China preparing for armed conflict 'in every direction'
114 replies, posted
It's sobering to see that the globalist don't control EVERY nation.
If the US can get put in its place and threatened by another super power... Or perhaps step down from being the global super power, I think we'll end up with a much better world. We've fucked things up long enough, it's time to let someone else give it a try.
[QUOTE=Swilly;27087747][img_thumb]http://aznbadger.files.wordpress.com/2010/04/great_flying_chinese_army.jpg[/img_thumb]
They can fly too!
HOLY SHIT!
/caps[/QUOTE]
Bunny hopping.
Only communists use physics exploits.
[editline]1st January 2011[/editline]
[img]http://www.geekologie.com/2008/07/03/segway-military.jpg[/img]
I have nothing to fear, I got an RC tank that fires our airsoft BBs that was made in China for Christmas.
It is a fair fight.
[editline]1st January 2011[/editline]
[QUOTE=Swilly;27087747][img_thumb]http://aznbadger.files.wordpress.com/2010/04/great_flying_chinese_army.jpg[/img_thumb]
They can fly too!
HOLY SHIT!
/caps[/QUOTE]
[img]http://filesmelt.com/dl/china_wants_the_moon.png[/img]
Well, fuck.
Preparing for a conflict in every direction..
So China is preparing to take it in the mouth, the ass, etc?
Well they do have some powerful and violent neighbors.
Uh oh.
WE MUST LIBERATE SPACE AND THE CORE OF EARTH FROM THE RED CHINESE INVADERS.
/caps
Honestly, I agree with everyone else in the thread that says that China is simply trying to play the ol' "we can hurt you, so don't you hurt us!" card.
Basically, they want to be able to defend themselves against anything anyone else can throw at them. That doesn't necessarily hint towards hostile action against the United States, or any other sovereign nation in the world, it simply means that, in the event of an attack by another power, they want to be able to defend themselves.
for the record, iceland has no military because no one gives a shit about iceland
China is playing catch up. Well I say the US should keep on pushing the finish line out of China's reach.
[QUOTE=Moose;27123640]for the record, iceland has no military because no one gives a shit about iceland[/QUOTE]They're a member of NATO, basically other countries protect it instead. It's strategically located for controlling the North Atlantic.
[QUOTE=Raiskauskone V2;27073640]The point went far and above your head smartass, what I'm trying to tell is that people here are biased as fuck and just blindly defend America no matter what and think everything China does is evil. When ironically, America does that kind of military preparationing [B]all the fucking time[/B][/QUOTE]
IRONY ALL UP IN THIS BITCH!!
You're biased against America.
[editline]1st January 2011[/editline]
[QUOTE=cqbcat;27126890]China is playing catch up. Well I say the US should keep on pushing the finish line out of China's reach.[/QUOTE]
ahaha
yeah china is one the few countries in the world with the military might to pulverise the US, it's also building it's own super carriers, and If I remember correctly it bought aircraft carriers from both the UK and Russia, or China is looking to buy one of the new UK carriers that will never be used.
[QUOTE=Canary;27070029]Oh yeah because having a huge military totally worked out for Germany against Britain's small and well experienced military.[/QUOTE]
IIRC it did.
[QUOTE=Tunak Mk. II;27129329]IIRC it did.[/QUOTE]
It didn't, the RAF held off the Luftwaffe and forced Hitler to indefinitely postpone the invasion of Britain.
[QUOTE=bravehat;27129440]It didn't, the RAF held off the Luftwaffe and forced Hitler to indefinitely postpone the invasion of Britain.[/QUOTE]That was mainly due to some really idiotic decisions; if they'd focused on pulverising the airfields instead of raging and bombing the cities instead, they'd have had a far better chance of taking out the RAF
Yeah but they still lost cause of Hitler being a retard and not letting most of generals do their work, or at least that was the case with the Wehrmacht.
Either way it still illustrates my point, Hitler was inexperienced, as was his armed forces for the most part where as the RAF and british army was forced to learn fast thanks to hitlers immediate advantages.
[QUOTE=bravehat;27131118]Yeah but they still lost cause of Hitler being a retard and not letting most of generals do their work, or at least that was the case with the Wehrmacht.
Either way it still illustrates my point, Hitler was inexperienced, as was his armed forces for the most part where as the RAF and british army was forced to learn fast thanks to hitlers immediate advantages.[/QUOTE]
Meh. Still, he had the British by the balls until his stupid decision to attack Russia during the winter. And then they destroyed him.
[QUOTE=bravehat;27131118]Yeah but they still lost cause of Hitler being a retard and not letting most of generals do their work, or at least that was the case with the Wehrmacht.
Either way it still illustrates my point, Hitler was inexperienced, as was his armed forces for the most part where as the RAF and british army was forced to learn fast thanks to hitlers immediate advantages.[/QUOTE]Hitler was the single greatest factor that led to German defeat. His forces were well-trained, gained experience rapidly (mainly due to invading every little corner of Europe) and tended to thrash equally-equipped and numbered opponents. Fortunately for us, we became better-equipped, and outnumbered them, and Hitler had a serious case of strategic derp.
Yeah Hitler was pretty much the sole purpose Germany didn't dominate every battle they went into, they were the first army to actually realise the power and capability of armoured warfare, if only he had listened to his generals and done what they recommended.
