• John Demjanjuk guilty of Nazi death camp murders
    191 replies, posted
Yes, punish this vicious monster for the last five years of his life. I thought the German justice system was more for rehabilitation.
They're prosecuting an Allied soldier and a prisoner of war who was forced into being a guard at an internment camp. Are they prosecuting the Jews who got stuck with the same job in places like Buna? Nah, they're Jews, that makes them better. :downs:
[QUOTE=teh pirate;29783297]They're prosecuting an Allied soldier and a prisoner of war who was forced into being a guard at an internment camp. Are they prosecuting the Jews who got stuck with the same job in places like Buna? Nah, they're Jews, that makes them better. :downs:[/QUOTE] People are all against discrimination against minorities, but well, that is discrimination against a majority. I guess people are against discrimination against specific groups, not for equality. Disgusting
I know in the geneva convention we said that "just following orders" doesn't cut it, but not only did he really have little choice, but this was also almost 70 years ago.
Wow re-reading the article they didn't even provide evidence that he did anything but they're still throwing the burden of 28,000 deaths on him over something he was forced to do 70 years ago after being captured fighting for these people's freedom Disgusting
[QUOTE=Rares;29778397]Might as well start charging the cashiers in the cases of people vs. McDonalds. Not the same thing, i'm aware but still.[/QUOTE] you are aware that suing a fast food company is different than participating in the genocide of over 28,000 people and being tried for it but you made a stupid post about it anyway gj
hey guys, so when do we get to arresting all those american and british soldiers in afganistan for killing tens of thousands of people? because this is the same exact thing, if you haven't noticed.
[QUOTE=Mattk50;29783834]hey guys, so when do we get to arresting all those american and british soldiers in afganistan for killing tens of thousands of people? because this is the same exact thing, if you haven't noticed.[/QUOTE] what the fuck are you on about
I like how everyone is assuming things even though they didn't actually witness the trial.
So, they're blaming all 28,000 deaths on one person? What did they expect him to do, attempt to desert and be killed? They're using him as a scapegoat and nothing more.
[QUOTE=Mr. Bleak;29783899]So, they're blaming all 28,000 deaths on one person? What did they expect him to do, attempt to desert and be killed? They're using him as a scapegoat and nothing more.[/QUOTE] No they're not.
[QUOTE=Penguiin;29783873]what the fuck are you on about[/QUOTE] are you really so thick
[QUOTE=Viper the Tiger;29783952]No they're not.[/QUOTE] okay WWII trial specialist Viper the Tiger, tell us how it went down in your expert opinion [editline]12th May 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=Mattk50;29783961]are you really so thick[/QUOTE] this isn't about that
[QUOTE=Lord of Ears;29783981]this isn't about that[/QUOTE] if he is going to be tried for being part of a military orginization and killing people while in it, why aren't our troops being tried for murder?
[QUOTE=Mattk50;29784029]if he is going to be tried for being part of a military orginization and killing people while in it, why aren't our troops being tried for murder?[/QUOTE] why do you idiots always have to drag afghanistan into everything it's not similar at all, shove off
[QUOTE=Lord of Ears;29783981]okay WWII trial specialist Viper the Tiger, tell us how it went down in your expert opinion [editline]12th May 2011[/editline] this isn't about that[/QUOTE] It says he took part in the murder, not that he killed 28,000 people.
[QUOTE=Viper the Tiger;29784131]It says he took part in the murder, not that he killed 28,000 people.[/QUOTE] he didn't take part in the murder
[QUOTE=Lord of Ears;29784145]he didn't take part in the murder[/QUOTE] You're assuming that. That was what the trial was for and they found him guilty.
[QUOTE=Mattk50;29784029]if he is going to be tried for being part of a military orginization and killing people while in it, why aren't our troops being tried for murder?[/QUOTE] yes and 9/11 was an inside job perpetrated by our govt for an excuse to rob the middle east of it's oil and kill the civilians over there. you must be trolling if you are dumb enough to equate genocide to the current war. you might have a point if we were rounding up afghani civilians and killing them
[QUOTE=Viper the Tiger;29784184]You're assuming that. That was what the trial was for and they found him guilty.[/QUOTE] there's no evidence at all he was a red army soldier from ukraine who was captured fighting and forced into labor so that obviously makes him an evil nazi sympathizer worthy of our scorn, right? get real, dumbass
[QUOTE=Lord of Ears;29784130]why do you idiots always have to drag afghanistan into everything it's not similar at all, shove off[/QUOTE] thats not the point, stop being a goddamn idiot. the point is, he didnt do it, he was ordered to as part of an army, in the same way our troops are ordered to kill. [editline]12th May 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=Penguiin;29784186]yes and 9/11 was an inside job perpetrated by our govt for an excuse to rob the middle east of it's oil and kill the civilians over there. you must be trolling if you are dumb enough to equate genocide to the current war. you might have a point if we were rounding up afghani civilians and killing them[/QUOTE] you must be trolling if you are dumb enough to equate one person forced into military service working at a prison to hitler himself.
[QUOTE=Mattk50;29784250]thats not the point, stop being a goddamn idiot. the point is, he didnt do it, he was ordered to as part of an army, in the same way our troops are ordered to kill.[/QUOTE] high up US officer says "murder afghan civilians" high up SS officer says "murder jews" that's just uncanny, you are really good at drawing comparisons on things like this
[QUOTE=Mattk50;29784250]thats not the point, stop being a goddamn idiot. the point is, he didnt do it, he was ordered to as part of an army, in the same way our troops are ordered to kill.[/QUOTE] whatever even so, our soldiers volunteered, he was captured and forced into it and even then, he didn't kill anyone, he was just a guard
assuming the trial was fair/true (which it isnt) he was tried for being forced to kill people. since ours are volunteers, shouldn't they receive worse sentences? [editline]12th May 2011[/editline] im saying that this trial is stupid in the first place, and by the logic they are using, our own military should also be imprisoned.
[QUOTE=Lord of Ears;29784228]there's no evidence at all he was a red army soldier from ukraine who was captured fighting and forced into labor so that obviously makes him an evil nazi sympathizer worthy of our scorn, right? get real, dumbass[/QUOTE] No evidence? Were you at the trial?
Whoa, forgot all about this. This guy lived a few miles from me, my sister and his grandaughter attend the same school.
I guess it all hinges on whether the SS I.D is real or not. I know there were non-german SS units, but it seems odd they'd force someone to be one and get an I.D card, as opposed to just giving them guard duties as enforced labour.
[QUOTE=Trunk Monkay;29780179]yep, proof how worthless justice systems are. We finally do something we should have done 70 years ago, while it was still relevant. Now this old man is going to die in 6 months, instead of a few years from now. Bravo justice system.[/QUOTE] he evaded the system, like criminals do. regardless, nothing is going to happen at this point. [editline]13th May 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=Lord of Ears;29784228]there's no evidence at all he was a red army soldier from ukraine who was captured fighting and forced into labor so that obviously makes him an evil nazi sympathizer worthy of our scorn, right? get real, dumbass[/QUOTE] you've got to be fucking kidding? are you actually accusing the court of fabricating evidence to seal a conviction?
It seems mean to try to put a 91 year old in prison, especially when he didn't even condone what he was convicted for.
[QUOTE=Da Jester;29788076]It seems mean to try to put a 91 year old in prison, especially when he didn't even condone what he was convicted for.[/QUOTE] as said before, this is for the public record. but what criminal condones his own crimes unless he's admitting guilt? that makes no sense
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.