Michigan women will now have to purchase ‘rape insurance’ to get an abortion
74 replies, posted
Why do we have republicans again?
lolz3 are you going to post anything, or just keep rating everyone dumb?
[QUOTE=Elecbullet;43160167]Do you require insurance to have an abortion? Can't you just summon the cash?[/QUOTE]
That is essentially what Planned Parenthood is for. Like previous posters have said, they're trying to profit off of rape victims. Its sick.
[QUOTE=Elecbullet;43160167]Do you require insurance to have an abortion? Can't you just summon the cash?[/QUOTE]
Yes, but it requires a magic circle and lambs blood and that can be difficult to acquire
[QUOTE=TheKingofBees;43160188]Why do we have republicans again?[/QUOTE]
Because they founded the Country, ended slavery, set up civil-rights, keeps Government in check, spends less then Dems.
Laugh and dumb all you want, facts are facts. Look at history at any Dem. controled country, it has crumbled in under 400 years, any Reb country crumbles in under 900 years.
[QUOTE=Tmaxx;43160193]lolz3 are you going to post anything, or just keep rating everyone dumb?[/QUOTE]
Why post? There is zero reasoning with people that want Government to do everything and control everything. People say there are many forms of Hell, one form is a place with no explanation or reasoning and the majority of people here live in that Hell that want to laugh, mock and not explain their reason. The more I see people post the more I laugh that people do not know History or Politics and just follow blindly with "Reps are bad because................... THEY'RE BAD AND DEMS HAVE NEVER DONE ANYTHING."
[QUOTE=Conservatives;43160118]hahahah tell Republicans that state governments are an extension of the US government and see how well that goes for you. just stop please[/QUOTE]
Alright I'll stop. You have fun with your barely functioning government that struggles to even keep their parks open.
[QUOTE=lolz3;43160207]Because they founded the Country, ended slavery, set up civil-rights, keeps Government in check, spends less then Dems.
Laugh and dumb all you want, facts are facts. Look at history at any Dem. controled country, it has crumbled in under 400 years, any Reb country crumbles in under 900 years.[/QUOTE]
burden of truth is on you broskin, you brought it up.
[QUOTE=lolz3;43160207]Because they founded the Country, ended slavery, set up civil-rights[/QUOTE]
this fuckin guy
[QUOTE=lolz3;43160207]Because they founded the Country, ended slavery, set up civil-rights, keeps Government in check, spends less then Dems.
Laugh and dumb all you want, facts are facts. Look at history at any Dem. controled country, it has crumbled in under 400 years, any Reb country crumbles in under 900 years.
[/QUOTE]
I don't think you understand that the party bases have long since switched, and the republican party of Lincoln's time was more similar to the democrat party of today. Also I don't think you understand that most countries don't have a cut and dry democrat and republican party system like the US.
[QUOTE=lolz3;43160207]Because they founded the Country, ended slavery, set up civil-rights, keeps Government in check, spends less then Dems.
Laugh and dumb all you want, facts are facts. Look at history at any Dem. controled country, it has crumbled in under 400 years, any Reb country crumbles in under 900 years.
Why post? There is zero reasoning with people that want Government to do everything and control everything. People say there are many forms of Hell, one form is a place with no explanation or reasoning and the majority of people here live in that Hell that want to laugh, mock and not explain their reason. The more I see people post the more I laugh that people do not know History or Politics and just follow blindly with "Reps are bad because................... THEY'RE BAD AND DEMS HAVE NEVER DONE ANYTHING."[/QUOTE]
Guess you weren't informed that there was a party line switch in the early 20th century.
[QUOTE=Squidman;43160273]I don't think you understand that the party bases have long since switched, and the republican party of Lincoln's time was much more similar to the democrat party of today. Also I don't think you understand that most countries don't have a cut and dry democrat and republican party system like the US.[/QUOTE]
Here's the mental state I was talking about. "Parties have switched." Which is false. The mental state of Dems today is to shout over everyone because if they are not a Dem they are the "EVIL ANTI-GAY, RACIST ANTI-EVERYTHING!" Which is also false. Yes we know about the war-mongering extremists, yes we know about the corrupt R Presidents we've had, yes we know Faux News is the most biased and uniformed network you can watch, but you compare all the bad Reps have done to the Dems you'd be dumbfounded at how man illegal things Dems have done more then the Reps. Every Dem I've met has a mental state of "NOPE FUCK YOU UR WRONG." Very rarely can I find a Dem in office that listens to reason and comprimises then does not try to back peddal their way out of it. When a Dem screws up "Aw, it'll be okay." When a Rep screws up "HAHA YOU PIECE OF SHIT!" What amazes me more is people that blindly follow any party without knowing anything about it, and more and more people are just voting D because "Well, R sucks because... they suck." America was founded on an idea for two people to sit at a table, listen to the entire idea and point out what was best for not them, but the people. Now it is two people sitting at a table, shaking hands that they both get money and fucking the people over then going public and talking trash about the other.
