• Swedish police gun down some robbers
    107 replies, posted
[url]http://www.expressen.se/nyheter/familjen-vakar-over-skjutna-26-aringen-1/[/url] Family complaining about police brutality and saying hes a nice guy.
[QUOTE=Mi-24;39102632][url]http://www.expressen.se/nyheter/familjen-vakar-over-skjutna-26-aringen-1/[/url] Family complaining about police brutality and saying hes a nice guy.[/QUOTE] [quote]"Not necessary to shoot ' Relatives No one disputes that the police shot 26-year-old in the forehead. - If they are going to shoot someone, they should shoot at the legs. They could have sent up a helicopter and followed the car. It was not necessary to shoot him.[/quote]
If someone brings out an AK-47 in a robbery they they deserve to be shot in the face.
Seeing how there was tons of people out there, robbers armed with assault rifles and shooting police. Police shooting them back. And only the robber got shot. So i would say police did their work well and robbers didn't completely fuck up everything.
[QUOTE=Vodkavia;39102552][IMG]http://i.imgur.com/RVYan.png[/IMG] What the fuck did they do to these scissors!?[/QUOTE] It's supposed to help cut away excess clothing to get a wound they cannot see. The angle is to make it more useful for paramedics to use
Good thing they were stopped, such a shame there had to be bloodshed though [img]http://sae.tweek.us/static/images/emoticons/frown.gif[/img]
[QUOTE=Mi-24;39102632][url]http://www.expressen.se/nyheter/familjen-vakar-over-skjutna-26-aringen-1/[/url] Family complaining about police brutality and saying hes a nice guy.[/QUOTE] [QUOTE="OP"]There were 4 robbers total and two of them were armed with AKs. One of the robbers opened a fire and was immediately shot down by the police.[/QUOTE]
Those robbers are totally retarded Really there seemed to be no attempt at making the ordeal clean so a better get away/less chance of getting fucking shot. It seems like they went in to the store with AKs and went "gibe moni naow".
I'm impressed! The news claimed it was an AK, and it actually WAS an AK!
[QUOTE=King Tiger;39100649]Why couldn't they just do a leg or arm shot? Police brutality right here.[/QUOTE] why couldnt they just use their hands?!?!
[QUOTE=SilentOpp;39103038]I'm impressed! The news claimed it was an AK, and it actually WAS an AK![/QUOTE] you trucking retard thats no ak, its a m16 assault rifle made for the recent brazillian revolution trust me the daily mail told me so i know
[QUOTE=abcpea2;39103064]why couldnt they just use their hands?!?![/QUOTE] why couldn't they just calmly defuse the situation through negotiation and hugs [Editline]ristnaiornstioanriostnoarnsotiear[/editline] ?!?!
[img]http://puu.sh/1JNiy[/img] thats a nice looking glock
its a type 58
The police in Sweden does not (are not supposed to) aim to kill. So I'm not sure if this was a failure in the aim, adrenaline/fear or something else.
[QUOTE=Jawyen;39103194]The police in Sweden does not (are not supposed to) aim to kill. So I'm not sure if this was a failure in the aim, adrenaline/fear or something else.[/QUOTE] How do you not aim to kill?
[QUOTE=abcpea2;39103175]its a type 58[/QUOTE] How can you tell?
[QUOTE=Araknid;39103127][img]http://puu.sh/1JNiy[/img] thats a nice looking glock[/QUOTE] It's not a Glock, it's an AK-47 Bushmaster.
[QUOTE=BlkDucky;39101011]how can you people be falling for this[/QUOTE] not everyone frequents SH.
[QUOTE=Jawyen;39103194]The police in Sweden does not (are not supposed to) aim to kill. So I'm not sure if this was a failure in the aim, adrenaline/fear or something else.[/QUOTE] I don't know about you, but when a guy starts shooting with an AK, keeping him alive wouldn't be the first thing on my mind. There are exceptions man.
They were some pretty good shots by the Swedish police amidst all the chaos. Two directly in the drivers windscreen, and two directly into the windscreen of the open door in which the robbers where entering the car. Bravo
I'm not entirely convinced the robbers opened fire first. From the vids I've seen, I only heard the police shoot. And tbh they handled it badly, they cared more about popping heads than getting civs to safety.
