• Wisconsin Senate Leader Fitzgerald Removes Representation Of 2.2 Million American Votes
    197 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Sobotnik;28678675]Glabers my favourite comedian on Facepunch.[/QUOTE] Better to be a Conservative instead of advocating something really crazy, like Authoritarianism or something.
[QUOTE=HumanAbyss;28678451]I would much rather have glaber reply to the issue at hand instead of his classic deflection[/QUOTE] That's like leading a horse to water and expecting it to drink.
[QUOTE=Habsburg;28678839]That's like leading a horse to water and expecting it to drink.[/QUOTE] What if the horse is thirsty?
[QUOTE=Megafanx13;28678875]What if the horse is thirsty?[/QUOTE] if ifs and buts were candy and nuts we would all have a merry christmas
[QUOTE=Megafanx13;28678833]Better to be a Conservative instead of advocating something really crazy, like Authoritarianism or something.[/QUOTE] Authoritarianism is just the opposite of Libertarianism, what's so crazy about it?
[QUOTE=Sobotnik;28679108]Authoritarianism is just the opposite of Libertarianism, what's so crazy about it?[/QUOTE] because its fucking stupid and crazy thats why
[QUOTE=yawmwen;28679148]because its fucking stupid and crazy thats why[/QUOTE] What about a Authoritarian Meritocracy then? That's my favourite form of government.
[QUOTE=Sobotnik;28679178]What about a Authoritarian Meritocracy then? That's my favourite form of government.[/QUOTE] any country implementing any form of authoritarianism or meritocracy would be horribly dystopian and oppressive
[QUOTE=Sobotnik;28679108]Authoritarianism is just the opposite of Libertarianism, what's so crazy about it?[/QUOTE] Pure Libertarianism isn't a good system either, just look at Strider.
[QUOTE=Megafanx13;28679299]Pure Libertarianism isn't a good system either, just look at Strider.[/QUOTE] i would consider pure libertarianism or anarchy preferable to complete authoritarianism
[QUOTE=yawmwen;28679554]i would consider pure libertarianism or anarchy preferable to complete authoritarianism[/QUOTE] Perhaps, but I still would rather not have either one.
[QUOTE=Megafanx13;28679584]Perhaps, but I still would not rather not have either one.[/QUOTE] of course not
[QUOTE=yawmwen;28679950]of course not[/QUOTE] So I think we can agree that Libertarianism and Authoritarianism aren't good ideologies?
Complete Authoritarianism has a small possibility of working, if the people in charge do it just right. Complete anarchy has next to no possibility of working, unless the humans are genetically modified somehow.
[QUOTE=Key_in_skillee;28682267][B]Complete Authoritarianism has a small possibility of working, if the people in charge do it just right.[/B] Complete anarchy has next to no possibility of working, unless the humans are genetically modified somehow.[/QUOTE] You could say that for a lot of "pure" ideologies. In pure Capitalism, it works if the CEOs and executives are all "doing it right". In pure Communism, it works if all the people of the nation are "doing it right". This argument is completely irrelevant.
[QUOTE=Megafanx13;28682710]You could say that for a lot of "pure" ideologies. In pure Capitalism, it works if the CEOs and executives are all "doing it right". In pure Communism, it works if all the people of the nation are "doing it right". This argument is completely irrelevant.[/QUOTE] You don't know Communism, there is no "nation" in Communism, there is only the people.
[QUOTE=Swilly;28684240]You don't know Communism, there is no "nation" in Communism, there is only the people.[/QUOTE] I mean nation as in where the borders stand. I'm well aware of what Communism is, and I suppose ideally it would be spread across the world, but I'm certain you knew what I meant.
At least we don't have to worry about the republicans in the state getting voted back in, unless they stop the voting process :tinfoil:
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.