[QUOTE=Timebomb575;38901525]Did you not just see the pictures I posted of[B] DEDICATED TARGET RIFLES [/B]that are not in any way designed to kill things?????[/QUOTE]
if you can give me an event like fridays that was carried out using a "dedicated target rifle" i'll concede defeat on this one
[QUOTE=GoldenGnome;38901467]if you're going to argue "derived from fighter jets" then we're talking semantics now[/QUOTE]
It's not semantics in the slightest, aircraft were initially used as recon planes in WWI for mapping out trenches and were armed with machine guns to shoot down other planes. All of the world's deadliest flying aces were from WWI, IE the Red Baron and Billy Bishop. Planes did not see civilian use until they had proven themselves on the battlefield, and it was the same with jet technology. The modern passenger jet would not be possible without WWII bombers and late-war fighter jets, and as a matter of fact, after the war many bombers were converted to be used as passenger planes and cargo planes. This still happens today, many of the jets used by the airline companies have their basis in a military transport plane.
[QUOTE=GoldenGnome;38901524]idk maybe i'll go polish my death machine because i like the way the barrel glints in the light as i shoot at some targets that are human shaped.[/QUOTE]
Nice one, paint the other side as a lunatic. Works all the time, right?
he used pistols designed for domestic/personal defense in a way they weren't intended to be used (murder)
you can use a civilian jet liner, meant for transport and NOT meant for killing people, in a way that they aren't intended to be used ([url=http://usahitman.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/wtc-911.jpg]murder[/url])
if you're not picking up on this pattern by now I am honestly astonished you've managed to avoid drinking bleach or sticking a fork into an electrical socket for all these years
[QUOTE=GoldenGnome;38901553]if you can give me an event like fridays that was carried out using a "dedicated target rifle" i'll concede defeat on this one[/QUOTE]
We were arguing that Rifles exist that do not exist for the purpose of killing people.
[QUOTE=GoldenGnome;38901536]home protection implies the maiming and possible killing a human.[/QUOTE]
no it doesnt lol
your home is just as protected if you scare the guy off, in fact thats usually what happens, there are less than a thousand cases yearly where someone actually needs to kill someone in home defense
[QUOTE=GoldenGnome;38901505]wow a completely different plane outfitted with military gadgets that are not present in the picture i posted[/QUOTE]
they're both boeing 747s you shitlord
[QUOTE=GoldenGnome;38901553]if you can give me an event like fridays that was carried out using a "dedicated target rifle" i'll concede defeat on this one[/QUOTE]
You don't understand do you? [B]Uses for things change.[/B] Planes, trains, guns, knives, internet, communications, etc. Just because something wasn't designed to be used in war/peace, doesn't mean it can't be and therefore shouldn't be allowed.
[QUOTE=cccritical;38901565]if you're not picking up on this pattern by now I am honestly astonished you've managed to avoid drinking bleach or [b]sticking a fork into an electrical socket[/b] for all these years[/QUOTE]
Doing that really tickles. :C
[QUOTE=GoldenGnome;38901553]if you can give me an event like fridays that was carried out using a "dedicated target rifle" i'll concede defeat on this one[/QUOTE]
thats my fucking point
you said that guns exist for the SOLE PURPOSE of killing people
there are plenty of guns that are designed for the SOLE PURPOSE of target shooting
[QUOTE=GoldenGnome;38901505]wow a completely different plane outfitted with military gadgets that are not present in the picture i posted[/QUOTE]
Oh look a completely different gun featuring gadgets that aren't in the original one
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/PVhvll.jpg[/IMG]
[QUOTE=GoldenGnome;38901536]home protection implies the maiming and possible killing a human.[/QUOTE]
because it isn't possible to scare someone away by waving a gun at them, and because once you've drawn a weapon, it is impossible to holster it until it has tasted the blood of innocents, right?
[QUOTE=Ridge;38901607]Oh look a completely different gun featuring gadgets that aren't in the origin
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/PVhvll.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE]
this isn't much better
[img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/57/AK-47_type_II_Part_DM-ST-89-01131.jpg/800px-AK-47_type_II_Part_DM-ST-89-01131.jpg[/img]
[QUOTE=cccritical;38901617]because it isn't possible to scare someone away by waving a gun at them, and because once you've drawn a weapon, it is impossible to holster it until it has tasted the blood of innocents, right?[/QUOTE]
I doubt breaking into the house makes you "innocent", per se, but I see what you mean. :v:
[editline]19th December 2012[/editline]
[QUOTE=GoldenGnome;38901639]this isn't much better
[img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/57/AK-47_type_II_Part_DM-ST-89-01131.jpg/800px-AK-47_type_II_Part_DM-ST-89-01131.jpg[/img][/QUOTE]
What are you talking about? That's the original design. It also appears to be in great condition. I see nothing wrong with this gun.
