• Battlefield: Bad Company 2's Initial Reviews
    162 replies, posted
[QUOTE=1/4 Life;20467031]Well, that would smooth out the rough edges. You'd pretty much be polishing shit to a shine, though.[/QUOTE] That's pretty much what AA does.
[QUOTE=bepassley;20467051]That's pretty much what AA does.[/QUOTE] Yes, that's why I said that. Where did you think you were going with this?
[QUOTE=1/4 Life;20467074]Yes, that's why I said that. Where did you think you were going with this?[/QUOTE] into your pants
[QUOTE=bepassley;20467098]into your pants[/QUOTE] oh.
[QUOTE=Ziron;20465944][/QUOTE] I've always hated MW2, I bought it 2 months after its release because I hated it that much, I never played the single player and only played the MP because it was one of the most recent FPS games for the PC at the time. I enjoyed the BC2 beta more than I did the 200 hours of MW2 multiplayer.
[QUOTE=1/4 Life;20467116]oh.[/QUOTE] my vagina is unaliased though so I don't think I am what you are looking for.
[QUOTE=bepassley;20467149]my vagina is unaliased though so I don't think I am what you are looking for.[/QUOTE] [img]http://lovelifelikeyourself.files.wordpress.com/2008/10/070404rapex.jpg[/img] FUCKING JAGGIES!
[QUOTE=Ziron;20466968]sorry for not sucking bc2's cock then[/QUOTE] Sorry for not making it obvious enough I was addressing your general idiocy and not your opinion on BC2.
[QUOTE=Banned?;20449556]IGN is owned by the same company as Fox News, so they should be discounted in opinion just like Fox News.[/QUOTE] That's news to me. And let's not all jump on a hate bandwagon, I mean 8.9 is only .1 away from 9.0, which is still pretty awesome.
[QUOTE=zpiscool;20468356]That's news to me. And let's not all jump on a hate bandwagon, I mean 8.9 is only .1 away from 9.0, which is still pretty awesome.[/QUOTE] And it would be higher if they weren't controlled by their goddess mw2
Guys just let it go. If he wants to play Modern Warfare 2 and hate on Bad Company 2, big deal. Do you really want someone like him on your team in this game anyway? He would probably bitch about how you can't go prone and that your bullets are effected by gravity. It's a good thing.
I thought it was a pretty good review, although there should've been more emphasis on the multiplayer.
[QUOTE=elevator13;20468902]I thought it was a pretty good review, although there should've been more emphasis on the multiplayer.[/QUOTE] I agree. They spent the whole time bitching about the singleplayer. And I doubt they got into a full 12v12 game with friends and good players 4 days before release. [editline]09:25AM[/editline] Their summary on metacritic seems to be a lot more positive [quote]Bad Company 2 as an online shooter is flexible and engaging, offering several features that the competition can only dream of. If you're looking for a more strategic and team-based change of pace, look no further. This is the game for you.[/quote] [editline]09:26AM[/editline] Hey guys. Guess what the 7 hour campaign in Bioshock 2 got from IGN. [quote]91 IGN It's a game in which story, setting, and gameplay are expertly blended to create an experience that's as thought-provoking as it is entertaining.[/quote] [editline]09:28AM[/editline] And they gave braid this: [quote]85 IGN Despite the short length and somewhat limited replay value, Braid's artistic vision and intelligent design is more than enough reason to download the game right away. Jonathan Blow's notoriety in the indie landscape is well deserved.[/quote]
[QUOTE=RG4ORDR;20461700]Lacking Epic [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tPKGsCP9xSQ&hd=1[/media] WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY BETTER that Fag war 2[/QUOTE] This is what all games should be, some anti-tank classes waiting at their perimeter to take out the incoming tanks, only to see the tanks and ATV's flying over their had faster than a Pereguin Falcon
[img]http://topschoolfundraisers.com/news/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/youre-fired.jpg[/img]
The amount of butthurt over a review in this thread is off the charts.
The best games are always rated 80%-94%, thats how you know that the editors werent bribed/blackmailed to give it over 95%
Wait did they make it where the buildings really fall down or is it the same
They fall down if you kick the shit out of them enough.
:gizz:
but it doesn't look that impressive. building starts to creek and groan and after a few seconds everyone still inside is insta-killed while the building just switches to a damage model and runs a predetermined animation of it crumbling. It works and is better then just having the invincible cores of buildings remain standing, but it doesn't exactly [I]hold up[/I] to close scrutiny.
RFG had good examples of how buildings fall
Except they melt.
And that's why I like to call RFG Break Shit: THE GAME.
what BC2 or RFG [editline]10:35AM[/editline] Now we need FUCK SHIT UP
[QUOTE=Legend286;20473676]Except they [I]break in a shitly form and disappear in a few seconds[/I].[/QUOTE] Fixe'd
[QUOTE=WPlayer;20451420]you can't spell ignorant without IGN.[/QUOTE] [img]http://www.lolware.net/somuchwin.png[/img]
wat
[QUOTE=StormHammer;20474011][img]http://www.lolware.net/somuchwin.png[/img][/QUOTE] Best anti-hotlink system ever.
[QUOTE=Banned?;20449556]IGN is owned by the same company as Fox News, so they should be discounted in opinion just like Fox News.[/QUOTE] That is the stupidest logic I've heard in a long time.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.