• Voters to GOP candidates: We don’t like any of you
    66 replies, posted
Mitt is the only one that stands anywhere close to a chance against Obama. If Santorum gets the vote then you can just go ahead and consider that a win.
[QUOTE=Bomimo;35023444]Then you're obviously insane. Seek mental help ASAP son![/QUOTE] After I wipe Facepunch's cum off my face.
[QUOTE=Chicken_Chaser;35022550]Millions =/= no one I guess this is the part where I say I'm not a Republican so I don't get flamed for acknowledging the enemy.[/QUOTE] Ok, not no one. But relatively their statistics are a small number compared to previous candidate approval ratings.
This whole election is going to be a mess in both parties.. There are no acceptable candidates, it's just picking out the piece of shit with the least peanuts in it. I'm a bit worried to say the least.
[QUOTE=evilweazel;35024042]This whole election is going to be a mess in both parties.. There are no acceptable candidates, it's just picking out the piece of shit with the lease peanuts in it.[/QUOTE] This is why the third party candidates need rich friends so they can actually advertise and do all the other shit needed to get noticed. Even then they'd be ignored by the media.
I hope people will start try to give those smaller parties that aren't inside the congress a chance.
[QUOTE=Coffee;35023629][img]http://www.washingtonpost.com/rf/image_606w/WashingtonPost/Content/Blogs/she-the-people/Images/APTOPIX_GOP_Debate_08099.jpg?uuid=2dBepGPUEeGJQdvjzWyqAw[/img] Ron Paul looks like he doesn't want to be associated with the others.[/QUOTE] Who would?
[QUOTE=Chicken_Chaser;35024086]This is why the third party candidates need rich friends so they can actually advertise and do all the other shit needed to get noticed. Even then they'd be ignored by the media.[/QUOTE] What we need are reformed and clearly defined election and campaign laws. We should define for ourselves what they should be and push to get it into the public's attention. I'll start: SuperPACs shall be required to issue a public statement on which candidate they support. They shall be considered part of the candidate's campaign as long as the candidate gives consent. If the candidate does not, the SuperPAC will have it's status revoked and be disbanded. Candidate campaigns shall be allowed to spend $1 million in each state. Further spending will only be allowed if agreed on by both candidates (or in the case of multiple candidates, 3/4 of them.)
My brother and I are part of the Obama re-election campaign (free shirts motherfuckerrrrrs), and I can tell you now, while it's looking good right now, we're still pushing as hard as we can. Don't get lax now friends, the hard fight is ahead.
[QUOTE=ewitwins;35024954]My brother and I are part of the Obama re-election campaign (free shirts motherfuckerrrrrs), and I can tell you now, while it's looking good right now, we're still pushing as hard as we can. Don't get lax now friends, the hard fight is ahead.[/QUOTE] Cool. Be sure to give us updates.
[QUOTE=The Baconator;35024585]Who would?[/QUOTE] I bet every single one of them is thinking "this guy sitting next to me is a fucking idiot"
[QUOTE=Hidole555;35024663]What we need are reformed and clearly defined election and campaign laws. We should define for ourselves what they should be and push to get it into the public's attention. I'll start: SuperPACs shall be required to issue a public statement on which candidate they support. They shall be considered part of the candidate's campaign as long as the candidate gives consent. If the candidate does not, the SuperPAC will have it's status revoked and be disbanded. Candidate campaigns shall be allowed to spend $1 million in each state. Further spending will only be allowed if agreed on by both candidates (or in the case of multiple candidates, 3/4 of them.)[/QUOTE] first off. Sponsor-stickers/logos. Like race-drivers. I want to see who's paying since that'll tell me more about his political agenda than the bullshit talks he gives on his way up there. Secondly, Every religious aspiring politician needs to take an IQ test and then a "general historical facts and scientifically proven theories" test and then needs to acknowledge his holy book as myths for gainful interpretation. I mean. Imagine me talking about going to Valhalla for massacring people while high on shrooms. Why is any other ancient religion any better? Third: When you vote, you need to answer 3 objective questions to prove that you what the fuck you're voting for. (that's a special one only for the south). Fourth: Fix the fucking swiss-cheese of an amendment and only pass laws that doesn't discriminate anyone in the name of any religious figure. Christ guys, how fucking though is this? This shit is what third grade demands over here and your officials and shit can't do it? Fifth: Tear down your sensationalistic, patriotic culture and build it up from the bottom again so you actually have something to be patriotic about. You're the most prejudiced nation in the west. Congrats. [editline]6th March 2012[/editline] [QUOTE=ewitwins;35024954]My brother and I are part of the Obama re-election campaign (free shirts motherfuckerrrrrs), and I can tell you now, while it's looking good right now, we're still pushing as hard as we can. Don't get lax now friends, the hard fight is ahead.[/QUOTE] How does it feel to stand on the sane side and look out on utter chaos and destructive elitism?
