EU presses ahead with military plans, UK opposes any EU army
40 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Niklas;51118369]If your intention was to parody the daily mail comment section, gratz, you succeeded.[/QUOTE]
The daily mail is a label which can be applied to an individual to remove the credibility of their point of view. If that's what you're trying to do, you partially succeeded.
So, well done. Anyway, forgetting labels and boxes and focusing on individual known human behaviour, the EU is still designed to be a federal union. Otherwise, what's the point? Why wouldn't people just strive to keep going further and further toward whatever they started? It's human nature. Even if the entire of the EU parliament right now didn't believe that they were creating a federal union, they will end up creating one anyway purely on forward momentum. "We've come [i]this[/i] far, so why not?" they will say.
[QUOTE=ph:lxyz;51117913]Enjoy your political integration, courtesy of the Marxist EU superstate.
We might not be in a better situation in the view of the globalists who want marxism for the people and capitalism for the multinationals - but at least the next Soviet Union won't include the UK for a while and that's better than nothing.
With that out of the way, [B]you may now begin the name-calling tactics![/B][/QUOTE]
But you already did?
[QUOTE=ph:lxyz;51118758]The daily mail is a label which can be applied to an individual to remove the credibility of their point of view.[/QUOTE]
You're doing a grand job of it yourself, mate, regardless of what anyone else says about you.
[QUOTE=ph:lxyz;51117913]Enjoy your political integration, courtesy of the Marxist EU superstate.
We might not be in a better situation in the view of the globalists who want marxism for the people and capitalism for the multinationals - but at least the next Soviet Union won't include the UK for a while and that's better than nothing.
With that out of the way, you may now begin the name-calling tactics![/QUOTE]
Do you need to go lay down somewhere.
Did something change? Unless I'm mistaken, [URL="https://facepunch.com/showthread.php?p=51064871"]we had this thread last week[/URL]. I'll repost this important information here:
[QUOTE=richard9311;51064871]But the [URL="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eurocorps"]Eurocorps is already a thing. [/URL]and has been for over 20 years. The recent talk is just to expand the scale and scope of the operation.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=TheBloodyNine;51118964]Do you need to go lay down somewhere.[/QUOTE]
Yeah, I thought I was wasting my time. Thanks for confirming it.
Young people have had the message bashed into their heads that "progress" = federal union and global unity. It is a huge mistake. Good luck migrating to [i]anywhere[/i] when there's only one government left on the planet and Mr Soros or whoever is its president.
Sadly, nobody cares about losing their rights as long as their iPhone / Android / Xbox / PS4 is operational.
Why not just let the U.S. join the EU? There, problem solved.
Other than the fact we'll be contributing the most once again. Cheapskates.
[QUOTE=ph:lxyz;51117913]Enjoy your political integration, courtesy of the Marxist EU superstate.
We might not be in a better situation in the view of the globalists who want marxism for the people and capitalism for the multinationals - but at least the next Soviet Union won't include the UK for a while and that's better than nothing.
[B]With that out of the way, you may now begin the name-calling tactics![/B][/QUOTE]
I think you started that by throwing around the Marxist and globalist buzzwords.
[editline]27th September 2016[/editline]
[QUOTE=ph:lxyz;51119183]
Sadly, nobody cares about losing their rights as long as their iPhone / Android / Xbox / PS4 is operational.[/QUOTE]
You are really bad at this whole "capturing the moral high ground" thing.
[QUOTE=Niklas;51116725]The idea is for europe to be less dependent on the US for defence, talking points during the meeting were a joint EU military headquarters, strengthenging of the already existing EU-battlegroups aswell as uniting development efforts for military assets on a larger scale, like the recent merger between nexter and kmv[/QUOTE]
So then stop using our fucking money for your defense, go ahead. We need that money for more important things like our failing infrastructure.
I can 1/5ths side with the UK here.
The EU is going to end up having a military AND nato to back them up, while the US will just have the US military to back them up if this is going how I see it.
I feel that the EU should be considered a "nation" for NATO purposes so the built military force can be used in the other NATO states.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.