• "Tolerant" liberals attack black conservative woman, call her 'n-word' (mod edit/less biased title:
    229 replies, posted
[QUOTE=NonCorporeal;37472491]My problem with the liberals is that they don't respect freedom; they oppose gun rights, they support the NDAA, they support the Patriot Act, etc. They also want to ban everything, all over the liberals are banning frivolous things, like happy meals, goldfish, sodas, etc. They also have no respect for the Constitution; many liberals consider it an "outdated" document and they think that "the Founding Fathers were all bigoted white land owners." Then there's the economy, on which liberals are just so opposed to capitalism, so opposed to the free-market. Liberals want big government, they believe that the state is above the individual, that the people are subservient to the state. When I say liberal, I'm not just referring to the Democrats, I'm also referring to fake conservatives like Mitt Romney, Rick Santorum, George W. Bush, etc. American politics have moved so far to the left, that even our so-called "conservative" politicians are left wing. There's nothing right wing about Santorums' disgusting homophobic bigotry or about Bush Jr.'s No Child Left Behind policy.[/QUOTE]No sensible liberal thinks any of those things at all ever.
[QUOTE=Boxbot219;37472520]I'm a liberal and I support gun rights.[/QUOTE] Not all liberals support gun control, but sadly the majority of them seem to.
[QUOTE=NonCorporeal;37472517]edit: Double post, sorry, please delete this post.[/QUOTE] YOu are mixing up direspect for the right to say something with disrespect for what is said.
[QUOTE=NonCorporeal;37472517]Whatever happened to "I don't agree with what you say, but I respect your right to say it?" How can you make it an offense to offend someone? I'm sorry, but people don't have the right to "not be offended."[/QUOTE] Words don't disappear into the aether once spoken; they manifest themselves in tangible ways. Some druggie asshole calling women sluts and opposing their reproductive rights on the airwaves is going to negatively affect the lives of women across the country in real, tangible ways when there are tens of millions of people who listen to said druggie asshole and ascribe validity to his words.
[QUOTE=Killuah;37472524]Please tell us what an ideal right wing guy is like if Goerge Double-Jew Bush Jr. is "too left" in your opinion.[/QUOTE] Barry Goldwater. Or Ron Paul without his non-interventionist foreign policy.
[QUOTE=viperfan7;37471748]Its not, its classified as entertainment under the FCC[/QUOTE] Source on that? I'm sure even if it was true, they'd be required to have disclaimers.
[QUOTE=NonCorporeal;37472545]Not all liberals support gun control, but sadly the majority of them seem to.[/QUOTE] And sadly the majority of right-wingers support homophobia but for some reason that bothers you less?
I'm sorry but you're very misinformed on what liberals actually believe, or you're a troll. Either way, please read up on what liberalism actually is and what the ideology is built upon from somewhere that won't just use the word "Liberal" as a synonym for "Fascist".
[QUOTE=NonCorporeal;37472491]My problem with the liberals is that they don't respect freedom; they oppose gun rights, they support the NDAA, they support the Patriot Act, etc.[/QUOTE] You know the NDAA is a yearly thing, and the Patriot Act was created by a Republican administration, specificly Bush himself came up with the ideas behind it. The only thing you barely got right was that most Democrats are for gun control, not against people owning weaponry all together. [QUOTE=NonCorporeal;37472491]They also want to ban everything, all over the liberals are banning frivolous things, like happy meals, goldfish, sodas, etc.[/QUOTE] What. [QUOTE=NonCorporeal;37472491]They also have no respect for the Constitution; many liberals consider it an "outdated" document and they think that "the Founding Fathers were all bigoted white land owners." [/QUOTE] No party seems to understand the Constitution anymore. Also the founding fathers were bigoted white land owners, they just made a revisable document because they figured that people will [b]not hold the same views and opinions as them, and they considered it important to make the document changeable and able to evolve with how society evolves.[/b] [QUOTE=NonCorporeal;37472491]Then there's the economy, on which liberals are just so opposed to capitalism, so opposed to the free-market.[/QUOTE] You know we actually [b]don't[/b] have a completely free market? A free market is a market with no restrictions on the flow of goods, services, or capital. We have a mixed free market, where some of those factors come into play but with close government supervison to make sure consumer protection laws and the like are enforced. [QUOTE=NonCorporeal;37472491]Liberals want big government, they believe that the state is above the individual, that the people are subservient to the state. When I say liberal, I'm not just referring to the Democrats, I'm also referring to fake conservatives like Mitt Romney, Rick Santorum, George W. Bush, etc. American politics have moved so far to the left, that even our so-called "conservative" politicians are left wing. There's nothing right wing about Santorums' disgusting homophobic bigotry or about Bush Jr.'s No Child Left Behind policy.[/QUOTE] And at the end here you start to make some sense.