[QUOTE=SeamanStains;35021869]The GOP makes me proud to be British.[/QUOTE] The BNP makes me proud to be American.
[QUOTE=Bomimo;35025324]first off. Sponsor-stickers/logos. Like race-drivers. I want to see who's paying since that'll tell me more about his political agenda than the bullshit talks he gives on his way up there. [/QUOTE] I rememer that from a stand up act
[QUOTE=kimr120;35024546]I hope people will start try to give those smaller parties that aren't inside the congress a chance.[/QUOTE] It won't happen. Most are either sucking an elephant cock or a donkey dick.
[QUOTE=ewitwins;35024954]My brother and I are part of the Obama re-election campaign (free shirts motherfuckerrrrrs), and I can tell you now, while it's looking good right now, we're still pushing as hard as we can. Don't get lax now friends, the hard fight is ahead.[/QUOTE] It's going to be a lukewarm 'yes', but it's still a vote.
[QUOTE=JustGman;35023651]People want to vote for Ron Paul because [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MppmwwRnOrA[/media] and nothing else, because that's all they know about him. Every republican is an incompetent fuck, even Ron Paul.[/QUOTE] Most Ron Paul supporters are obsessed with learning about libertarian-ism, and are usually young businessmen. Tell me how Romney a hugely successful businessman is incompetent. Tell me how Paul was able to apply his understanding of Austrian economics to predict the housing bubble burst if he is so incompetent. Also a huge chunk of Obama supporters know nothing about his policies and just see free things to grab at.
Yeah people shouldn't take the election lightly. Conservatives have a very high voter turnout, meanwhile America in general has a [I]very[/I] poor voter turnout, and independents (the group Obama won over in 2008) have a lower voter turnout than the two parties. You'll be shocked at how many people don't vote, even if registered. [url]http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0781453.html[/url]
[QUOTE=Hidole555;35020553]I find it interesting in how if you look at the margin of error for the poll, even in the worst case scenario with Romney up 3.5 points and Ron Paul down 3.5 points, Paul is still on top, being favored the most. Yet here we have a CNN article that says Ron Paul's name only twice alongside a video showing Romney to be almost guaranteed at least 6 states today. [URL="http://www.cnn.com/2012/03/06/politics/super-tuesday/index.html"]http://www.cnn.com/2012/03/06/politics/super-tuesday/index.html[/URL] Even if you hate Ron Paul, you have to admit he's being a little short changed.[/QUOTE]Really, its more an issue of most of the GOP prefer the others over him and really want nothing to do with him. He almost came dead last amongst the GOP, barely edging out Gingrich. Its more than just an issue of some media conspiracy to keep him from being elected, he is genuinely disliked. At some point you have to acknowledge that Ron Paul's support is genuinely low on a national scale, and people overall just do not want him elected. And never mind; looking back, Ron Paul IS in dead last. The article reversed the order of the listings for him and I thought he had a 44% favorability over Gingrich's 42%. He actually has a 38% [editline]6th March 2012[/editline] [QUOTE=King Tiger;35025426]The BNP makes me proud to be American.[/QUOTE]To be fair, the BNP doesn't make up half of the British government.