[QUOTE=lolz3;43160330]Here's the mental state I was talking about. "Parties have switched." Which is false.[/QUOTE]
Which party was it whose supreme court's members recently struck down part of the civil rights act and are now passing voter ID laws to discourage minorities from voting? Oh right.
[QUOTE=lolz3;43160330]Here's the mental state I was talking about. "Parties have switched." Which is false. The mental state of Dems today is to shout over everyone because if they are not a Dem they are the "EVIL ANTI-GAY, RACIST ANTI-EVERYTHING!" Which is also false. Yes we know about the war-mongering extremists, yes we know about the corrupt R Presidents we've had, but you compare all the bad Reps have done to the Dems you'd be dumbfounded at how man illegal things Dems have done more then the Reps.[/QUOTE]
I never said anything about democrats being better than republicans; I was just pointing out errors in your post. Since you don't believe that the party bases have switched, lets bring in a few maps.
Election of 1860
[IMG]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/01/ElectoralCollege1860.svg[/IMG]
Election of 2012
[IMG]http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/files/2013/02/Screen-shot-2013-02-04-at-12.19.45-PM.png[/IMG]
We are mostly paying attention to the east coast with these maps, seeing as most of the west coast weren't official states at the time. Keep in mind that Breckinridge was the democratic party candidate in 1860 (green).
I also don't think that "they are just as terrible as us" is a good argument for why your party may or may not be better.
[QUOTE=lolz3;43160330]Here's the mental state I was talking about. "Parties have switched." Which is false. The mental state of Dems today is to shout over everyone because if they are not a Dem they are the "EVIL ANTI-GAY, RACIST ANTI-EVERYTHING!" Which is also false. Yes we know about the war-mongering extremists, yes we know about the corrupt R Presidents we've had, yes we know Faux News is the most biased and uniformed network you can watch, but you compare all the bad Reps have done to the Dems you'd be dumbfounded at how man illegal things Dems have done more then the Reps. Every Dem I've met has a mental state of "NOPE FUCK YOU UR WRONG." Very rarely can I find a Dem in office that listens to reason and comprimises then does not try to back peddal their way out of it. When a Dem screws up "Aw, it'll be okay." When a Rep screws up "HAHA YOU PIECE OF SHIT!" What amazes me more is people that blindly follow any party without knowing anything about it, and more and more people are just voting D because "Well, R sucks because... they suck." America was founded on an idea for two people to sit at a table, listen to the entire idea and point out what was best for not them, but the people. Now it is two people sitting at a table, shaking hands that they both get money and fucking the people over then going public and talking trash about the other.[/QUOTE]
Strong straw man.
[QUOTE=Daemon;43160029]the more weight you gain, the lower the insurance rate[/QUOTE]
Rape has nothing to do with whether you're conventionally attractive...
[QUOTE=CommanderPT;43160209]Alright I'll stop. You have fun with your barely functioning government that struggles to even keep their parks open.[/QUOTE]
Lmao again you prove that you have no idea what you're talking about, we don't "struggle to keep our parks open", closing down the parks (and on a bigger scale, the "government") was a part of a political game by the republicans' last ditch effort to repeal the ACA because they couldn't get it done legitimately through the supreme courts. pay attention to your swedish government, because you obviously aren't paying attention to the US's
Government sponsored perpetuation of the problem of telling women they should try not to get raped, instead of teaching men to not rape.
Good job Michigan.
[QUOTE=Squidman;43160415]I also don't think that "they are just as terrible as us" is a good argument for why your party may or may not be better.[/QUOTE]
I don't have a party, I listen to both, but I also know the history of both and does that cause me to have some bias against they other? Yes, it's human feelings but come voting time I really search and think and pick the best of the two. Like how you presented the map, this is what I would love to see through the whole Senate, presenting something and going over it, but no, both sides now just want to fill their own wallets. Look at Rand Paul, some people praise him, others loathe him, I do not like him because he used a filibuster on Obama's Health Care Law to quote from Duck Dynasty. He had 21 hours to say why it was bad or something could be changed, of those 21 hours he only talked about the law for 15 minutes if you get right to it. The sooner people realize that both only want to profit, take control and gain power the sooner people can make the Government work for us as it should be. Do we need Govermnet, absolutly, but we do not need or want Government in private schools, private companies, private homes, churches of any religion, marriage, who can vote and who can't, etc. Goverment should only be Police, Fire, Health, Millitary, Public servecis, Public transit, road construction, things of that nature.
What makes my blood boil, is this connection people like to give everyone. "Oh well he rated me dumb so he must be a Reb and supports this law." I'M FUCKING DISGUESTED by this thing, I'm not even calling it a law.
