Mother at Trump rally: “Trump NEVER kicked me or my child out” - What a surprise
162 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Bat-shit;50835253]I am willing.
I believe Hilary Clinton does everything in her power to win the election. There are a lot of newspapers, some supporting some less supporting. I don't think Hillary's resources are limitless, nor that all the powerful and rich men in the world are all that organized, even inside America.
I'm sure Hillary's got rich friends and powerful connections, I can't really deny something like that. Who would? She's Hilary Clinton. Anyone in their positions should have rich friends and connections by some point in their careers, that's the game they're playing, and they don't all slither either.
I can't even speak on behalf of the U.S. business and the parts of the government or the level of corruption you're suggesting, but seriously I think you may be overlooking something about these people, and the "powerful shadowy men extending a case full of cash" are just rich as fuck people who keep their successful companies running, and probably do various types of investments for personal interest mostly and like I said, you gotta consider that people still need sleep, and have even something resembling that of a personal life.
Where do they all find the time to organize or otherwise plan some very high-profile criminal conspiracies (rigging the elections would be one heck of a criminal conspiracy, and I'm not using the word 'conspiracy' ironically there, it's a word used in the criminal law) when they too are just humans in the end, with varying degrees of power, wealth, influence and organizational level between those, from none to full.[/QUOTE]
I fully agree with this approach. I humor the idea of the Illuminati more than most people I'd think (less than anyone on /pol/ or other more depraved spots I'd hope) but there are the limitations of a single person, and then there's the sluggish movement of an organized body. I think you could offer possible circumstances that would allow for a single person to have extremely fast and responsive will upon the world, but it's also just as likely that is too difficult to realistically pull off.
Consider the lady at the front desk of Mr. Illuminati's office.
[QUOTE=Phycosymo;50835283]What??[/QUOTE]
Stop.
[QUOTE=Take_Opal;50835223]
I'd tell you that your assumption is incorrect, but then that'd leave me vulnerable for a fucking doozy of a rebuttal post to solidify your position as internet forum cool guy. The sickest of the shitposters.[/QUOTE]
What??
[QUOTE=Take_Opal;50835275]I fully agree with this approach. I humor the idea of the Illuminati more than most people I'd think (less than anyone on /pol/ or other more depraved spots I'd hope) but there are the limitations of a single person, and then there's the sluggish movement of an organized body. I think you could offer possible circumstances that would allow for a single person to have extremely fast and responsive will upon the world, but it's also just as likely that is too difficult to realistically pull off.
Consider the lady at the front desk of Mr. Illuminati's office.[/QUOTE]
Yeah I think so too. About offering a possible circumstance that would allow for a single person to have extremely fast and responsive will upon the world. You pretty much described a nuclear-headed ICBM. Hell's yeah, now we're talking.
So, the single person who has the most immediate access and the ability (and preferably a permit of sorts) to issue mass-destructive weapon launches, could perhaps be considered as truly the most powerful Illuminatus. (Yes, 'Illuminatus' is what I think is the correct singular form of Illuminati. I searched online.)
[editline]5th August 2016[/editline]
Aw shit, you got banned. I think I liked this guy, and he made me discover something new about the definition of Illuminati.
[QUOTE=DeadCow;50834543]And Hillary isn't spewing bullshit? As much as I dislike both candidates, I'd much rather have Trump in office than that shady bitch[/QUOTE]
Id rather not have an absolute fuckhead who wants to throw nukes around in power. Or someone who is completely against green energy and denies climate change.
[QUOTE=DeadCow;50834563]Jesus you guys are more extreme left than I thought.
Not trying to start a shitstorm here, calm the fuck down[/QUOTE]
Yes you were.
[QUOTE=DeadCow;50834466]
What a surprise, the media blew something out of proportion again.
[/QUOTE]
You tried to spin a narrative, got blown the fuck out, and now want to fall back on tone policing and crying about the "extreme left"
[QUOTE=DeadCow;50834543]And Hillary isn't spewing bullshit? As much as I dislike both candidates, I'd much rather have Trump in office than that shady bitch[/QUOTE]
And Trump isn't spewing bullshit? As much as I dislike both candidates, I'd much rather have Hilary in office than that shady bitch
literally every DT VS HC argument
It's almost as if the media in general is terribly reactive in an attempt to get as many clicks as possible.
way to revive this thread
[QUOTE=TheBloodyNine;51067960]way to revive this thread[/QUOTE]
I think it took him a whole month to find a proper response.
[QUOTE=J!NX;51067628]And Trump isn't spewing bullshit? As much as I dislike both candidates, I'd much rather have Hilary in office than that shady bitch
literally every DT VS HC argument[/QUOTE]
why a month and a half later though
[QUOTE=Mining Bill;51068082]why a month and a half later though[/QUOTE]
tbh didn't even notice it was that old, didn't know how I was linked it though
its insanely easy to not notice too
[QUOTE=greasemunky;50834577]The only one who's being extreme here is you.[/QUOTE]
That's the problem, you all don't see your own bias. You're wearing rose-tinted glasses if you really can't see the innate tendency we all have as human beings to be biased towards something we think is right, even if we don't have all the information to come to the "best" conclusion.
Is there a way to report threads to get them locked? Or are you supposed to pm a mod for that?
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.