[QUOTE=G-Strogg;39103712]I'm not entirely convinced the robbers opened fire first. From the vids I've seen, I only heard the police shoot. And tbh they handled it badly, they cared more about popping heads than getting civs to safety.[/QUOTE] Are you joking? Getting civilians to safety in that situation is shooting down the bad guys who could potentially kill the cops and the civilians.
[QUOTE=laserguided;39103727]Are you joking? Getting civilians to safety in that situation is shooting down the bad guys who could potentially kill the cops and the civilians.[/QUOTE] There was a guy standing literally behind a police officer, least he could've done was push him down or something. He was sort of hiding behind a thin tree which would not have offered good cover if he was actually shot at.
[QUOTE=G-Strogg;39103736]There was a guy standing literally behind a police officer, least he could've done was push him down or something. He was sort of hiding behind a thin tree which would not have offered good cover if he was actually shot at.[/QUOTE] Its kind of his fault for standing behind a cop in a shoot out.
[QUOTE=G-Strogg;39103712]I'm not entirely convinced the robbers opened fire first. From the vids I've seen, I only heard the police shoot. And tbh they handled it badly, they cared more about popping heads than getting civs to safety.[/QUOTE] So let the robbers keep shooting at them with AK's while pulling civilians into safety? You shoot the threat, you don't get shot while trying to get a completely safe environment for shooting. Huzza söta bror, you handled this good. Also note for the people who are asking why the civvies didn't run: It's a few days after new years eve, a couple of loud bangs isn't going to scare anyone.
[QUOTE=laserguided;39103752]Its kind of his fault for standing behind a cop in a shoot out.[/QUOTE] What if he was caught in the middle of it without time to escape? Even more stupid to just run out of what little cover he had. And where do you get off saying it's his fault, he doesn't deserve to get shot just because he didn't react fast enough. You are beyond stupid. [editline]5th January 2013[/editline] [QUOTE=brainmaster;39103807]So let the robbers keep shooting at them with AK's while pulling civilians into safety? You shoot the threat, you don't get shot while trying to get a completely safe environment for shooting. Huzza söta bror, you handled this good. Also note for the people who are asking why the civvies didn't run: It's a few days after new years eve, a couple of loud bangs isn't going to scare anyone.[/QUOTE] As soon as they hit the first robber the others just up and left as quickly as they could, if you watch the videos you'll notice that only the police are firing. It's the same as that other shootout that was in Stockholm, were the (I think it was a robbery also) robbers barely shot at all whilst police had fired loads and several of those bullets hit a gym with people inside. (the gym had glass walls so the bullets went straight through and almost hit people)
[QUOTE=Kljunas;39103297]It's not a Glock, it's an [b]Kalashnikov[/b] AK-47 Bushmaster.[/QUOTE] fixed that for you.
[QUOTE=G-Strogg;39103736]There was a guy standing literally behind a police officer, least he could've done was push him down or something. He was sort of hiding behind a thin tree which would not have offered good cover if he was actually shot at.[/QUOTE] If the civilian was going to get fucked up trying to run, what good would the police officer have done to save him apart from shooting at the guys with fucking guns. I imagined they were focuses on "Popping heads" because there wasn't a lot else they could do in that situation, it was obvious they weren't going to back down and were trying to make an escape.
[QUOTE=G-Strogg;39103809]What if he was caught in the middle of it without time to escape? Even more stupid to just run out of what little cover he had. And where do you get off saying it's his fault, he doesn't deserve to get shot just because he didn't react fast enough. You are beyond stupid. [editline]5th January 2013[/editline] As soon as they hit the first robber the others just up and left as quickly as they could, if you watch the videos you'll notice that only the police are firing. It's the same as that other shootout that was in Stockholm, were the (I think it was a robbery also) robbers barely shot at all whilst police had fired loads and several of those bullets hit a gym with people inside. (the gym had glass walls so the bullets went straight through and almost hit people)[/QUOTE] I disagree, the best thing to do would have been to fall to the ground. I'm not talking about off chance luck to behind him but when you see armed robbers with AK-47's you should get the fuck down on the ground, even more so when you have cops pulling their guns.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.