[QUOTE=lolz3;43160505]I don't have a party, I listen to both, but I also know the history of both and does that cause me to have some bias against they other? Yes, it's human feelings but come voting time I really search and think and pick the best of the two. Like how you presented the map, this is what I would love to see through the whole Senate, presenting something and going over it, but no, both sides now just want to fill their own wallets. Look at Rand Paul, some people praise him, others loathe him, I do not like him because he used a filibuster on Obama's Health Care Law to quote from Duck Dynasty. He had 21 hours to say why it was bad or something could be changed, of those 21 hours he only talked about the law for 15 minutes if you get right to it. The sooner people realize that both only want to profit, take control and gain power the sooner people can make the Government work for us as it should be. Do we need Govermnet, absolutly, but we do not need or want Government in private schools, private companies, private homes, churches of any religion, marriage, who can vote and who can't, etc. Goverment should only be Police, Fire, Health, Millitary, Public servecis, Public transit, road construction, things of that nature.
What makes my blood boil, is this connection people like to give everyone. "Oh well he rated me dumb so he must be a Reb and supports this law." I'M FUCKING DISGUESTED by this thing, I'm not even calling it a law.[/QUOTE]
The fuck is a Reb? A rebublican?
I'm a Republican.
Shower me with boxes if you like.
But seriously this is bullshit. The entirety of the US government needs to be reformed.
Wheres the fucking "GOVERNMENT RESET" button when you need it.
[QUOTE=Helix Snake;43160661]The fuck is a Reb? A rebublican?[/QUOTE]
I made a tybo.
[QUOTE=MaxOfS2D;43160439]Rape has nothing to do with whether you're conventionally attractive...[/QUOTE]
Interesting theory but being attractive has influence in many other ways, why would it be excluded from this case?
[QUOTE=Daemon;43160892]Interesting theory but being attractive has influence in many other ways, why would it be excluded from this case?[/QUOTE]
Rape is not about sexual fulfilment but dominance/power
[QUOTE=MaxOfS2D;43161103]Rape is not about sexual fulfilment but dominance/power[/QUOTE]
any episode of law and order svu would teach someone this
[QUOTE=MaxOfS2D;43161103]Rape is not about sexual fulfilment but dominance/power[/QUOTE]
that's a pretty flawed statement. you can't assume that every rape that occurs is for the same reason, and there's more than enough evidence to show that this absolutely isn't the case. if it had nothing to do with sexual attraction, then statistically male on male rape would be just as common as male on female rape, if not more so.
[QUOTE=Squad1993;43160777]
"GOVERNMENT RESET"[/QUOTE]
We tried that already. Might have to turn it back off and on again
[editline]12th December 2013[/editline]
[QUOTE=Bruhmis;43161228]that's a pretty flawed statement. you can't assume that every rape that occurs is for the same reason, and there's more than enough evidence to show that this absolutely isn't the case. if it had nothing to do with sexual attraction, then statistically [b]male on male rape would be just as common as male on female rape,[/b] if not more so.[/QUOTE]
I wouldn't be surprised if it were just as common. I dont think men would just outright go to the police and tell them they've been raped by another man based on being embarrassed and ashamed. Same reasons why women dont report their rapists outright. ex; speaking from experience.
Then later on being told its your fault or the fear of being called a fag or disowned.
Also, havent you heard of prison rape?
[QUOTE=Bruhmis;43161228]if it had nothing to do with sexual attraction, then statistically male on male rape would be just as common as male on female rape, if not more so.[/QUOTE]
i think you're just making things up now
[QUOTE=HookerVomit;43161242]We tried that already. Might have to turn it back off and on again[/QUOTE]
Maybe its an undervoltage issue? I swear this keeps happening.
[QUOTE=S31-Syntax;43161292]Maybe its an undervoltage issue? I swear this keeps happening.[/QUOTE]
Take it out and blow on it.
[QUOTE=HookerVomit;43161242]
I wouldn't be surprised if it were just as common. I dont think men would just outright go to the police and tell them they've been raped by another man based on being embarrassed and ashamed. Same reasons why women dont report their rapists outright. ex; speaking from experience.
Then later on being told its your fault or the fear of being called a fag or disowned.
Also, havent you heard of prison rape?[/QUOTE]
I don't understand what you're trying to say. first you said men don't report the rapes out of shame, but then you noted how women are no different in that regard, which is true, so how is it noteworthy?
prison rape is a completely different situation.
[editline]12th December 2013[/editline]
[QUOTE=Uber|nooB;43161281]i think you're just making things up now[/QUOTE]
if somebody wants to feel dominant why would they only abuse the sex that has been historically submissive and continues to be seen as weaker/less than the opposite sex by many facets of society? it's pretty ridiculous to claim that nobody has ever raped someone simply because they wanted sex with that person.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.