• Gay war veteran owns Mitt Romney
    65 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Rubs10;33697534]Romney's such a Jew. Romney's such a woman. Romney's such a nigger. Do you not see how these are inappropriate?[/QUOTE] ok try this one on for size : you're retarded
[QUOTE=OzJackal;33697491]Older and wiser.[/QUOTE] Mitt Romney is actually one year older than 63-year old Bob
Its pretty sad that as a country the US has a problem with such a topic, sometimes this country can be so ass backwards it isn't even funny.
I really think people should be more concerned with candidates' other views on things other than gay marriage, especially at a time when our economy is how it is. Seems harsh, but I'd be willing to go conservative for a bit if it means a president who knows how to set the country straight again financially. But honestly, I don't like Obama or any of the repub candidates. Ron Paul seems like an interesting guy, but wouldn't vote for him.
[QUOTE=Sir Whoopsalot;33699831]Wait what? I do request a source on this because this is just too hilarious to be her literal words.[/QUOTE] I can't find the original article, but I know it was posted on FP before. [url]http://www.mediaite.com/online/teenager-confronts-michele-bachmann-over-gay-marriage-in-awkward-iowa-town-hall-exchange/[/url]
Why do people have to be homophobic
Now see, here's what bugs me. I for one think gay sex is kinda gross, but in the end, what business is it of mine? It's not like they're fucking in public, so why should it bother me? Sanctity of marriage? 70% of marriages end in divorce after 2 years on average, so what sanctity is there in that? Hell, even my great-grandmother who was a highly devout and old-fashioned Christian didn't see any problem with gay people, even stating that some of the nicest people she had ever met were gay.
[QUOTE=Zeke129;33698628]This wasn't as cringe-worthy as Bachmann's "gays have equality, they can marry if they want, just not someone of the same sex"[/QUOTE] Well I guess that's true in a, "Genie who turns you into a sandwich when you say 'make me a sandwich'" sort of way.
[QUOTE=AJisAwesome15;33704841]Why do people have to be homophobic[/QUOTE] - I am such a fucking idiot when I'm sleep deprived -
[QUOTE=Cone;33705248]I suppose that is must be a part of the older reptillian part of our brains[/QUOTE] uh no
[QUOTE=Lambeth;33697576]He's such a straight white male conservative christian flipflopper buttface![/QUOTE] [img]http://yourstylefashion.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/wpid-1305301431_flipflops3.jpg[/img] The weather seems nice outside, better put my Mitts on!
[QUOTE=Rubs10;33697534]Romney's such a Jew. Romney's such a woman. Romney's such a nigger. Do you not see how these are inappropriate?[/QUOTE] Romney's such a poo.
[QUOTE=Zeke129;33698628]This wasn't as cringe-worthy as Bachmann's "gays have equality, they can marry if they want, just not someone of the same sex"[/QUOTE] Does that mean that you can marry people of the same sex if you are straight?
[QUOTE=Cone;33705248]I suppose that is must be a part of the older reptillian part of our brains; after all, you can't make a baby if your partner doesn't have a uterus, can you? But it's fucking retarded how we still listen to that scaly old lump of gray matter. If there were a population crisis I might be okay with seperating them (to a certain extent - no need to break up the relationship, y'know?), but we're slightly overstocked as it is. I suppose it says a lot that the entire basis for the conservative party has the same thought process as that of a lizard's behind it.[/QUOTE] Proof that Mitt Romney is an interdimensional space lizard.
[quote] "I believe that marriage is a relationship between a man and a woman," Romney responded [/quote] welcome to america romney, the country where you're supposed to represent the people, not yourself *supposed to*
One of the comments "Notice how homosexuals seek out ways to broadcast their sexuality. It's like they're "gay" FIRST, and a human being second. This guy seems more proud of his unnatural sexuality (will the "free speech" liberals ALLOW me to speak that viewpoint?) than his service in vietnam. Mitt asked him about his service, and Mitt got in return a big spiel about how gay the guy is."
[QUOTE=GhettoGeek;33706997]One of the comments "Notice how homosexuals seek out ways to broadcast their sexuality. It's like they're "gay" FIRST, and a human being second. This guy seems more proud of his unnatural sexuality (will the "free speech" liberals ALLOW me to speak that viewpoint?) than his service in vietnam. Mitt asked him about his service, and Mitt got in return a big spiel about how gay the guy is."[/QUOTE] Wait what Did they seriously just say that gay people choose to be gay just so they can annoy people? Because the world revolves around Conservatives :downs:
Seems kind of rude to go up and ask someone about their service in a war. Most veterans don't want to talk about what they did in a war
That is a load of half-and-half I used to drink those little things
Sometimes I wish politicians weren't allowed to enter office if they had an obvious religious bias. Too bad most of the country is Protestant like these ignorant fucks, or they'd never get elected.