[QUOTE=Javascript;35020924]I'm at least happy to know that the general public has enough intelligence to understand how absolutely batshit insane all of these GOP candidates are. All I know is, Ron Paul 2012.[/QUOTE] He's the most insane. The only reason he polled the best is because his supporters think he's a mesiah.
Also, article, I don't hate them because they have been at this thing for so long and how they have treated each other, I hate them for being genuinely horrible, detestable disgraces to humanity.
I personally don't like obama right now, but with the other candidates, i am probably gonna change that very soon.
[QUOTE=zombini;35028411]I personally don't like obama right now, but with the other candidates, i am probably gonna change that very soon.[/QUOTE]He's the best of the bunch.
[quote]This Washington Post-ABC News poll was conducted by telephone February 29 to March 4 2012, among a random national sample of 1,014 adults[/quote] I don't see why you guys jump all over this when the data sample was so miniscule.
[QUOTE=Hidole555;35020553]I find it interesting in how if you look at the margin of error for the poll, even in the worst case scenario with Romney up 3.5 points and Ron Paul down 3.5 points, Paul is still on top, being favored the most. Yet here we have a CNN article that says Ron Paul's name only twice alongside a video showing Romney to be almost guaranteed at least 6 states today. [URL="http://www.cnn.com/2012/03/06/politics/super-tuesday/index.html"]http://www.cnn.com/2012/03/06/politics/super-tuesday/index.html[/URL] Even if you hate Ron Paul, you have to admit he's being a little short changed.[/QUOTE] A "little"? If he were elected, it would be the death knell of horrible corporate and/or fascist police state politics in America, and that's not convenient to keeping these scoundrels in comfy positions. Thus, why the media is deliberately keeping Paul out of any serious mention, as if the current lineup of figureheads were somehow more legitimate.
[QUOTE=Hidole555;35020553]I find it interesting in how if you look at the margin of error for the poll, even in the worst case scenario with Romney up 3.5 points and Ron Paul down 3.5 points, Paul is still on top, being favored the most. Yet here we have a CNN article that says Ron Paul's name only twice alongside a video showing Romney to be almost guaranteed at least 6 states today. [URL="http://www.cnn.com/2012/03/06/politics/super-tuesday/index.html"]http://www.cnn.com/2012/03/06/politics/super-tuesday/index.html[/URL] Even if you hate Ron Paul, you have to admit he's being a little short changed.[/QUOTE] It seems the link in this comment leads to a different page now. CNN, you troll.
[QUOTE=Doctor Zedacon;35028327]To be fair, the BNP doesn't make up half of the British government.[/QUOTE] Still makes me proud to be American.
[QUOTE=asteroidrules;35028375]He's the most insane. The only reason he polled the best is because his supporters think he's a mesiah.[/QUOTE] If you're going to call Paul the most insane how about you back it up for once. Thanks for saying his supporters think he's Jesus too even though I've talked to supporters and only one of them was behind him 100 percent. How do you not feel like a major shit-head saying Santorum is saner?
[QUOTE=kimr120;35024546]I hope people will start try to give those smaller parties that aren't inside the congress a chance.[/QUOTE] Well the problem with that is, if you have 200 dem voters to 190 rep voters, the democrats win. But if 25 people vote for a third party, it's now 25, 175, and 190, and the republicans win.
[QUOTE=Mr. Someguy;35031169]Well the problem with that is, if you have 200 dem voters to 190 rep voters, the democrats win. But if 25 people vote for a third party, it's now 25, 175, and 190, and the republicans win.[/QUOTE] It's called the spoiler effect and we wouldn't have it if our voting system was halfway decent. [video=youtube;3Y3jE3B8HsE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Y3jE3B8HsE[/video]
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.