• Father proves he's a LAD by luring a suspected paedophile to a field and beating him to death
    225 replies, posted
This is the only online forum I know that defends pedophiles. Even goddamn 4chan hates pedos and they're full of retards.
[QUOTE=CaptainObvious1;47297574]This is the only online forum I know that defends pedophiles. Even goddamn 4chan hates pedos and they're full of retards.[/QUOTE] who here is defending pedophilia. what kind of goddamn extrapolation is that?
[QUOTE=CaptainObvious1;47297574]This is the only online forum I know that defends pedophiles. Even goddamn 4chan hates pedos and they're full of retards.[/QUOTE] And are you defending murderers? Such a moral beacon of light.
[QUOTE=CaptainObvious1;47297574]This is the only online forum I know that defends pedophiles. Even goddamn 4chan hates pedos and they're full of retards.[/QUOTE] This is the only forum I know where people like you will defend the vigilante killing of a guy [I]suspected[/I] of a crime instead of advocating contacting the proper authorities like sane people.
[QUOTE=gastyne;47294521]It amazes me how, in threads like these, there are always some people who think murder is nice and OK. Having bad thoughts does not warrant a death sentence and should never. Thinking about molesting kids is not the same thing as doing it.[/QUOTE] He went to that field intending to meet and rape a child. So I'm not exactly going to hold it against the father for killing him.
[QUOTE=gastyne;47294521]It amazes me how, in threads like these, there are always some people who think murder is nice and OK. Having bad thoughts does not warrant a death sentence and should never. Thinking about molesting kids is not the same thing as doing it.[/QUOTE] Hurts for you to read doesn't it? If you read the article you will know the pedo in question already contacted the young girl. I find it appalling that anyone would say they wouldn't have done the same if it was their kid in danger of being a target.
[QUOTE=FLIPPY;47297722]Hurts for you to read doesn't it? If you read the article you will know the pedo in question already contacted the young girl. I find it appalling that anyone would say they wouldn't have done the same if it was their kid in danger of being a target.[/QUOTE] "I find it appalling that anyone would say they wouldn't have lured a man over the course of 3 months with the intent of severely beating him as opposed to letting our justice system take the proper measures" [editline]10th March 2015[/editline] What the fuck is wrong with you people? Holy shit you're fucking savage.
[QUOTE=AlexConnor;47297651]He went to that field intending to meet and rape a child. So I'm not exactly going to hold it against the father for killing him.[/QUOTE] Okay lets all start killing people because fuck the law.
[QUOTE=geel9;47297748]"I find it appalling that anyone would say they wouldn't have lured a man over the course of 3 months with the intent of severely beating him as opposed to letting our justice system take the proper measures" [editline]10th March 2015[/editline] What the fuck is wrong with you people? Holy shit you're fucking savage.[/QUOTE] No, whats savage is letting the pedophile scum live. He had intent to harm therefor he forfeits his right to live. He would end up dead prison anyways. It's Brazil, if anything he got off easy.
[QUOTE=FLIPPY;47297817]No, whats savage is letting the pedophile scum live. He had intent to harm therefor he forfeits his right to live. He would end up dead prison anyways. It's Brazil, if anything he got off easy.[/QUOTE] Well shit, I guess someone should go beat the Father to death as well since he not only had 'intent to harm' but actually went and murdered a guy. Nobody 'forfeits their right to live'. The right to life is the most fundamental of all human rights.
[QUOTE=FLIPPY;47297817]No, whats savage is letting the pedophile scum live. He had intent to harm therefor he forfeits his right to live. He would end up dead prison anyways. It's Brazil, if anything he got off easy.[/QUOTE] I guess we should go and murder everyone who's mental disorders cause them to want to harm people? Because there totally aren't any other, more humane options, right?
[QUOTE=FLIPPY;47297722]Hurts for you to read doesn't it? If you read the article you will know the pedo in question already contacted the young girl. I find it appalling that anyone would say they wouldn't have done the same if it was their kid in danger of being a target.[/QUOTE] I find it appalling that you think murder is OK.