[QUOTE=DarkendSky;33708321]Sometimes I wish politicians weren't allowed to enter office if they had an obvious religious bias. Too bad most of the country is Protestant like these ignorant fucks, or they'd never get elected.[/QUOTE] As much as I want this, kind of ruins the whole "freedom of speech" thing. Would be nice to have an atheist as president, too bad admitting to it outright would be political suicide, even if every Facepuncher lived in the United States, and voted for them, they still wouldn't get elected. Sad sad statistics.
That picture was more endearing to me than that entire article. I think Romney slowly began to realize what a shitfest he introduced himself to roughly around fifteen seconds into the conversation. That sinking feeling one gets when he's put himself into an uncomfortable position for a silly reason. Meanwhile, the Bobs must have been loving every fucking minute of it.[QUOTE=GhettoGeek;33706997]One of the comments "Notice how homosexuals seek out ways to broadcast their sexuality. It's like they're "gay" FIRST, and a human being second. This guy seems more proud of his unnatural sexuality (will the "free speech" liberals ALLOW me to speak that viewpoint?) than his service in vietnam. Mitt asked him about his service, and Mitt got in return a big spiel about how gay the guy is."[/QUOTE]The author of that comment does have a small, completely unrelated point, though. It's a bit annoying to encounter somebody who's entire persona is centered around their homosexuality. It strikes me as shallow that somebody defines everything about them based entirely by who they choose to have sex with. To me, a person who defines who they are based upon one thing is an unsophisticated idiot.
[QUOTE=Rubs10;33697534]Romney's such a Jew. Romney's such a woman. Romney's such a nigger. Do you not see how these are inappropriate?[/QUOTE] your troll has failed
Anyone have a video of it?
[QUOTE=Cone;33705248]I suppose that is must be a part of the older reptillian part of our brains; after all, you can't make a baby if your partner doesn't have a uterus, can you? But it's fucking retarded how we still listen to that scaly old lump of gray matter. If there were a population crisis I might be okay with seperating them (to a certain extent - no need to break up the relationship, y'know?), but we're slightly overstocked as it is. I suppose it says a lot that the entire basis for the conservative party has the same thought process as that of a lizard's behind it.[/QUOTE] -snip, I'm tired-
What a homophob
[QUOTE=lil_n00blett;33697884][media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1IFloXOuLgA[/media] tl;dw get over it[/QUOTE] [video=youtube;v-55wC5dEnc]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v-55wC5dEnc[/video]
[QUOTE=GhettoGeek;33706997]One of the comments "Notice how homosexuals seek out ways to broadcast their sexuality. It's like they're "gay" FIRST, and a human being second. This guy seems more proud of his unnatural sexuality (will the "free speech" liberals ALLOW me to speak that viewpoint?) than his service in vietnam. Mitt asked him about his service, and Mitt got in return a big spiel about how gay the guy is."[/QUOTE] The guy who said that comment is dumb, didn't he think that the veteran saw the opportunity to talk about gay serving and gay marriage to a politician he probably knew that was against it just so he could humiliate him? At least, I would like to believe he did that for this reason, I would have.
[QUOTE=Zeke129;33698628]This wasn't as cringe-worthy as Bachmann's "gays have equality, they can marry if they want, just not someone of the same sex"[/QUOTE] I had to read this several times before finally convulsing. [i]What?![/i] [editline]14th December 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=Cone;33705248]I suppose that is must be a part of the older reptillian part of our brains; after all, you can't make a baby if your partner doesn't have a uterus, can you? But it's fucking retarded how we still listen to that scaly old lump of gray matter. If there were a population crisis I might be okay with seperating them (to a certain extent - no need to break up the relationship, y'know?), but we're slightly overstocked as it is. I suppose it says a lot that the entire basis for the conservative party has the same thought process as that of a lizard's behind it.[/QUOTE] First of all I'd love to point out that Human beings are the [i]only[/i] known species that have homophobia and we've discovered nearly 400 different species with gays in them. Second of all, what do you mean by 'reptilian'-brain? Are you suggesting reptiles are cognitively inferior compared to other animals? That's absolute bullshit.
[QUOTE=Cone;33705248]I suppose that is must be a part of the older reptillian part of our brains; after all, you can't make a baby if your partner doesn't have a uterus, can you? But it's fucking retarded how we still listen to that scaly old lump of gray matter. If there were a population crisis I might be okay with seperating them (to a certain extent - no need to break up the relationship, y'know?), but we're slightly overstocked as it is. I suppose it says a lot that the entire basis for the conservative party has the same thought process as that of a lizard's behind it.[/QUOTE] what
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.