[QUOTE=GoldenGnome;38901639]this isn't much better
[img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/57/AK-47_type_II_Part_DM-ST-89-01131.jpg/800px-AK-47_type_II_Part_DM-ST-89-01131.jpg[/img][/QUOTE]
Yikes that scary, we should ban it
[QUOTE=Zillamaster55;38901649]Yikes that scary, we should ban it[/QUOTE]
Wrong. There is clearly no bayonet lug on it. It is of no threat.
[QUOTE=GoldenGnome;38901639]this isn't much better
[img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/57/AK-47_type_II_Part_DM-ST-89-01131.jpg/800px-AK-47_type_II_Part_DM-ST-89-01131.jpg[/img][/QUOTE]
Oh hey look, the gun that EVERYONE brings up in gun control arguments but [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AK-47]hasn't actually been produced since 1959.[/url] (the AK-47 that is)
awww my giant post went unnoticed, oh well I'm done here anyways. Evening, fuckas
[QUOTE=Zillamaster55;38901649]Yikes that scary, we should ban it[/QUOTE]
it's already essentially banned for production, that third rivet indicates that it's a automatic variant
[QUOTE=GoldenGnome;38901639]this isn't much better
[img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/57/AK-47_type_II_Part_DM-ST-89-01131.jpg/800px-AK-47_type_II_Part_DM-ST-89-01131.jpg[/img][/QUOTE]
I see you've stopped your already-infantile attempt at trying to disprove my point
[QUOTE=ButtsexV3;38901682]it's already essentially banned for production, that third rivet indicates that it's a automatic variant[/QUOTE]
It's been [b]out[/b] of production for over 50 years.
[QUOTE=GoldenGnome;38901639]this isn't much better
[img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/57/AK-47_type_II_Part_DM-ST-89-01131.jpg/800px-AK-47_type_II_Part_DM-ST-89-01131.jpg[/img][/QUOTE]
He was making a mockery of you saying that the planes were completely different because they had some fancy toys attached to it.
[QUOTE=Apache249;38901694]He was making a mockery of you saying that the planes were completely different because they had some fancy toys attached to it.[/QUOTE]
there are already so many words on the screen, you're just confusing him more
I've got something that'll pacify him
[img_thumb]http://www.empowernetwork.com/chrisandsusan/files/2012/08/4-keys.jpg[/img_thumb]
Also, there are lots of military jet fighters in civilian hands that aren't being used to carpet bomb orphanages or anything. Their owners own them because their owners think they are pretty cool. Like guns.
[QUOTE=cccritical;38901707]there are already so many words on the screen, you're just confusing him more
I've got something that'll pacify him
[img_thumb]http://www.empowernetwork.com/chrisandsusan/files/2012/08/4-keys.jpg[/img_thumb][/QUOTE]
Careful, is that bayonet on those keys? It could be an assault weapon!
[QUOTE=teh pirate;38901711]Also, there are lots of military jet fighters in civilian hands, in case you weren't aware.[/QUOTE]
A couple of brand new Su-27s were purchased by a private buyer.
[QUOTE=QueenSasha24;38901666]Oh hey look, the gun that EVERYONE brings up in gun control arguments but [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AK-47]hasn't actually been produced since 1959.[/url] (the AK-47 that is)[/QUOTE]
okay i don't really know about ~receiver specifications~ but the gun i posted and the one he posted are the same weapon or based on the same design???
[QUOTE=teh pirate;38901711]Also, there are lots of military jet fighters in civilian hands, in case you weren't aware.[/QUOTE]
My friend's dad has an L39Z :v:
[QUOTE=GoldenGnome;38901723]okay i don't really know about ~receiver specifications~ but the gun i posted and the one he posted are the same weapon or based on the same design???[/QUOTE]
the more you post the more it becomes clear that you don't really know about ~anything~
[QUOTE=Zillamaster55;38899456]I find hunting disgusting. You don't need to do it any more, there are supermarkets, jeez.[/QUOTE]
-snip-
Sorry sorry sorry, too many actual stupid people, the sarcasm wasn't far from the people that were being parodied. :v:
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.