There is a reason no cyriptid photos or videos are clear images, because the lack of detail makes your mind fill in the unknown information making bears look like mammoths.
Does not move like an elephant, which is what I assume a mammoth would move like.
[QUOTE=Soleeedus;34642508]in this day and age, we would've discovered something [I]that big[/I] by now[/QUOTE]
You'd be surprised.
[editline]11th February 2012[/editline]
Not saying that thing is a Mammoth though.
[QUOTE=Black;34641282]I take it that the Sun is the British version of Fox News?[/QUOTE]
The reminiscence is not that great. While fox news has propaganda goals, the sun seems to be just spouting bullshit to attract attention and readers.
[B]KILL[/B] IT
I WANT IT'S [I]HIDE[/I]
Too blury, would not find.
obvious fish with a bear on it's body
[QUOTE=Black;34641282]I take it that the Sun is the British version of Fox News?[/QUOTE]
Every tabloid is.
[QUOTE=Mr. Bleak;34641838]1. Tusks do not jiggle
2. The proportions are all wrong. That thing looks tiny when compared to trees at the same distance while mammoths were very tall.[/QUOTE]
The jiggling thing is probably (supposed) to be the trunk unless I'm missing something.
I have nothing to say about the proportions though.
Unfortunately, no matter how awesome it would be to have real live wooly mammoths, this is probably fake. Which is shame.
Nicolas Cage must be using his time machine again.
[img]http://i.huffpost.com/gen/495212/thumbs/s-LATE-SHOW-NICOLAS-CAGE-120209-large.jpg[/img]
I don't think it's a woolly mammoth. I don't think it's a bear either. What kind of fucking bear has such a disproportionate body? Its body is short as fuck and its head is almost half the size of it.
[QUOTE=The Winner;34662544]I don't think it's a woolly mammoth. I don't think it's a bear either. What kind of fucking bear has such a disproportionate body? Its body is short as fuck and its head is almost half the size of it.[/QUOTE]
It's a man in a bear suit? A man bear?
Unfocuses = Fake
I don't believe anything The Sun says. it's run by a bunch of Cockney, morons who would embarrass their own mothers for a Decent story.
[QUOTE=BCell;34662607]It's a man in a bear suit? A man bear?[/QUOTE]
It's Manbearpig!
it's a half life 3 ARG
Well would you look at that...
[video=youtube;D9Qsdxye6Yc]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9Qsdxye6Yc[/video]
[QUOTE=jaykray;34716162]Well would you look at that...
[video=youtube;D9Qsdxye6Yc]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9Qsdxye6Yc[/video][/QUOTE]
Mammoths have evolved invisibility!
[QUOTE=jaykray;34716162]Well would you look at that...
[video=youtube;D9Qsdxye6Yc]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9Qsdxye6Yc[/video][/QUOTE]
Wow, so it wasn't even a bear with a fish in it's mouth, they actually just photoshopped it in.
[QUOTE=jaykray;34716162]Well would you look at that...
[video=youtube;D9Qsdxye6Yc]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9Qsdxye6Yc[/video][/QUOTE]
had to turn quality down to 240p to make sure
I live in Alaska, and I can 100% confirm it's a bear.
[QUOTE=Mr. Bleak;34641838]1. Tusks do not jiggle
2. The proportions are all wrong. That thing looks tiny when compared to trees at the same distance while mammoths were very tall.[/QUOTE]
I didn't even see any tusks to be honest with you.
And it's always amazed me that anyone gives any credibility to blurry-ass photos/videos. I mean surely even consumer electronics have better focusing technology than this, though it was probably very misty and not a camera blur.
Either way, bear with a fish.
It's not even a bear with a fish. It was edited in.
Hell it could just be a normal fucking elephant.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.