument is to make an ass out of yourself arguing it[/QUOTE]
The irony hurts
[QUOTE=xxncxx;36373350]my sides hurt from this[/QUOTE]
hm interesting reply, i see now why i'm wrong
[QUOTE=FlubberNugget;36373345]So you're trying to say anyone that likes loli pretty much likes actual CP?
hah, good1[/QUOTE]
yeah i am, glad you're keeping up
[QUOTE=Swilly;36373352]Wait...I lost track.
What's this debate about now?[/QUOTE]
it's just 2 people spouting bias
[QUOTE=xxncxx;36373364]also having a small figure != child[/QUOTE]
uh there's a big difference between like, a petite woman and a child
i don't know what loli porn you're looking at and i almost wish we were allowed to link loli porn just to prove how full of shit you are
[editline]17th June 2012[/editline]
[QUOTE=xxncxx;36373374]it's just 2 people spouting bias[/QUOTE]
and heres why i think that:
So where is the proof of this, kopimi, I mean there's a ton of proof against this so you must sure have some proof that both destroys those, and validates your argument, or you wouldn't be talking right now, would you?
Also, real children look like this:
[img]http://seitoacademy.files.wordpress.com/2008/09/lucky-star1.jpg[/img]
:v:
[QUOTE=Sanius;36369751]give me a fucking break, dude. pedophiles are not victims of bigotry. whatever flak they get they deserve
[/QUOTE]
That's horse shit. They have very unfortunate urges, and loli can let them deal with those urges without actually, you know, raping children. They can't control what they're attracted to, they just are. They're normal people like you and I.
[QUOTE=Kopimi;36373380]uh there's a big difference between like, a petite woman and a child
i don't know what loli porn you're looking at and i almost wish we were allowed to link loli porn just to prove how full of shit you are
[editline]17th June 2012[/editline]
and heres why i think that:[/QUOTE]
It's pretty much true, you and sanius are the only people here essentially insisting that people who did nothing wrong are scum of the earth.
And since loli has already been linked in this thread anyway(The images the guy was arrested for in the first case), I'm pretty sure you're allowed to post a link to it, as long as you don't img tag it.
[QUOTE=Crimor;36373410]So where is the proof of this, kopimi, I mean there's a ton of proof against this so you must sure have some proof that both destroys those, and validates your argument, or you wouldn't be talking right now, would you?
Also, real children look like this:
[img]http://seitoacademy.files.wordpress.com/2008/09/lucky-star1.jpg[/img]
:v:[/QUOTE]
I'd also love to see this so called proof he has against it.
[QUOTE=Crimor;36373410]So where is the proof of this, kopimi, I mean there's a ton of proof against this so you must sure have some proof that both destroys those, and validates your argument, or you wouldn't be talking right now, would you?
Also, real children look like this:
[img]http://seitoacademy.files.wordpress.com/2008/09/lucky-star1.jpg[/img]
:v:[/QUOTE]
A. yeah the overall form, figure and personality is that of a child
B. that isn't loli, you're no longer worth listening to in this argument
[url=https://7chan.org/cake/src/127835316155.gif]nsfw - lolicon / disgusting pedo shit only linked for comparison, not shock value dont ban me i swear to god[/url]
this is lolicon
doesnt look like a real child at all, cmon guys i swear..
That's toddlercon afaik, try again.
...I'm still confused.
Don't give me vague answers, dammit!
[QUOTE=Crimor;36373452]That's toddlercon, try again.[/QUOTE]
are you fuckin serious
fine let me ask you this, do you find toddlercon acceptable?
[editline]17th June 2012[/editline]
the fact that you know the names of multiple classifications of illustrated child fucking is a bit distressing tbh
[QUOTE=Kopimi;36373445]A. yeah the overall form, figure and personality is that of a child
B. that isn't loli, you're no longer worth listening to in this argument
[url=https://7chan.org/cake/src/127835316155.gif]nsfw - lolicon / disgusting pedo shit only linked for comparison, not shock value dont ban me i swear to god[/url]
this is lolicon
doesnt look like a real child at all, cmon guys i swear..[/QUOTE]
Well for one, real children aren't drawn, nor 2D.
[QUOTE=Crimor;36373452]That's toddlercon afaik, try again.[/QUOTE]
toddlercon is a subset of lolicon
Ok everyone's opinion on loli being ok/hateful/notCP/simulatedCP/whatever aside, anyone who thinks any drawing should be a criminal offense for any reason is an idiot.
Like seriously. Being sent to prison over a fucking drawing.
[QUOTE=xxncxx;36373486]Well for one, real children aren't drawn, nor 2D.[/QUOTE]
does that mean people to jerk off to illustrations of adult women (be it actual drawings or photographs) aren't attracted to real life women, because they're 2D?
[QUOTE=Kopimi;36373445]A. yeah the overall form, figure and personality is that of a child
B. that isn't loli, you're no longer worth listening to in this argument
[url=https://7chan.org/cake/src/127835316155.gif]nsfw - lolicon / disgusting pedo shit only linked for comparison, not shock value dont ban me i swear to god[/url]
this is lolicon
doesnt look like a real child at all, cmon guys i swear..[/QUOTE]
[B]You're wrong, that means you can't contribute to the argument![/B]
[QUOTE=Kopimi;36373467]are you fuckin serious
fine let me ask you this, do you find toddlercon acceptable?
[editline]17th June 2012[/editline]
the fact that you know the names of multiple classifications of illustrated child fucking is a bit distressing tbh[/QUOTE]
Hi guess what unpleasant things exist
Sorry to shatter your earth-view
And I'm pretty sure they don't have eyes the size of a 4" marble
[QUOTE=Kopimi;36373496]does that mean people to jerk off to illustrations of adult women (be it actual drawings or photographs) aren't attracted to real life women, because they're 2D?[/QUOTE]
There is always going to be someone that is like this
[QUOTE=Kopimi;36373496]does that mean people to jerk off to illustrations of adult women (be it actual drawings or photographs) aren't attracted to real life women, because they're 2D?[/QUOTE]
They might like both, they might not. I only like gay stuff when it's drawn, I'm sure it could go the reverse as well.
[QUOTE=Kopimi;36373496]does that mean people to jerk off to illustrations of adult women (be it actual drawings or photographs) aren't attracted to real life women, because they're 2D?[/QUOTE]
Yes, its fairly common too
[QUOTE=FlubberNugget;36373497][B]You're wrong, that means you can't contribute to the argument![/B][/QUOTE]
uh considering he's either honestly dumb enough to think a simple anime about children is comparable to illustrations of buggering children, or he's misleading enough to try using that as an argument, yeah, i'm not paying attention to him anymore
[QUOTE=Mr. Smartass;36373501]Hi guess what unpleasant things exist
Sorry to shatter your earth-view[/QUOTE]
literally no relation to what i'm talking about but thanks for your effort
[QUOTE=Kopimi;36373467]are you fuckin serious
fine let me ask you this, do you find toddlercon acceptable?
[editline]17th June 2012[/editline]
the fact that you know the names of multiple classifications of illustrated child fucking is a bit distressing tbh[/QUOTE]
I actually study the psychology of pedophilia and lolicon as a hobby, you'd be amazed how interesting it is.
And I support anything as long as it does not have a victim, I don't like it myself, but people are free to fap to anything they fucking please as long as there's not a victim involved.
[QUOTE=xxncxx;36373505]And I'm pretty sure they don't have eyes the size of a 4" marble[/QUOTE]
stylized erotic depictions of young girls are still erotic depictions of young girls
[QUOTE=xxncxx;36373527]Yes, its fairly common too[/QUOTE]
aight im out
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.