Silly Hitler v:v:v
Thread title is wrong.
it was supposed to be "Germany preparing for armed conflict "in every direction""
[QUOTE=Jewsus;27061402]Well fuck.
[editline]30th December 2010[/editline]
[img_thumb]http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2008/8/13/saupload_jq1.jpg&imgrefurl=http://seekingalpha.com/article/90742-the-economic-cost-of-the-military-industrial-complex&usg=__lI1YKx2cE0K6Zbyrqh5om8V72oM=&h=508&w=680&sz=49&hl=en&start=0&zoom=1&tbnid=txC5yM8xzIYMbM:&tbnh=141&tbnw=188&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dus%2Bmilitary%2Bspending%2Bvs%2Bchinese%2Bmilitary%2Bspending%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DN%26biw%3D1366%26bih%3D588%26tbs%3Disch:1&um=1&itbs=1&iact=hc&vpx=326&vpy=234&dur=1579&hovh=194&hovw=260&tx=148&ty=109&ei=q9sbTYTKK4X7lwf5k7zGCw&oei=q9sbTYTKK4X7lwf5k7zGCw&esq=1&page=1&ndsp=18&ved=1t:429,r:7,s:0[/img_thumb][img_thumb]http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2008/8/13/saupload_jq1.jpg&imgrefurl=http://seekingalpha.com/article/90742-the-economic-cost-of-the-military-industrial-complex&usg=__lI1YKx2cE0K6Zbyrqh5om8V72oM=&h=508&w=680&sz=49&hl=en&start=0&zoom=1&tbnid=txC5yM8xzIYMbM:&tbnh=141&tbnw=188&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dus%2Bmilitary%2Bspending%2Bvs%2Bchinese%2Bmilitary%2Bspending%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DN%26biw%3D1366%26bih%3D588%26tbs%3Disch:1&um=1&itbs=1&iact=hc&vpx=326&vpy=234&dur=1579&hovh=194&hovw=260&tx=148&ty=109&ei=q9sbTYTKK4X7lwf5k7zGCw&oei=q9sbTYTKK4X7lwf5k7zGCw&esq=1&page=1&ndsp=18&ved=1t:429,r:7,s:0[/img_thumb][img_thumb]http://www.ceasefire.ca/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/global_spending_graph.jpg[/img_thumb]
I'm not all that worried.[/QUOTE]
That doesn't mean much. The USA Doesn't spend as much of its GDP, percentage wise, as other countries do on their military
Our GDP is just metric fuck tons larger
[QUOTE=Canary;27070029]Oh yeah because having a huge military totally worked out for Germany against Britain's small and well experienced military.[/QUOTE]
That was one of the most utterly misinformed things I have ever read.
[editline]1st January 2011[/editline]
[QUOTE=Raiskauskone V2;27073149]By your logic if America was in same position as Russia right now, we'd be in a fucking Nuclear War right now because America flips it's shit immediately when *gasp* theres even one single country near it that sides with russia.
[editline]30th December 2010[/editline]
Americunts should just get fucked right now and start thinking things without their PATRIOTISM filtering their views.
[editline]30th December 2010[/editline]
Because this thread is just one sided of "OMFG CHINA GUNNA DO MITE BAD"[/QUOTE]
I don't quite see what you're talking about, as we haven't taken any openly hostile stances towards pro-Russian governments in the near abroad. Also, what do you mean by "same position?" Are you suggesting we have recently lost multiple territories that have been parts of our country for several hundred years, many of which are now trying quite hard to align themselves with people that we aren't on the best of terms with? Last time I checked, we hadn't.
[editline]1st January 2011[/editline]
[QUOTE=Raiskauskone V2;27070038]Are you fucking kidding me?
More like America has been compensating for their militaristically shitty dick since the end of World War 2.
See Jewsus post with the stupid budged thing in which he thinks military budged=army performance 'n' efficiency.
This thread will be one of those filled with ignorant americans who try to prove everyone that AMERIKU=STRONG
[editline]30th December 2010[/editline]
[B]I mean come on, your fucking soldiers cry already in a insurgent mortar attack.[/B][/QUOTE]
Oh really? They do now? Odd, haven't been hearing much of that.
I would like to see you sit whilst high explosive shells are falling around you. You would shit your pants and curl up into a ball.
[QUOTE=gamefreek76;27078960]I respect China for defending themselves, but I pity them for thinking they have an actual chance against the United States or N.K.[/QUOTE]
I thought this was funny.
[QUOTE=Raiskauskone V2;27070038]Are you fucking kidding me?
More like America has been compensating for their militaristically shitty dick since the end of World War 2.
See Jewsus post with the stupid budged thing in which he thinks military budged=army performance 'n' efficiency.
This thread will be one of those filled with ignorant americans who try to prove everyone that AMERIKU=STRONG
[editline]30th December 2010[/editline]
I mean come on, your fucking soldiers cry already in a insurgent mortar attack.[/QUOTE]
youre just mad because china makes all our shit for us and they abuse the living fuck out of their workers
[QUOTE=gamefreek76;27078960]I respect China for defending themselves, but I pity them for thinking they have an actual chance against the United States or N.K.[/QUOTE]
Lol, what?
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.