[QUOTE=geel9;47297748]"I find it appalling that anyone would say they wouldn't have lured a man over the course of 3 months with the intent of severely beating him as opposed to letting our justice system take the proper measures" [editline]10th March 2015[/editline] What the fuck is wrong with you people? Holy shit you're fucking savage.[/QUOTE] That's not what's being said. We're simply saying that we don't care that the father killed this guy. I don't care one way or the other about whether it was right or wrong morally and ethically. And there's not any reason to care either. We've got a 23-year-old pedophilic adult meticulously pursuing for three months an 11-year-old child with the intention of raping her and doing who knows what else to her; this being Brazil, he probably would have killed her after he raped her and dumped the body somewhere (which happens all the fucking time down there). We just don't care. The outcome of the situation ended either way with the girl safe, and that's what really counts in the end. Considering how much Brazil hates rapists, I'm sure there's going to be a lot of people sympathetic to the father. If he's convicted of anything, he'll be fine. It would be smart for the judge to be lenient in sentencing, for obvious reasons.
[QUOTE=Gum100;47297914]I guess we should go and murder everyone who's mental disorders cause them to want to harm people? Because there totally aren't any other, more humane options, right?[/QUOTE] They don't intend to harm. Humane? To pedophiles? How about no. [editline]10th March 2015[/editline] [QUOTE=CatFodder;47297885]Well shit, I guess someone should go beat the Father to death as well since he not only had 'intent to harm' but actually went and murdered a guy. Nobody 'forfeits their right to live'. The right to life is the most fundamental of all human rights.[/QUOTE] The father isn't a pedophile.
[QUOTE=FLIPPY;47297947]They don't intend to harm. Humane? To pedophiles? How about no. [editline]10th March 2015[/editline] The father isn't a pedophile.[/QUOTE] how to be hardcore on the internet 101
[QUOTE=FLIPPY;47297947]They don't intend to harm. Humane? To pedophiles? How about no. [editline]10th March 2015[/editline] The father isn't a pedophile.[/QUOTE] You are a cancer on society.
[QUOTE=FLIPPY;47297722]Hurts for you to read doesn't it? If you read the article you will know the pedo in question already contacted the young girl. I find it appalling that anyone would say they wouldn't have done the same if it was their kid in danger of being a target.[/QUOTE] You're sick. [editline]10th March 2015[/editline] [QUOTE=FLIPPY;47297947]They don't intend to harm. Humane? To pedophiles? How about no. [editline]10th March 2015[/editline] The father isn't a pedophile.[/QUOTE] The murder may "justified" but that doesn't make it okay. Did that piece of shit deserve to die? Maybe, but that doesn't make it okay, especially if you're gonna record it and put it on the internet. What if the dead guy had a metal disorder, what if he didn't deserve to die? We don't fucking know that
[QUOTE=AlexConnor;47297651]He went to that field intending to meet and rape a child. So I'm not exactly going to hold it against the father for killing him.[/QUOTE] I can't blame the father for killing him. I don't have a child and I don't know what I'd do to someone intending to harm mine if I did. That does not make it morally or legally acceptable in any way.
I absolutely blame the father for killing him. Planning a severe, violent assault on a person for months on end when you have numerous other options is not sane or rational behavior.
Why are people here so alien to the concept of karma these thread templates repeat themselves over and over again, instead of arguing who is right why don't we just agree to disagree. You can debate morality to whatever degree you want, it changes nothing. This is the real world, not a world populated by the lofty ideas you were taught in high school or philosophy 101. I get guenuine keks from reading the posts of the absolutely dedicated in this thread, just as I will the next time one of these threads is made people have different opinions. It's k. Addtional keks - muh rehabilitation - muh prison time ($$$$) [editline]11th March 2015[/editline] although granted posting a video of the beating/aftermath was probably a bit extreme. Not to mention self incriminating. Why not just do it without letting the whole world know? [highlight](User was banned for this post ("4chan memes not allowed" - OvB))[/highlight] [highlight](User was permabanned for this post ("extended - ban history" - OvB))[/highlight]
[QUOTE=En-Guage;47298505]although granted posting a video of the beating/aftermath was probably a bit extreme. Not to mention self incriminating. Why not just do it without letting the whole world know?[/QUOTE] if he were capable of thinking that far ahead he wouldn't be watching the remainder of his daughter's (probably now severely warped) childhood from a prison cell
I guess if he was a thinker he probably would have done something more imaginative than beating the guy to death But yeah poor kid, abused and now without a father, shit sucks. He must've been blinded with rage though, that's why I'm guessing he acted as he did. Surely it would have been easier and better for him if he'd just kept it on the dl. There are so many murders in Brazil he'd never get found out, not to mention the cops probably wouldn't care anyway
[QUOTE=En-Guage;47298505]You can debate morality to whatever degree you want, it changes nothing. This is the real world, not a world populated by the lofty ideas you were taught in high school or philosophy 101. I get guenuine keks from reading the posts of the absolutely dedicated in this thread, just as I will the next time one of these threads is made[/QUOTE] Thinking first-degree murder is bad isn't a particularly lofty ideal.