[QUOTE=SigmaLambda;37472563]Words don't disappear into the aether once spoken; they manifest themselves in tangible ways. Some druggie asshole calling women sluts and opposing their reproductive rights on the airwaves is going to negatively affect the lives of women across the country in real, tangible ways when there are tens of millions of people who listen to said druggie asshole and ascribe validity to his words.[/QUOTE] You clearly didn't listen to what Rush was saying, what he was getting at is that if you need the government to buy your condoms, birthcontrol, etc. then you probably shouldn't be having sex; and that's something I agree with. Instead of having sex, that person should be out looking for a job, instead of begging for the government to give him/her birth control that is purchased with our tax dollars. People that spread "hateful" should still have the right to spread said messages. Does that mean we have to like it or listen to them? No. Does that mean the government should stop them? Hell no. [editline]30th August 2012[/editline] [QUOTE=SigmaLambda;37472576]And sadly the majority of right-wingers support homophobia but for some reason that bothers you less?[/QUOTE] The Christian fundamentalists are a dying breed, I don't know any conservatives who oppose homosexuality; they all agree that it's hypocritical to say you want small government, then to have the government ban gay marriage. If anything, the RINOs who oppose homosexuality are left-wingers, because they support big government.
[QUOTE=NonCorporeal;37472608]You clearly didn't listen to what Rush was saying, what he was getting at is that if you need the government to buy your condoms, birthcontrol, etc. then you probably shouldn't be having sex; and that's something I agree with. Instead of having sex, that person should be out looking for a job, instead of begging for the government to give him/her birth control that is purchased with our tax dollars.[/QUOTE] Lol as if telling people, especially people in a relationship, to practice abstinence has ever actually worked. If you are so worried about these kinds of people being a drain on society then why on earth would you oppose them receiving birth control?
[QUOTE=imptastick;37472374]I am a left leaning libertarian, so I guess I spread propaganda about myself? [IMG]http://i45.tinypic.com/25g9tug.png[/IMG] You are operating off of liberal stereotypes that are propagated by individuals like Rush limbaugh. If you are pro-gay marriage, pro-drug legalization and pro-choice as you have claimed you yourself are quite liberal, you are hating on people who share your beliefs.[/QUOTE] in other news i thought that test was kinda interesting a few years ago and ended up about where you are, and this is where i end up now: [img]http://snag.gy/c5cXS.jpg[/img] wtf lol
[QUOTE=NonCorporeal;37472608]You clearly didn't listen to what Rush was saying, what he was getting at is that if you need the government to buy your condoms, birthcontrol, etc. then you probably shouldn't be having sex; and that's something I agree with. Instead of having sex, that person should be out looking for a job, instead of begging for the government to give him/her birth control that is purchased with our tax dollars.[/QUOTE] The thing is people aren't that desperate for condoms or birthcontrol, even if the government allowed them to get them for free. Rush blew something out of fucking proportion to get ratings you smuck. [QUOTE=NonCorporeal;37472608]People that spread "hateful" should still have the right to spread said messages. Does that mean we have to like it or listen to them? No. Does that mean the government should stop them? Hell no.[/QUOTE] You understand that you are free to say as you want right? Well, you can only do so if you're willing to live with the consequences of your words. You can yell Rape or Fire in a crowded building, but does that make it right? Same with saying that women are going to take advantage of this government program to get profilactives and have gratuitous amounts of sex, you can say it but be prepared for the shitstorm you have created.
[QUOTE=NonCorporeal;37472608]You clearly didn't listen to what Rush was saying, what he was getting at is that if you need the government to buy your condoms, birthcontrol, etc. then you probably shouldn't be having sex; and that's something I agree with. Instead of having sex, that person should be out looking for a job, instead of begging for the government to give him/her birth control that is purchased with our tax dollars. People that spread "hateful" should still have the right to spread said messages. Does that mean we have to like it or listen to them? No. Does that mean the government should stop them? Hell no. [editline]30th August 2012[/editline] The Christian fundamentalists are a dying breed, I don't know any conservatives who oppose homosexuality; they all agree that it's hypocritical to say you want small government, then to have the government ban gay marriage. If anything, the RINOs who oppose homosexuality are left-wingers, because they support big government.[/QUOTE] k first republicans usually are considered to represent those who want to RESTRICT personal freedoms (except guns) and allow more freedom for large businesses. "liberals" are usually considered to represent those who want more business regulation but more personal freedom. Also, birth control is a necessity for certain women. I'm assuming you've never dated a girl with severe period problems. Severe period pain can be alleviated with birth control pills, a perfectly non-sexual reason for them
[QUOTE=Bobie;37472669]in other news i thought that test was kinda interesting a few years ago and ended up about where you are, and this is where i end up now: [img]http://snag.gy/c5cXS.jpg[/img] wtf lol[/QUOTE] Anarchist!
Took the test: [img]http://www.politicalcompass.org/facebook/pcgraphpng.php?ec=-3.00&soc=-6.97[/img] I don't think I am THAT laisez-faire but whatev's
[IMG]http://www.colourbox.com/preview/2483597-496777-silver-small-fish-on-a-hook-against-the-blue-sky-rivers-and-green-trees.jpg[/IMG] accurate representation what facepunch has done it was obvious as fuck lol
I mean the test IS kinda bullshit as I would need FAR more input to answer ANY of thsese questions correctly.
