[QUOTE=gmaster;20459475]"Kill a bad guy and i'll buy you ice cream for dinner!"
The funny part is, they sampled what real soldiers had actually said in combat to keep morale up for the multiplayer voices, the above example being one of them. So if they thought the voices were annoying, perhaps they should go and confront the real-life troops.[/QUOTE]
are you seriously suggesting that because you think the in-game voices are annoying that means you hate the us military because if so holy shit
[QUOTE=Ziron;20459607]are you seriously suggesting that because you think the in-game voices are annoying that means you hate the us military because if so holy shit[/QUOTE]
No, it's just that I got the impression from the review that they didn't like the voices because they detracted from the feeling of war
[QUOTE=gmaster;20459756]No, it's just that I got the impression from the review that they didn't like the voices because they detracted from the feeling of war[/QUOTE]
oh ok
[QUOTE=T2L_Goose;20449326]Wow what a surprise the singleplayer in a battlefield game is nothing special.
If you get a battlefield game for its singleplayer you're a fucking moron.[/QUOTE]
I thought the main focus of making the Bad Company franchise was a good singleplayer though.
[QUOTE=Henry Townshend;20459885]I thought the main focus of making the Bad Company franchise was a good singleplayer though.[/QUOTE]
No. Battlefield games have [B]always[/B] been focuses on multiplayer.
They just recently decided to try and make a singleplayer that isn't bots running around an empty map.
Lacking Epic
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tPKGsCP9xSQ&hd=1[/media]
WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY BETTER that Fag war 2
I like how he complained the campaign was about 6 hours long.
Not one game review site bitched about MW2's campaign being 4-5 hours long. I just kept seeing, "Short but sweet LOLOLOL!!!!"
"Missed epic feeling"
Hurr. Can't pull out a knife out of your chest :downs:
[QUOTE=Legolas;20462440]"Missed epic feeling"
Hurr. Can't pull out a knife out of your chest :downs:[/QUOTE]
I'M NOT GOING TO TOLERATE ANY FUCKIN UNREALISM IN A GAME THAT'S BASICALLY A MICHAEL BAY MOVIe!!!!!!!
[QUOTE=Ziron;20462504]I'M NOT GOING TO TOLERATE ANY FUCKIN UNREALISM IN A GAME THAT'S BASICALLY A MICHAEL BAY MOVIe!!!!!!![/QUOTE]
How about you take a step back and think about your posts before you make them.
[QUOTE=T2L_Goose;20462592]How about you take a step back and think about your posts before you make them.[/QUOTE]
nah
They didn't even say ONE thing about the sound.
Just finished single player. Nothing flash at all. 7.5/10 for SP only.
I tend to agree with a lot of what IGN have said.
[QUOTE=DogGunn;20465276]Just finished single player. Nothing flash at all. 7.5/10 for SP only.
I tend to agree with a lot of what IGN have said.[/QUOTE]
Play the multiplayer, that's what the game is about.
Also, someone needs to create a bot that rates Ziron's posts dumb automatically, would save us the trouble.
After playing the BC2 PC beta and playing MW2 MP until 9th prestige I realized something about BC2 that really sets itself apart from call of duty, and that is, every multiplayer match in BC2 is different. Playing MW2 and logging 200+ hours on it I've figured that every multiplayer round is the same, there is nothing that changes the way the round plays out. All the weapons are the same, there isn't much of variety in classes you can make, and the killstreaks are all the same.
However, in BC2 the unlockables and upgrades are extremely hybrid, multiplayer game play greatly differs based on your unlocks and everything is extremely balanced. Also, during every MP match in BC2 I find myself trying some new way to score or help my team, whether it's C4 on the M-COM or sniping with a tank on a hill, I'm always finding something new that makes me enjoy this game even more. Sure, there are some things about this game that needs to be fixed (and are probably already fixed) but I honestly think that I should have paid for the beta it's so good.
I feel that IGN is probably getting paid to score this game so low, I think that almost everything in BC2s multiplayer surpasses MW2's ten-fold. Overall I think This game should have scored a 9 or a 9.5.
Hurp durp mw2 iz bettur bc2 sux bcuz is not epic
:foxnews::foxnews::foxnews:
[QUOTE=Blargtastic;20465389]Play the multiplayer, that's what the game is about.
Also, someone needs to create a bot that rates Ziron's posts dumb automatically, would save us the trouble.[/QUOTE]
sorry for going against the facepunch hivemind ;(
Fucking IGNorant cunts.
[QUOTE=reedbo;20465405]-long post-.[/QUOTE] I think it's just that IGN like mainstream shit over quality games.
[QUOTE=Legend286;20465915]I think it's just that IGN like mainstream shit over quality games.[/QUOTE]
[quote=me]i like how its suddenly become cool to bash mw2. what, are you guys pissed off that the jocks are playing it?[/quote]
You act like people haven't always hated Modern Warfare 2.
[QUOTE=Ziron;20465883]sorry for going against the facepunch hivemind ;([/QUOTE]
No no, you meet the FP shit post quota.
a website reviewed a game and it got a bad score oh no
I feel like posting my opinion of this thread and said content in the thread.
[B]1. Review complained about length of the Singleplayer campaign[/B]
It's a Battlefield game lol. Halo 3 had a 4 hour long campaign and it was like GOTY wasn't it?
[B]
2. "legitimate threat to the Modern Warfare 2 throne"[/B]
You mean the throne crafted from feces and the tears of rage from the 13 year old fanbase?
3."not epic enuf lOL"
That point doesn't even deserve to be bold.
[B]4. all of Ziron's posts[/B]
shut the fuck up, please.
:iceburn:
Oh I forgot to mention the one part I made the post to address
"characters not as annoying this time around"
Who found the characters in Bad Company to be annoying?! I loved Haggard.
"There's gold in them thar hills!"
[QUOTE=Blargtastic;20466365]No no, you meet the FP shit post quota.[/QUOTE]
sorry for not sucking bc2's cock then
[QUOTE=Ziron;20466968]sorry for not sucking bc2's cock then[/QUOTE]
Couldn't be that your posting quality sucks. That would be too inconvenient.
[QUOTE=1/4 Life;20466998]Couldn't be that your posting quality sucks. That would be too inconvenient.[/QUOTE]
maybe if his posts had more anti aliasing
[QUOTE=bepassley;20467013]maybe if his posts had more anti aliasing[/QUOTE]
Well, that would smooth out the rough edges.
You'd pretty much be polishing shit to a shine, though.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.