[QUOTE=En-Guage;47298505]Why are people here so alien to the concept of karma[/QUOTE] Some people don't give a shit about the made-up concept of karma like you do, believe it or not.
[QUOTE=En-Guage;47298505]Why are people here so alien to the concept of karma these thread templates repeat themselves over and over again, instead of arguing who is right why don't we just agree to disagree. You can debate morality to whatever degree you want, it changes nothing. This is the real world, not a world populated by the lofty ideas you were taught in high school or philosophy 101. I get guenuine keks from reading the posts of the absolutely dedicated in this thread, just as I will the next time one of these threads is made people have different opinions. It's k. Addtional keks - muh rehabilitation - muh prison time ($$$$) [editline]11th March 2015[/editline] although granted posting a video of the beating/aftermath was probably a bit extreme. Not to mention self incriminating. Why not just do it without letting the whole world know?[/QUOTE] Talks about keks. Talks about karma. Moral high horse. Yeah okay
[QUOTE=Skerion;47299089]Some people don't give a shit about the made-up concept of karma like you do, believe it or not.[/QUOTE] I haven't met many people who don't believe in it one way or another, then I guess I haven't asked them specifically. Surely most people at some point in their life believes "what goes around comes around" in one way or another, ie they get fucked over and then they think back to when they fucked someone else over (vice versa). I mean you don't have to believe in it fully, but when you get wronged or at least when I am wronged I always think back to when I did something similar to someone else I'm actually interested to see how many people do believe in it versus those who don't, can I get an agree/disagree rating for that?
[QUOTE=En-Guage;47299119]I haven't met many people who don't believe in it one way or another, then I guess I haven't asked them specifically. Surely most people at some point in their life believes "what goes around comes around" in one way or another, ie they get fucked over and then they think back to when they fucked someone else over (vice versa). I mean you don't have to believe in it fully, but when you get wronged or at least when I am wronged I always think back to when I did something similar to someone else I'm actually interested to see how many people do believe in it versus those who don't, can I get an agree/disagree rating for that?[/QUOTE] There were times where I did want to get back at someone, but that was only because it's usually our nature as humans to get pissy and act like vengeful cunts whenever somebody does something to fuck us over, and it's usually not easy to control that for understandable reasons. It makes sense that it happens, but it shouldn't automatically mean that it's the only objectively right thing to do, and neither does it make it a desirable trait to have. Overall, I'm not a huge believer on karma and I get pretty annoyed whenever some guys just shout out "karmas a bitch" in these types of threads. I feel that the concept's only there so that people will feel good whenever unfortunate things happen to others they don't like.
[QUOTE=Scot;47291087]the lad bible is seriously the worst thing that has ever happened to the UK.[/QUOTE] All they do is steal from reddit anyway, surprising how they have a operational [i]company[/i] still.
Fairly certain after whats been said here we can conclude that 20% of people on facepunch who post in ST will either end up in the prison system for a large portion of their life or dead. (or they could be talking shit but like that could be true, no one ever acts tough on the internet about things they would probably never do in real life)
[QUOTE=OutspokenGolf;47297598]who here is defending pedophilia. what kind of goddamn extrapolation is that?[/QUOTE] As stated before, I am a defender of pedophiles so long as they are trying to receive help, are not trying to start relationships with children, and aren't performing any crimes. I'm not going to defend this guy's actions because he crossed that line, but at the same time he didn't deserve to die like the way he did.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.