Trump fires back at Cameron: 'I'm not stupid, OK? I can tell you that right now."
85 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Gwoodman;50377763]yes
now what was the point of yours[/QUOTE]
I just seriously don't understand the point you were trying to make. It's like you don't understand why people are actually against the wall.
Or do you think we should just open up our borders completely?
[QUOTE=Nebukadnezzer;50377900]I just seriously don't understand the point you were trying to make. It's like you don't understand why people are actually against the wall.
Or do you think we should just open up our borders completely?[/QUOTE]
i don't see what building the wall would do to help
[QUOTE=Nebukadnezzer;50377900]I just seriously don't understand the point you were trying to make. It's like you don't understand why people are actually against the wall.
Or do you think we should just open up our borders completely?[/QUOTE]
I'm not making a stand on the wall topic, it's the notion that he's a total liar and people still trust him.
[QUOTE=Nebukadnezzer;50377900]I just seriously don't understand the point you were trying to make. It's like you don't understand why people are actually against the wall.
Or do you think we should just open up our borders completely?[/QUOTE]
I think you just might have missed the point by a few miles.
As bad as Trump is, I'll still vote for him way before I vote for Hillary.
You guys better start hoping Bernie pulls a miracle if you hate Trump this much.
[QUOTE=1/4 Life;50378297]As bad as Trump is, I'll still vote for him way before I vote for Hillary.
You guys better start hoping Bernie pulls a miracle if you hate Trump this much.[/QUOTE]
Honestly, I heard it as a joke but I'm thinking it's going to happen "Oh, I voted for Trump, I've never seen a president assassinated on live tv before"
[QUOTE=proboardslol;50333411]Newsflash: There are, in fact, Muslims and Mexican-Americans that vote. America isn't 100% white. Far From it. In fact, the kind of racial demagoguery that Trump runs on may not work in coming year, as it's predicted that whites will no longer be the majority by 2040.[/QUOTE]
If I recall correctly, Donald pretty handily clinched the Hispanic vote in the Republican nomination, and has entertained a not-unsubstantial electorate of other races as well. Racial minorities constitute a portion of the Republican voter base just like any other political party in the world, and in the case of the GOP, these groups do throw their support behind Trump. If we as a voting population have any intent to stop Trump from winning the presidency, these are facts we need to accept.
[QUOTE=proboardslol;50333411]Well of course it doesn't [I]prove[/I] it, but it shows that theres a strong correlation between areas in the deep south and midwest which are associated with Racial bias and Donald Trump supporters. Of course, there's the possibility that it just so happens that all the Donald Trump supporters are [I]neighbors[/I] with all the bigots in America, but I find that unlikely.[/QUOTE]
[B]Hold the god damn phone.[/B] If you're going to be implying things like​ "strong correlation" you better have some actual data before you go about slapping the term "racial bias" on an entire constituency. The statistician quoted in your [I]Atlantic [/I]article doesn't support the relationship you're speaking of. He doesn't even come close to making such an assumption about the population of all Trump supporters. The article merely states that the assumption that can be made from comparing these two entirely different data sets--sets compiled with different (or perhaps similar?) motives and at different periods in time--happens to agree with the possibility that [I]some[/I] of Trump's supporters [I]might [/I]be racially biased.
[QUOTE=Arrk;50378317]Honestly, I heard it as a joke but I'm thinking it's going to happen "Oh, I voted for Trump, I've never seen a president assassinated on live tv before"[/QUOTE]
Honestly who would try and kill him though?
Nu-males who are buttblasted that Sanders didn't get in?
[sp]Satirizing who would be made enough to try aside, you're probably right though.[/sp]
[QUOTE=Gwoodman;50378167]I'm not making a stand on the wall topic, it's the notion that he's a total liar and people still trust him.[/QUOTE]
What does a wall to prevent illegal immigration have to do with unifying America?
[editline]23rd May 2016[/editline]
[QUOTE=Ruski v2.0;50378787]Honestly who would try and kill him though?
Nu-males who are buttblasted that Sanders didn't get in?
[sp]Satirizing who would be made enough to try aside, you're probably right though.[/sp][/QUOTE]
I haven't forgotten people saying the same stupid shit when Obama first got elected and he's alive today
[editline]23rd May 2016[/editline]
[QUOTE=1/4 Life;50378297]As bad as Trump is, I'll still vote for him way before I vote for Hillary.
You guys better start hoping Bernie pulls a miracle if you hate Trump this much.[/QUOTE]
People used to theorize Trump was running to help Hillary get a landslide early on since he was at their wedding or something
My how the tables have turned
[QUOTE=1/4 Life;50378297]As bad as Trump is, I'll still vote for him way before I vote for Hillary.
You guys better start hoping Bernie pulls a miracle if you hate Trump this much.[/QUOTE]
I'll hope American's aren't so dumb to elect someone who so blatantly disregards their interests.
[QUOTE=Ruski v2.0;50378787]Honestly who would try and kill him though? [/QUOTE]
The Zodiac Killer.
[QUOTE=Raidyr;50379063]I'll hope American's aren't so dumb to elect someone who so blatantly disregards their interests.[/QUOTE]
That describes both candidates???
[QUOTE=1/4 Life;50379066]
That describes both candidates???[/QUOTE]
Then don't vote for either. I'm not saying vote Hillary, I'm saying definitely don't vote Trump.
