• Conservative anti-spending movie hits theatres in October
    362 replies, posted
So if it's an anti-spending movie, does that mean tickets are free?
[QUOTE=HumanAbyss;23906700]Social conservatism is right, and almost everyone on the right is a social conservative, so apparently, left is the best way to go if you don't believe in ruining peoples fucking lives. Also, Reagan got the election due to, I don't know, being placed there and practically having bought the election? Being a fiscal conservative means nothing, sometimes they work, often they don't due to the fact deregulation is just... a fucking bad idea.[/QUOTE] How did he "buy the election"?
Sadly, this will be No. 1 in the box office in one day.
[QUOTE=Emperor Scorpious II;23908500]How did he "buy the election"?[/QUOTE] ...Don't tell me you think he didn't have an insane amount of funding from companies who benefited from reaganomics...
I'll probably just watch it for laughs the trailer was pretty amusing
[QUOTE=Uberman77883;23905757] The day Reagen signed in as president was the day the hostages were released.[/QUOTE] Yeah oh gee what a coincidence. Reagen got their release worked out ahead of time and let them stay hostages for a couple extra days because it would make him look like a divine being who magically fixes everything on his first day.
[QUOTE=HumanAbyss;23908547]...Don't tell me you think he didn't have an insane amount of funding from companies who benefited from reaganomics...[/QUOTE] In all honesty, I've never heard of a president who [I]didn't[/I] get a ton of funding from companies in recent history.
[QUOTE=Emperor Scorpious II;23909166]In all honesty, I've never heard of a president who [I]didn't[/I] get a ton of funding from companies in recent history.[/QUOTE] Yeah, but what president do you think benefited them the most with the near total deregulation of industry? Reagan. And for a braid dead actor to get into office, I'm sure there was more money here than we're aware of.
[QUOTE=HumanAbyss;23909224]Yeah, but what president do you think benefited them the most with the near total deregulation of industry? Reagan. And for a braid dead actor to get into office, I'm sure there was more money here than we're aware of.[/QUOTE] All despite the fact that, if it were so simple for pro-deregulation presidents to get elected like that, there would never be a Democrat in office in the past 50 years, and for the matter that, no matter how much money you throw at things, it's the [I]voter[/I] who decides the election, not who rakes in the most money.
Knox just shat all over his computer.
I just think the Conservatives should have a more open mind and actually RESEARCH things.
[QUOTE=ExplodingGuy;23889936]That dipshit Micheal Moore does shit films, why can't a dipshit conservative who misplaced his trust in Reaganomics?[/QUOTE] Moore makes really fantastic films actually you've never really seen one have you? [editline]06:11AM[/editline] [QUOTE=Boba_Fett;23891856]I'm going to have something to watch in October. Hopefully it will be as good as "An American Carol". :munch:[/QUOTE] An American Carol was an atrocity of a movie.
Michael Moore's films are full of outright lies and an amazing lack of discretion with displaying his bias. Not to mention his idiocy on par with Bush
reagan totally fucked up the US couldn't he have picked a better conservative
[QUOTE=M_B;23910090]reagan totally fucked up the US couldn't he have picked a better conservative[/QUOTE] Could you explain how he did?
[QUOTE=Ridge;23910036]Michael Moore's films are full of outright lies and an amazing lack of discretion with displaying his bias. Not to mention his idiocy on par with Bush[/QUOTE] yeah like the bible and elephants
[QUOTE=Uberman77883;23895789]How stupid are you guys? The government spent $700 billion bailing out companies. You know what, 1.2 billion of those dollars went to CEO's bonuses.[/QUOTE] You conservatives forget what happened AFTER it. [editline]06:17AM[/editline] [QUOTE=Ridge;23898725]W. came out while Bush was in office[/QUOTE] The movie was released during the laying duck period about him being a laying duck.
[QUOTE=Warhol;23910113]The movie was released during the laying duck period about him being a laying duck.[/QUOTE] Your lack of English besmirches your argument.