[QUOTE=Lambeth;37472693]Anarchist![/QUOTE] apparently so. though i despise economic libertarianism, i'm more of a post-scarcity guy myself
[QUOTE=NonCorporeal;37469603]It's nice to see the "tolerant" and "loving" liberals in their natural state. This always happens with liberals, they say they love tolerance and diversity, but when anyone dares question their authority, they revert to their true form; that of an angry totalitarian bigot. Hussein and his far-left Democrat friends are so terrified of African American conservatives, as they're true Americans who actually worked to get where they are, as opposed to Obama-loving socialists who beg for handouts. The liberals want nothing more than to keep the blacks under their thumb, to keep them completely dependent on the Democrat Party. Now many of you are probably thinking "but the Democrats want to keep everyone dependent on them, not just blacks," and while that is true, they seem to have a particular disdain for the African Americans. Notice how after voting Democratic in every election for over 50 years, the Democrats are still no better off than they were before? Not only that, but in many instances, they are even worse off. Notice how whenever Democrats speak to African Americans, they always talk down to them like they are a minority group, as opposed to treating them like equals, like you would any other American? What was it that sent these spineless liberals cowering, you ask? This speech: [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H4BM_B0PTvM[/media] GUNFOX EDIT: Alternate source: [url]http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/08/29/mia-love-wikipedia-page-vandalized-with-slurs/[/url][/QUOTE] Prepare your anus, you are about to be destroyed. Your kind is not welcome here.
[QUOTE=Bobie;37472720]apparently so. though i despise economic libertarianism, i'm more of a post-scarcity guy myself[/QUOTE] No Bobie, you are the Libertarians. And then Bobie was a Ron Paul.
I mean, look at that: "Our race has many superior qualities, compared with other races." - Too obvious - black people tend to have longer muscle-cells for example, that is proven, who am I to judge if that is a superior quality? "Military action that defies international law is sometimes justified." That depends on international law !? I mean for example what if the cold war turned out different and somehow some dictatorship dictated "international law"? How am I supposed to answer that? What military action? I am against the Afghanistan war but the Bundeswehr is more of an armed Red Cross than an army, is giving food and medical supplies to people "military action"? And so on and so on.
[QUOTE=Killuah;37472794]I mean, look at that: "Our race has many superior qualities, compared with other races." - Too obvious - black people tend to have longer muscle-cells for example, that is proven, who am I to judge if that is a superior quality? "Military action that defies international law is sometimes justified." That depends on international law !? I mean for example what if the cold war turned out different and somehow some dictatorship dictated "international law"? How am I supposed to answer that? What military action? I am against the Afghanistan war but the Bundeswehr is more of an armed Red Cross than an army, is giving food and medical supplies to people "military action"? And so on and so on.[/QUOTE] dont question the political spectrum man its wisdom is infinite vote political spectrum 2012
[QUOTE=Killuah;37472794] "Military action that defies international law is sometimes justified." That depends on international law !? I mean for example what if the cold war turned out different and somehow some dictatorship dictated "international law"? How am I supposed to answer that? What military action? I am against the Afghanistan war but the Bundeswehr is more of an armed Red Cross than an army, is giving food and medical supplies to people "military action"? [/quote] it's clearly referring to current international law. quit being obtuse
[QUOTE=Lazor;37472839]it's clearly referring to current international law. quit being obtuse[/QUOTE] Clearly? Where ? And even if so my second point still stands.
[QUOTE=Killuah;37472930]Clearly? Where ? And even if so my second point still stands.[/QUOTE] It is not meant to be a super serious 100% accurate tool, it is just fun to use and while it can be off it does an alright job of portraying if you are left or right leaning.
[QUOTE=Killuah;37472696]Took the test: [img]http://www.politicalcompass.org/facebook/pcgraphpng.php?ec=-3.00&soc=-6.97[/img] I don't think I am THAT laisez-faire but whatev's[/QUOTE] Is there a test you can take for these? If so a link would be nice.
[QUOTE=Liem;37473765]Is there a test you can take for these? If so a link would be nice.[/QUOTE] [url]http://www.politicalcompass.org/test[/url] [editline]30th August 2012[/editline] [QUOTE=Bobie;37472720]apparently so. though i despise economic libertarianism, i'm more of a post-scarcity guy myself[/QUOTE] That's why you're over on the left. Left-Right designates how you feel an economy should be organized. Libertarian-Authoritarian deals with how you feel society should be organized/what rights and safeties human beings are entitled to. You are pretty close to anarcho-collectivism/communism simply judging by the political compass.
Apparently I'm pretty close to Gandhi [IMG]http://www.politicalcompass.org/facebook/pcgraphpng.php?ec=-3.12&soc=-4.10[/IMG]
By the way, Bobie: [img]http://www.politicalcompass.org/facebook/pcgraphpng.php?ec=-8.88&soc=-9.44[/img]
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.