[QUOTE=Raidyr;50379089]Then don't vote for either. I'm not saying vote Hillary, I'm saying definitely don't vote Trump.[/QUOTE]
I'll vote for whomever gives Hillary the greatest chance of losing.
Simple & easy criteria.
[QUOTE=1/4 Life;50379159]I'll vote for whomever gives Hillary the greatest chance of losing.
Simple & easy criteria.[/QUOTE]
Explain why, because you sound rather childish right now.
[QUOTE=1nfiniteseed;50379221]Explain why, because you sound rather childish right now.[/QUOTE]
My pick has a very low chance of getting the nomination. I'd rather a colossal idiot in office whom will face opposition on all sides than an already bought & sold liar and criminal.
[QUOTE=1/4 Life;50379159]I'll vote for whomever gives Hillary the greatest chance of losing.
Simple & easy criteria.[/QUOTE]
That's like burning your house down to stop a fire in the living room.
[QUOTE=Wiggles;50379248]That's like burning your house down to stop a fire in the living room.[/QUOTE]
It's more like burning my 2 room & 1 entryway house down when both rooms are already on fire.
If I'm stuck with a bad situation, I might as well make sure it's as [I]least-bad[/I] as possible.
[QUOTE=1/4 Life;50379237]My pick has a very low change of getting the nomination. I'd rather a colossal idiot in office whom will face opposition on all sides than an already bought & sold liar and criminal.[/QUOTE]
Opposition from all sides, right. After trying 60 times to repeal ACA a Republican congress will stop trying when they have their best shot at it because Trump also wants to repeal it. Also all the various other things Trump and Republican congressmen agree on.
[QUOTE=Raidyr;50379311]Opposition from all sides, right. After trying 60 times to repeal ACA a Republican congress will stop trying when they have their best shot at it because Trump also wants to repeal it. Also all the various other things Trump and Republican congressmen agree on.[/QUOTE]
Naturally I will vote all democrat with the exception of Trump to help ensure that does not happen. I suppose I'm a unicorn as far as the political process is concerned.
The ACA is a shell of what it could have been; the Republicans saw to it's ruin. If it gets repealed it'll only come back better later, and hopefully in single payer form.
[QUOTE=1/4 Life;50379237]My pick has a very low change of getting the nomination. I'd rather a colossal idiot in office whom will face opposition on all sides than an already bought & sold liar and criminal.[/QUOTE]
if Trump tries to pass Republican legislation they'll back it, they're not such idiots that they'll deny that just because they don't like him. also don't forget that he can appoint more conservative members of the Supreme Court, meaning those elderly liberal Justices who have defended gay marriage through thick and thin? when they die, Trump will replace them with conservatives like Scalia. no more civil rights breakthroughs.
[QUOTE=Cone;50379371]if Trump tries to pass Republican legislation they'll back it, they're not such idiots that they'll deny that just because they don't like him. also don't forget that he can appoint more conservative members of the Supreme Court, meaning those elderly liberal Justices who have defended gay marriage through thick and thin? when they die, Trump will replace them with conservatives like Scalia. no more civil rights breakthroughs.[/QUOTE]
There's no way in hell Obama won't appoint someone before he's out of office. I'll risk the current justices + Obama's pick lasting 4 more years.
[QUOTE=1/4 Life;50379318]Naturally I will vote all democrat with the exception of Trump to help ensure that does not happen. I suppose I'm a unicorn as far as the political process is concerned.
The ACA is a shell of what it could have been; the Republicans saw to it's ruin. If it gets repealed it'll only come back better later, and hopefully in single payer form.[/QUOTE]
You think a Republican-backed Congress with Trump as President would [i]honestly[/i] create a single-payer system? Here's what Trump has said about a single-payer Healthcare system in an interview last year:
Q: But the single payer, you're not interested anymore?
A: [B]No. No[/B], these are different times. And over the years, you are going to change your attitudes. You're going to learn things and you're going to change. And I have evolved on that issue. I have evolved on numerous issues.
The idea that Trump will magically decide to back a single-payer healthcare system, and that the Republican congress will help him get it through... that's delusional. That's beyond unrealistic.
You're not a unicorn. Why in the [i]world[/i] would the Republicans, who explicitly fought to [i]get rid of[/i] the public option in Obamacare, suddenly decide to allow Trump to get single-payer through, [i]even though Trump has explicitly denied that he is interested in single-payer[/i]? You're not a unicorn at all - you're deluded.
[QUOTE=.Isak.;50379457]you're deluded.[/QUOTE]
Or you're very bad at reading, and 'later' means [B]after[/B] a Trump presidency.
I don't trust Trump to wipe his own ass while in office, let alone push through a liberal healthcare system.
[QUOTE=1/4 Life;50379376]There's no way in hell Obama won't appoint someone before he's out of office. I'll risk the current justices + Obama's pick lasting 4 more years.[/QUOTE]
The current justices are on the brink of retiring. Three of the eight are over 77 years old - Ginsburg, one of the most liberal, is 83. The next president would very likely select at least two more justices - if they get two terms, almost definitely all three of the oldest.
This presidency is critically important in getting decent justices into the Supreme Court. Three of them might not even last 8 more years.
Yeah, you're a unifier of divisive assholes.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.