[QUOTE=RBM11;23900933]No, portraying anyone who is conservative or Republican as a racist, homophobe, or islamaphobe makes you a bigot. [editline]04:20PM[/editline] You have the exact same "us vs. them" attitude as most of the strawmen conservatives you seem to hate so much.[/QUOTE] Except he never did that [editline]06:20AM[/editline] [QUOTE=Ridge;23910145]Your lack of English besmirches your argument.[/QUOTE] I realised now it was Lame duck, not Laying duck. Other then that, it's pretty coherent. [editline]06:21AM[/editline] It's a fact, Ridge, the film was made during a period of the presidency ABOUT that period.
[QUOTE=Warhol;23910113]You conservatives forget what happened AFTER it.[/QUOTE] that's the way conservatives roll. because the peak of the fuck up of Bush's presidency occurred during the first 4 months of Obama's presidency, it's Obama's fault. because his stuff hasn't kicked in yet (as any economist would be shocked if it were to), and is instead supposed to kick in 4 years or so from now, he "does nothing". in their minds, if the golden feces of god aren't handed to them on a silver platter the second they want it, it's never going to happen.
[QUOTE=ExplodingGuy;23889936]That dipshit Micheal Moore does shit films, why can't a dipshit conservative who misplaced his trust in Reaganomics?[/QUOTE] Not a fan of him, but he can be really funny sometimes. This was not funny.
[QUOTE=Warhol;23910169]Except he never did that[/QUOTE] He's called me a racist many times because I dare question the motives of our glorious leader. [editline]11:24PM[/editline] [QUOTE=Warhol;23910169]It's a fact, Ridge, the film was made during a period of the presidency ABOUT that period.[/QUOTE] According to IMDB: [QUOTE]Oliver Stone's biographical take on the life of George W. Bush...chronicling from 1967 to his wild and carefree days in college, to his military service, to his governorship of Texas and oil businesses, leading to his 2000 candidacy for president, his first turbulent four years to his 2004 re-election campaign.[/QUOTE] So it was about his life, not his last months in office.
[QUOTE=Ridge;23910220]He's called me a racist many times because I dare question the motives of our glorious leader.[/QUOTE] nah, it's probably because you're racist
[QUOTE=Ridge;23902093]It came out October 17th, a month before the elections. guess we'll see what happens to this President in November....I forsee angry people voting out a lot of Dems...[/QUOTE] A month before the elections IS the lame duck period. lol, you really think this stupid claymation documentary is going to fucking cause an epic revolution?
[QUOTE=Warhol;23910247] lol, you really think this stupid claymation documentary is going to fucking cause an epic revolution?[/QUOTE] i don't think conservatives are capable of making a revolution without going ultra-right
[QUOTE=Ridge;23910220]He's called me a racist many times because I dare question the motives of our glorious leader.[/quote] Actually you ARE a racist, although it really has little to do with Obama. And stop with that retarded "lol glorious leader" bullshit. you people act that way when Republicans are in power. [quote]According to IMDB: So it was about his life, not his last months in office.[/QUOTE] The majority of the film is about his life before the presidency you haven't seen the film, have you?
[QUOTE=Warhol;23910247]A month before the elections IS the lame duck period. lol, you really think this stupid claymation documentary is going to fucking cause an epic revolution?[/QUOTE] Lame duck period is the time frame between the election and the inauguration. Its not going to cause some revolution, know. But it is giving the left the same treatment they gave Bush. I look forward to see how it is received, and how many people are labeled as racists and birthers and whatnot by the media.
[QUOTE=NickFury6;23902742]There were dozens of them, One including a parody of what happened if Bush was assassinated.[/QUOTE] That was a brilliant documentary. It really delved into the future of what would happen.
[QUOTE=Ridge;23910307]Lame duck period is the time frame between the election and the inauguration. Its not going to cause some revolution, know. But it is giving the left the same treatment they gave Bush. I look forward to see how it is received, and how many people are labeled as racists and birthers and whatnot by the media.[/QUOTE] That's all the left does, call people racists.
[QUOTE=Ridge;23910307]But it is giving the left the same treatment they gave Bush.[/QUOTE] nope the teaparty doesn't criticize anything that should be criticized in obama, it just says no to a whole bunch of things that don't exist and it's led by fox news anchors sure the left had the same shit as well but in retrospect anti-war protests seemed completely logical
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.